logo
Man executed for the 2000 killing of a police officer in Indiana's second execution in 15 years

Man executed for the 2000 killing of a police officer in Indiana's second execution in 15 years

NBC News20-05-2025
MICHIGAN CITY, Ind. — An Indiana man convicted in the fatal shooting of a police officer in 2000 was executed Tuesday by lethal injection in the state's second execution in 15 years.
Benjamin Ritchie, 45, had been on Indiana's death row since 2002, when he was convicted of killing Beech Grove Police Officer Bill Toney during a chase on foot.
Ritchie was executed at the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City, according to Indiana Department of Corrections officials. IDOC said in a statement that the process started shortly after midnight and Ritchie was pronounced dead at 12:46 a.m.
Ritchie's last meal was from the Olive Garden and he expressed love, support and peace for his friends and family, according to the statement.
Under state law, he was allowed five witnesses at his execution, which included his attorney Steve Schutte, who told reporters he had a limited view of the process.
'I couldn't see his face. He was lying flat by that time,' Schutte said. 'He sat up, twitched, laid back down.'
The process was carried out hours after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to take the case, exhausting all of Ritchie's legal options to fight the death sentence.
Dozens of people, both anti-death penalty advocates and supporters of Toney, stood outside the prison until early Tuesday.
Indiana resumed executions in December after a yearslong hiatus due to a scarcity of lethal injection drugs nationwide. Prison officials provided photos of the execution chamber before Joseph Corcoran's execution, showing a space that looks like an operating room with a gurney, fluorescent lighting and an adjacent viewing room. They've since offered few other details.
Among 27 states with death penalty laws, Indiana is one of two that bars media witnesses. The other, Wyoming, has conducted one execution in the last half-century.
The Associated Press and other media organizations filed a federal lawsuit in Indiana seeking media access, but a federal judge denied a preliminary injunction last week that would have allowed journalists to witness Ritchie's execution and future ones. The judge found that barring the news media doesn't violate the First Amendment nor does it single out the news media for unequal treatment.
The execution in Indiana is among 12 scheduled in eight states this year. Ritchie's execution and two others in Texas and Tennessee will be carried out this week.
The 2000 fatal shooting of a police officer
Ritchie was 20 when he and others stole a van in Beech Grove, near Indianapolis. He then fired at Toney during a foot chase, killing him.
At the time Ritchie was on probation from a 1998 burglary conviction.
Toney, 31, had worked at the Beech Grove Police Department for two years. The married father of two was the first officer of the small department to be killed by gunfire in the line of duty.
Relatives spoke at a clemency hearing last week in support of the execution.
'It's time. We're all tired,' said Dee Dee Horen, who was Toney's wife. 'It is time for this chapter of my story, our story, to be closed. It's time for us to remember Bill, to remember Bill's life, and not his death.'
Appealing a death sentence
Ritchie's attorneys have fought the death sentence, arguing his legal counsel at trial was ineffective because his lawyers failed to fully investigate and present evidence on his fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and childhood lead exposure.
Current defense attorneys say Ritchie suffered 'severe brain damage' because his mother abused alcohol and drugs during pregnancy and he's struggled with decision-making. He was also diagnosed with bipolar disorder in 2005.
Disability rights advocates argued that Ritchie's brain damage should have excluded him from the death penalty.
'This is a foolish, senseless, agonizing waste of time and money,' said Schutte, who added that Ritchie was no longer 'the same person who committed that crime.'
Attorney General Todd Rokita said the execution honored Toney's 'sacrifice to the community.'
Republican Gov. Mike Braun rejected Ritchie's clemency bid last week without explanation.
The Indiana Supreme Court denied a request to stop the execution. Ritchie's attorneys challenged that decision in federal court, which a judge rejected. The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the lower court on Sunday.
As the sun set Monday, the Rev. Richard Holy, a Catholic priest, recited the rosary with about 20 people in the prison parking lot.
'We don't have to keep taking one life to exact justice for taking another,' he said.
Dozens also showed up to honor Toney's memory.
'I support the death penalty in certain cases and this is one of them,' said Mark Hamner, an Indianapolis-area officer.
Expressing regret and awaiting execution
Attorneys said Ritchie changed during his more than two decades behind bars and had shown remorse.
In court as a young man, Ritchie smiled at Horen and laughed as the verdict was read.
He told a parole board he deeply regretted his actions, especially how he acted with Toney's widow.
'I wish I could go back to the day in court, because that man's wife deserved to say everything she needed to say to me, and that punk kid should have just kept his mouth shut and let her say whatever she needed to say,' Ritchie said.
Ritchie, who was also a father, spent his last days getting visits from friends and family.
'I've ruined my life and other people's lives, and I'm so sorry for that night,' he told the parole board earlier this month. 'You can't take back what you did.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US appeals court rejects challenge to SEC 'gag rule'
US appeals court rejects challenge to SEC 'gag rule'

