Coins are literal cash. Why do Americans treat them like trash?
Learn to love your coins.
That's the message from Kevin McColly, CEO of Coinstar, the company behind those coin-cashing machines you see in supermarkets.
American consumers made only 16% of their payments in cash in 2023, according to the Federal Reserve. A 2022 Pew survey found that two-fifths of consumers never use cash at all.
President Trump has ordered the Treasury to stop minting pennies, because their production cost exceeds their value. (Intriguingly, the same is true of nickels.)
Many Americans regard both nickels and pennies as more nuisance than currency. The typical household is sitting on $60 to $90 in neglected coins, enough to fill one or two pint-size beer mugs, according to the Federal Reserve. Americans throw away millions of dollars in coins every year, literally treating them like trash.
United States currency coins used in daily purchases.
Coins are literal money. Why do we treat them like trash?
McColly thinks we should change the way we think about coins.
To state the obvious, coins are worth money. Coinstar converts $3 billion in coins into spendable cash every year, one coin jar at a time. The average jar yields $58 in buying power.
Most of us don't realize how much our coins are worth. Thus, a trip to a coin-exchange kiosk (or a bank, or credit union) can yield a pleasant surprise.
'People underestimate the value of their jar by about half,' McColly said. 'It's a wonderfully pleasurable experience. People have this sensation of found money.'
Certain groups of Americans – lower-income households, and those over 55 – still use plenty of cash, the Fed found, along with people who prefer to shop in person.
A copper 1943 penny is examined closely to check its date on July 18, 1963. The coin has been tested with a magnet and found to be made of copper. If it is authentic, coin collectors say, it may be worth thousands of dollars to its owners, the John Powers of Janette Drive in Goodlettsville, who have put it in a bank for safekeeping. No copper pennies were minted in 1943 according to the U.S. Treasury Department instead a billion steel pennies were minted because copper was urgently needed for war materials during World War II. But many coin-collectors believe that a very few copper discs were run through the 1943 mints by accident.
Coins aren't clutter. They're currency
As for the rest of us, McColly thinks it is time for a paradigm shift. Don't think of your coins as clutter. Think of them as recyclables.
'They're metal,' he said, in case we needed a reminder. 'And they have a long and useful life.'
The Treasury still mints more than 5 billion coins a year, although the figure is dropping, according to the journal CoinNews.
'Those are just natural resources coming out of the Earth,' McColly said: Copper-platted zinc for pennies, copper-nickel alloys for nickels, dimes and quarters.
His point: If Americans got serious about gathering up their idle coins and 'recycling' them into the monetary system, the Mint wouldn't have to make so many new ones.
Granted, McColly has a vested interest. His company collects a small cut of the coins that consumers deposit.
'You can go to your own bank or credit union and not pay any fee,' said Kimberly Palmer, personal finance expert at NerdWallet. Both NerdWallet and Bankrate offer tip sheets on exchanging coins for cash. Most banks will take an account holder's coins for free, Bankrate reports, but not all, and you may need to roll the coins yourself.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. races to break China's hold on rare earth magnets
While U.S. trade negotiators work to ease an immediate shortage of rare earth magnets from China, the Trump administration is scrambling to line up viable alternatives that would reduce America's reliance on its chief economic rival. Why it matters: Small-but-powerful rare earth magnets are essential to high-tech products, from cars and robots to electronics and weapons. But China controls 90% of the world's supply of the critical components. The contentious trade relationship between the U.S. and China has amplified the economic and security risks of that reliance. Global automakers are "in full panic" that China's limits on rare earth exports will trigger supply chain shocks like the pandemic-related semiconductor shortages that occurred in 2021 and 2022. The big picture: It's not a new problem. U.S. officials have been talking about the need to mitigate American dependence on China for years. China also dominates processing of metals like lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite used in batteries. The latest: U.S. and Chinese officials met Monday and Tuesday in London to try to iron out their trade issues, amid reports that China was willing to expedite export licenses for U.S. and European automakers if the U.S. loosened export controls on jet engine parts and software. Late Tuesday both sides said they'd reached a framework of a deal, pending approval from both countries' leaders, that would in theory resolve the most recent export issues. Yes, but: There's still an urgency to find alternative sources. President Trump in April called for an investigation into national security risks posed by U.S. reliance on imported processed critical minerals, including rare earth elements. He has also used a series of executive orders to try to bolster domestic supply chains, like fast-tracking environmental reviews for U.S. mining projects. In Congress, meanwhile, rare earth competition with China has galvanized both