GE2025: Government did not weaken after losing GRCs, says PSP's Leong Mun Wai
"Would a weak government be able to pass through or bulldoze the GST in 2022?' He asked, referring to the increase in the Goods and Services Tax from 7 to 9 per cent announced during Budget 2022.
Mr Leong was speaking during a walkabout at Boon Lay Place Market with the PSP team contesting West Coast-Jurong West GRC on the final day of campaigning before Polling Day.
His comments were in response to Health Minister Ong Ye Kung, who said at a rally on Wednesday that a further GRC loss for the People's Action Party (PAP) could destabilise Singapore and risk the country "crashing".
Calling Mr Ong's remarks "out of this world", Mr Leong said: "PAP has lost ministers and GRCs before. Has that weakened the government in the past few years or past 10 years?
"A strong government with all the power to amend the Constitution – only such a government can bulldoze the GST through the parliament," he added.
"So, the argument that the minister had about losing some ministers of GRCs to weaken the government is not quite accurate."
PAP BROUGHT ONG YE KUNG BACK
Fellow PSP candidate and former Non-Constituency MP Hazel Poa also responded to Mr Ong's remarks, pointing out that he lost the 2011 election at Aljunied GRC as part of a PAP team led by then Foreign Minister George Yeo.
'But what happened after that? He was brought back in the next election, at another GRC,' she said.
Mr Ong was fielded in Sembawang GRC in 2015, where he was elected and later appointed Health Minister.
The PSP team for West Coast-Jurong West GRC is led by party founder Tan Cheng Bock, and includes Mr Leong, Ms Poa and new candidates Sumarleki Amjah and Sani Ismail.
They are contesting against a PAP team led by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, alongside incumbent MPs Shawn Huang and Ang Wei Neng, and new candidates Cassandra Lee and Hamid Razak.
When asked why Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong have focused more on rebutting the Workers' Party (WP) rather than addressing PSP directly, Dr Tan said it showed the party's credibility.
'I think they find that the ground we have built for the party is strong enough,' he said. 'You take us, we can reply – our rebuttals are there … they realise that our party is a party that has got a lot of meat, it's got a lot of substance.'
Dr Tan added that the limited direct confrontation with top PAP leaders was a 'testimony to the fact that we want to have a fair fight'.
He said the PSP does not have to resort to shouting to get its points across, though he acknowledged 'a little bit' of over-enthusiasm after a boisterous chanting match broke out between PSP and PAP supporters at a Jurong West coffee shop on Wednesday.
The party, he said, has proven itself to be a 'very responsible' opposition in parliament, and Mr Leong and Ms Poa have shown that in their NCMP roles over the last five years.
WARM RECEPTION AT TAMAN JURONG
After their stop at Boon Lay Place Market, the PSP team visited Taman Jurong Market and Food Centre, where the reception from the crowd was noticeably warmer.
The market is located in Taman Jurong – previously the ward of former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam before he resigned to run for the presidency.
The PSP team could hardly finish their coffee as residents approached them for chats and photos. Several residents greeted Dr Tan, 85, while others shook hands and took selfies with Mr Leong and Ms Poa.
In the 2020 General Election, PSP ran in West Coast GRC and narrowly lost with 48.31 per cent of the vote, earning two NCMP seats as the best-performing losing team.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Japan mulls over exporting used destroyers to S-E Asia allies
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Japan's Takanami-class destroyer JS Sazanami sail on an anti-piracy mission off the coast of Somalia. TOKYO – Japan is considering the export of used Maritime Self-Defence Force destroyers to South-east Asia, government sources said on Aug 13, in an effort to strengthen security ties with countries in the region where key sea lanes are located. Japan has been studying the export of Abukuma-class ships to the Philippines following a June meeting in Singapore where the countries' defence ministers discussed the matter. Tokyo is also looking at Indonesia and Vietnam as possible export destinations, according to the sources. Japan's principles on the overseas transfer of defence equipment and technology restrict the export of lethal weapons under its war-renouncing Constitution. But Japan eased its strict rules on the overseas transfer of defence equipment in 2024 to allow exports of lethal arms only if they are jointly developed or produced with other nations, with an eye on future sales of a next-generation fighter jet being developed with Britain and Italy. If the ship exports proceed, the Japanese government plans to classify the destroyers as 'jointly developed' products by making specification changes, the sources said, a move that could spark controversy. According to the Defence Ministry, six Abukuma-class destroyers were commissioned between 1989 and 1993, and all are set to be retired and replaced by new types operable by smaller crews, as the Self-Defence Forces have been struggling with a chronic personnel shortage. In its Defence Buildup Programme drawn up in 2022, the government said it will 'decommission vessels that have been in service for a considerable amount of years and have limitations in expandability' at an 'early date', and consider their transfer to 'like-minded countries'. Japan agreed with Indonesia at their defence ministers' talks in January to establish a working-level consultation body on maritime security to strengthen cooperation, while also promoting defence exchanges with Vietnam, including the provision of used Japanese material transport vehicles. Japan and the Philippines, both US allies in Asia, have been deepening security cooperation, sharing concerns over China's assertive maritime posture in the East and South China seas. KYODO NEWS
Asia News Network
10 hours ago
- Asia News Network
Another amendment?: Dawn
