
North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong brings a hunter's mindset to the governor's office
May 23—When it comes to hunting, North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong leaves no doubt about his passion for the pursuit.
"My wife would use the word 'addiction,' " Armstrong said. "And my favorite thing to hunt is ... 'What season is next?' "
A first-term governor who served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2019 until last year, Armstrong stopped by the Grand Forks Herald office Thursday, May 15. While the purpose of the visit
was to talk about the recently wrapped-up session of the Legislature,
the governor also discussed hunting, fishing and some of the challenges and opportunities the outdoors faces in North Dakota.
"I always say we're not the best at anything, but we're the best at everything," Armstrong said, referring to North Dakota's abundance of outdoors opportunities. "There's still not a lot of places that you can go shoot a limit of pheasant, grouse, partridge, mallards, geese, whitetail, mule deer — all of the above. You can do it 100 miles from the governor's residence."
One of the most publicized outdoors-related bills during the legislative session was SB 2137, which prohibits the Game and Fish Department from restricting the practice of baiting for big game hunting on private land in hunting units with confirmed cases of chronic wasting disease.
Game and Fish historically has banned baiting for deer on private land in hunting units within 25 miles of a confirmed positive CWD case. The highly contagious brain disease is fatal to deer, elk and moose, and minimizing the chances of bringing animals into close contact has been a standard practice wildlife managers use to mitigate the risk.
The "baiting bill," as it was commonly called,
passed the House by a 56-34 vote, and Armstrong signed it
Thursday, April 17. Baiting remains illegal for hunting on public land.
"I think one of the things North Dakota always has to be conscious of is we don't have a lot of public land," Armstrong said. "I always viewed (baiting) as a private property right."
Considering only about 9% of North Dakota land is public land, support from private landowners is crucial to the future of hunting and access in the state, he said.
That's why he signed the bill. All the "habitat in the world" doesn't mean much without access to private land, Armstrong said. The legislation sunsets in 2029.
"We don't have outdoor heritage if we don't have buy-in from landowners because we don't have a lot of federal land, we don't have a lot of state land," Armstrong said. "We'll monitor and watch it. If we start seeing a spike (in CWD), we'll have to sit down and look at it.
Game and Fish tested 1,456 animals for CWD
during the 2024 sampling season, and 17 tested positive — 15 taken by hunters and two "clinical deer" that were confirmed through diagnostic examination. That brings the total of positive cases to 122 since 2009, when CWD was first detected in North Dakota.
In December, the North Dakota Game and Fish Department hosted a Habitat and Hunting Access Summit in Bismarck. Armstrong, just days into his first term as governor, spoke at the summit.
Gone are the days when North Dakota had more than 3 million acres of land enrolled in the federal Conservation Reserve Program. As CRP contracts expire, wildlife habitat is less abundant, and wildlife populations — especially white-tailed deer — are struggling and less resilient to severe winters and diseases such as the EHD (epizootic hemorrhagic disease) outbreak that
decimated deer numbers in some areas in 2021.
North Dakota today has less than 1 million acres of land enrolled in CRP, and 85% of the acreage enrolled during the peak in 2007 could be gone by 2026 if contracts continue to expire at their current rate,
Game and Fish biologist Doug Leier reported this week
in his weekly "North Dakota Outdoors" column.
The summit was the first step in what promises to be a slow, challenging process to address access and the loss of habitat. Whatever direction any potential solutions ultimately take, farmers and ranchers must be on board, Armstrong says.
There are no easy answers.
"If you don't start with the ag groups and the actual farmers and ranchers about what works for them ... what works for sportsmen and what works for the guy making a living off that land every day of the week aren't always the same thing," Armstrong said. "I think the low-hanging fruit, me personally — youth deer, youth pheasant, youth duck — I think you have to be a pretty (difficult) guy to say no to a 14-year-old kid who wants to shoot his first whitetail doe or her first pheasant or first duck. I think there are opportunities to do this."
Game and Fish recently announced it will offer 42,300 licenses for this fall's deer gun season — a near 50-year low — down from more than 100,000 for several years during the peak of CRP.
In some ways, North Dakota is losing its "deer camp culture," Armstrong says. CWD and baiting isn't the issue, he says, it's EHD and two bad winters.
"We have way too many people chasing inches instead of chasing experience," he said, referring to the size of a buck's rack. "I can tell you, looking back on all of my favorite deer hunts, I don't care how big the deer was. I don't look back 20 years ago and have a more fond experience because it was a 156-inch deer vs. a 142-inch deer."