Reuters

time5 days ago

  • Reuters

US appeals court rejects challenge to SEC 'gag rule'

Aug 6 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected a challenge a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission "gag rule" that prevents defendants who settle civil enforcement actions from publicly denying the regulator's allegations. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the rule, reflecting SEC policy dating to 1972, was not unconstitutional on its face, but could violate the First Amendment if applied in a manner that prevented defendants from criticizing the agency. Circuit Judge Daniel Bress said challenges to how the rule is applied could be brought before the SEC brings enforcement cases, while judges consider settlements, or when the SEC seeks to reopen settled cases because of alleged breaches. To enforce the rule, the SEC often requires settling defendants to say at least that they neither admit nor deny the regulator's allegations. Twelve petitioners, including eight people whose SEC settlements contained the rule's obligations, had sought to declare the rule unconstitutional. Lawyers for the petitioners did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The SEC did not immediately respond to a similar request. The 9th Circuit heard the appeal in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Fringe 2025: #Charlottesville ⭐⭐⭐
Fringe 2025: #Charlottesville ⭐⭐⭐

Edinburgh Reporter

time7 days ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Fringe 2025: #Charlottesville ⭐⭐⭐

At 1.45pm on 12 August 2017 white supremacist James Alex Fields Jnr deliberately drove his car into a crowd of people who had been protesting against a Unite the Right rally in a Charlottesville park. Many people were injured; 32 year old Heather Heyer was killed. 'Everything was flying through the air. People were flying, shoes. The sound of metal on people, metal on metal.' The crime had been preceded by two days of confrontations, many of them violent, between various alt-right groups (one of whose leaders had obtained a permit to hold the 12 August rally), counter protesters and the police. The initial spark for the protest had been the plan to remove the city's statue of Thomas Jefferson, but the alt-right swiftly expanded the scope of the rally to cover its hatred of non-white people, immigrants, Jews, the LGBT+ community, and women who didn't stay at home 'honouring' their men. During the protests two state troopers also died. In 2017 Priyanka Shetty, an Indian student, was enrolled on a Master of Fine Arts and Acting course at the University of Virginia. She decided to investigate the events of those two days, and the people behind them. Having looked at numerous far right websites and social media, and dug around in the murky depths of the Dark Web, Shetty wanted to talk to Charlottesville residents about their thoughts on the city, its people, and what they remembered about those two days in August. The University of Virginia did not authorise her investigation. Based on her findings, Shetty has written a partly verbatim show; #Charlottesville premiered at The Keegan Theatre in Washington DC, and now it has come to the Pleasance Courtyard. The names of the people Shetty quotes are projected onto the back wall of Pleasance Bunker Two. They include a Peace Corps Recruiter, a musician, an undergraduate, a waitress, a Conservative radio host and the Dean of the university. They all love the city, but interestingly, it is only the waitress, Tamra (whose family has lived in Charlottesville since the 18th century) who points out that it consists of pockets of population; each pocket lives in its own bubble, they rarely if ever interact. All of the speakers say the city is friendly, but several refer to simmering interracial tensions. Shetty has also studied the transcript records of the court cases, criminal and civil, that followed the violence. She plays the judge and counsel for both plaintiff and defendants, taking up different positions in the room to differentiate between them. The defendants' argument centres on two crucial points, the first being that the First Amendment protects Americans' right to free speech. Their counsel happily admits that his clients are unpleasant people with highly offensive views – but that it not a crime. His second argument is that Fields was acting alone when he drove into the crowd. He had nothing to do with the others, there was no conspiracy and there is therefore no case to answer. Further interspersed are Shetty's own conversations with Susan, the Chair of her university department. Susan dismisses Shetty's complaints about racist comments made by another class member. Shetty also asks why she has not been cast in either of the department's productions; again she does not receive a satisfactory answer, but is instead fobbed off with the offer of a role in a community production. 'It will be a lifelong struggle for you and there's nothing I can do about that.' Shetty has researched the alt-right groups involved in the events of 11/12 August in depth. Again she uses projected images to profile the ringleaders while she quotes their words. I did find this part of the show a little confusing, as Shetty seemed to jump from one alt-right person to another, then back to the residents, then back to the courtroom scenes, very quickly at times so that I was not entirely sure who was saying what or indeed who belonged to which organisation. The voices of Kevin, the musician, and of the somewhat pompous counsel for the defence in court, were clearly differentiated and identifiable, but most of the women Shetty had chatted to sounded more or less the same to me. It was also, unfortunately, sometimes difficult to see the words projected on the wall. It's likely that this would work much better in a more traditional theatre, where all audience members are facing one way. In the Bunker people are sitting round three sides of a square, and the side seats are not best placed to see the projections. The Charlottesville residents are also asked for their recollections of the violence. They describe the lit torches the protestors held; the air being 'thick with Kerosene,' There was constant chanting, 'You will not replace us!' They watched as counter protesters were beaten. Shetty draws parallels between the increasing hard line racism in the US, the personal racism she encountered in her department, and the failure of President Trump to condemn the white supremacists in Charlottesville. She does an excellent and very funny impression of the President, who notoriously first stated that 'there were very fine people on both sides in Charlottesville', then immediately attempted to divert attention to his claims that the country was 'doing very well.' But although this scene brings some welcome light humour to the show, its content is of course frightening. Shetty shows pictures of Trump and the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi embracing; India too is experiencing a shift to the right and towards an authoritarian style of government. Modi has even started saying 'Make India Great Again.' Another celebrated democracy is threatened. Just when we might feel bogged down in all the political and legal facts, Shetty reminds us that a young woman died on 12 August. Heather Heyer's mother describes in agonising detail her desperate attempts to find out what has happened to her daughter; the phone calls to all the hospitals, the journey into town. Waiting for her husband to arrive, then finding that the hospital has already moved Heather's body. Heather's parents did not see her until the day before her funeral, 'It's like an amputation. You can survive it, you can adapt, but you're still an amputee.' It's not just about placards and shouting. Real people, fellow human beings, are being attacked, injured and sometimes killed. A favourite quote of Heather's was, 'If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.' Very few people were paying attention before 11 August 2017. Are we paying more attention now? Are we outraged, or are we complacent in the rise of fascism in the US and on our own doorsteps? #Charlottesville is a thought-provoking show and Shetty is an accomplished actor. For me there were perhaps too many different threads to manage within the short time constraints of a Fringe show, and I wonder if the court scenes could be abbreviated or cut to allow more time to hear the people's voices. Courts can only do so much, especially in the US where many judges are political appointees. In the end it is the people who need to take a stand against the rise of white supremacy in all its forms, to wake up and pay attention before it's too late. #Charlottesville is at Pleasance Courtyard (Bunker Two), 60 Pleasance (Venue 33) at 12.20pm every day until 25 August. Please note: there is no show on Wednesday 13 August. Like this: Like Related

