How 13 US presidents have managed the Iran relationship
Their history involves threats of regime change, proxy warfare, secret arms deals, underground intelligence sharing, and now direct military strikes.
Not to mention how the US played a role in building up Iran's military and nuclear program, which it's now been bombing.
And of course, you can't talk about the US and Iran relationship without discussing Israel.
"Iran, the US and Israel are caught in a seemingly perpetual, intense toxic relationship," says Benjamin MacQueen, associate professor of politics and international relations at Monash University.
For now, the missile strikes have stopped and a ceasefire between Iran and Israel is holding.
But Shahram Akbarzadeh, professor of Middle East and central Asian politics at Deakin University, says there's one crucial lesson we should take from the relationship between Iran and the last 13 US presidents.
"This is not going to be the end of the animosity between Iran and Israel and the United States," he says.
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961)
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and Dwight D. Eisenhower drive past cheering crowds in Tehran on their way to the shah's marble palace on December 14, 1959. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
This was the beginning of a long friendship between the US and the Shah of Iran, after the CIA helped with a coup.
What was going on?
As the UK was being pushed out of the Middle East, the US was trying to assert its power in the region to stop the spread of communism after World War II.
Power meant allies and oil.
The existing democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, got in the way of that. He wanted to nationalise the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, which we know today as BP.
Mohammad Mosaddegh addresses a crowd of demonstrators outside the Parliament Building, October 1951. ( )
Massive protests broke out in Iran as Mohammad Mosaddegh was overthrown in a coup in Tehran, August 1953. ( )
Under Eisenhower the CIA along with the UK helped plan a coup that would replace Mosaddegh with someone the US preferred.
It involved discrediting him and restoring power to Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi.
The US began supplying military aid to Iran as well as civilian nuclear technology as part of the Atoms for Peace program, a way of strengthening its alliance.
What's also worth knowing?
The coup ignited distrust of the US amongst the people of Iran.
The coup ignited distrust of the US amongst the people of Iran. Israel formed a state in 1948 and in these earlier stages, the US and Israel alliance was not as strong.
Israel formed a state in 1948 and in these earlier stages, the US and Israel alliance was not as strong. The shah did not officially recognise Israel but was one of the only leaders of a Muslim-majority country to accept its existence.
The shah did not officially recognise Israel but was one of the only leaders of a Muslim-majority country to accept its existence.
The first Arab-Israeli war also broke out in 1948. Palestinians know it as The Nakba, meaning "catastrophe" because of the large number of Palestinians that were displaced.
What our experts say
"Given the context of the Cold War the United States was more concerned with stopping communist and pro-Soviet forces than gaining a political foothold in Iran." — Shahram Akbarzadeh, professor of Middle East and central Asian politics at Deakin University
"Given the context of the Cold War the United States was more concerned with stopping communist and pro-Soviet forces than gaining a political foothold in Iran." — Shahram Akbarzadeh, professor of Middle East and central Asian politics at Deakin University "It was their absolute most important relationship. Big country, a lot of oil, strategic location, very compliant and was a kind of key part of the extension of the US's containment policy on the southern or south-western flank of the Soviet Union." — Benjamin MacQueen, associate professor of politics and international relations at Monash University
"It was their absolute most important relationship. Big country, a lot of oil, strategic location, very compliant and was a kind of key part of the extension of the US's containment policy on the southern or south-western flank of the Soviet Union." — Benjamin MacQueen, associate professor of politics and international relations at Monash University
"Ironically, this is when the United States started supporting Iran's ambition to be a nuclear power and even signed an agreement allowing the enrichment." — Mireille Rebeiz, chair of Middle East studies and associate professor at Dickinson College
John F. Kennedy (1961-1963)
John F. Kennedy meets with Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in the White House along with US secretary of defense Robert S. McNamara, 13 April, 1962. ( )
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (third from left) and his wife, Farah Pahlavi, are greeted by Jacqueline Kennedy and John F. Kennedy as they arrive at the White House for a dinner in their honour, 11 April, 1962. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Iran remained a strong ally under JFK.
