logo
Lawmakers weigh proposal to let certain people out of prison early

Lawmakers weigh proposal to let certain people out of prison early

Yahoo31-01-2025

The Brief
Washington lawmakers are considering legislation to let certain inmates in prison apply for resentencing, prompting debate about rehabilitation and accountability.
House Bill 1125 would allow inmates who meet certain conditions to apply for a review of their sentence.
Proponents say the process best recognizes people's rehabilitation, while opponents believe it could cause more harm.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - State lawmakers are considering legislation to let certain inmates in prison apply for resentencing, prompting debate about rehabilitation and accountability.
House Bill 1125, also called the "Judicial Discretion Act," would establish a process to allow inmates to petition a court to change their sentence. The process is already available to prosecutors.
With the exception for those sentenced as "persistent offenders" or convicted of first-degree aggravated murder, any inmate could apply for a hearing after serving a minimum amount of time or having a certain medical condition.
The petitioner would need to show they've made changes in their behavior and have a low risk of reoffending. Ultimately, it would be up to a judge whether that inmate could get out sooner than sentenced.
What they're saying
"This population who does get out has a less than 1% recidivism rate," said prime sponsor State Representative Tarra Simmons (D-Bremerton) at the bill's first hearing on January 23.
Simmons pointed to her own experience of being incarcerated in trying to make changes to the criminal justice system. She highlighted provisions that would keep crime victims involved in the modification process, like notices about petitions and hearings, and provide them with advocacy services like financial assistance.
"Every 12 years we shave off a sentence, we're saving a million dollars," Simmons said. "But right now we underfund victim services. And all the money that we're gonna save from this, I want to put it into victim services."
One man who received a resentencing initiated by a prosecutor told the House Community Safety Committee on Thursday there are plenty of people behind bars who should receive careful consideration to be released.
"We're not asking them to let everybody out," said Jacob Schmitt. "We're asking to have the opportunity to have a professional judge to review the totality of things. To include who the person is today and the things that they have done to demonstrate extraordinary rehabilitation so they might be returned to the community."
But not everyone agrees.
The other side
One woman whose brother was murdered told the committee the bill prioritizes the rights of violent individuals over those who were affected by their violence.
"By allowing offenders who have already demonstrated a willingness to assault and kill to petition for resentencing–this legislation, it jeopardizes public safety and retraumatizes families like mine," Krista Stogner testified.
"I've heard the word 'retribution' used, and 'retribution' is the act of seeking revenge," said former victim's advocate Tiffany Attrill. "It is not 'retribution' for a victim's family to want the judicial system to uphold the commitment when a sentence is imposed."
Other opponents say clemency and pardons should be used to release those who have reformed. They also raised concerns about court caseloads increasing with the resentencing requests.
State Representative Lauren Davis (D-Shoreline) said she is struggling with how to vote on or amend the bill because of instances where judges release people who go on to commit other crimes.
"How can I have confidence in granting more discretion to judicial officers when I have some concerns about the ability of some judges to assess dangerousness and prioritize public safety," she said at the bill's first hearing.
The bill is currently slated for a committee vote on February 6.
The Source
Information in this story is from Albert James, a television reporter covering state government as part of the Murrow News Fellowship program – a collaborative effort between news outlets statewide and Washington State University.
LIVE DC plane crash updates: Midair collision leaves no survivors
President Trump's response to the plane crash in Washington, DC
FULL VIDEO: Trump questions role of helicopter pilot, air traffic control; faults Biden after deadly DC crash
Seattle weather: Snow possible in areas this weekend
Another movie theater in Seattle is closing after 10 years
Two earthquakes, 4.2 and 3.0, strike off WA coast
Renton police, families slam King Co. judge for release of 2 violent suspects
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily Fox Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas House newcomers champion causes close to home
Texas House newcomers champion causes close to home

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Texas House newcomers champion causes close to home

