Trade deal brings some cheer to Surat's gems and jewellery sector; many plan on exploring opportunities in the UK
Though the scale of export to the UK in the sector is not as high as it is in the case of the United States, industry stakeholders in Surat said the FTA has brought some cheer to those involved in gems and jewellery trade in the city. Some industry leaders said the FTA has prompted them to explore trade options with the UK.
Last year, gems and jewellery worth 9,236.46 million US Dollars were exported to the US – the highest among other countries. The exports to the UK stood at 941 million USD.
'Now with the duty concessions, this figure is poised to surge to USD 2.5 billion in the next three years, elevating overall bilateral trade in the gems and jewellery sector to an estimated USD 7 billion,' according to a statement from Kirit Bhansali, Chairman of Gems & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC).
Following the conflict with Ukraine, sanctions were imposed on Alrosa, the Russia-based diamond mining giant, which directly impacted livelihoods in Surat – a major centre for polishing diamonds in the world.
Talking to The Indian Express from the UK, Bhansali said, 'Three years ago, India did an FTA with the UAE, and we have seen immense growth in the business between both countries with an annual growth rate of 12% to 14%. In the last three years, the total growth rate has been around 30%. Similarly, we are hoping that FTA with the UK will also boost the gems and jewellery sector in the coming years.'
Sources said that in terms of exports from India to the UK, the highest value is of studded gold jewellery, closely followed by polished natural diamonds, and then lab grown diamond (LGDs). The UK ranks fifth in the value of exports in this sector while the US brings in the maximum business.
Vallabhbhai Lakhani of Kiran Gems, a natural diamonds manufacturer and promoter, said, 'India's gems and jewellery business with the UK is not huge so the scale of impact of the FTA is difficult to guess. But something is better than nothing. The US is a major consumer of gems and jewellery. As of now, we have no presence in the UK but will explore an opportunity in the coming days.'
Nagjibhai Sakariya, promoter of HVK diamonds, too, said the company is hoping to explore business opportunities in the UK following the FTA. 'We are doing business of diamond-studded jewellery worldwide, but due to lower demand from the UK, we haven't touched that market so far,' he said. 'A major consumer is the US market, and we have come to know that India and the US will be coming up with a trade agreement next month. A decision on such an agreement will impact the gems and jewellery industry,' he added.
According to figures from GJEPC , the gross exports of gems and jewellery stood at USD 28.67 billion in the financial year 2024-2025. This marks an 11.2% decline from USD 32.29 billion recorded in 2023 -2024.
Industry players blamed this dip in exports to the introduction of a 26% tariff on India under the US Fair and Reciprocal Tariff Plan. The other reasons that they cited were weak global demand and uncertainty in major markets, particularly the US, China and Europe. Many suppliers also held excess inventory from previous quarters due to slower offtakes, which limited the placement of new orders. The retailers worldwide adopted a wait-and-watch approach due to price volatility and geopolitical uncertainty, they said.
Talking to The Indian Express, Vipul Shah, Managing Director of Asian Star Company, a natural diamonds dealer, said, 'The FTA between India and the UK will be a win-win situation for both countries. We began doing business with the Middle East three years ago, following the establishment of the FTA. We have received a good response, as we have gained new customers and our business has prospered. Now with FTA with the UK, we are also planning to move into the UK market and look for business opportunities. We will send a team to the UK next week to seek new customers.'
Smit Patel, director of Green Lab Diamonds, which makes lab-grown diamonds, said, 'We have been doing business of loose lab-grown diamonds with the UK for the last few years. Now that the FTA has come into existence, we will also expand into the jewellery business, which we are currently operating with the Middle East, the US, Hong Kong, and other countries. Earlier, due to the impact of import duty in the UK, we would send fewer quantities of diamonds. Now, we will take full advantage of the zero duty and reach out to customers in the UK.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
UK firms can offer telecom, construction services in India without local office under CETA
New Delhi: Companies from the UK will be able to offer services in sectors such as telecom, and construction in India without setting up a local presence, under the free trade agreement signed between the two countries. The British firms will be treated on par with Indian firms. The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) was signed on July 24 in London. It may take about a year for items implementation as the free trade pact needs approval from the British Parliament. "UK companies can now provide telecom, construction, and related services in India without establishing a local presence, enjoying full national treatment, meaning they will be treated on par with Indian firms," the commerce ministry said. Services is a key chapter in the agreement as both countries are strong in different kinds of services. India enjoys a trade surplus of around USD 6.6 billion with the UK. The country's services exports stood at USD 19.8 billion and imports at USD 13.2 billion. In the agreement, the UK has provided a comprehensive and deep market access in 137 sub-sectors to Indian firms. On the Indian side, commitments have been extended in 108 sub-sectors, granting UK firms access to domains like accounting, auditing, financial services (with FDI capped at 74%), telecom (100% FDI allowed), environmental services, and auxiliary air transport services, it said.>
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US-EU trade deal: Winners, losers, and what's missing? Who benefits and what new deal mean?
