logo
Pentagon Orders Services to Cut PCS Moves by 50% Over Next 5 Years

Pentagon Orders Services to Cut PCS Moves by 50% Over Next 5 Years

Yahoo28-05-2025
The Pentagon has directed the military services to cut the amount of money they spend on permanent change-of-station, or PCS, moves for troops in half by 2030 as part of an ongoing effort to reduce spending.
The services are tasked with cuts that amount to an initial 10% of the $5 billion PCS budget in 2027 and that increase annually -- hitting 50% by 2030, according to a May 22 memo that was publicly released Wednesday. The memo, by the under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness, says the services should target 'discretionary move' budgets.
Pentagon leaders framed the push to cut those PCS moves as a way to reduce costs and provide stability for families. However, department officials did not offer clear definitions on what moves are discretionary and what guardrails will be put in place to keep the cuts from affecting families or careers.
Read Next: Pentagon Diverts $1 Billion from Army Barracks to Fund Border Mission
Tim Dill, a top official in the Pentagon's Office for Personnel and Readiness, told reporters that the department is giving the services four months to come up with plans to 'reduce the frequency of PCS moves for service members, driving much needed efficiencies for the department and improving the quality of life for warfighters and military families.'
The memo charges each service to consider altering troop career pathways or just how many opportunities service members get to serve outside of their specialties.
Dill wants the service to 'look at where is a move absolutely necessary to accomplish' giving troops 'the right leadership opportunities,' and where 'a move [is] not necessary to accomplish it.'
While the emphasis is being placed on 'discretionary moves,' officials at the Pentagon on Wednesday struggled to define the term, and one explained it as moves that include operational travel inside the U.S., rotational travel to or from overseas, and individual service member training travel -- three categories that include a broad majority of military moves.
The memo and Pentagon officials stressed the outcome of the changes should be a boon for families, but they stopped short of offering guarantees on all possible scenarios.
The overall idea is also not entirely new. Several years ago, the Marine Corps made a push to offer more opportunities for families to stay put for longer as part of an overhaul of its retention policies.
When asked whether a possible outcome of the new policy would be more family separations, given the tightening budget for moves, Dill said they were 'not dictating the way in which this needs to be done and we would want to hear from the services, their concerns … about some of the examples you named.'
'We understand there's some risks associated with some of the methods,' Dill added.
Dill also pushed back on the idea that the new policy, framed as protecting military families, would result in single service members bearing the brunt of the burden to support jobs in less popular or less family friendly locations.
'This is not a policy where we just think we need to take the moves away from the families and put it on someone else -- it's for everyone,' he said.
Dill also said he is aware that some military locations are just broadly unpopular, and the department is 'very open' to talking to the services about those dynamics. But Dill also said he thought 'that there are service members out there that are perfect for any installation, but we want to make sure that where we can, we match up with service member preferences as much as possible.'
According to officials, cutting PCS moves is separate from another effort to address problems with the privatization of PCS household goods shipments and shortcomings with the contractor that is taking over those shipments.
In a memo Tuesday to senior leaders and combatant commanders, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced he ordered U.S. Transportation Command to address what he called "recent deficiencies" in performance by the company that manages the $7.2 billion contract to run the department's moving process.
Military families have reported numerous issues with scheduling and executing moves that included issues such as packers not showing up, delayed pickups and deliveries, and surprise cancellations.
Related: Hegseth Orders Review of Defense Department's Support for Homeschooling
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President
Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President

Wall Street Journal

time12 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President

The State Department designated eight organized-crime syndicates based in Latin America as 'foreign terrorist organizations,' or FTOs, in February. In July it added a ninth. Last week the New York Times reported that President Trump has signed a secret 'directive' to the Pentagon to 'begin using military force against certain Latin American drug cartels.' The White House declined to tell me if the Times story is true. But on Thursday Reuters reported that the U.S. deployment of air and naval resources to the Caribbean to combat cartels had begun. Whether their mission is interdiction or something more invasive remains unclear.

GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to D.C.
GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to D.C.

Axios

time18 hours ago

  • Axios

GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to D.C.