What was happening?
As one of the main world players in oil production, Iran formed the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) along with Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
It aimed to give those countries more control over their oil resources and maximise profits as well as give stable supply and prices to foreign companies and countries. But the wealth didn't filter down to many of the Iranian people.
Kennedy began a military alliance with Israel but was an opponent of its nuclear program.
What our experts say
"Anti-American sentiment was on the rise [in Iran] because they saw the United States … supporting a corrupt government that did not fit their lifestyle. — Mireille Rebeiz
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)
Lyndon B. Johnson with Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, 5 June, 1964. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Iran was still a key ally, but the alliance between the US and Israel was also becoming a threat to that.
What was happening?
LBJ continued to lean into the relationship to maintain control in the Middle East and access to oil.
The administration continued selling military equipment to the shah.
What else is worth knowing?
Iran had a relatively close relationship with Israel. It was a key oil supplier to Israel and they shared intelligence around the time of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War.
Iran had a relatively close relationship with Israel. It was a key oil supplier to Israel and they shared intelligence around the time of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War.
However, Iran is believed to have put pressure on the US to back UN Resolution 242 which demanded Israel retreat from the occupied territories it gained in 1967, including the Gaza Strip.
What our experts say
"It kind of forced the US to pick … There was this kind of weird competition between Iran and Israel as to who would be the US's key ally. And Iran always kind of won that competition because it was just a bigger, stronger, wealthier country." — Benjamin MacQueen
Richard Nixon (1969-1974)
Richard Nixon with the shah of Iran at the White House, October 21, 1969. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Nixon is trying to keep two friends who have turned on each other.
What was happening?
Nixon visited Iran in 1972.
He was incredibly concerned about global instability and the economy, amidst a long and drawn-out war in Vietnam.
The following year another Arab-Israeli war — the Yom Kippur War — broke out when Egypt and Syria attacked Israel. Palestinians now living as refugees in other countries mobilised and started launching military strikes from Lebanon into Israel.
At this time, the Israel and US relationship grew tighter. But that came with consequences.
OPEC sanctioned the US and Israel with an oil embargo, causing an oil crisis.
Nixon and his national security adviser and secretary of state Henry Kissinger made a plan to strengthen Iran's military to keep its ally and protect oil supply.
It sold Iran $15 billion worth of state-of-the-art conventional weapons, including fighter jets.
Loading Instagram content
Other things worth knowing:
Nixon supported Iran's plans to build 23 nuclear reactors for domestic energy purposes
Nixon supported Iran's plans to build 23 nuclear reactors for domestic energy purposes
The Shah later hinted at wanting to build nuclear weapons
What our experts say:
"Iran participated in the oil embargo in 1973. The US response wasn't to go in and remove the shah. The US response was to go in and say, 'OK, can you not do that again? Also, here's some tanks'… Iran historically has been treated as an equal … a key global player." — Benjamin MacQueen
Gerald Ford (1974-1977)
Gerald R. Ford and Mohammad Reza Pahlavi inspect US troops during a welcoming ceremony for the shah on the South Lawn at the White House, May 15, 1975. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Things are tense, both amongst the leaders and the people in Iran.
What was happening?
The shah was no longer feeling like he was in an equal partnership with the US.
Major arms sales continued to Iran but there were failed negotiations around nuclear weapons.
On the ground in Iran, hatred of the shah and the US was escalating. Opposition voices were becoming more vocal.
Islamic scholar Ruhollah Khomeini, who had been exiled in France, started spreading the word of Islam on cassette tapes that were shared throughout Iran.
Gerald Ford and the shah of Iran look at charts from a military operation on May 15, 1975. ( )
What else is worth knowing?
US officials were becoming increasingly frustrated at the shah's role in keeping oil prices high as inflation back home drove America toward a recession.
