
Trump's targets for Putin summit appear fluid - can he even get a ceasefire?
Mr Trump floated the idea of a second meeting, this one between Putin, Zelenskyy and possibly himself, "if" the Alaska summit goes well.
Speaking to European leaders earlier, in a virtual call he rated at "10" and "very friendly", he'd shared his intention to try to broker a ceasefire on Friday.
So, the strategy is crystallising - he will press for a trilateral meeting to discuss territory "if" he manages to secure a truce during the bilateral meeting.
But that begs the obvious question: what if he can't?
The US president is keeping his options open - rating the chance of a second meeting as "very good" but preparing the ground for failure too.
"There may be no second meeting because if I feel that it is not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we're not going to have a second meeting," he said.
Unusually, given how often he talks about his abilities, he conceded that he may not persuade Vladimir Putin to stop targeting civilians.
4:25
But without elaborating on what any sanctions might be, he warned that Russia would face "very severe consequences" if it doesn't end the war.
Even if he achieves the seemingly impossible - a halt to the fighting - there seems little chance of agreement on any swapping of territory.
Mr Zelenskyy has told Mr Trump that Putin "is bluffing" and wants to "push forward along the whole front" not return land.
In the space of a week, Donald Trump has gone from talking about a land-swapping deal, to a "listening exercise", to the potential for a ceasefire.
His expectations appear changeable, an indication of how fluid back-room negotiations are in the run-up to his first face-to-face with Vladimir Putin in six years.
He described Friday's summit as "setting the table for a second meeting", but that's presumptuous when the meal - or deal - isn't cooked yet.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former White House photographer criticizes Trump's decision to move Obama's portrait
Pete Souza, Barack Obama 's official White House photographer, criticized the decision to move Obama's portrait to a less visible area of the White House. Souza described the move as 'pretty petty' and questioned if the motives were 'petty or racist,' suggesting Obama occupies a significant space in Donald Trump 's thoughts. The portraits of three presidents, including Obama, were reportedly moved by White House staff to the top of the Grand Staircase, an area restricted to family, Secret Service, and select staff. Souza highlighted that this action breaks a longstanding tradition where recent presidential portraits are displayed in prominent areas like the Grand Foyer for public viewing. The relocation of Obama's portrait occurs amidst heightened tensions between Donald Trump and Obama, marked by Trump's unsubstantiated accusations.


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump says Putin faces ‘very severe consequences' if no Ukraine truce agreed
Vladimir Putin will face 'very severe consequences' if he does not agree a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine at his summit with Donald Trump in Alaska, the US president said on Wednesday. Speaking after a call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, including Britain's Keir Starmer, Trump also suggested he would push for a second summit if his meeting with Putin goes well – this time including his Ukrainian counterpart.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bessent vows to finish divestitures that ethics office says are late
WASHINGTON, Aug 12 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Wednesday he was working to divest illiquid personal assets including farmland by year-end after the Office of Government Ethics said he had not met deadlines in the ethics agreement he signed in January. In a letter sent on Monday to Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo, OGE Deputy Compliance Director Dale Christopher wrote that Bessent "has failed to timely comply with certain terms of the ethics agreement he signed" before taking office in late January. The ethics office said it told Treasury ethics officials to remind Bessent "that it is his personal responsibility to avoid taking any action that could create a real or apparent conflict of interest with regard to his holdings," the letter said. Bessent, a key figure driving President Donald Trump's economic agenda including tariffs, tax cuts and deregulation, signed an ethics agreement in January that pledged he would divest his Key Square Group hedge fund and other assets to avoid conflicts of interest. Many of the divestitures were to be completed by April 28. In a statement issued by the Treasury Department, Bessent said he had completed all but 4% of the asset divestitures required by his ethics agreement. "Much of (that) is farmland, an inherently highly illiquid asset," Bessent said. "As agreed upon with OGE, I am working towards selling the rest of my required divestitures before the end of this year." A U.S. Treasury spokesperson said most of the required divestitures, valued at about $1 billion, were completed before Trump's second-term inauguration on January 20. Bessent took office about a week later. OGE's Christopher on Wednesday said in a subsequent letter to Crapo that Treasury ethics officials told OGE that Bessent was committed to completing the remaining asset divestitures by December 15, including farmland in North Dakota. Christopher said the Treasury officials had explained that the illiquid assets were not readily marketable. Some assets also have restrictions on who can acquire them. Bessent will continue to recuse himself from certain matters affecting the remaining assets, and Treasury's ethics office has set up screening procedures to identify "potentially conflicting matters that would be seen by the Secretary," the letter said.