The Republican governors of three states announced they will send state National Guard personnel to Washington, D.C., at the Trump administration's request. The big picture: The deployment of hundreds of additional troops, who will join the 800 already mobilized in the nation's capital, marks a major escalation in President Trump's takeover. Driving the news: South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster authorized the deployment of 200 Guard personnel from his state to support federal law enforcement activities, according to a Saturday statement. The deployment, per his office's statement, comes at the request of the Pentagon's National Guard Bureau and will be funded by the federal government under Title 32. Zoom out: Some 300 to 400 West Virginia Guard personnel will also be deployed to the District at the administration's request, Gov. Patrick Morrisey announced. "West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital," he said in a statement. Those troops will be joined by 150 military police from the Ohio National Guard, sent by Gov. Mike DeWine, multiple outlets reported. Catch up quick: Trump on Monday announced a federal takeover of the District's police and deployment of National Guard troops in his push to crack down on crime and homelessness in D.C. Trump's memorandum, signed Monday, directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to coordinate with state governors to authorize additional Guard units as needed. The president has cast his crackdown as an effort to "take our Capital back," describing rampant lawlessness in a city where violent crime is trending down. Zoom in: The D.C. National Guard members — who, unlike Guard personnel in other states and territories, report to the president — have "broad latitude," Hegseth told Fox News Monday, but he noted they won't be involved in law enforcement functions. But if police aren't around, Hegseth said he "will have their back to ensure they can take the necessary action to protect citizens of D.C. and to protect themselves." He said troops could remain in D.C. for weeks or months but emphasized that it's "the president's call." Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson told reporters Thursday that those personnel will not be making arrests, but they may "temporarily limit the movement of an individual who has entered restricted or secured area without permission."

Pentagon planning ‘quick reaction force' for civil disturbances: Report
Pentagon planning ‘quick reaction force' for civil disturbances: Report

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Pentagon planning ‘quick reaction force' for civil disturbances: Report

The Trump administration is looking at plans to set up a 600-person National Guard 'quick reaction force' to quickly deploy to U.S. cities to quell protests or other unrest, The Washington Post reported Tuesday. Internal Pentagon documents reviewed by the Post lay out the parameters for a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force,' calling for hundreds of guard members outfitted with weapons and riot gear to be on constant standby and deployable in as little as one hour. The proposal, if enacted, would be another expansion of President Trump's use of U.S. troops on American soil. The commander in chief on Monday declared he was deploying 800 National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., to combat what he claimed was a scourge of violent crime and drug use, even as D.C. police data shows violent incidents in the city have fallen off sharply since 2023. As part of that effort, guard members on Tuesday morning began reporting to the D.C. Armory. The documents reported by the Post — compiled by National Guard officials as recently as late July and early August — lay out a plan in which troops would be split into two groups of 300 and stationed at military bases in Alabama and Arizona. The proposal also contains discussions about the potential societal implications in setting up such a program, as well as budget projections, which show the effort could cost hundreds of millions of dollars if military aircraft are needed to be ready at all times. The program could be created and funded at the earliest in fiscal 2027 if using the Pentagon's annual budgetary process, with an open question as to whether it could begin sooner through other means of funding, according to the Post. Asked about the documents, a defense official appeared to acknowledge that such plans existed but declined to comment. 'The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe. We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise,' the official told News Nation, The Hill's sister network. The plan is unique as it would allow the Trump administration to move troops from one state to another, versus the typical route of National Guard commands using fast-response teams within their home states. But this isn't the first time such a tactic would be used. In fall 2020, after racial justice protests across the U.S. that summer and prior to the presidential election in November, the National Guard designated military police units in Alabama and Arizona to serve as rapid reaction forces. Trump also deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles in June — against the wishes of local and state lawmakers — to crack down on protests against immigration enforcement activities. The roughly 4,000 California troops — in addition to 700 Marines sent to protect buildings — were seen standing idle around the city for weeks after protests largely died down, adding to the narrative that their deployment was politically motivated. In addition, the administration has dispatched 10,000 guard members to the U.S.-Mexico border in a show of force intended to discourage illegal immigration. The plan reported by the Post notes that the Trump administration would rely on a section of U.S. Code that allows him to bypass limitations on using the military on American soil. The proposal envisions a 90-day rotation of service members, to be pulled from Army and Air Force National Guard units based in Alabama, Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Tennessee, according to the Post. The documents highlight several concerns, including budgetary and logistical constraints; the possible ramifications of taking guard members away from state-level duties such as helping with wildfire and hurricane response; strains on personnel and equipment; training disruptions that could impact readiness; and the potential of inflaming political sensitivities. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store