Trump makes decision on pardoning P Diddy after conviction
Trump makes decision on pardoning P Diddy after conviction

Daily Mirror

time02-08-2025

  • Daily Mirror

Trump makes decision on pardoning P Diddy after conviction

Donald Trump has said he is unlikely to pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs following the music mogul's conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution, In an interview with Newsmax on Friday, the former president addressed speculation that he might offer Combs a presidential pardon, revealing he had been 'seriously considering' the possibility. However, Trump ultimately suggested the answer would be 'more likely a no'. 'Well he was essentially, sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do that he's still in jail or something,' Trump said. 'He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good a victory.' EAD MORE: Sharon Osbourne breaks down in tears at Ozzy's funeral in heartbreaking scenes. READ MORE: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are set for new 'goldmine' offer - but could face issue. Combs, 55, was acquitted earlier this month of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges related to ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and another woman referred to as Jane. But he was found guilty on two federal counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, which was a violation of the Mann Act, and now faces up to 10 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for October 3. Trump recalls having a friendly rapport with Combs in the past as they were both prominent figures in New York. But he claimed that their relationship soured after Trump entered politics, pointing to Combs' vocal support of Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential race. 'When I ran for office he was very hostile,' Trump told interviewer Rob Finnerty. 'He made some terrible statements, so I don't know — it makes it more difficult to do.' When he was pressed on whether a pardon was off the table, Trump replied: 'I'd say so.' Behind the scenes, sources previously indicated that the idea of a pardon had moved beyond idle talk and was being taken seriously by the Trump team. One insider told Deadline it had progressed from 'just another Trump weave to an actionable event'. Combs' legal team has already filed for either an acquittal or a retrial. In a strongly worded motion, his lawyers argued that his conviction under the Mann Act was unprecedented and should be overturned. 'This verdict is unsound. And this conviction, rooted in a misapplied, overbroad statute, should not stand,' they wrote, and maintained that all parties involved in the so-called 'Freak-Offs' were consenting adults and that no commercial sex acts had taken place. They also claimed that Combs' activities were in the same vein as producing amateur adult films for private viewing, and therefore protected by the First Amendment. 'The men were paid for their time,' the motion continued. 'They enjoyed the activities and had friendships with Ms. Ventura and Jane and were not merely traveling to have sex for money.' If a full acquittal isn't granted, Combs' attorneys argue a retrial should be ordered due to 'severe spillover prejudice' from the inclusion of inflammatory evidence during the trial, including surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura. Combs remains in custody at a Brooklyn detention centre.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store