No EU toast raised with single malta: CJEU verdict spells end for 'Golden Passport' scheme
Freedom to do so must be exercised in compliance with EU laws.
The scheme led to 'commercialisation of the grant of nationality of a member state and, by extension, of [EU] citizenship', which breaches EU rules relating to citizenship and the principle of sincere cooperation.
Every person holding the nationality of a member state shall be an EU citizen and enjoy the rights, and be subject to the duties, provided for in the treaty.
These rights shall be exercised under conditions and limits defined by the treaties and by measures adopted under them.
Assist each other in carrying out tasks flowing from the treaties.
Take appropriate measures to ensure fulfilment of obligations arising from the treaties or resulting from acts of EU institutions.
Refrain from any measure that would jeopardise attainment of EU objectives.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
In April, Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held Malta's investor-citizenship scheme (ICS) - 'golden passports' - to be a contravention of EU laws. This was the only remaining EU member state that still operated a golden passport programme.ICS was adopted under Article 10(9) of the Maltese Citizenship Act, and the Granting of Citizenship for Exceptional Services Regulations 2020, which allowed foreign investors to be naturalised as citizens of Malta upon fulfilment of certain conditions, principally of a financial nature. Such schemes are called ' citizenship by investment ' (CBI). CJEU's impugned order comes days after the EC initiated legal proceedings against Malta after revelations that Maltese passports had allegedly been sold to Russians, who were later sanctioned due to the Russia-Ukraine war.Malta defended its competence in regulating citizenship matters. While the court recognised this, it also held that:According to Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU):Article 9 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) similarly states that every citizen of a member state shall be an EU citizen. Also, Article 4(3) of TEU puts forth the principle of sincere cooperation, under which the EU and member states shall:Notably, CJEU's order contradicts advocate general Anthony Collins' opinion from 2024, in which he remarked that 'holding the scheme to be illegitimate would upset the carefully crafted balance between national and EU citizenship, leading to a wholly unlawful erosion of member states' competence'.CBI was launched after Malta's integration into the EU and its adoption of the euro, which exposed Malta's economy to the 2008 financial crisis and the euro crisis of 2009. After this, Malta first came up with the idea of CBI in the form of the Individual Investor Programme (IIP) in 2013. Under it, an investor (citizenship buyer) was required to make a non-refundable contribution to Malta's National Development and Social Fund.A minimum non-refundable donation of ₹6 lakh was required for a 36-mth naturalisation period, while ₹7.5 lakh could fast-track naturalisation to only a year. IIP was open for applications until September 30, 2020, after which it was replaced by 2020 regulations and the Maltese Citizenship by Naturalisation for Exceptional Services by Direct Investment scheme.With its success, Malta has continued to promote the scheme. Valletta has now become home to many licensed agencies and legitimate brokers that peddle citizenship of their country (and, by extension, that of the EU). Its concurrent rise in notoriety stems from the fact that by selling its citizenship, Malta is transacting EU citizenship - opening the proverbial door to non-EU nationals to enter the union's political bloc and economic markets.CBI's implications have been deep, perverse and expansive. Countries such as Malta are arguably transacting more than just an entitlement or a bundle of rights, leading to unexpected triggers and worries. The issues around national sovereignty, market access, free trade, visa-free travel and global security are just the tip of the iceberg.Whether it's the issue of absconsion, tax avoidance, shifting wealth or even waging wars, one can witness a systematic and institutional decoupling of the state from its citizenry. This is a proven nightmare for polity and governance.The writer is a Delhi-based lawyer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Indian export businesses are using AI to stay ahead on global tax rules
Indian organizations have long embraced Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning technologies in various aspects to achieve their business goals. Now, they are actively exploring ways to implement these advancements responsibly and profitably. This goal closely aligns with the Digital India initiative, launched in 2015 to build a next-generation empowered economy. By many measures, the country is steadily progressing toward this vision, with its digital economy projected to contribute nearly one-fifth of the nation's GDP by 2030. This shift holds significant potential for businesses operating domestically, as well as for those planning to expand into global markets.. However, they must address regulatory compliance, cross-border taxation, and evolving trade policies to navigate international trade efficiently. Recognizing these concerns, many organizations are turning to technology-driven tax solutions. A recent survey stated that 92% of companies have adopted or planned to implement digital tax platforms within the next five years. Moreover, over half are actively integrating AI-driven technologies to streamline tax functions, paving the way for a smarter, more automated compliance space. Why the growing interest in AI? The constant stress of creating a tax-transparent and globally connected trade environment has driven Indian exporters to seek the best-in-class solutions. This stress arises from the multilayered regulations they need to tackle from the outset. In the US, for instance, tax compliance becomes challenging due to the multijurisdictional nature of sales tax. Each state imposes their own rates and economic nexus laws requiring businesses to collect and remit sales tax once they exceed certain revenue thresholds, even if the company has no physical presence there. Moreover, there are over 13,000 sales and use tax jurisdictions in the US with their policies and deadlines. Similarly, the VAT system in the European Union (EU) has its own set of requirements. An Indian exporter selling across member states may need to charge different VAT rates based on the product type and the buyer's location, leading to a convoluted network of compliance responsibilities. This can be overwhelming, especially as compliance errors can lead to penalties and disruptions in trade. To overcome this, AI-powered tax systems offer an integrated solution that consolidates tax laws from multiple jurisdictions, automating calculations, filings, and regulatory updates. By reducing manual efforts and decreasing the risk of errors, AI helps exporters redirect their focus from regulatory burdens to strategic expansion. Additionally, AI-enabled platforms can help track real-time transactions, proactively flagging potential issues before filing returns. For example, if an Indian exporter