
Bryan Kohberger defense ramps up legal maneuvers in bid to keep Idaho murders suspect off death row
As Bryan Kohberger's trial date approaches in the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, new evidence and legal positioning continues to emerge and evolve as the parties pick up the pace of court filings.
The defense is asking the court to limit the use of the word "murder" at trial, as well as ban terms like psychopath, sociopath and even references to "bushy eyebrows." They also don't want the judge to allow too many crime scene photos to be shown in front of the jury because the grisly imagery could be "inflammatory."
On the other hand, prosecutors have demanded the defense stop referring to the state's intent to seek the death penalty if there is a conviction as "an attempt to kill" the defendant.
In what could become one of the more consequential motions, Kohberger's defense asked the court to throw out the possibility of the death penalty on the grounds that prosecutors took too long handing over discovery disclosures.
The filings became public as part of a slew of documents unsealed by the Ada County judge now overseeing the case, who told both sides they will have to legally justify submitting filings under seal going forward.
Shanon Gray, the attorney for the family of victim Kaylee Goncalves, 21, said he could not share his views on the filings themselves due to a long-standing gag order on the case – but he blasted the lack of communication between authorities and his clients.
"The Latah County prosecutors' failure to notify the victims' families about the content of the motions that were being filed is unacceptable," he told Fox News Digital. "As we have previously stated… the communication from their office to the Goncalves family has been poor, to say the least."
Kohberger's attorney, Anne Taylor, has had several prior attempts to take the death penalty off the table rejected, but she noted that Lori Vallow, a convicted multi-murderer, successfully made a similar argument in her own Idaho case.
"This Court has commented in other proceedings related to Mr. Kohberger's trial setting and motions about discovery and expert opinions, that Lori Vallow's case is distinguishable because she had not waived her speedy trial rights," Taylor wrote. "However, in this case, it is the Court that is repeatedly telling all counsel and Mr. Kohberger that the trial date is set in stone and everyone must be ready to proceed by July 30, 2025."
Kohberger did waive his right to a speedy trial and has been held without bail since his arrest on Dec. 30, 2022. But Taylor claimed that it could take up to another three years to review and understand the digital evidence alone.
The trial is scheduled to begin in August.
"I think the motion to preclude the death penalty for discovery violations might have some legitimate teeth," said Edwina Elcox, a Boise-based defense attorney who used to represent Vallow. "I think Judge Hippler will hold them to the trial schedule unless it becomes virtually impossible to do so. If the defense motion is accurate, which I have no doubt it is, I do not think the Court will be sympathetic to the prosecution."
A New York City judge limited the use of the word "murder" in Daniel Penny's trial for the death of Jordan Neely last year. However, Penny wasn't charged with murder. He was accused of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide for the unintentional death of Neely – and later acquitted.
Kohberger is accused of four counts of first-degree murder. While the defense does not oppose using the word in charging documents or jury instructions, his lawyers asked the court to block the terms "murder," "murderer," "murdered," "murder weapon," and other variations when applied to Kohberger specifically.
"To label Mr. Kohberger as a 'murderer,' the alleged weapon consistent with an empty sheath as a 'murder weapon,' or to assert that any of the four decedents was 'murdered' by Mr. Kohberger denies his right to a fair trial and the right to be presumed innocent," Taylor argued in court filings unsealed this week.
Further, according to Taylor, using words like "psychopath" and "sociopath" to refer to the quadruple murder suspect amounts to "name calling" and would be "unfairly prejudicial."
"Murder is a legal term and the crime being charged, so there is no basis to exclude it," said Neama Rahmani, a Los Angeles-based trial attorney and former federal prosecutor who has been following the case. "Psychopath and sociopath are different and potentially inflammatory, so the judge may exclude those terms, at least during the guilt phase. 'Bushy eyebrows' was part of the roommate's description, so that should come in."
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
Taylor is also seeking to suppress at least some crime scene photos, police bodycam and images of the victims' autopsies.
Photos inside the house are expected to paint a gruesome scene due to the nature of the crime.
Goncalves, Madison Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20, had all been stabbed multiple times.
Goncalves' father, Steve Goncalves, previously told Fox News Digital after the attack that his daughter's wounds included "tears" and "big open gouges."
Latah County Coroner Cathy Mabbutt said it appeared that whoever attacked them used the same knife on each victim.
"It had to be a really big knife to inflict those injuries and kill four people," she said, before Kohberger had been identified as a suspect.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
Investigators discovered a Ka-Bar knife sheath under Mogen's body, which they allege had DNA on the snap that led them to Kohberger. While search warrant returns show police confiscated knives as part of the investigation, it's unclear whether any are believed to be the suspected murder weapon.
There are also hours of bodycam video from police who entered the home, as well as 3D models created by the FBI.
"Crime scene photos can and should come in to the extent that it's not overly cumulative," Rahmani said. "We're talking about a gruesome quadruple murder and it's key evidence in the case."
Repeatedly showing similar, grisly images could be unfairly prejudicial and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial, Taylor argued.
