World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%
US President Donald Trump's trade wars are expected to slash economic growth this year in America and around the world, the World Bank forecast.
Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' but without mentioning Mr Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the US economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4%) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8%).
That marks a downgrade from the 2.3% US growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January.
The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024.
In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing' – slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain – it appeared headed for just six months ago.
'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Mr Gill wrote.
'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
House advances Trump's $9.4B spending cuts package targeting NPR, PBS, USAID to House-wide vote
President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cuts package survived a key hurdle on Wednesday afternoon, setting the measure up for a final House-wide vote later this week. Trump's proposal, which was introduced as legislation by House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., would cut $8.3 billion from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and just over $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting distributes federal funding to NPR and PBS. The House of Representatives made a procedural motion known as a "rule vote," which passed mostly along party lines. The rule passing now allows for debate on the $9.4 billion spending cut measure, followed by a final House-wide vote. But it's not atypical for House leaders to include unrelated measures in rule votes, as is the case with the spending cuts package – House GOP leaders included a provision with minor changes to Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" to account for the Senate needing to amend the bill. That latter piece of legislation, a vast tax and immigration bill, is moving through the budget reconciliation process. By dropping the Senate's threshold for advancement from 60 votes to 51, it allows the party in power to skirt the minority – in this case, Democrats – on vast pieces of legislation, provided they adhere to a specific set of budgetary rules. House GOP leaders said they needed to make the recent changes to the bill to better adhere to the Senate's "Byrd Bath," when the Senate parliamentarian reviews the bill and removes anything not adhering to reconciliation guidelines. Whereas that deals with the government's mandatory spending processes that are more difficult to amend, the $9.4 billion spending cuts package tackles discretionary spending that Congress controls every year. It's called a "rescissions package," which is a formal proposal by the White House to claw back federal funds already allocated for the current fiscal year. Like reconciliation, the mechanism allows for a 51-vote majority in the Senate rather than 60. Congress has 45 days to consider it, or it is deemed rejected. Republican leaders have held up this rescissions package as the first step to codifying the billions of dollars of government waste identified by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump allies have also made clear they view this first package as a test of what kind of cuts congressional Republicans can stomach. And while the rule vote was expected to pass, the bill could have trouble ahead of its expected Thursday afternoon vote. Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., pointed out in a bipartisan statement that the media funding represents less than 0.01% of the federal budget and said taking that money away would "dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans." Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., told reporters on Tuesday that he got assurances that USAID cuts would exclude critical medical funding. "I feel better than what I was hearing last week, that was gonna be a total cut," he said, without revealing whether he would support the bill.
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Potential US-China Trade 'deal'highlights US dependence on China's rare earth minerals
President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. has reached a trade deal with China, subject to final approval by Chinese President Xi Jinping. A central component of the deal, reportedly includes expanding U.S. access to Chinese rare earth minerals, in exchange for concessions allowing more Chinese students to attend American universities and the export of sensitive products to China. Though the full details of the deal are still unfolding, the U.S. is at a disadvantage in the negotiations. Reportedly Beijing is only offering a concession that it had already offered a month ago to lift the blockade on shipments of rare earth minerals. The current deal may be a short-term solution for a much larger, long-term problem. Much attention has been given to the importance of rare earth minerals for electric vehicles, electronics, robots and wind turbines. But rare earth minerals are not just important to the global economy and energy supply. They also play a critical role in defence. Syracuse University Professor Sean McFate claimed that 'what oil was to the 20th century, rare earth minerals are to the 21st." Rare earths minerals are used in almost every form of advanced defence technology. Tanks, lasers, missiles, fighter jets, submarines, and warships all rely on rare earth minerals. Just