US officials were becoming increasingly frustrated at the shah's role in keeping oil prices high as inflation back home drove America toward a recession.
The US secretly went behind the shah's back and colluded with Saudi Arabia to force down oil prices.
What our experts say
"The opposition to the shah is really coalescing, and the thing they're seeing is kind of an unquestioning US support for someone they see as a puppet and the dictator of the US." — Benjamin MacQueen
Jimmy Carter (1977-1981)
Jimmy Carter toasts Mohammad Reza Pahlavi during a New Year's Eve dinner at Niavaran Palace in Tehran on December 31, 1977. ( )
A banner denouncing Mohammad Reza Pahlavi is put up at the entrance of Tehran University in Tehran, Iran on January 13, 1979. ( )
An Iranian child holds a photo showing Ayatollah Khomeini in front of the entrance of the US embassy during the 1952 hostage crisis. ( )
Ayatollah Khomeini waves to a crowd of enthusiastic supporters on his return to Iran from exile in 1979. ( )
Blindfolded US hostages and their Iranian captors outside the US embassy in Tehran, Iran, 1979. ( )
Police stand guard at a demonstration during the Iran hostage crisis in Washington DC on November 9, 1979. ( )
Jimmy Carter at a press conference in 1980, announcing sanctions on Iran. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
There's a break-up. This is a turning point in the relationship and from here, there was no going back. Well, at least openly.
What was going on?
A revolution.
Anger was rising amongst the Iranian population around the regime, the hoarding of wealth, its increasing move away from its culture, and oppression.
In 1979, Khomeini overthrew the shah, becoming supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This was an end to the strong US-Iran alliance.
Ayatollah Khomeini called the US the "Great Satan", Israel the "Little Satan" and the Soviet Union the "Lesser Satan".
The new Iranian regime, now an enemy, is equipped with a nuclear program and a military supplied by the US.
What's also worth knowing?
In the months following the revolution, Iranian students stormed the US embassy. They took 52 Americans hostage and held them for 444 days.
In the months following the revolution, Iranian students stormed the US embassy. They took 52 Americans hostage and held them for 444 days. Carter's failure to secure the hostages' release was seen as the main reason he lost the next election.
Carter's failure to secure the hostages' release was seen as the main reason he lost the next election.
Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who had seized power in the 60s with the help of US intelligence, invaded Iran, kicking off the Iraq-Iran War.
What our experts say
"You can always spot a regime that's scared by how repressive it gets. And he was getting very repressive, those normal tools of control weren't working. And so it was deploying the secret service, you know, arbitrary arrests, torture, mass imprisonment." — Benjamin MacQueen
Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)
Ronald Reagan with senior staff in Oval Office on April 4, 1985. ( )
US hostages departing an aircraft on their return from Iran after being held for 444 days on January 20, 1981. ( )
The Iran-Contra affair made the front page of Time Magazine on November 17, 1986.
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Reagan and Khomeini started out as enemies but the threat of a bigger foe meant the US began dealing with Iran in secret.
What was going on?
It's the middle of the Cold War. After initially backing Iraq's invasion of Iran, Reagan administration officials began covertly selling weapons to Iran, as part of what will become known as the Iran-Contra deal.
They were worried about Iran reaching out to the Soviet Union for help to fight the war, and also used the deal to negotiate the release of US hostages.
The Iraq-Iran War ended after hundreds of thousands of people were killed on both sides.
The US Navy shot down an Iranian civilian plane heading from Tehran to Dubai, killing the 290 passengers and crew. The US claimed it had incorrectly identified it as a jet fighter. Reagan did not apologise but paid compensation to the families.
What's also worth knowing?
Here's where it gets really messy. It's impossible to understand what was happening with the US and Iran at this time without looking at what was happening more broadly in the region.
Tensions were building between the US, Israel and Iran.
Tensions were building between the US, Israel and Iran. Iran cemented its backing of the Palestinian fight against Israel.