parties. A spate of bills would create a tax credit for production of high-performance rare earth magnets, use Defense Production Act authority to direct emergency funding, and establish an Energy Department program to finance minerals projects. Two Republicans and two Democrats are pressing legislation that allows the president to strike free trade agreements exclusively focused on critical minerals and rare earth elements. "There is fairly broad bipartisan support around becoming more resilient, especially in areas that invoke national security — and this is clearly one of them," Sen. Todd Young, an Indiana Republican leading that bill, told Axios last month. Zoom in: One deal that's getting a lot of attention is a potential partnership between California-based MP Materials and Saudi Arabia's flagship mining company, Maaden. The deal was inked in May on the sidelines of the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, coinciding with a broader agreement between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia to cooperate on energy and critical minerals. MP Materials operates California's Mountain Pass, the only rare-earths mine in the U.S., which produces 12% of the global supply. At maximum production, Mountain Pass could yield enough rare earths to supply more than 6 million electric vehicles, the company says. But the bottleneck is magnets, which MP Materials is just beginning to produce. Maaden, a fast-growing, government-controlled mining company, is developing mines for a variety of critical minerals, but doesn't produce rare earths today. What to watch: Together, the companies seek to jointly develop a vertically integrated rare earths supply chain in Saudi Arabia—mining, separation, refining and magnet production—for global consumption. Zoning and environmental regulations in the U.S. make it hard to open a rare earth mine, but Saudi Arabia moves more quickly and is anxious to wean its economy off of oil. Saudi expertise in petrochemical refining can be leveraged for minerals processing, while MP brings experience across the entire rare earths supply chain, including mining, refining and magnet production. Reality check: The preliminary deal is non-binding, so it could still fall apart.
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Here's what's happening with unemployed Americans — in five charts
While the unemployment rate in the U.S. is still fairly low, data shows it's not uncommon to see individuals job hunting for extended periods of time. The unemployment rate remained flat at 4.2% in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. However, over the past six months, it's become "drastically harder to find a job," whether you're entering the job market for the first time or you've been looking for a while, according to Alí Bustamante, an economist and director at the Roosevelt Institute, a liberal think tank. "It's not that folks are losing their jobs," Bustamante said. "It's just that businesses are much more reticent to hire people, to make investments, because they just feel this very uncertain economic climate." More from Personal Finance:Millions of Americans would lose health insurance under House GOP megabillCheck your home insurance ahead of an 'above normal' hurricane season401(k) balances drop due to market volatility: Fidelity Bustamante and other economists say several data points beyond the headline job market numbers — the job-finding and quits rates, the share of workers who have been unemployed for 27 weeks or more, a broader rate of unemployment and the state of so-called "white collar" jobs — showcase deeper issues within the labor market. "Employers aren't hiring, they're not firing. People aren't leaving their jobs, and there's just fewer opportunities right now," said Cory Stahle, an economist at Indeed, a job search site. As career coach Mandi Woodruff-Santos put it during a recent interview with CNBC: "The job market is kind of trash right now." Here's what's happening with unemployed Americans, in five charts. The job-finding rate reflects the share of unemployed workers who successfully found a job, Stahle said. Over the past few years, the job-finding rate for unemployment has been declining, he said. In other words, people who are looking for work are not finding jobs, Stahle said. On the flip side, the quits rate reflects the share of employees who have left their jobs in a given month, Stahle said. That figure has also been declining, meaning people are not voluntarily leaving their jobs. The quits rate was at 2.0% in April, little changed from 2.1% in March, both numbers seasonally adjusted, according to the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of quits was down by 220,000 over the year. Hiring activity has also been down in recent years. The rate of hires was at 3.5% in April, little changed from 3.4% in March, both seasonally adjusted, per the JOLTs report. As people stay put in their jobs and employers are reluctant to hire, such factors create a "low hiring, low firing" environment, Stahle said. The number of long-term unemployed workers dropped in the bureau's latest report. However, not only is the rate still high, the recent drop could also be a red flag, Bustamente said. The share of unemployed workers facing long-term unemployment — those who have been jobless for at least 27 weeks — was a seasonally adjusted 20.4% in May, according to the bureau's latest data. That's down from a seasonally adjusted 23.5% in April. But the recent decline may not be an improvement. It could be signaling that a large