US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have unveiled a broad trade agreement that sets 15% tariffs on most European imports. This averts Trump's earlier warning of a 30% rate if a deal isn't struck by 1 August. These tariffs, import taxes applied to European goods bought by Americans, could raise prices for US consumers and reduce profits for European businesses and their US partners. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on 'the vast majority' of European goods brought into the US, including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. it's lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods-Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was USD 750 billion worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional USD 600 billion in the US. Trump said the 50% US tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas, that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. Where the USD 600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. The 15% rate removes Trump's threat of a 30% tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office, of around 1%, and higher than Trump's minimum 10% baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers, risking loss of market share or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the US market and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations" and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.' The Federation of German Industries was blunter. "Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry," said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, "the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet," said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy," Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' When asked whether European carmakers could still compete under the new 15% tariff, von der Leyen noted that the rate is significantly lower than the previous 27.5% which included Trump's 25% tariff on foreign cars, along with the existing 2.5% U.S. car import duty. The effect on some companies is expected to be considerable. Automaker Volkswagen, for instance, reported a $1.5 billion loss in profit during the first half of the year due to the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the US have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in the coming years. Before Trump returned to office, the US and the EU maintained relatively low tariff rates within the world's largest bilateral trading relationship, totalling around $2 trillion annually. Combined, the U.S. and EU account for 44% of the global economy. According to the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, the average U.S. tariff on European goods was 1.47%, while the EU's average tariff on American products stood at 1.35%. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for US-made cars. Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the US market. Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
US-EU trade deal wards off escalation, to raise costs for firms, consumers
President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15 per cent tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30 per cent rate if no deal had been reached by August 1. The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for US consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country. Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union: What's in the agreement? Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15 per cent tariff rate on the vast majority of European goods brought into the US, including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20 per cent Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50 per cent and then 30 per cent. Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of strategic goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said the two sides would keep working to add more products to the list. Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was USD 750 billion worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional USD 600 billion in the US. What's not in the deal? Trump said the 50 per cent US tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was on a separate sheet of paper from Sunday's deal. Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that there were tariffs that could not be lowered, without specifying which products. What's the impact? The 15 per cent rate removes Trump's threat of a 30 per cent tariff. It's still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1 per cent, and higher than Trump's minimum 10 per cent baseline tariff. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the US would have to either increase prices for consumers risking loss of market share or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. The 10 per cent baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union's executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3 per cent to 0.9 per cent. Von der Leyen said the 15 per cent rate was the best we could do and credited the deal with maintaining access to the US market and providing stability and predictability for companies on both sides. What is some of the reaction to the deal? German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations" and said that we were able to preserve our core interests, while adding that I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade. The Federation of German Industries was blunter. "Even a 15 per cent tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry," said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation's leadership. While the rate is lower than threatened, "the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet," said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today's agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy," Brzeski said. This risk seems to have been avoided. What about car companies? Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15 per cent, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5 per cent. That has been the rate under Trump's 25 per cent tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting US car tariff of 2.5 per cent. The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a $1.5 billion hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the US have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices until further notice. The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35 per cent of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the US in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo significant increases in coming years. What were the issues dividing the two sides? Before Trump returned to office, the US and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some USD 2 trillion in annual trade. Together the US and the EU have 44 per cent of the global economy. The US rate averaged 1.47 per cent for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35 per cent for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for US-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30 per cent of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
