logo
She's a waitress raised on a farm – can Rebecca Cooke win a key Wisconsin seat?

She's a waitress raised on a farm – can Rebecca Cooke win a key Wisconsin seat?

The Guardian04-04-2025

Wisconsin's third congressional district has voted for Donald Trump every time he's been on the ballot, but the moderate Democrat Rebecca Cooke, a waitress who grew up on a dairy farm, thinks she can flip the state's most competitive seat next year.
Last year, Cooke outperformed other Democrats when she tried to unseat incumbent Derrick Van Orden, a retired US Navy Seal who attended the January 6 'Stop the Steal
' rally at the Capitol and shouted 'lies' during Joe Biden's 2024 state of the union address. She lost the race by less than three points.
She's trying again. She launched her 2026 campaign in March, amid constituent anger at Van Orden for refusing to face questions at in-person town halls. She is doubling down on the campaigning that worked for in November, hitting the pavement across the western Wisconsin district.
In the soul-searching among Democrats over the future of their party, Cooke aligns with the moderate Blue Dog coalition led by Washington state representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, who told Mother Jones that after she endorsed Cooke, Van Orden 'shoulder-checked me on the floor'.
But Cooke rejects a label within the party, calling them 'somewhat harmful' and polarizing in her district. She tells voters that she thinks lawmakers in DC are either too far left or too far right, and that there need to be more regular folks willing to work across the aisle to get things done. The idea resonates with people, who tell her they're over the polarization and chaos. She needs votes from people across the political spectrum to win in the moderately right-leaning district.
Cooke's resumé is the kind often cobbled together in small towns across the US: she works as a waitress, she ran a retail business and an Airbnb business, she worked on Democratic campaigns, and she started a nonprofit to support women entrepreneurs. She first ran for the congressional seat in 2022, losing in the Democratic primary, then again in 2024, beating out two other Democrats to take on Van Orden.
She has been waitressing since she was a teenager, she said. 'I love that work. I love the hospitality industry. I think there's so much dignity in hospitality work, and it's something that allows me being able to work at night, to be able to campaign all day.'
She said her 'more working-class' background aligns with the district but upsets her opponents, who have brought up her work on Democratic campaigns. The National Republican Campaign Committee has repeatedly called her a 'sleazy political activist' and said she is lying about her background.
'I'd love them to see the car that I drive around, and the place that I live,' she said. 'Anybody that knows me knows that I'm not rolling in dough by any means.'
Cooke grew up on a dairy farm, but her family had to sell their cows because of how competition affected the price of milk. Losing the farm wasn't just losing a business, she said. 'It's just very much a part of our way of life, and we've lost thousands of dairy farms in Wisconsin.'
In June, farmers around the state will host breakfasts to promote dairy farming. She said she'll be at every dairy breakfast she can get to in the district, shaking hands and introducing herself.
'I don't know what people's political background is, but when I'm shaking their hand, I'll say, I'm Rebecca Cooke, I grew up on a dairy farm, and I tell them a little bit about my background,' she said. 'By the end of the conversation, they go, so, what party are you from? And I would rather that question if they're agreeing with me on similar values.'
Cooke said she thinks Democrats need to bring people back into a big tent through pragmatism and detailing how their agenda would help Americans afford their housing and groceries.
The party needs to create its own 'prosperity gospel instead of just demonizing the right', she said. 'What are we going to do better? And how are we going to help people find their path to the middle class?' Democrats need to be bold, fresh and and willing to be 'more uninhibited'.
'I really think the change that we want to see has to come from the inside out and not from the outside in,' she said. 'We need to look to our communities to solve these gaps and this vacuum and work to recruit people to be those strong voices and to run for office.
'It shouldn't be like, this is coming from the national party, and this is what you should think or do. It should be, this is what's coming from our communities, and this is what we want the party to do.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

7 senators to watch as Republicans make changes to Trump's big bill
7 senators to watch as Republicans make changes to Trump's big bill