Iran cemented its backing of the Palestinian fight against Israel. Israel, the US's closest ally in the region, invaded Lebanon.
Israel, the US's closest ally in the region, invaded Lebanon. Reagan at the time is believed to have offended Israel's president by telling him the bombing of West Beirut was creating a ''holocaust".
Reagan at the time is believed to have offended Israel's president by telling him the bombing of West Beirut was creating a ''holocaust". Inside Lebanon, Iran is backing Hezbollah, keeping in mind that Iran is receiving weapons from the US.
Inside Lebanon, Iran is backing Hezbollah, keeping in mind that Iran is receiving weapons from the US. Hezbollah bombed a US barracks in Lebanon. The US did not retaliate.
Hezbollah bombed a US barracks in Lebanon. The US did not retaliate. The US declares Iran a state sponsor of terrorism.
The US declares Iran a state sponsor of terrorism.
The scandal involving secret US arms deals with Iran made news.
What our experts say
"So on the one hand, publicly, the United States is saying Iran is the state of terror, the hostage situation, we cannot allow this. But in the background, the United States was actually continuing its support with weapons." — Mireille Rebeiz
"So on the one hand, publicly, the United States is saying Iran is the state of terror, the hostage situation, we cannot allow this. But in the background, the United States was actually continuing its support with weapons." — Mireille Rebeiz
"One thing that really impacted Iran at this time was the fact that its army was built by the US and now it was openly hostile to the US. It was fighting a war with an army that was carrying US-made stuff … There's open, visceral hostility between the new regime and the US. But Iran needs supplies. And the only supplies that are compatible with the stuff that it's already got is American … Reagan got away with it. No prosecution. Said he didn't know. Plausible deniability … It's utterly mad." — Benjamin MacQueen
George HW Bush (1989-1993)
George H W Bush answers a question during a news conference at the White House, October 25, 1991. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Hostilities did improve slightly.
What was happening?
The fall-out of the arms deal scandal spilled into George Bush Snr's presidency.
Iran had started to extend its influence regionally, and continued support for Hezbollah.
What our experts say:
"Iran had emerged from the war with Iraq devastated. And there wasn't a lot of appetite for ongoing open hostility to the US." — Benjamin MacQueen
Bill Clinton (1993-2001)
Bill Clinton with Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin (left) and Palestinian Liberation Organization chairman Yasser Arafat during the Oslo Accord discussions, September 13, 1993. Clinton was the closest of all US presidents to negotiate a deal between Israel and the Palestinians. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Things are frosty, but thawing out.
What was happening?
Clinton increased sanctions, stopping exports to Iran and banning US companies from trading with Iran, a "rogue nation".
There were failed attempts at starting official diplomatic relations again.
However, the US and Iran to a large degree quietly accepted that they needed each other. Later in Clinton's term, his administration would stop using the term ''rogue nations'' and instead used ''states of concern".
What else is worth knowing?
The US is trying to balance its support for Israel while engaging in dialogue with Iran.
The US is trying to balance its support for Israel while engaging in dialogue with Iran.
A younger generation of people in Iran are beginning to question the regime's policies around press freedom, interaction between genders and Islamic law, resulting in protests and a brutal crackdown on human rights.
What our experts say:
"The Iranian regime was signalling that, 'Yeah, I'd really like it if we were on less frosty terms with our old friend because it means a lot to us,' and the US was kind of signalling the same thing, you know, 'You mean a lot to us, we used to be best mates, it's never going to be the same, but it doesn't have to be this bad.'" — Benjamin MacQueen
George W Bush (2001-2009)
George W. Bush announces Operation Iraqi Freedom in nation address on March 19, 2003. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Things started out OK but became toxic after the "war on terror" era began.
What was happening?
Much like Donald Trump, George W. Bush initially vowed to focus on domestic policy instead of foreign entanglements.
Then the Al-Qaeda terrorist group attacked the US on September 11, 2001.
The US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, beginning long and costly wars that killed hundreds of thousands of people.