AUSTIN (KXAN)–The 89th Texas Legislative Session concluded with 31 new state representatives completing their first 140 days in office, representing more than 20% of the House chamber. Among these freshman lawmakers were Republican Don McLaughlin of District 80 in south Texas and Democrat Lauren Ashley Simmons of District 146 in the Houston area. Each brought distinct backgrounds and legislative priorities to Austin. The freshman class emerged from elections that shifted the House composition to 88 Republicans and 62 Democrats, with Republicans gaining two additional seats. McLaughlin, who previously served as mayor of Uvalde during the tragic 2022 school shooting that killed 19 children and two teachers, focused his legislative efforts on improving law enforcement response protocols. His signature legislation, the Uvalde Strong Act, passed both chambers and awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature. 'What I see in this bill, more than anything, is if an agency shows up, all these agencies have been training together, supposed to be meeting together now, so if the first agency on the scene does nothing, the second agency immediately knows what to do, then we won't have that chaos and that indecision that we saw that day at Uvalde,' McLaughlin said in an interview with KXAN's Will DuPree shortly after the session ended. The legislation would mandate annual training exercises between school districts and law enforcement agencies, require crisis response policies and establish reporting requirements for active shooter incidents. McLaughlin acknowledged the painful necessity behind his legislation. 'It's very meaningful. I'm ecstatic over but same token, I'm sad that we had to pass a law like this,' he said. On the Democratic side, Simmons was recognized by her colleagues as Freshman of the Year within the House Democratic Caucus. Despite serving in the minority party, she successfully advanced multiple pieces of legislation, with at least 11 bills bearing her name awaiting the governor's signature and five additional measures she co-authored or co-sponsored set to become law. Her most personal legislative achievement was House Bill 107, which would establish a Sickle Cell Disease Registry in Texas. The measure represents a personal fight for the Houston Democrat. 'My daughter has sickle cell disease. That was a bill I watched very closely. I was in tears when it did not become law, but I just couldn't. I had no idea that I would be in the legislature, and I would be that person that was able to bring that bill back,' Simmons said in an interview with KXAN's Will Dupree. The legislation represents a second attempt after a similar measure was vetoed by Abbott in 2023. Simmons worked to address the governor's previous concerns while maintaining the bill's core purpose. 'We made sure that we address the concerns that came from the governor's office, and so we are very confident with those you know, updates to that bill,' she said. Both lawmakers expressed exhaustion but satisfaction with their first legislative experience. McLaughlin highlighted additional accomplishments including judicial pay raises, bail reform measures and infrastructure improvements for economically distressed border communities in his district. 'You know, I think it was good. I think we had a really good session. You know, did we please everybody? Probably not, but I think we got a lot of good things done for the state of Texas in this session,' McLaughlin said. Simmons emphasized the magnitude of conducting state business for Texas, the nation's second-largest state by both population and economy, within the constraints of a biennial 140-day session. 'Being able to see how much work we're able to do, all the things that we're able to do for not just our individual districts that we represent, but for the millions of people in this state. It's such an honor. It's a heavy task. It's a heavy lift,' she said. The freshman class faced the challenge of learning legislative procedures while advancing their policy priorities. Simmons noted the complexity of the process, saying she 'gained a lot of respect for the process when you see just how many ways a bill can die.' As the session concluded, both representatives expressed commitment to continued advocacy for their constituents. McLaughlin indicated he would closely monitor the governor's action on the Uvalde Strong Act, while Simmons vowed to maintain her opposition to the state takeover of Houston Independent School District, which was extended through 2027. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Warner Bros Discovery Hits Back At Russell Simmons' 'Unfounded Allegations' In Ex-Mogul's $20M Suit Over 2020 Sexual Assault Documentary
Warner Bros Discovery Hits Back At Russell Simmons' 'Unfounded Allegations' In Ex-Mogul's $20M Suit Over 2020 Sexual Assault Documentary

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Warner Bros Discovery Hits Back At Russell Simmons' 'Unfounded Allegations' In Ex-Mogul's $20M Suit Over 2020 Sexual Assault Documentary