NBC News

time6 hours ago

  • NBC News

7 senators to watch as Republicans make changes to Trump's big bill

WASHINGTON — As Senate Republican leaders push to a massive bill for President Donald Trump's agenda by July 4, they are juggling a host of competing demands. Some senators are genuine threats to vote against the legislation, while others are expected to support it in the end after using their demands to shape it. Several of them have complicated political considerations. The Republicans who are speaking out most loudly point to a variety of ways the House-passed bill may change in the Senate, as party leaders seek to ease enough of their concerns. With all Democrats expected to vote against the package, Republicans will need at least 50 votes to pass it, as Vice President JD Vance could break a tie. Here are seven key senators to watch. Rand Paul Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is the only Republican senator who has voted against this legislation every step of the way. He has blasted the spike in military spending, the huge increase in deficits and, in particular, the $5 trillion debt limit hike. Paul does support a key part of the package — an extension of the Trump's 2017 tax cuts — but he wants to offset it with trillions of dollars in additional spending cuts, which the GOP has no hope of finding consensus on. Paul typically doesn't play games with his red lines. Barring an uncharacteristic about face, expect him to vote against the bill. Susan Collins Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is the sole surviving GOP senator to represent a state that Democrats consistently win at the presidential level. And she faces re-election this year. Her trajectory has been revealing, from supporting the initial budget resolution to voting against the revised version. A key reason for her opposition? Concerns that the Medicaid cuts would harm low-income and elderly constituents. She also expressed reservations about going after waste and fraud in Medicare, as GOP leaders have begun to consider. In addition, Collins and others like Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, would firmly oppose overruling the parliamentarian, the Senate's in-house referee who settles rule disputes, if she disqualifies some policies. Collins voted for the party's 2017 tax law, but she has been willing to vote against major GOP bills in the past. Party leaders will need to take her demands seriously in order to win her vote. Lisa Murkowski When Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voted for the budget blueprint in April that kickstarted the process of writing the legislation, she quickly followed it up with a broad set of grievances that will need to be addressed, or she'll be 'unable to support' the final product. Among other things, she took issue with Medicaid cuts and an accounting trick her party is using to obscure the cost of the tax cuts. Two months later, her concerns persist. Asked Thursday by NBC News what she wants to change in the emerging bill, Murkowski replied dryly, 'Oh, I'll give you a list.' Murkowski has criticized the phaseout and repeal of clean energy tax credits that benefit her state, writing a letter in April with three of her colleagues — Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Curtis — highlighting the importance of America's energy independence, which they argued could be weakened as a result of this bill. Murkowski has shown an independent streak and a willingness to take political arrows when standing her ground. Mike Crapo Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, is the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and will help craft some of the biggest and most contentious pieces of the bill — including the tax cuts and Medicaid cuts. Despite his soft-spoken and non-confrontational style, Crapo won't be able to make everybody happy. And any changes he makes in the Senate would have to be palatable to the wafer-thin House Republican majority, which engaged in painstaking negotiations before passing its version of the bill by a one-vote margin. One example of the disconnect is the expanded $40,000 cap on state and local tax deductions, to placate a group of blue-state House Republicans. But there are no GOP senators representing blue states where that is a big issue. Crapo said "there's not a strong mood in the Senate Republican caucus right now" to expand SALT. The bill represents his biggest test since taking the powerful gavel. Thom Tillis Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he wants to adjust the phaseouts of the clean energy tax credits with a more 'targeted' approach to protect U.S. businesses that are already invested in existing projects. He said there's 'general consensus that the House proposed language will be modified.' Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito, agreed, telling NBC News some phaseouts will likely be pushed back. A member of the Finance Committee, Tillis has sounded generally positive about the direction of the bill, making him a likely 'yes' vote. But he's skeptical that the Senate will meet the Independence Day deadline: 'There's a lot of things that have to go perfectly right to get all that done and be out by July 4.' Tillis faces a tough political balancing act: He's up for re-election next year in a state that Democrats will be targeting; but first he needs to get through a Republican primary, which means staying on Trump's good side. Ron Johnson Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has railed against the bill and its estimated $2.4 trillion contribution to the deficit, insisting he can't vote for it as written. He has slammed the idea of a mega-bill, calling for breaking it up and limiting the debt ceiling hike. Trump asked him to be 'less negative' during a meeting at the White House on Wednesday, Johnson said. 'I think we had a good, lively discussion between the two of us,' Johnson told NBC News. 'He obviously would like me to be a little less negative, a little more positive, which I'm happy to do.' Johnson said he isn't trying to make Trump and GOP leaders' jobs harder. And the senator zig-zagged his way to 'yes' on the 2017 tax law after initially coming out against it, so party leaders have reason to be optimistic that he won't sink this legislation. Josh Hawley Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has been the Senate GOP's most vocal opponent of cutting Medicaid "benefits' — and he's been specific about which parts of the House bill he's worried about, citing the Medicaid provider tax and cost-sharing provisions. Notably, Hawley said he's fine with coverage losses resulting from Medicaid work requirements and expanded proof-of-eligibility provisions. Those make up the bulk of the House bill's savings. Hawley has also expressed reservations about including any provisions in the bill related to Medicare, which Republicans recently said they would discuss related to savings connected to so-called 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' Hawley called that 'a terrible idea,' telling reporters Thursday, 'If you don't ever want to win an election again, just go fiddle around with people's Medicare that they've worked hard for, paid into.'