The Bush administration invaded Iraq under the guise that it had "weapons of mass destruction", however a UN search found none.
Bush declared Iran, Iraq and North Korea an "axis of evil" for sponsoring terrorism and "arming to threaten the peace of the world".
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a vocal supporter of his country's right to a peaceful nuclear program, visits the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility, 350 km south of Tehran, 8 April, 2008. ( )
What else is worth knowing?
Tensions between Iran and Israel deepened.
Tensions between Iran and Israel deepened. Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said "Israel must be wiped off the map", while Israel asked Bush to back the bombing of nuclear sites in Iran.
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said "Israel must be wiped off the map", while Israel asked Bush to back the bombing of nuclear sites in Iran. The Lebanon War began and Israel was again fighting Hezbollah, which was heavily backed by Iran.
The Lebanon War began and Israel was again fighting Hezbollah, which was heavily backed by Iran.
Bush called for uprisings and regime change in Iran.
What our experts say
"George Bush announced this idea of regime change, and really put it on notice, so at the time when the US was in Afghanistan, when the US was in Iraq, it looked very much as though the US was poised to go for the Iran regime, and that was a very low point in their relationship. That hardened political thinking in Iran." — Shahram Akbarzadeh
"George Bush announced this idea of regime change, and really put it on notice, so at the time when the US was in Afghanistan, when the US was in Iraq, it looked very much as though the US was poised to go for the Iran regime, and that was a very low point in their relationship. That hardened political thinking in Iran." — Shahram Akbarzadeh
"[Iran] is one of three countries explicitly named by Bush, which was Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Only one of those countries [North Korea] has a nuclear weapon, and only one of those countries has not been attacked — which Iran no doubt knows and no doubt sees." — Benjamin MacQueen
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Barack Obama delivers a statement after a nuclear deal was reached between Iran and six major world powers, beside Joe Biden, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, July 14, 2015. ( )
Barack Obama with members of the P5+1 discussing a nuclear dealing with Iran in 2015. ( )
Many conservative politicians, including then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, spoke out against the deal that Barack Obama negotiated with Iran. This protest was held in September 2015. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
After the two countries spent more than 30 years barely speaking, Obama extended a hand.
What was happening?
Obama pursued diplomacy with Iran, negotiating a nuclear plan to limit its nuclear program in exchange for fewer sanctions.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was agreed upon by the UN Security Council — China, France, Russia, the UK and the US plus Germany (P5+1) — with conditions including robust monitoring and development of only basic nuclear infrastructure and a promise by Iran to never seek or obtain nuclear weapons.
The deal put pressure on the US alliance with Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the deal was "very bad" and accused Obama of "giving up" on trying to stop Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Netanyahu ramped up his attention on Iran's nuclear program.
What else is worth knowing?
Netanyahu and Obama had a very strained relationship.
Netanyahu and Obama had a very strained relationship.
Iran supported the regimes in Syria and continued to support Hezbollah.
What our experts say
"Obama was hailed as the father of the nuclear deal as the one who stopped a potential World War III, but the one big mistake that the nuclear deal did not include is that it did not dictate Iran stop its support or funding for terrorist organisations in the region." — Mireille Rebeiz
Donald Trump (2017-2021)
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands after Trump's address at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, May 23, 2017. ( )
People march as they take part in an anti-war protest amid increased tensions between the United States and Iran at Times Square in New York, US, January 4, 2020. ( )
Protesters marking the 40th anniversary of the Iran hostage crisis outside the US embassy in Tehran. ( )
A boy carries a portrait of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a US air strike in Iraq, prior to the Friday prayers in Tehran, Iran, Friday January 3, 2020. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
The US and Iran are sworn enemies.
What is happening?
Trump presented himself as a leader who was going to end wars.
He withdrew from Obama's JCPOA with Iran, saying it was "defective at its core".
This was celebrated by Netanyahu and angered Iran's president, Hassan Rouhani.