UPDATE: A lot of time has passed since Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering's documentary expose of Russell Simmons and allegations of sexual assault by the famed music executive aired on HBO Max, over five years. Today, with court filings certain to follow, it didn't take Warner Bros Discovery that long at all to respond to Simmons' $20 million defamation suit against On the Record – and give no quarter. More from Deadline Channel 4 Says It Doesn't Use NDAs, But Documents Reveal Company Is Curbing Free Speech Of Aggrieved Ex-Employees Sean "Diddy" Combs' Faces New Accuser "Jane" Wednesday; Trial Dominated Today By $100K Payment For "Only Copy" Of 2016 L.A. Hotel Footage Of Cassie Ventura Beating Jury In Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Set To Start Deliberations Wednesday - Update 'We dispute Mr. Simmons' allegations, stand by the filmmakers and their process, and will vigorously defend ourselves against these unfounded allegations, a WBD spokesperson told Deadline this morning, as a new round of layoffs hit the company's cable TV units. Maybe the Bali-residing Simmons will even show up in court to press his own case vigorously against that vigorous defense. PREVIOUSLY, 10:59 AM: With Oprah Winfrey very publicly exiting as a producer, Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering's documentary On the Record, about the women who accused hip hop impresario Russell Simmons of rape and more, was controversial even before its debut at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival. Now, years later, Simmons is claiming again he had proof the allegations cited in OTR were false or at least questionable in their truth. Living in Bali of late, the much-accused Def Jam co-founder is going after HBO, parent company Warner Bros Discovery and the filmmakers for $20 million in a defamation action filed today in NYC – and he's naming names, past and present. 'The Defendants willfully, intentionally, negligently, and/or recklessly, disregarded and/or suppressed evidence and information, including interviews, and over twenty witnesses, that were supportive and favorable to Plaintiff, and/or refuted and rebutted the accusations falsely made against Plaintiff in the film,' exclaims the complaint placed in the Supreme Court of the state of New York docket late Tuesday by attorneys Imran Ansari and Carla DiMare. The duo not only want a hunk of cash for their much-accused client, but they also want the Drew Dixon (a former Def Jam exec), Sheri Sher, Sil Lai Abrams, Jenny Lumet, and Kelly Cutrone featuring On the Record, which HBO Max picked up in February 2020, essentially scrubbed from 'all platforms, networks and media outlets in the Defendants' control' so to never be seen again. Naming those names, Simmons' complaint adds: 'The evidence and information were made available to Defendants, including then CEO of WarnerMedia John Stankey, Chairman and CEO of HBO and Max Content, Casey Bloys, and the company's board members, by the Plaintiff, and/or others on his behalf, however, the Defendants disregarded and/or suppressed said materials.' 'Defendants further disregarded nine consecutive credible and favorable CIA-grade polygraph results, and/or information favorable to Plaintiff that was provided to them or would have been discovered with due diligence, and adherence to accepted journalistic standards, and that Defendants willfully, and/or recklessly, disregarded and suppressed said information and evidence, and published, and continue to republish defamatory content,' it goes on to state. HBO and WBD's scarce communications boss (and ex-Obama press secretary) Robert Gibbs had no response when reached out to by Deadline over Simmons' new swipe at the docu. While repetitive of what was in their actual filing, the same cannot be said of Simmons lawyers. 'Despite voluminous support for Mr. Simmons in the form of credible information, persuasive evidence, witness statements, and calls for further investigation by notable members of the media, politics, and the civil rights movement, the defendants simply disregarded it, and released, and continue to re-release globally, a film that tremendously disparaged and damaged Mr. Simmons with salacious and defamatory accusations that he vehemently denies,' Ansari and DiMare told Deadline this AM of the Oscar-nominated and Emmy-winning Dick and Ziering. In the overlapping nature of #MeToo lawsuits, it is worth noting that Ansari is a partner and chief of the civil litigation practice of Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins – a firm founded by longtime Harvey Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala, who literally is in court for his ex-producer client's NYC rape retrial as it goes to the jury today. That trial is taking place not far from where Sean 'Diddy' Combs, a clear protégé of Simmons on may levels, is on trial in federal court on charges of sex-trafficking and more. Corporately, On the Record was supposed to screen on AppleTV+ under the streamer's deal with Winfrey, but when the talk show queen pulled out of the film over concerns about 'some inconsistencies in the stories,' that avenue became a dead-end. After a strong reception at the Robert Redford founded Sundance, just as Covid-19 was hitting the world, the film was bought by HBO and aired on what was then called HBO Max on May 27, 2020. While Simmons has denied the allegations against him from a variety of women, it seems he has not been so prompt to pay up sums he agreed to. A trio of women who reached settlements with Simmons said in filings earlier this year that he still owes them around $8 million. To be specific, after reaching deals in 2023 and paying up initially, Simmons still owes Alexia Jones $190,000 with 20% annual interest, journalist Toni Sallie $2,940,000 with 20% annual interest, and $4,950,000 to singer Tina Klein-Baker. Living in Bali, Indonesia since 2018, around the time the allegations against him began to peak, and having founded an upmarket retreat. Simmons is out of the reach of U.S. justice. There is no extradition treaty between the world's fourth most populous nation and America. Best of Deadline 'Nine Perfect Strangers' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More

EXCLUSIVE: Richard Simmons' Longtime Home Is Put on the Market for $7 Million—1 Year After He Died Inside Historic Property
EXCLUSIVE: Richard Simmons' Longtime Home Is Put on the Market for $7 Million—1 Year After He Died Inside Historic Property

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

EXCLUSIVE: Richard Simmons' Longtime Home Is Put on the Market for $7 Million—1 Year After He Died Inside Historic Property