Trump admin must restore AmeriCorps programs in 24 states, judge rules
Trump admin must restore AmeriCorps programs in 24 states, judge rules

The Herald Scotland

time13 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump admin must restore AmeriCorps programs in 24 states, judge rules

Her ruling applied only to the Democratic-led states who sued in April to challenge what they said was an unlawful dismantling of AmeriCorps by Republican President Donald Trump's administration. More: What is AmeriCorps? What to know about the latest organization impacted by DOGE cuts Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown, a Democrat who helped lead the litigation, in a statement said the ruling safeguards services communities rely on to educate students, preserve parks and care for the elderly from "unlawful and reckless cuts." AmeriCorps did not respond to requests for comment. A White House spokesperson in a statement said Trump "has the right to restore accountability to the entire executive branch, and this will not be the final say on the matter." AmeriCorps' grants fund local and national organizations that offer community services related to education, disaster preparedness, conservation and more. It sends more than 200,000 volunteers out nationally as part of its programs. The states sued after the administration terminated over 1,000 grants and placed 85% of AmeriCorps' staff on administrative leave with the intent to terminate them effective June 24 as part of a push by Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency to shrink the federal government. The cuts impacted $396.5 million in federal funding for AmeriCorps programs and tens of thousands of volunteers nationally. The agency has a roughly $1 billion budget and had more than 500 employees when Trump took office. Democratic state attorneys general argued Trump lacks the authority under the U.S. Constitution to gut AmeriCorps, which was created by Congress, and that the agency failed to follow proper procedures before altering program services. Boardman, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, partially agreed, saying AmeriCorps failed to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking before making major changes. "Because the agency did not provide notice and an opportunity to comment before it made significant changes to service delivery, the States were unable to voice their concerns about these changes," she wrote. But Boardman said the states lacked standing to block the mass job cuts, saying an anticipated delay in their grant applications being reviewed due to reduced staff was not sufficient grounds.

6 takeaways from Trump and Musk's ruptured relationship and wild feud
6 takeaways from Trump and Musk's ruptured relationship and wild feud

The Herald Scotland

time13 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

6 takeaways from Trump and Musk's ruptured relationship and wild feud

Meanwhile, Musk endorsed a third Trump impeachment. Not satisfied with predicting Trump's tariffs would lead to a recession, Musk later accused Trump of consorting with accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump's political adviser and former White House aide Steve Bannon suggested the president should deport Musk back to his native South Africa. Here are six takeaways about the feud and where it might lead: Trump 'very disappointed' with Musk Musk has called the cost of Trump's legislative package of tax and spending cuts a "disgusting abomination," and urged lawmakers to kill it. Trump responded during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz by saying he was disappointed with Musk. Trump blamed Musk's criticism on the legislation aiming to end incentives for electric vehicles, which Musk's company Tesla manufactures, and "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I helped Elon a lot," Trump said. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump added later. "I don't know if we will anymore." Musk endorses third impeachment of Trump When someone else suggested on social media that Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance, Musk replied, "Yes." The House impeached Trump during his first term. Once was for his urging Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate his Democratic rival, Joe Biden. The second time was for inciting the riot Jan. 6, 2021, at the Capitol. The Senate acquitted Trump both times after failing to get a two-thirds majority for conviction. Musk predicts recession from Trump tariffs Musk upped the ante by predicting Trump's tariffs - the centerpiece of his economic policy - would cause a recession. "The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year," Musk wrote on social media. Trump has argued the tariffs would bring the government billions in revenue and force manufacturers to bring jobs back to the U.S. He has also used tariffs as leverage to negotiate trade deals with other countries. Musk alleges Trump connection to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein was a financier charged federally with sex trafficking. He died by suicide in a New York jail cell in August 2019. Conspiracy theorists have speculated that powerful people silenced Epstein rather than have their secrets exposed. Trump and Epstein were filmed and photographed together at parties. In 2002 Trump praised the wealthy businessman as a "terrific guy" but he has since distanced himself from him. Attorney General Pam Bondi said she would declassify the government's files on Epstein but about 200 pages released Feb. 27 implicated no one else. "Time to drop the really big bomb," Musk said in a June 5 post on X. "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" The White House responded that Musk was unhappy with Trump's legislative package. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." Trump threatens to cancel Musk's government contracts and subsidies Trump later threatened on social media to cancel Musk's government contracts and subsidies. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump said. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" Tesla's shares dropped 14%, losing about $150 billion in market share, on June 5. Trump's legislative package seeks to end government subsidies for electric vehicles. Musk's SpaceX also relies on billions in contracts to transport people and supplies to the International Space Station. The government must rely on private rockets or the rockets of other countries for such trips after retiring the space shuttle program. "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately," Musk wrote. Trump adviser Steve Bannon urges deportation of Musk One of Trump's informal advisers, Steve Bannon, told the New York Times he was urging the president to launch several investigations into Musk, including whether he should be deported. Musk came to the U.S. on a student visa and has since become a naturalized citizen, but critics have raised questions about whether Musk overstayed the terms of his original visa. "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately," Bannon said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store