WHO pushes countries to raise prices on sugary drinks, alcohol and tobacco by 50%
The United Nations health agency said the move would help cut consumption of the products, which contribute to diseases like diabetes and some cancers, as well as raising money at a time when development aid is shrinking and public debt rising.
"Health taxes are one of the most efficient tools we have," said Jeremy Farrar, WHO assistant-director general of health promotion and disease prevention and control. "It's time to act."
The WHO launched the push, which it called "3 by 35" at the UN Finance for Development conference in Seville.
WHO said that its tax initiative could raise $1 trillion by 2035 based on evidence from health taxes in countries such as Colombia and South Africa.
The WHO has backed tobacco taxes and price rises for decades, and has called for taxes on alcohol and sugary drinks in recent years, but this is the first time it has suggested a target price rise for all three products.
WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the conference that the taxes could help governments "adjust to the new reality" and bolster their own health systems with the money raised.
Many low and middle-income countries are coping with cuts to aid spending led by the United States, which is not attending the Seville conference. The U.S. is also in the process of withdrawing from the WHO.
FROM $4 to $10
As an example, the initiative would mean a government in a middle-income country raising taxes on the product to push the price up from $4 today to $10 by 2035, taking into account inflation, said WHO health economist Guillermo Sandoval.
Nearly 140 countries had already raised tobacco taxes and therefore prices by over 50% on average between 2012 and 2022, the WHO added.
Sandoval said the WHO was also considering broader taxation recommendations, including on ultra-processed food, after the agency finalises its definition of that type of food in the coming months. But he added that the agency expected pushback from the industries involved.
'It's deeply concerning that the World Health Organization (WHO) continues to disregard over a decade of clear evidence showing that taxing sugar-sweetened beverages has never improved health outcomes or reduced obesity in any country,' said Kate Loatman, executive director of the International Council of Beverages Associations, adding that the industry was working on options to support health.
'The World Health Organization's suggestion that raising taxes will prevent alcohol-related harm is misguided,'said Amanda Berger, senior vice president of science and research at the Distilled Spirits Council, adding that it would not prevent alcohol abuse.
The tax initiative is backed by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and involves support for countries who want to take action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
31 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Warning for parents about colors your children should NEVER wear at the beach – certain swimsuits make them ‘invisible'
An organization is sharing a petition to ban these three popular colors SAFETY FIRST Warning for parents about colors your children should NEVER wear at the beach – certain swimsuits make them 'invisible' EXPERTS are warning parents to think twice before buying their child's bathing suits, as certain colors are more dangerous than others. Research found that parents are unknowingly putting their children in danger by buying colors that may be invisible underwater. 2 Parents are being warned not to dress their children in certain colors (stock photo) Credit: Getty 2 Parents should avoid blue, gray and white colors Credit: On the Beach Parents should avoid dressing their children in blue, white, or gray swimsuits, according to On the Beach. Those three colors were found to be nearly invisible underwater, even if you're child is just a few feet below the surface. If the child were to be in any sort of danger, it may be harder for a lifeguard to spot them. 'I've swam my entire life and I've only recently become aware that there are certain colours that can't be seen underwater,' Olympic gold medalist Rebecca Adlington told On the Beach. 'As a parent, I should have been aware of this sooner.' On the Beach is launching a petition to ban clothing companies from producing children's swimwear in those colors. 'Alongside On the Beach, I'm urging the government to review the legislation around selling blue, white and grey swimwear to children,' Adlington said. 'They must make sure retailers are being safe and looking after our children by not selling unseeable swimwear that could put them in danger.' According to the organization, about 66% of children still wear plain blue, white or grey swim apparel. The UK-based Royal Life Saving Society found that there was an 85% increase in the number of child drownings in England between 2019 and 2022. Parents warned 3 common summer foods are dangerous to toddlers - and eating a specific fruit can cause nasty sunburn "It is essential that water safety education and experience for children should be taken forward regionally and nationally,' the RLSS director, Lee Heard, said in the report. "There is a requirement to nationally revise and reform the current approach to swimming and water safety education.' Colors such as pink, yellow, red, black, purple, and green are all safe to wear while underwater. 'It is vital that the Government takes action now so that children can be seen at all times in the water,' On the Beach's petition reads. Colors to wear and avoid ❌ Blue ❌ White ❌ Grey ✅Pink ✅Yellow ✅Red ✅Black ✅Purple ✅Green ✅Fluorescent colours [Source: On the Beach] 'Lives are at stake. 'Please help us end putting children's lives in unnecessary danger and sign this petition for change.' Supporters of the petition backed the organization's mission, mentioning their own anecdotes. 'As a lifeguard myself, when families come swimming in these particular colours, it becomes a lot harder to make sure all children are safe,' one supporter named Megan wrote. 'It's a small request to ask retailers not to sell swimwear to boys and girls in those particular colors if it's going to save children's lives,' another commenter wrote. The petition has 3,903 verified signatures so far.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Hospital missed chances to stop boy's sepsis death