Latah County Judge John Judge, who was overseeing the case before he granted a change of venue, entered not guilty pleas on Kohberger's behalf at his arraignment in May 2023.
The suspect faces four counts of first-degree murder and a felony burglary charge and could face execution by firing squad if convicted.
The new judge, Steven Hippler in Ada County, has scheduled motion hearings in April.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Illegal immigrant convicted in 100 mph DUI crash that killed Washington state trooper
Jurors in Washington state delivered a guilty verdict against an illegal immigrant accused of killing a state trooper last year. Raul Benitez-Santana, 33, was found guilty of vehicular assault and vehicular homicide in connection with the death of Washington State Patrol Trooper Christopher Gadd. Advertisement Gadd, 27, was killed when his cruiser was hit by a speeding car in March 2024 at more than 100 mph. Benitez-Santana was under the influence at the time of the crash, and admitted to drinking and smoking marijuana before driving, Fox Seattle reported. He was swerving across the road before slamming into the rear end of Gadd's vehicle, which was parked on the shoulder. Gadd was watching for speeding and DUI drivers, when he was struck and killed in a three-vehicle crash on Interstate 5. Advertisement After his arrest, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a detainer request with Snohomish County Jail for Benitez-Santana, a Mexican citizen. 4 Raul Benitez-Santana was convicted for driving under the influence and going 100 mph before a crash that killed a Washington State Patrol trooper. Snohomish county Sheriff's office 4 Washington State Patrol Trooper Christopher Gadd was killed in the crash on March 2, 2024. Washington State Memorial Foundation He was first encountered by immigration agents on Oct. 28, 2013, at the South Correctional Entity in Burien, Washington, after being arrested for failing to appear in court for driving on a suspended license. Advertisement He was also sentenced to 90 days behind bars, with 87 of the days suspended, in May 2013, after being convicted of possessing less than 40 grams of marijuana. On Oct. 6, 2014, Santana was sentenced to 90 days behind bars for driving on a suspended license, and in May 2019, was arrested again for domestic violence assault. 4 Gadd was watching for speeding and DUI drivers, when he was struck and killed in a three-vehicle crash on Interstate 5. 4 Benitez-Santana appears in court after his arrested for the fatal crash. FOX 13 Advertisement Fox News Digital has reached out to ICE. Fox News Digital's Greg Wehner and Timothy H.J. Nerozzi contributed to this report.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Too scared to shop? Why retail is a prime target for criminals
Harrods, Co-op, Marks & Spencer (M&S) and now Adidas have all experienced damaging cyber attacks in recent weeks, which have sent shock waves through the retail industry. M&S alone has warned of a £300 million ($405 million) hit on profits. The attack, which began over the Easter weekend, also wiped more than £750 million ($1 billion) off its market capitalization. On 30th April, the Co-op also fell victim, reporting a few days later that hackers had accessed a 'significant' amount of customer data. Then on 2nd May, Harrods also experienced a cyber attack, although in this instance, they managed to prevent any malicious intrusion. 101 Co-op Group rank on the Fortune 500 Europe In the M&S incident, third-party service provider Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has reportedly launched an internal investigation to determine whether it was the gateway by which the hackers gained access. It all points to a vulnerability amongst retail businesses, despite the fact that the threat from cyber attacks has existed for many years. But why are retail businesses being targeted? 252 Marks & Spencer rank on the Fortune 500 Europe 'Retailers are prime targets for cybercriminals due to the vast amounts of personal, financial, and other sensitive data they manage. For malicious actors, access to this data is like gold dust: highly valuable and potentially extremely lucrative' Marc Rivero, Lead Security Researcher in the Global Research & Analysis Team at Kaspersky, told Fortune. On 27th May, Adidas became the latest victim of a cyber attack when it reported that, similar to M&S, hackers had accessed customer data through a third-party service provider. In the case of M&S, according to Vaibhav Chechani, a Mumbai-based analyst at brokerage Nirmal Bang, if the attack did originate from the Indian company, 'it will definitely impact their brand image'. TCS also works as a 'strategic partner' to Co-op. 'Retailers are prime targets for cybercriminals due to the vast amounts of personal, financial, and other sensitive data they manage…' Marc Rivero, Lead Security Researcher in the Global Research & Analysis Team, Kaspersky Rivero commented, 'As seen in the M&S attack, social engineering allows attackers to bypass sophisticated cybersecurity measures by exploiting human error. These 'human hacking' tactics manipulate users into clicking malicious links, disclosing sensitive information, or granting access to restricted systems'. 'Simply put, data opens doors. It enables fraud, fuels targeted phishing campaigns, and can even be leveraged to infiltrate other businesses within the supply chain. This makes retailers not just lucrative targets, but also strategically valuable within the broader digital ecosystem'. M&S CEO Stuart Machin confirmed this, blaming the attack on 'human error' rather than a weakness in its cybersecurity measures and added that, 'it is a moment in time, and we are now focused on recovery, with the aim of exiting this period a much stronger business. There is no change to our strategy and our longer-term plans to reshape M&S for growth, and if anything, the incident allows us to accelerate the pace of change as we draw a line and move on'. Despite this optimistic outlook, Retail Technology Magazine publisher and retail expert, Miya Knights, believes that other retailers could also be targeted, believing that those most vulnerable would be 'those that have a sizable business with large tier one scale turnover across many channels'. Speaking to Fortune, she added, 'Cybersecurity has been a basic requirement for as long as retailers have deployed IT and transacted online. But, just as e-commerce has become a major growth driver, safeguarding the digital systems they now rely on must become as core to their business as it is for financial services companies.' This should be the wake-up call that the retail industry needed in order to treat these threats in the same way as financial services institutions. Actions to combat the threat appear to be happening within the industry, with one prominent retail CTO saying that he is collaborating with several other retailers, including some direct competitors, to mitigate the risk of future cyber attacks. M&S CEO Stuart Machin [blamed] the attack on 'human error' rather than a weakness in its cybersecurity measures… According to Rivero, the retail sector is under mounting pressure from cyber groups persistently probing for vulnerabilities to access large volumes of data. He said that, 'Retailers must regularly reassess their cybersecurity strategies and continue to invest in robust defense mechanisms'. 