
Texas Instruments to invest more than $60 billion to make semiconductors in the US
Texas Instruments will invest more than $60 billion to expand semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, the company announced on Wednesday, as President Donald Trump continues to pressure tech giants like Apple and Samsung to build their products in America.
The investment will go towards seven semiconductor fabrication plants across Texas and Utah, resulting in more than 60,000 jobs, the company said in a press release. TI says it's working with the Trump administration to help produce the critical chips that power everything from smartphones to data centers and cars domestically. It's part of the White House's push to keep the United States ahead of China in the technology industry while promoting American manufacturing.
TI, which partners with tech and auto giants like Apple, Nvidia and Ford, claims this is the 'largest investment in foundational semiconductor manufacturing in US history.'
'President Trump has made it a priority to increase semiconductor manufacturing in America – including these foundational semiconductors that go into the electronics that people use every day,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a press release. 'Our partnership with TI will support US chip manufacturing for decades to come.'
The announcement marks the latest major planned investment in the United States by an American company as Trump pushes industries like tech to onshore more production. Earlier this month, General Motors said it would invest $4 billion to increase US production. Apple said in February that it would invest $500 billion to expand its US facilities. Oracle, OpenAI and SoftBank announced in January that they would team up to create a new company called Stargate to grow artificial intelligence infrastructure in America.
However, some of these tech giants – including Apple and TSMC – were expanding in the United States long before Trump's second administration.
Reviving US manufacturing has been a tentpole goal of Trump's presidency. For the first three months of his second term, he went on a tariff blitz, promising to impose levies on nearly every product made abroad. He claimed these efforts would boost jobs in the US and rebalance what he saw as unfair practices by America's trading partners.
Trump Mobile, a new venture from the Trump Organization, plans to launch a new smartphone in September that it claims will be 'proudly designed and built' in the United States. But experts have said manufacturing products like iPhones domestically would be a daunting challenge even if the United States had the necessary fabrication plants. That's primarily because America lacks the labor skills and components to produce them.
Staying ahead of China in the tech race has been another priority of Trump's presidency, especially after Chinese startup DeepSeek shook Wall Street and Silicon Valley with its high-performing yet supposedly cheap AI model.
'The United States of America is the leader in AI,' Vice President JD Vance said at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris in February. 'And our administration plans to keep it that way.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's parade didn't make him feel tough. Maybe a war with Iran will?
Trump's parade didn't make him feel tough. Maybe a war with Iran will? | Opinion Trump is proving, as if we needed proof, that insecure men are dangerous. They act impulsively, with no focus beyond soothing their own tender feelings. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump teases possible strike on Iran but says it's not too late for deal "I may do it. I may not do it." President Trump teased a possible strike on Iran but also said it is not too late to negotiate. Having an insecure president during a time of crisis is a problem, largely because he's going to say things like this when asked about possibly bombing Iran: 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' That was President Donald Trump's wildly problematic comment on June 18. First, President Dodo-head seems to think the decision to draw America into a potentially cataclysmic conflict in the Middle East is his alone ‒ you'll note the use of the first person four times in two sentences. Apparently, Congress and the American public have no voice in such a decision. It all rests in the little hands of the Supreme Leader. Trump says, 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' No kidding. Second, the man who oversees the world's largest military probably shouldn't be saying, 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' That sounds like something an unhinged dictator would say and … well, never mind, I guess that tracks. Trump was speaking outside the White House, where he was having two enormous flagpoles installed. It was effectively an advertisement for male overcompensation, which makes sense in the wake of Trump's poorly attended and morose military parade, the one he thought would cast him in the all-powerful-ruler light he desires. Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down The weekend and weakened parade was overshadowed by millions of Americans across the country protesting Trump and his king-like behavior. Trump sent the Marines to be bored in LA Before that, the president's previous show of manly-man toughness ‒ sending the U.S. Marines into Los Angeles to address anti-ICE protesters ‒ also failed. Now, soldiers are just standing around in a city that's doing fine. Will the quest to quench this man's insecurity ever end? Trump stumbled disconsolately from his puny parade to the summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Canada on June 16, then left early the next day to return to Washington, DC, ostensibly to deal with the worsening crisis between Israel and Iran. After getting home, Trump's 'dealing with the crisis' seemed to largely involve posting unhinged comments on social media, bizarrely advising residents of Tehran to evacuate and, despite claiming the United States isn't involved in Israel's ongoing attacks on Iran, boldly proclaiming: 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Trump raises flagpoles while threatening war So are we in or are we out? It's a reasonable question for any American to ask, and it's one Trump clearly won't answer, as evidenced by his 'nobody knows what I'm going to do' comment during the apparently critical installation of new White House phallic symbols. 'These are the most magnificent poles made,' Trump posted on social media on June 17, the night before the flagpoles went up. 