August 13, 2025 ISLAMABAD – THE dust from the 26th Amendment has yet to settle, but talk of a 27th one is already in the air. Given the acrimony that surrounded the last attempt to tinker with the Constitution, one wonders if it will be any different this time. Much has changed since the last amendment was forced through the legislature. The last time the Constitution was being amended, the government did not have the votes to get its bill passed. Lawmakers had to be roped in from the opposition benches to cobble together a two-thirds majority. Some came willingly, after cutting deals. Others had no choice. It did not matter. It was clear from the beginning that the law had to be passed. Even allied lawmakers did not have full knowledge of what they were voting for, and the law minister is said to have simply been handed a draft with clear instructions. To be clear, there is nothing concrete that is known about the '27th Amendment'. For now, it seems merely to be a topic of discussion within the PML-N and its coterie of legal advisers. No proposal has been shared with the party's allies, nor is there a draft that may be debated. Still, it has remained a topic of discussion ever since the government inherited a two-thirds majority courtesy of the Constitutional Bench that the 26th Amendment had helped set up. The two-thirds majority might be the main reason why the government does not seem too fussed. This time, there will not be a need to abduct, bribe or coerce opposition lawmakers. Nor will any party not already allied to the regime be able to blackmail its way into receiving concessions, or to force the government to rethink its agenda. Indeed, the amendment will be seen through without any hiccups even if the regime were to decide that it must be passed tomorrow. It is said that the government may be seeking more 'fixes' for the judiciary. The 26th Amendment apparently did not fix it enough. But it would be deeply unfortunate if the amendment being debated is also focused heavily on a narrow agenda. Pakistan faces several deep-rooted issues that require urgent legislative intervention. These include matters like the possibility of a new province in south Punjab; the need to revisit the role and authority of caretaker governments; addressing the inability of the ECP in fulfilling its intended purpose; and the management of the growing burden of the NFC award, among many others. If the government decides to take all stakeholders on board, especially the opposition, the new amendment could become an opportunity to build bridges where the 26th sowed divisions. Now virtually unchallengeable, the regime would benefit by showing some grace. With power comes responsibility, and it must start to demonstrate some.
Straits Times
19 hours ago
- Straits Times
Explainer: Can Trump take control of Washington to fight the city's crime?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Trump has in recent months directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to put Washington under full federal control to reduce crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling. While Trump does have some authority over the capital city's police force and National Guard soldiers, a full federal takeover would likely be blocked in court. Here is why. What does the constitution say about control of Washington? The US Constitution, ratified in 1787, provides for the creation of a federal capital district to serve as the permanent seat of the government. The Constitution makes clear that Congress has complete legislative authority over the district. But Congress has historically delegated at least some of the day-to-day work of municipal government to other entities. How is the capital governed? A federal law passed by Congress in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, allows city residents to elect a mayor and council, who have some autonomy to pass their own laws. Congress still has budgetary oversight over Washington, however, and can overturn local legislation. Congress did that most recently in 2023, voting to overturn changes to Washington's laws that lowered penalties for some crimes. Who controls the city's law enforcement? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Ms Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). But the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for federal purposes during emergencies if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Asia South Korea's former first lady arrested after court issues warrant, Yonhap reports Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation Singapore MyRepublic customers air concerns over broadband speed after sale to StarHub Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Mr Trump invoked this part of the Home Rule Act on Aug 11, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city that necessitates federal management of the police department. Ms Bowser has pushed back on Mr Trump's claims of unchecked violence, saying the city is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, spiked in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities, according to city police data. However, that dropped 35 per cent in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26 per cent in the first seven months of 2025. Mr Trump also has broad control over the DC National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. The US President said on Aug 11 that he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. So can Trump 'federalise' Washington? It is highly unlikely. To exert full federal control of Washington, Mr Trump would need Congress to repeal the Home Rule Act. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the US Senate, where Mr Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for Washington and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse the US President's vision. But there are ways Mr Trump can exert more influence over the district without fully taking it over. He has in recent months directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. He has broad authority to reallocate FBI personnel, and in recent months, FBI agents around the country have been given temporary assignments to help with immigration enforcement. Mr Trump also signed an executive order in March to make Washington "safe and beautiful", establishing a task force to increase police presence in public areas, maximise immigration enforcement, and expedite concealed carry licences. Can Trump evict Washington's homeless population? Mr Trump has said homeless people must move out of Washington , without offering specifics of a plan to accomplish this. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," the US President said on Truth Social. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, like President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, legal experts said. REUTERS