Trapshooting has become one of the fastest-growing high school sports in North Dakota and nationwide, but "less and less" of the kids shooting trap are actually hunting, Armstrong says, a trend that presents both a challenge and an opportunity.
"How we can figure out how to (get kids hunting) also happens to be a pretty good workforce recruitment and retention tool," Armstrong said. "If you're 17 years old and love to hunt and fish, the chances of you staying in North Dakota at 35 are higher than if you don't" hunt and fish.
While Armstrong says he's not an avid angler, the quality of fishing available in North Dakota is another piece of "low-hanging fruit," in terms of outdoors opportunities.
"For as much criticism as Game and Fish gets — and a lot of it isn't deserved — we spend a lot of time talking about Devils Lake, Sakakawea and the Missouri River, but there are tons of the little fisheries out there that are (anglers') secret spots," he said.
As for hunting, Armstrong says he looks forward to spending more time in the field as governor than he did as North Dakota's representative in Congress.
Regardless, he says, it won't be enough.
"No hunter on his deathbed ever said, 'Man, I really wish I would have hunted less,' " Armstrong said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon backs surprising tax change
Certain political truths have stood the test of time. Republicans' love for tax cuts has been one of those political truths. Modern Republican presidents are responsible for the most significant cuts in history. President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Economic Recovery Act of 1981, which lowered the highest individual tax rate from 70% to 50% and the lowest to 11% from 14%, along with the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which lowered the highest capital gains tax rate from 28% to 20%. Related: Jamie Dimon sends stark warning on the economy President George W. Bush enacted the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts that gave the top 1% of households an average tax cut of over $570,000 between 2004 and 2012, increasing their after-tax income by more than 5% each of those years. President Donald Trump continued that legacy wth the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered the top marginal tax rate from 39.6% to 37% and increased the standard deductions for single and married filers, among other changes. Those provisions are scheduled to expire in December, but the Republican-controlled Senate and House of Representatives are working on legislation making them permanent. JP Morgan (JPM) 's CEO has been smart enough to describe himself as politically agnostic, calling himself "barely a Democrat" and telling CNBC, "My heart is Democratic but my brain is kind of Republican." New comments from Dimon at the Reagan National Economic Forum make it seem that Dimon's brain is also moving over to the Democratic side. Image source:On Friday, Jamie Dimon told the mostly Republican crowd in Washington, D.C., that he supports taxing carried interest, the compensation paid to private investment fund managers. This compensation is taxed at a much lower rate than regular income, giving a significant tax benefit for the lucky few Americans who qualify. According to Reuters, Dimon said, "We absolutely should be taxing carried interest," echoing President Donald Trump's sentiment. Related: Elon Musk has surprising message on Big Beautiful Bill income tax cuts This change, which has received bipartisan support over the years but never came to pass, would severely hurt the bottom line for hedge funds, private equity firms, and similar financial institutions. Even in 2015, Trump said, "The hedge fund guys are getting away with murder," but nothing changed during his presidency. It's estimated that the government loses about $20 billion in annual tax revenue from the rule. Dimon and Trump's stance on this tax loophole may indicate that the country's finances are reaching their tipping point. Despite Moody's recent unprecedented credit downgrade, the White House's latest budget proposal is expected to explode the deficit. More economy American car company takes drastic action in response to tariffsTariff repeal couldn't come at a better time for US businesses Wall Street's TACO trade gains momentum and stock market rally The bill includes a slate of tax cuts, including increases to the Social Security income tax deduction and breaks for tips and overtime, as well as a revamped State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction. According to the Tax Foundation, the bill would increase the country's 10-year budget deficit by $2.6 trillion while reducing federal tax revenue by $4.1 trillion. In essence, it increases spending while taking in less income than the government already does. But the $20 billion from closing the tax loopholes is better than nothing. Related: DOGE cuts are already saving Elon Musk billions The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
To The Point: Highlights from the Mackinac Policy Conference