Iran announced it would resume nuclear research and development, but did not explicitly say it would pursue nuclear weapons.
Trump said he was not not looking for war but threatened "obliteration like you've never seen before".
Rouhani called the White House "mentally disabled".
What else is worth knowing?
Trump also expanded sanctions and ordered the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani by drone strike.
Trump also expanded sanctions and ordered the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani by drone strike. Iran issued arrest warrants for Trump and other officials on murder and terrorism charges.
Iran issued arrest warrants for Trump and other officials on murder and terrorism charges.
Israel admits to bombing Iranian targets in Syria.
Iranian politicians chant anti-American and anti-Israeli slogans to protest against the US killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, at the start of an open session of parliament in Tehran, Iran, January 5, 2020. ( )
Joe Biden (2021-2025)
Joe Biden meets with Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss the Israel-Gaza conflict in October 2023. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Not much changes, until October 7, 2023.
What was happening?
Diplomacy with Iran had deteriorated.
Biden did attempt to revive the JCPOA initially agreed upon under Obama, but talks stalled and then Biden furthered sanctions.
And then October 7 happened: Palestinian group Hamas launched a terror attack inside Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking dozens of hostages.
Almost immediately, Israel invaded Gaza and began a war that has killed tens of thousands of civilians.
Biden spent at least $US17.9 billion ($27.3 billion) on additional military aid to Israel.
People visit the site of the Nova music festival, where hundreds were killed and abducted by Hamas and taken into Gaza, on the one-year anniversary of the terrorist attack, October 7, 2024. ( )
The father of Alma Al Majayda, 3, killed in Israeli strikes, reacts while carrying her body during her funeral, amid the ongoing war between Israel and Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, October 19, 2023. ( )
A UN Special Committee report handed down in November 2024 concluded Israel's warfare tactics in Gaza were "consistent with the characteristics of genocide" and that the government was using starvation as a weapon.
In the same month, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and two senior officials for alleged Gaza war crimes, as well as three Hamas leaders for extermination, murder and taking hostages.
Israel strenuously denied the accusations and labelled the warrant as an "antisemitic" decision. Biden described the war crime allegations as "outrageous" and vowed to stand by Israel against threats to its security.
What else is worth knowing?
Iran began launching missiles at Israel in response to the killings of Hezbollah and Hamas leaders, which was followed by Israel attacking Iran.
Iran began launching missiles at Israel in response to the killings of Hezbollah and Hamas leaders, which was followed by Israel attacking Iran.
Israel also bombed Lebanon, where the Iran-backed Hezbollah continue to operate.
Donald Trump (2025- )
Donald Trump gestures as Benjamin Netanyahu leaves the West Wing of the White House, April 7, 2025, in Washington. ( )
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves during the 36th anniversary of the death of the leader of Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, at Khomeini's shrine in southern Tehran, Iran June 4, 2025. ( )
A satellite overview shows the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility, along with damage from June 23 air strikes, amid the Iran-Israel War, near Qom, Iran, June 24, 2025. ( )
Friend, foe or frenemy?
Definitely foe.
What's happening?
The second Trump presidency is less than six months old, but the US-Iran-Israel relationship has further deteriorated.
The recent US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, as part of a wider Israeli campaign, is unprecedented.
Trump has since taken to social media floating the idea of regime change, but has also suggested the US and Iran will engage in a new round of negotiations.
And no-one seems to know what will come next.
What else is worth knowing?
"You know what, we basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," Trump told White House reporters about Iran and Israel.
"You know what, we basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," Trump told White House reporters about Iran and Israel.
Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, has declared the Islamic republic "delivered a hard slap to America's face" with a retaliatory missile attack on a US military base in Qatar and has warned the US and Israel against attacking it again.
What our experts say:
Mireille Rebeiz says the escalation — surrounding a nuclear program that was initially started by the US — is another example of American governments failing to look at long-term foreign policy impacts.