one F-35 fighter jet uses about 900 pounds of rare earth minerals. Consisting of a group 17 metals (and ranging from heavy to light), each rare earth mineral offers distinct properties and uses. Minerals such as neodymium is a key component in missile guidance systems, such as the Tomahawk cruise missile, helping it to be more precise and manoeuvrable. Yttrium is used to coat jet engines to ensure that they don't melt mid-flight due to high temperatures. Gadolinium is crucial for sonar and radiation detection systems and radiation shielding, especially in nuclear-powered submarines. Though there is an abundance of rare earth minerals with 110 million tonnes of deposits across the world, China dominates the market, producing more than 70% of the total supply. While the US is the second largest producer generating 14% of the total, 70% of U.S. rare earth minerals imports come from China. Worldwide China maintains a near monopoly-accounting for 61% of rare earth production and 92% of their processing. China's dominance is even greater in heavy rare earth minerals—which are more critical to the production of defence equipment . It processes nearly 100% of heavy rare earth minerals. At one point Vietnam also had some capacity to process these types of minerals, but its facility was shut down in 2024 and is no longer operable. China is also the world's sole producer of samarium, a light rare earth metal that is vital for military hardware including building fighter jets, missiles, electric warfare systems, and radar and sonar applications. Samarium magnets are essential for signal generation and play an important role in navigation, target tracking and threat detection. Samarium magnets are also valued because they can tolerate high temperatures without losing their magnetic force, which is critical to withstanding the heat created by fast moving motors. Currently the U.S. is lagging far behind in production capacity—and has only has two domestic rare earth mining centers located in the state of Georgia and in Mountain Pass, California. But the U.S. hadn't always trailed China in this area. From the 1960s until the 1990s, the U.S. was the global leader in rare earth production. This all changed in 1998 when Molycorp, then the only U.S. rare earth producer, shut down its chemical processing operations after a radioactive wastewater leak. At the same time, production had already shifted to China due to low labour costs and lax environmental standards. Since then concerns over rare earth dependency have circulated in Washington for years. By 2010 policymakers were raising the alarm that the U.S. was losing its rare earth production capacity to produce minerals that are critical to national security just as China was tightening export controls. Under the Biden administration, the Department of Defence earmarked more than $439 million to build a domestic 'mine to magnet' supply chain. Additionally, in 2022, the company MP Materials was awarded a $35 million contract from the Department of Defence to build a facility that could process heavy rare earth elements in Mountain Pass. Biden also tried to issue a large contract to construct two samarium production facilities, but this plan never materialized. As part of Trump's ongoing trade war with China, Beijing strategically applied export restrictions (requiring domestic producers to apply for export licences from the Chinese government) in April on seven medium and heavy earth metals including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, which are all important to the defence industry. Trump's announcement of a deal may mean that these export restrictions on rare earth minerals have been reversed. But knowing how important these minerals are to U.S. national security, there are no guarantees that China won't rescind this offer in the future and use its rare earth dominance to push for a deal that's even more favorable to its own terms.
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Thursday Briefing: A Look at the U.S.-China Trade Deal
Trump said U.S.-China trade deal is 'done' After two days of talks in London, President Trump said yesterday that the U.S. and China had struck a deal to roll back some of the punitive measures they had taken against each other's economies in recent months. Under the agreement, China would relax its restrictions on shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets critical for some U.S. manufacturers. In return, the U.S. would not impose visa restrictions on Chinese students and would relax limits it had placed on some U.S. exports. The full details of the agreement were not immediately released. 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME,' Trump wrote on social media. 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!' Context: Economic tensions between the U.S. and China spiraled after Trump announced expansive tariffs in April. The escalation threatened businesses in both countries and risked empty shelves in American stores later this year. Tariffs: The levies between the two countries will remain unchanged, and a 90-day pause in implementing some of the tariffs will expire in August. The U.S. trade representative said that the two sides would remain in contact but that another meeting had not yet been scheduled. Analysis: 'From what we know of the agreement, it appears to merely unwind the damage and escalation from the president's own trade war,' my colleague Ana Swanson, who covers trade and international economics, told me. 'They haven't yet made any progress toward a new trade deal.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