selling apparel online approaches California's economic nexus threshold of $500,000 in sales , AI systems can alert the business to register for sales tax in that state. By utilizing ML algorithms, AI can also predict future tax liabilities based on historical data and projections, helping businesses avoid unforeseen tax burdens. Simultaneously, AI and ML make accessing and interpreting vast amounts of tax data stored in the cloud easier. AI-driven platforms can source and structure this data, helping businesses understand what has changed, track new tax rates, and automatically find the correct rates for each product and location. In line with this, companies are increasingly adopting advanced technologies, such as GenAI, blockchain, and data analytics, to revolutionize their tax functions. According to recent studies, 87% of tax and finance professionals believe GenAI will significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their operations. GenAI helps businesses automate complex tax-related processes, such as generating accurate tax reports, predicting potential liabilities, and identifying discrepancies across jurisdictions. This allows organizations to swiftly adapt to regulatory shifts, ensuring greater compliance and reducing the risk of costly mistakes in cross-border transactions. Beyond the basics The push for Digital India is propelling significant progress in various sectors, focusing on leveraging technology to streamline operations and compliance. A recent example of this impel is the launch of Bharat Trade Net (BTN), a unified digital platform designed to simplify cross-border trade. BTN focuses on enhancing logistics, customs clearance, and trade documentation processes, which are often burdensome for exporters. Moreover, it significantly improves transparency and provides easier access to financing, making it simpler for Indian businesses to expand. Given this, as AI drives tax compliance and automation, it has the potential to enhance the capabilities of platforms like BTN, ensuring that Indian businesses remain innovative and efficient globally. Notably, the collaboration between the government and businesses will be crucial in shaping a future-ready tax ecosystem. With this, the increasing adoption of third-party, automated tax solution providers signals towards more secure, scalable, and cost-efficient solutions for managing tax compliance. Looking ahead, all these advancements will smoothen the tax processes and empower businesses to respond faster to regulatory changes, ensuring greater accuracy and transparency. As the industry evolves, Indian exporters need to be better equipped to meet the obstacles of a rapidly changing tax world, enabling sustainable growth and unfolding new opportunities for businesses and the economy alike.
Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi court acquits former coal secy HC Gupta, 2 senior officials over Jharkhand block allocation ‘scam'
A Delhi court Friday acquitted former coal ministry officials H C Gupta (secretary), K S Kropha (joint secretary) and K C Samaria (coal allocation director) in a case linked to alleged irregularities in the allocation of the Mahuagarhi coal block in Jharkhand to the company M/s Jas Infrastructure Capital Pvt Ltd (JICPL). While the three men – represented by advocates Rahul Tyagi and Mathew M Phillip – were acquitted, Special Judge Sanjay Bansal of Rouse Avenue Court convicted the firm JICPL and its director Manoj Kumar Jayaswal. Arguments on their sentence will be heard on July 8. The allegations in the case were that JICPL had misrepresented various facts in its application and had fraudulently obtained the allocation of the coal block. Allegations against the public servants were that they had acted in a manner which was 'detrimental' to public interest and that they had allowed JICPL to 'misappropriate' nationalised natural resources. In December 2016, a trial court in Delhi had framed charges in this case for alleged offences under sections 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery for the purpose of cheating), 120 B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under relevant provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Initially, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had filed a closure report in this case in April 2014, stating that no case was made out against the accused. A detailed closure report was filed on October 14, 2014. The court had on November 20 that year disagreed with the CBI's conclusion and held that a case was made out for taking cognisance of the alleged offences against the accused. A Delhi court had in 2018 sentenced Gupta, Kropha and Samaria to three years' imprisonment in a case pertaining to alleged irregularities in the allocation of Moira and Madhujore (North and South) coal blocks in West Bengal to Vikash Metal and Powers Ltd. In 2017, the three were convicted in a case related to irregularities in the allocation of Thesgora-B Rudrapuri coal block in Madhya Pradesh to Kamal Sponge Steel and Power Ltd (KSSPL). Towards the end of its tenure, the UPA 2 government started being perceived as corrupt due to allegations connected with the 'coal scam'. A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report had at the time pegged the loss to the exchequer at Rs 1.8 lakh crore. While 27 of the 54 cases being investigated by the CBI have been disposed of, the other half are still pending a decade later. With this case, the CBI has achieved 19 convictions. Three of its cases have ended in acquittals and two in discharge. In the aftermath of the alleged coal scam, on August 25, 2014, the Supreme Court cancelled the allocation of 204 coal blocks, deeming them illegal and arbitrary. Additionally, it also levied a penalty of Rs 295 per tonne of coal that had already been mined over the years. In his book titled Supreme Court and the Indian Economy, Pradeep S Mehta states that the apex court's decision increased the current account deficit by US$ 700 million due to additional coal imports. 'Around Rs 4.4 lakh crore was the estimated loss in royalty, cess, direct and indirect taxes, etc,' wrote Mehta, citing an SBI research report. Former Solicitor General of India Harish Salve had stated that the decision cost the economy 1 per cent of the GDP.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
HC adjourns bail pleas in TTD ghee case to June 17
VIJAYAWADA: The High Court adjourned to June 17 the hearing on bail pleas filed in connection with the supply of adulterated ghee to Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) case. Several accused, including directors of Bhole Baba Dairy, Vaishnavi Dairy, and the managing director of AR Dairy, have sought bail, with the CBI-led SIT having filed a chargesheet. Advocates CV Mohan Reddy and S Sriram, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the accused have been in judicial custody for four months, and with all evidence collected, there is no risk of tampering. Bhole Baba and Vaishnavi Dairies had no direct role in the dairy supply agreement, they said. However, the CBI counsel contended that Bhole Baba Dairy was central to the scam, and claimed accused intimidated a key witness, accountant Ashish Rohilla, who was allegedly coerced at Tirupati airport and sent back to Delhi.