Late fitness guru Richard Simmons' longtime Los Angeles home has been put on the market for $7 million—one year after the reclusive Hollywood figure passed away inside the historic dwelling. Simmons, who shot to fame in the 1970s after launching a career as a fitness expert and weight loss guru, passed away at the age of 76 in July 2024, days after he celebrated his birthday. At the time, the Los Angeles Police Department confirmed that they had responded to a 911 call made by Simmons' housekeeper from his Hollywood Hills home, where they arrived to find the fitness guru had passed away. He was later determined to have died from natural causes. One month after his death, the family issued a statement, revealing that the L.A. Coroner's office revealed that Simmons had died from 'complications from recent falls,' adding that 'heart disease was a contributing factor.' 'The toxicology report was negative other than medication Richard had been prescribed,' the statement continued. 'The Family wishes to thank everyone for their outpouring of love and support during this time of great loss.' Simmons' death quickly became the source of fervent speculation online—much of which pointed to the fact that the fitness expert had become increasingly reclusive in the 10 years leading up to his passing. Despite his once-prominent Hollywood profile, from 2014, Simmons was seen outside of his home on just a handful of occasions, although he maintained a close connection with his fans via regular Facebook updates in which he would offer glimpses into his life—while also sharing inspirational messages with his followers. The reason behind his disappearance became the source of intense media scrutiny, with a TMZ documentary entitled 'What Really Happened to Richard Simmons' claiming that his decision to step away from public life was the result of a longtime ailment that he had suffered with since birth. 'Something that happened to him at birth is directly connected to his disappearance — a birth defect that significantly affected one of his legs,' TMZ editor Fabian Garcia claimed in the documentary, according to the New York Post. 'He was born without a full set of bones in his foot and it causes physical and emotional problems.' In 2024, before his death, Simmons addressed the speculation about his disappearance in a social media post, urging his fans to pay no attention to the rumors. 'Don't believe everything you read. I no longer have a manager, and I no longer have a publicist. I just try to live a quiet life and be peaceful,' he wrote. Still, Simmons' family faced continued scrutiny in the wake of his death, particularly after it was revealed that they had become embroiled in a bitter legal battle with the fitness guru's longtime housekeeper, Teresa Reveles. Two months after her boss's death, Reveles filed a petition with a Los Angeles court in which she claimed that she had been pressured into giving up her role as a co-trustee of his estate, accusing Simmons' brother, Lenny, and his wife, Cathy, of carrying out a 'nefarious scheme' to remove her from all future decisions about his finances. Lenny and his family quickly hit back at the claims, insisting that their only desire was 'protecting and maintaining' Simmons' legacy—while accusing Reveles of 'greed.' '[Richard] would be heartbroken to learn of Teresa's greed and insulted that she would diminish their three decades of supposed friendship in such a public way,' family spokesperson Tom Estey told People in a statement. 'Her actions threaten to harm Richard's incredible legacy, which we are working hard to preserve.' Lenny added in his own statement: 'First, I am solely interested in protecting and maintaining my brother's legacy. It was never my intention to play this out in public, but due to circumstances beyond my control, I have been forced to do so. 'Second, we have filed papers with the court that address and refute what Teresa has claimed. They also provide a brief summary of the reasons I declined Teresa's request to serve as co-trustee and my concerns about why she is proceeding with this litigation.' Lenny also accused Reveles of 'refusing to vacate' his brother's home—stating in court papers that she remained in the dwelling for 76 after his death and alleging that, when she did finally leave the property, she took $1 million worth of jewelry and 'other valuable pieces of fine art' with her. 'Although Teresa has her own home, she had a room in Richard's house that she refused to vacate after his death. When she finally did leave, 76 days later, she took almost $1 million of Richard's jewelry and other valuable pieces of fine art, which she has refused to return,' the court papers read, according to NewsNation. 'And, as discussed below, she participated in the effort to misappropriate the Trust's intellectual property. 'Teresa's counsel has not informed the Trustee whether Teresa intends to keep this property or return it. If she decides to try to keep it, the Trustee will have no choice but to file a petition to recover it, which is a clear reason she should not be Co-Trustee. 'The Trustee and his counsel need to appraise any property to be sold and may need to sell it to pay the taxes. Teresa should not be permitted to interfere with this process absent serious, legitimate concerns about the administration of the estate that do not exist here.' Now, Simmons' family appears ready to move on from the legal drama that ensued after his death—and are parting ways with the expansive dwelling, which he called home for several decades. According to property records, Simmons purchased the home in the 1980s and it is understood to have served as his main residence up until the time of his death. However, the dwelling, which was built in 1937, was transferred to a trust of which Lenny is the trustee, after the exercise guru's passed away The online listing calls attention to the property's illustrious history, describing it as the 'Richard Simmons Estate,' however the images reveal that almost every trace of its former owner has been cleared out—with just a few unique murals left in memory of its famous prior resident. Despite its impressive heritage, the listing also concedes that the property may well be viewed by prospective buyers as a tear down, stating that it presents 'a one-of-a-kind opportunity to own a landmark home or construct a new masterpiece.' New York City Luxury Market Booms With the Most Signings in a Single Week Since 2021 This City Struck Gold—by Paying Workers To Move There How To Add $15,000 Value to Your Home—by Spending Only $1,500

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store