Mireille Rebeiz says the escalation — surrounding a nuclear program that was initially started by the US — is another example of American governments failing to look at long-term foreign policy impacts. "If you look at the history, it's always inconsistent … it's flip-flopped based on its own interest, based on its access to oil, based on its access to wealth in the region and its support to Israel.
"If you look at the history, it's always inconsistent … it's flip-flopped based on its own interest, based on its access to oil, based on its access to wealth in the region and its support to Israel.
"The United States is not looking at what's going to happen in 20 years in Iran and Iraq and Lebanon. We are really in the realm of lawlessness and I'm really, really concerned for what's going to happen next."
Credits
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australia Post halts transit shipping to US as 'chaotic' Trump tariff deadline looms
Australia Post is suspending some forms of shipping to the United States as a Trump administration tariff deadline creates "chaos" for postal networks and retailers globally. The development means goods from other countries will no longer be able to be shipped to the US via Australia, a method known as "transit" shipping. Australia Post's suspension comes as low-value goods imported into the US face additional tariffs from next week. Until now, parcels of goods from Australia worth less than $US800 ($1,200) were not taxed when they arrived in the US, under what was known as the "de minimis" exemption. The tax exemption is due to end on August 29 for imports from all countries globally, with parcels to be slugged with tariffs or flat fees. The decision — formalised in an executive order on July 30 — has caught many postal operators globally off guard. Kate Muth, who leads the US-based trade association, International Mailers Advisory Group (IMAG), said many of its members are confused about how to collect the duties set to come into play from next week. "It's a bit chaotic here," she told ABC News from Washington, DC. Australia Post is one of the global postal carriers that has elected to suspend transit mail to the US as it grapples with changes. "[Transit mail] is where a postal operator in one country will use the services of another postal operator to send it on to the final destination," Ms Muth explained. "For example, maybe the Philippines post uses Australia Post to send mail to the United States because Philippines has low volumes or infrequent flights." The government-owned entity has not confirmed how many nations use Australia for transit mail, or what volume it handles for other countries, ultimately destined for the US. ABC News has sighted an "emergency information" letter from the United Nations' specialised postal agency informing members globally about Australia Post's decision. "This measure will take effect on 20 August 2025," the letter read. The uncertainty with postage has also created chaos for Australian e-commerce retailers, with one Brisbane based brand, Apéro, deciding to halt shipping to the US this week. "The volatility in decision making, and the volatility of the market, and, quite frankly, the lack of ability of even Australia Post to be able to address these issues in a timely manner, puts us, and all of Australian fashion, in a really precarious position," Apéro co-founder Laz Smith told ABC News this week. IMAG's Ms Muth said the overarching concern is that many postal carriers are not set up to "collect and remit" the duties specified by Donald Trump's executive order. "Australian Post is not set up to do that … they obviously have to work with either an airline carrier who is willing to do [this], and we have not heard of any airline carrier that's willing to," she said. Several postal carriers globally have already gone one step further ahead of August 29 and suspended shipping to the US entirely. They include Bpost — a logistics company based in Brussels — and several others in Europe. PostNord — which services Sweden and Denmark — has additionally axed shipments to Puerto Rico. "Letters without goods will not be affected," PostNord's announcement said. "Customers and partners will be kept updated and informed." Australia Post would not confirm whether it is poised to halt US shipments entirely. Australia Post has sent updates to merchant retailers and uploaded information about the end of de minimis on its website. "Australia Post is investigating paying duties and taxes through an approved third-party platform provider on behalf of our merchants," it wrote to merchants on Monday.