'Retailers must adopt a multi-layered approach to cybersecurity, acknowledging that no single measure can provide complete protection. This approach should begin with staff education. Training employees to recognize phishing attempts and suspicious behavior is critical, with human error remaining one of the most common entry points for attackers', he continued. However, it's not all the responsibility of retailers, Rivero believes that to feel more secure, consumers should take a proactive approach to their digital safety. Regularly update passwords, enable multi-factor authentication where possible, remain cautious of suspicious messages or emails, and monitor financial activity closely, 'reporting any unusual behavior immediately', adding that, 'a cautious, informed approach remains the best line of defense'. His advice to retailers using third-party service providers: 'Adopt a proactive approach: regularly conducting thorough risk assessments of all vendors, enforcing strict access controls, and requiring regular security audits. Ongoing employee training is also essential – not just for non-IT staff, but also for IT teams, who are frequently targeted by social engineering tactics'. And as he puts it, 'In a landscape where cybercriminals exploit every weak link, resilience must extend beyond the organization itself to encompass the entire supply chain and all vendors'. This story was originally featured on


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
How China Silences Critics From Afar
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. United Kingdom-based human rights group Article 19 has released a report on the Chinese government's relentless campaigns to silence dissenting voices beyond China's borders. The report, based on existing research and on recent interviews with 29 members of diaspora communities, details "the myriad tactics and actors involved in China's ongoing transnational repression of protesters around the world." Why It Matters Hong Kongers, Tibetans and others who have fled China out of fear of political persecution have reported being targeted by a sophisticated network said to include Beijing's United Front Work Department, embassy personnel and online influencers. Outspoken opponents of China's human rights record, in particular, have been in the crosshairs, amid Chinese Communist Party (CCP) efforts to stamp out or delegitimize international protest movements, observers say. Newsweek reached out to the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., and the Federal Bureau of Investigation with emailed requests for comment. An attendee holds an electric candle on Liberty Square in Taipei, Taiwan, on June 4, 2025, during a vigil marking the 36th anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown in Beijing. An attendee holds an electric candle on Liberty Square in Taipei, Taiwan, on June 4, 2025, during a vigil marking the 36th anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown in Beijing. Annabelle Chih/Associated Press What To Know Transnational repression can take the form of digital threats, abduction, forced repatriation and even assassination Article 19 said in its report, released on June 4, the anniversary of China's bloody 1989 crackdown on protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. While such tactics are also employed by governments like Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, Beijing is "by far the most prolific perpetrator," the group said, citing Freedom House estimates that millions of Chinese nationals have been targeted in at least 36 countries. "From public acts of physical violence to online intimidation, the targeting of family members—especially against high-profile protest leaders—has a knock-on effect on human rights movements," the report said. In some cases, authorities have gone after the families of prominent dissidents deemed problematic. A recent example of this cited by rights groups centers on Anna Kwok, a U.S.-based activist wanted by the Hong Kong government. In late April, her father and brother were arrested on suspicion of violating the city's National Security Law—a sweeping measure imposed by Beijing following the 2019 pro-democracy protests. "The Chinese government has increased its appalling use of collective punishment against family members of peaceful activists from Hong Kong," Yalkun Uluyol, China researcher at Human Rights Watch, said in May. What People Are Saying Michael Caster, head of Article 19's Global China Programme, said in the press release for the report: "The CCP employs its tactics to intimidate people from participating in protests, weakening global support and solidarity for human rights in China and around the world. Transnational repression silences dissent and chills freedom of expression." Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in the U.S., told the Washington Post in April: "China firmly opposes the politicization, instrumentalization, or weaponization of human rights issues, as well as foreign interference under the pretext of human rights." Article 19's Recommendations With China expected to continue seeking to silence overseas dissidents, Article 19 urged governments to build up their response capacity for suspected cases of transnational repression and improve public awareness. The group also urged tech companies—some accused of complying with Chinese censorship demands—to be more transparent about these communications and to improve digital security and technical support for those targeted.