'They are tall, tapered, rust proof, rope inside the pole, and of the highest quality.' Great job, Mr. President. Americans are laser-focused on White House pole quality and are not at all concerned about you starting a war nobody wants ‒ a new Economist/YouGov poll finds "only 16% of Americans think the U.S. military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran" ‒ without congressional approval. Trump's sad-boy feelings will always override what's best for America Trump is proving, as if we needed proof, that insecure men are dangerous. They act impulsively, with no focus beyond soothing their own tender feelings. Dispatching troops against American citizens didn't make Trump feel big. A military parade didn't make him feel big. He didn't feel big around other world leaders at the G7 summit, so he left and did some online hollering and saber-rattling. And now? We wait to see if our capricious president needs to drop a bunker-busting bomb on Iran to feel big. We wait to see if Trump single-handedly marches America into war, leaving us to suffer the blowback of his inextinguishable self-doubt. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at


New York Times
12 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Supreme Court Upheld a State Ban on Transgender Care for Minors
The Supreme Court announced today that it had upheld a Tennessee law that prohibits some medical treatments for transgender youths. The decision, which shielded similar laws in more than 20 other states, was supported by the court's six conservative justices. All three liberal justices dissented. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion that the ban did not violate the Constitution's equal protection principles, dismissing the argument that it discriminated based on sex. He acknowledged the 'fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy and propriety' of the treatments, but wrote that those questions should be resolved by elected legislators. (See our annotated version of the court's decision here.) Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent that the court's decision 'authorizes, without second thought, untold harm to transgender children and the parents and families who love them.' For more: These 27 states have restricted gender-transition treatments for minors since 2021. Go deeper: 'The Protocol' is a new Times podcast about the development of medical treatment for transgender minors and how it became a target of the Trump administration. Listen to it here. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Fed holds interest rates steady and forecasts two rate cuts for 2025
The Federal Reserve did not cut interest rates, as was expected. With little question over whether the Fed would cut, investors turned their attention to the central bank's outlook for the future of interest rates. The Fed kept its forecast from March of two interest rate cuts. Investors were treated to another predictable Fed meeting. Interest rates remained the same, which had been all but a certainty in the lead-up to Wednesday's decision. The Federal Reserve maintained its position that the economy was stable, even as uncertainty among participants was rising. Investors and business leaders might feel as though the economy is teetering on a knife's edge, but the data, Fed chair Jerome Powell reassured them, pointed to a solid picture—though one that was cloudier than before. Whether or not they are storm clouds is the critical question at hand. 'Uncertainty about the economic outlook has diminished but remains elevated,' according to a Fed statement released after the meeting. With the question of rate cuts largely a foregone conclusion, investors instead turned their attention to the Fed's Summary of Economic Predictions, which is commonly referred to as the 'dot plot.' The hope is that Fed officials' quarterly forecast about the U.S. economy, which includes expectations for interest rates, inflation, and growth, will offer some hints about their views for the economy. With the Fed usually circumspect about its outlook, investors often hope to divine some greater understanding about the fate of the U.S. economy. The median rate projection was for two quarter-point rate cuts in 2025. The previous dot plot, released in March, had the same median projection. One of the major updates from that version was the expectation of lower GDP growth and higher inflation over the course of 2025. At the time, it was a significant development because it meant Fed officials weren't just considering the possibility of those two unwelcome changes, but also began to see them as the likely outcome of the economy's current path. That said, it's worth remembering the dot plot is not a commitment to a certain amount of rate cuts; rather, it is a collection of forecasts made by top Fed officials at a given moment in time. Importantly, it also doesn't communicate how certain each official is in their forecast. It is nonetheless an important measure of where the central bank sees monetary policy heading. And with only six months left in the year, the timing left for the rate cuts it foresees (but not guarantees) is only getting tighter. For now, the consensus seems to be that there will be either one or two rate cuts. For President Donald Trump, any interest-rate cuts can't come soon enough. His criticisms of Powell have practically become a customary part of FOMC meetings. In the president's view, interest rates should come down because inflation has not increased. And while that is true, the Fed is still hesitant to cut interest rates because it isn't sure yet whether inflation will spike again as a result of Trump's tariffs. So far, the Trump administration has made some progress on the trade agreements it promised—something investors believed would calm the markets. The U.S. says it has signed a preliminary agreement with the UK and established a framework of a deal with China after two meetings. While a welcome early sign the U.S. might return to its previous role in the global economy, the two deals are well short of the dozens promised by the White House. As a result, uncertainty still lingers. At the same time, the geopolitical conflicts also risk disrupting the market—namely, the military actions between Israel and Iran. The widening conflict in the Middle East only exacerbates tensions in an already volatile part of the world. Shipping through the Red Sea, oil markets, and U.S. military involvement all now remain open questions. Their potential answers are both varied and significant—unwelcome news for those clamoring for clarity. This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data