SBS Australia
44 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
'Anti-Americanism' could now count against applicants for US visas
US President Donald Trump's administration says it will assess applicants for work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said in a "policy alert" that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism". Trump has labelled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting US slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing US ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies." The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the USCIS policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalisation of people "opposed to government or law, or who favour totalitarian forms of government". Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step had echoes of the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution. "McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Reichlin-Melnick said anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin". Temporary deportation protections Meanwhile, a federal appeals court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to end temporary deportation protections and cancel work permits for more than 60,000 immigrants from Central America and Nepal. The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit allows the government to end Temporary Protected Status for immigrants from Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal while a court challenge to that policy plays out. The order immediately ends protections for Nepalis, which expired on August 5. Protections for Hondurans and Nicaraguans will expire on 8 September. US Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said the decision will help restore integrity to the immigration system and stop Temporary Protected Status from being used as a "de facto asylum system". US district judge Trina L Thompson had temporarily blocked the administration from cancelling the protections in a sharply worded ruling in July, where she found the government's decision was likely motivated by racial animus.

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Significantly more likely': New data reveals almost three million Americans identify as transgender
Donald Trump may have signed an executive order stating trans people don't exist, but more people than ever before now say they are indeed transgender. According to new data, almost three million Americans now identify with the gender, a figure estimated to be almost double what it was a decade ago and largely down to the almost 1 in 30 young people who are trans. The figure has emerged amid the Trump administration’s concerted efforts to insist trans people don’t exist. Almost immediately after his inauguration in January, the US President signed an executive order that essentially barred the government from acknowledging trans people. That has led to the removal of government funding from trans initiatives, including specific healthcare information on government websites and even the removal of the word “transgenderâ€� from the website of a national memorial which partly commemorates trans people. Trans athletes have been barred from competing and the removal of known trans people from the military, regardless of their service record, is underway. The new data was released by the University of California Los Angeles’ Williams Institute, which does regular surveys on the demography of trans Americans. The LGBT issue-focused think tank found 2.8 million people in the US now identify as transgender, equating to around 1 per cent of the country’s total population. The figure is slightly more than in Australia: in 2024, the Australian Bureau of Statistics estimated 0.9 per cent of Aussies were trans. Of those Americans who identify as trans, roughly equal numbers are trans men, trans women and non-binary. Despite the findings, the Williams Institute warned that a White House crackdown on the collection of government data about trans people means it could be some time before an accurate estimate can be done again. Rise in people identifying as trans In 2016, the Williams Institute found 0.6 per cent of adults â€' or 1.4 million people â€' were transgender. The rise in that figure could be due to trans people being more open now about their gender identity, as well as the US government in the last decade collecting data from far more people. Rates of people identifying as transgender significantly increased among younger Americans. Of 18- to 24-year-olds, 2.7 per cent said they were trans compared to 0.4 per cent of those aged over 35 and 0.3 per cent of those aged 65 and older. More than 1 in 30 young people trans Additionally about 724,000 teens aged 13-17 identify as trans, or 3.3 per cent of the Americans in that age range. “Younger generations are more likely to identify as transgender, and we expect that trend to continue,â€� Williams Institute senior scholar of public policy and the study’s lead author, Jody Herman, said. “Youth and young adults are more likely to identify as transgender due to a variety of factors, including a greater willingness among younger individuals to disclose that they identify as transgender on surveys.â€� The state with the fewest number of trans people is New Mexico, in the south, accounting for 0.4 per cent of adults. The state with the highest number of trans people is Minnesota in the north, with 1.2 per cent of residents stating it as their gender identity. Hawaii has the highest number of young people who identify as trans, at 3.4 per cent. “In prior estimates, there have been no statistically significant differences between age groups for adults in the percentage of those who identify as transgender,â€� the report states. “Our current estimates … show that the youngest adult age groups are now significantly more likely to identify as transgender than older age groups.â€� The Williams Institute used data from the US Government’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System, the US Youth Risk Behaviour Surveillance System (YRBS), and “advanced statistical modellingâ€� to estimate numbers of trans people. The Trump administration has now removed questions on trans identity from two periodic surveys by the CDC. That means future assessments of numbers of trans Americans may not be as accurate. “For these data sources to just suddenly disappear, it is a major setback,â€� Ms Herman said.