MACKINAC ISLAND, Mich. (WOOD) — The annual Detroit Regional Chamber's annual Mackinac Policy Conference drew decision-makers, business leaders and stakeholders to Mackinac Island. This year, there were two major themes. The first was trade and tariffs. Relations with Canada, a key trading partner of the nation and Michigan, have been strained recently. U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra told To The Point he believes that tension will ease. 'The mandate from the president is to deliver more prosperity to the American people. The mandate for Prime Minister (Mark) Carney is to do the same thing — deliver more prosperity to the Canadian people. And as they're both successful, again, imagine what will happen to North America. More prosperity for America. I think what's damaging us right now is the uncertainty. I mean, you got personal relationships across the border,' Hoekstra said. The other topic on everyone's minds at the conference was the federal spending bill dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The bill has made it through the U.S. House of Representatives and now goes to the U.S. Senate. Above on this episode of 'To The Point,' see comment on the bill from U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Zeeland, and U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Holly. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans in Congress pull out all the stops to protect Trump tariffs
Warning signs flashed this week that Donald Trump's tariffs were beginning to destabilize what had, at the start of his term, appeared to be a solid economy. But in Congress, Republican leaders pulled out all the stops to protect his signature trade policy. The threat appeared in the form of a Senate resolution sponsored by the Republican Rand Paul and Democrat Ron Wyden that targeted the levies and looked like it had a shot at passing a chamber in which the Republican majority had previously shown little inclination of resisting the president. But even before the first votes were cast, Trump and his allies moved to ensure it would go nowhere. First, the White House issued a veto threat against the resolution, which would have repealed the national emergency Trump declared earlier in the month to impose sweeping 10% tariffs on imports and, briefly, even higher levies on many trading partners. Then the GOP-controlled House of Representatives enacted a rule to prevent consideration of the Senate resolution until at least the end of September. When the resolution came up for a vote in the Senate on Wednesday, Paul, a libertarian-leaning conservative, described it as necessary to take back power Congress had ceded to the president, and pleaded with fellow Republicans to get onboard. 'The founders would not have expected the upper chamber, the Senate, to let the novel use of a statute traditionally used to sanction adversaries to become used for tariffs, to tax American people and to let it go unchallenged. This is not constitutionalism. This is cowardice,' the Kentucky lawmaker said. While all Democrats in attendance voted for the bill, only the moderate Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine heeded Paul's words, and the measure deadlocked, with 49 votes both in favor and against. Not long after, Vice-President JD Vance appeared in the Capitol to break the tie on a procedural motion that made certain the resolution was dead for good. Trump has moved to ensure that a similar fate will befall any other attempts percolating through the Senate to undermine his tariffs. He has threatened to veto both a bipartisan bill that would set a 60-day deadline for Congress to approve new tariffs, and a resolution to block his tariffs on Canada, which made it through the chamber but has been stopped in the House. This week's vote took place against the release of data showing the US economy shrank in the first three months of the year, its first contraction since 2022 and a consequence, economist say, of a rush of imports prompted by unease over the new president's trade policies. 'A major culprit is unquestionably Donald Trump and his senseless global tariffs,' Wyden said on the Senate floor. 'If this continues to be our tariff policy, every major economist and forecaster is unfortunately predicting recession, job losses and the misery that was all over our news feeds this morning.' The vote might have succeeded if the Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican Mitch McConnell, who has spoken out against tariffs, were present. But the Democratic minority leader, Chuck Schumer, told reporters on Thursday that the situation was a 'win-win either way' because it presented an opportunity to get Republicans on the record supporting the levies. 'We've already forced them to vote on tariffs a couple of times, and we may try to do that again in the future,' Schumer said, adding he expected the policy to come up as Republicans negotiate a forthcoming bill expected to approve Trump's tax and immigration policies while making cuts to social safety net programs. 'Republicans own it. They cared so much about tariffs, they had to bring JD Vance to come in and break the 50-49 tie, and they own it now … they're stuck.' Better economic news arrived on Friday, when government data showed employers hired more people than expected in April. Earlier in the week, Mike Johnson, the House speaker and ardent defender of Trump's agenda, had acknowledged a 'rocky start' to the tariff policy, but described them as a gamble that would pay off. 'Right now, even today, people are beginning to see the dust settle on that. They understand there's a master strategy behind this, and they're seeing the results,' Johnson said at a Tuesday press conference. 'We're going to have 100 countries – by some counts, it may be higher – renegotiate their trade policies with America, because of what President Trump did.' Asked why he deployed parliamentary tactics to prevent the consideration of the Senate's attempts to undo Trump's tariffs, Johnson replied: 'We're using the rules of the House to prevent political hijinks and political stunts. And that's what the Democrats have.'