Here's what the new Austin Convention Center could look like
Austinites are can now get a first look at the new Austin Convention Center.
"City staff and architects revealed renderings of the $1.6 billion Unconventional ATX project, showcasing the extensive expansion of the existing building in downtown on East Cesar Chavez Street, during a public meeting on Tuesday.
The existing center is scheduled to close this April to allow for demolition to begin. The $1.26 billion construction project is funded by the convention center's share of the city's hotel occupancy tax and its own revenue
'The redevelopment of the convention center will create a vital downtown amenity and urban connector,' Austin Mayor Kirk Watson said. 'With a design that emphasizes street-level openness and accessibility, vibrant public plazas, and pedestrian-friendly pathways, this transformation will enhance connectivity and inclusivity, creating a more accessible and engaging downtown experience for residents and visitors.'
Here's what we know.
The Austin Convention Center's makeover will nearly double its rentable square footage, expanding from 365,000 square feet to 620,000 square feet.
The update, designed through a joint venture of LMN Architects and Page Southerland Page, will feature more outdoor amenities such as open-air terraces and public plazas. According to the Austin Convention Center Department, it will also be the world's first zero-carbon-certified convention center.
The new center is intended to serve as a 'cultural hub' by connecting with the surrounding Waterloo Greenway and Palm Districts and showcasing art installations and interactive exhibits. It is also being designed to integrate with the ongoing Project Connect transportation projects in Austin.
This will be done in part with a $17.7 million investment in public art, the largest in Austin's history," according to the department.
Unconventional ATX will also reopen Third Street for multimodal traffic and enhance Second Street to make it more pedestrian-friendly.
'The new Austin Convention Center is more than a venue — it's a landmark that reflects our city's bold and creative spirit,' said Trisha Tatro, director of the Austin Convention Center Department. 'With its dynamic design, enhanced community access, and commitment to sustainability, this facility will set a new benchmark for convention spaces while strengthening Austin's reputation as a premier global destination.'
The Austin Convention Center will close for demolition in April of this year and construction will begin shortly after.
The expected completion date for construction is in the latter half of 2028, set to reopen in time for the 2029 spring festival season.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: First look: Austin Convention Center project renderings released
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site
A judge this week ruled in favor of the city of Austin in a case involving the former American-Statesman site just south of downtown along Lady Bird Lake. The ruling denied a motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by the Save Our Springs Alliance, an environmental watchdog group. The lawsuit alleged that the Austin City Council violated key provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act in 2022 when it approved a special type of zoning known as a planned unit development, or PUD, for the former Statesman site. The lawsuit sought to void the council's Dec. 2, 2022 vote to approve the PUD, based on the alleged open meetings violations. The Statesman moved several years ago from the site at 305 S. Congress Ave. to a new location near the airport. In arguing their case before District Judge Jan Soifer on May 15, Save Our Springs attorneys Bobby Levinski and Bill Bunch contended that the council granted the PUD zoning in violation of two key mandates of the Texas Open Meetings Act: proper public notice, and a reasonable opportunity for the public to speak before the vote was taken. Levinski said today that the Save Our Springs Alliance might appeal the ruling. "Given the importance of this case for governmental transparency and proper enforcement of the Texas Open Meetings Act, we'll be evaluating our options for appeal," Levinski said. "This case ultimately impacts the ability of residents to weigh in on important matters that affect their community, including the relocation of the Hike and Bike Trail and removal of the natural, tree-lined aesthetic of the Lady Bird Lake shoreline. Every case has its challenges, and we may need to work on it a little longer to ultimately prevail." More: Lawsuit seeks to halt planned redevelopment of former Statesman site on Lady Bird Lake Casey Dobson and Sara Wilder Clark represented the landowner, the Cox family of Atlanta, along with Austin-based Endeavor Real Estate Group. The Cox family hired Endeavor several years ago to create plans to redevelop the prime waterfront site. The site formerly housed the newspaper offices and printing plant. Cox sold the Statesman but retained ownership of the 18.9-acre site, a property many developers had long coveted and said was ripe for new development. Dobson did not immediately respond to an email for comment about the ruling and what it means for future plans to transform the property into a mixed-use project with high-rise buildings and other uses, which could include housing, office and retail development. Richard Suttle Jr., an Austin attorney and the spokesperson for the planned redevelopment, said he hasn't seen a final judgment yet in the case, so couldn't comment on what it might mean for the future planned redevelopment. Dan Richards represented the city in the lawsuit. Richards said Soifer's ruling, signed Monday, means "the trial court case is basically over." At last month's hearing, Richards told Soifer that voiding the PUD could jeopardize the developer's ability, in the current economic climate, to secure a new amendment offering the same level of community benefits — such as 6.5 acres of green space — at the site. At the same hearing, Dobson and Wilder Clark said the PUD zoning change was properly noticed, and the public was given sufficient opportunity to speak at nine different meetings. However, Levinski said that, while the PUD was listed on the council agenda as a zoning item, that posting was misleading because it failed to provide "full disclosure of the subjects to be discussed." The proposed PUD ordinance encompassed "numerous provisions that extend well