number of long-term unemployed workers left the labor force altogether, he said. Considering that 139,000 jobs were added in May and about 218,000 workers are no longer in the unemployment cohort, there's a significant gap of workers who were unemployed but did not secure new roles, Bustamante said. What's more, the number of people not in the labor force jumped by 622,000 in May. "All the data point to long-term unemployment declining because people left the labor force," Bustamante said. While the headline unemployment rate — also known as the U-3 rate — has remained steady, another measure shows a clearer picture of what's happening with unemployed workers still looking for jobs, experts say. The U-6 rate includes the total number of unemployed workers, plus all marginally attached workers, and the total employed part time for economic reasons. Marginally attached workers are those who are neither working nor looking for a job — but indicate that they want and are available for work, and looked for a new role recently. There's a subset of this group called discouraged workers, or those who are not currently looking for a job due to labor-market reasons. People employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but settled for a part-time schedule. As of the latest BLS data, the U-6 rate remained unchanged from April at 7.8%. This data tells us that more and more Americans have either stopped looking for work out of labor-market frustrations, or are picking up part-time gigs to get by financially, experts say. When looking at professional and business services — the industry that represents "white collar," and middle and upper-class, educated workers — there hasn't been much hiring, experts say. Fields such as marketing, software development, data analytics and data science have far fewer opportunities now than they did before the pandemic, Stahle said. On the other hand, industries such as health care, construction and manufacturing have seen consistent job growth. Nearly half of the job growth came from health care, which added 62,000 jobs in May, the bureau found. "There's been a divergence in opportunity," Stahle said. "Your experience with the labor market is going to depend largely on the type of work it is you're doing."
36 minutes ago
Inflation expected to have ticked higher in May amid Trump tariffs
A fresh inflation report to be released on Wednesday will provide the latest test for President Donald Trump's tariffs as some retailers and economists warn the policy will raise prices. So far, the economy has defied fears of price hikes, instead giving way to a cooldown of inflation over the months since Trump took office. Economists expect inflation to have jumped slightly in May, registering year-over-year price increases of 2.4%. That would mark an increase from an inflation rate of 2.3% over the year ending in April, which amounted to the lowest inflation level since 2021. The small increase in inflation anticipated by economists would keep price levels near the Federal Reserve's target rate of 2%, putting them well below a recent peak of 9% in 2022. In recent weeks, Trump has dialed back some of his steepest tariffs, easing the costs imposed upon importers. Such companies typically pass along a share of the higher tax burden in the form of price hikes. A trade agreement between the U.S. and China in May slashed tit-for-tat tariffs between the world's two largest economies and triggered a surge in the stock market. Within days, Wall Street firms softened their forecasts of a downturn. The U.S.-China accord came weeks after the White House paused a large swath of Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs targeting dozens of countries. Trump also eased sector-specific tariffs targeting autos and rolled back duties on some goods from Mexico and Canada. Still, an across-the-board 10% tariff applies to nearly all imports, except for semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and some other items. Those tariffs stand in legal limbo, however, after a pair of federal court rulings late last month. Tariffs remain in place for steel, aluminum and autos, as well as some goods from Canada and Mexico. Warning signs point to the possibility of elevated prices over the coming months. Nationwide retailers like Walmart and Best Buy have voiced alarm about the possibility they may raise prices as a result of the levies. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, said this month it expects U.S. inflation to reach 4% by the end of 2025, which would mark a sharp increase from current levels. Federal Chair Jerome Powell, in recent months, has warned about the possibility that tariffs may cause what economists call "stagflation," which is when inflation rises and the economy slows. Stagflation could put the central bank in a difficult position. If the Fed were to raise interest rates, it could help ease inflation, but it may risk an economic downturn. If the Fed were to cut rates in an effort to spur economic growth, the move could unleash faster price increases. For now, the Fed appears willing to take a wait-and-see approach. At its last meeting, in May, the Fed opted to hold interest rates steady for the second consecutive time. "For now, it does seem like a fairly clear decision for us to wait and see," Powell said at a press conference in Washington, D.C., last month. The Fed will announce its next rate decision on June 18. Investors peg the chances of a decision to leave rates unchanged at 99.9%, according to the CME FedWatch Tool, a measure of market sentiment.