A hospital missed opportunities to treat a three-year-old boy who later died from sepsis, an inquest jury found. Theo Tuikubulau had been gradually getting sicker with a high temperature, flu-like symptoms and breathing difficulties, and was reluctant to eat or drink. The jury returned a narrative conclusion and highlighted three 'missed opportunities' when his mother had called the 72-hour open access line, the differences in 111 and 999 categorisations, and the allocation of ambulances following the emergency call as being contributory factors. 'From this, Theo died from an invasive Group Strep A infection contributed by missed opportunities to render earlier care and treatment,' they said. The four-day hearing heard Theo was first admitted to Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, on the afternoon of July 6 2022 with a suspected upper respiratory infection, but discharged a few hours later. Kayleigh Kenneford, his mother, explained that her son's condition had not been improving as she looked after him at home. 'I remembered that the doctor had said that Theo might get worse before he got better, so I was thinking that it was his body fighting the infection,' she told the inquest. 'I was watching my son deteriorate and just thinking that this was how things were supposed to happen, that he would get worse before he got better, but really, he was dying.' Ms Kenneford called the 72-hour, open access line listed in a discharge letter, but said she felt 'fobbed off' by a nurse. An hour later, at 11pm, she called 111 and after a further three calls, an ambulance arrived at their home near Plymouth shortly before 12.30am. Theo reached the hospital just after 1am, some 90 minutes after Ms Kenneford first called 111. He received emergency treatment but suffered cardiac arrest at 1.35am and died a short time later. The cause of death was from sepsis, caused by an 'invasive' Strep A infection. Before Theo's first admission, call handlers from the South West Ambulance Service Trust had graded his case as category one, meaning it was life-threatening. When Ms Kenneford called 111, her son's case was rated at category two by service operator Herts Urgent Care, which led to the ambulance taking longer to respond. Jon Knight, head of emergency operations at the South West Ambulance Service Trust, said that had the call been answered by his team it would have been graded as a category one. Asked about a likely response time, he replied: 'It certainly would have been quicker than 90 minutes, would be my belief.' The inquest heard that, had the ambulance reached Theo within the national target, he could have been in hospital by midnight. Prof Damian Roland, a paediatric consultant in emergency medicine, said he could say when the sepsis had developed but once an 'inflammatory cascade' begins it 'can be difficult, sometimes impossible to stop'. 'I am very clear about the fact that the night before (July 6), we were not in a cascade situation,' he said. The inquest heard it was difficult to know what the outcome would have been if Theo had been readmitted to the hospital after his mother spoke with the nurse on the phone or following the 111 call. 'I can't say on the balance of probability that intervention by 11pm would have made a critical difference,' he said. Assistant coroner Louise Wiltshire asked: 'Is it likely on balance of probabilities that Theo would have died when he did if appropriate care and treatment was administered at 11pm?' Prof Roland replied: 'I think had he arrived earlier, I think it is possible that he would not have suffered the cardiac arrest at that point.' He was asked about what could have happened had Theo arrived at the hospital by midnight if the 111 call had been graded as a category one emergency. 'I think some earlier treatment would have especially delayed the collapse,' Prof Roland said. At the end of the inquest, Ms Wiltshire said she had concerns about the 111 and 999 systems for grading calls which 'appear to create a two-tier system particularly if both are used in the same geographical area'.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Over three-quarters of Brits cut back on boozing with one in three pub trips being alcohol-free
WE have become a nation of sensible drinkers — with more than three-quarters cutting back on the amount of boozing we do. Some 76 per cent of over 18s, the equivalent of nearly 40million adults, admitted they were careful about how much alcohol they knocked back, a survey found. 2 And more than a third (34 per cent) alternate between low and no-alcohol drinks and alcoholic tipples when they go out, a trend known as zebra striping. That was up from 28 per cent a year ago. And 36 per cent said they thought it was less acceptable for their pals to get drunk on a night out. One in three pub visits are now totally booze-free, with a quarter of those surveyed choosing to finish off the night with a soft drink. The trend is a far cry from the traditional image of beer-swilling booze hounds sinking as many pints as possible before last orders. More than eight in ten (82 per cent) cited their health as the main reason for being more responsible around alcohol — rising to 90 per cent among under 35s. Four in ten drinks consumed on a night out are now low or no-alcohol, with zero or reduced booze beer the second most popular choice — up from seventh place last year. Almost two in five, some 37 per cent, admitted they went home early in a huff over the lack of low-alcohol options down the pub. More than three in ten (35 per cent) expect pubs to offer alcohol-free beer on draught. And three in five people (59 per cent) said there was less stigma attached to choosing alcohol-free beverages than there used to be. The survey was carried out by hospitality industry researchers at KAM and zero beer brand Lucky Saint. Dua Lipa 'splits the G' in popular Dublin pub Pub trade newspaper the Morning Advertiser, which published the findings, said: 'More than three-quarters of UK adults are moderating their alcohol consumption, according to new research. 'One in three pub visits are alcohol-free and a quarter of adults choose to make their final drink an alcohol-free one in order to stay out longer.'