beyond traditional zoning regulations," Levinski told Soifer. Those included "sweeping changes" to environmental protections and other city land-use codes, including a failure to disclose height limits, setbacks and the elimination of two restrictive covenants. "There are so many different parts of this (PUD) ordinance that are not zoning, yet it was sold to public as a rezoning," Levinski said. The zoning changes included modifications to the Lady Bird Lake shoreline; the relocation of the Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail inland away from the lake; the removal of more than 90 mature trees; code waivers; and "amendments to almost every chapter of Austin's land development code," Levinski told Soifer. In arguing their case before Soifer, Leviniski and Bunch said that the Texas Open Meetings Act requires a public notice identifying these major changes to city standards and a public 'right to speak' on them before council granted the approvals. The Cox owners and Endeavor have the right to build high-rises — up to 725 feet tall — within 140 feet of Lady Bird Lake. The development would be "forever exempt from a plethora of water quality, parkland and lakeshore rules and regulations," according to the Save Our Springs Alliance. "The key here is the Statesman PUD went beyond zoning," Levinski said. "This didn't give sufficient notice to the public to say what is occurring with this zoning." Among other issues, he said the PUD included "non-zoning provisions, including items the council doesn't have authority over." There was a way the city could have described with greater detail what was occurring with the zoning case, "but they chose not to, and it's deceptive that they chose not to," Levinski said. The level of specificity "gets enhanced" when the issue involves matters of "significant public interest," Levinski said. "It's not enough to rely on the assumption that the general public may have knowledge of the subject matter." Dobson and Wilder Clark, however, told Soifer that the public notices complied with the Texas Open Meetings Act. The notices properly and adequately disclosed the subject of the PUD at various meetings on the council's printed public agenda, Dobson and Wilder Clark said. Moreover, all the details that Save Our Springs claims were lacking from the notice were available at "the click of a link" in backup materials on the council's online agenda, Wilder Clark said. "Not only did (the public) get to talk in meetings, but they got to submit written testimony," Wilder Clark said. She also noted that the council postponed meetings on the case. Showing slides of newspaper articles, Dobson said the proposed redevelopment of the Statesman site was front-page news. He said the case was "noticed out of the wazoo." "(Opponents) think this was done in the dark of night, with adequate notice to nobody," Dobson said. "In fact, the polar opposite happened." Dobson said no special notice was required, and opponents "didn't need it. They wrote letters, they spoke at length to (the city) Planning Commission and City Council. This did not take place under the shroud of secrecy," Dobson said. Countering the city's arguments, Bunch said the city "invented out of whole cloth" its position that it upheld the open meetings act, saying "there's no support for that in the entire body of open meetings cases." Early in the hearing, Dobson showed a photo of the current Statesman site "in all its glory," showing a low-slung building surrounded by a near vacant parking lot with lots of asphalt and concrete. Attorneys for the city and the developer stated that "virtually no one" opposes the proposed development, which may include condominiums, apartments, a hotel, office space and retail areas. Noting the site's popularity as a prime location for viewing the famed bat colony under the Ann Richards Congress Avenue Bridge, they emphasized the new development will enhance the bat viewing area. Additionally, they said the project has the support of bat conservation groups. Last year, the Save Our Springs Alliance won a lawsuit contesting the city's creation of a special financing district, a so-called tax increment reinvestment zone, to fund infrastructure improvements within the proposed Statesman redevelopment project. A judge ruled that financing method unlawful. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Judge rules for city in case involving former Statesman site
CNET
3 hours ago
- CNET
Elon Musk Says Tesla's Robotaxi Service Will 'Tentatively' Kick Off June 22 in Austin
Table of Contents Elon Musk Says Tesla's Robotaxi Service Will 'Tentatively' Kick Off June 22 in Austin Tesla's robotaxi service appears slated to kick off as scheduled, at least according to Elon Musk. On Tuesday, the CEO shared on X that the launch is "tentatively" slated for June 22 in Austin, Texas. "We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift," Musk noted. He added that the first self-driving trip from the Tesla factory to a customer's house is scheduled for June 28. Musk on Tuesday also reposted a video of a Tesla Model Y driving without anyone behind the wheel in Austin. The short clip shows the vehicle at an intersection, waiting for pedestrians to cross the road before making a left turn. In October, Tesla unveiled a custom-built robotaxi with no steering wheel or pedals, which it also dubbed a Cybercab. Musk said the car would cost "below $30,000," and production would kick off "before 2027." He also said the process of rolling out fully autonomous, unsupervised driving would start in 2025 with the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y in Texas and California, before the robotaxi's eventual rollout. Tesla's purpose-built robotaxi, also called a Cybercab, is slated to begin production"before 2027," according to Elon Musk. Tesla In the following months, Musk maintained that Tesla's robotaxi service would debut in June in Austin. It began testing the service with Tesla employees in the San Francisco Bay Area, but with a safety driver on board. And in May, Musk posted on X that "For the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver's seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents." The robotaxi service in Austin will reportedly start small, with about 10 to 20 vehicles, and the initial operation zone will only be a few square miles, according to Bloomberg. Texas' minimal rules surrounding driverless vehicles can make it an alluring location to launch a robotaxi service. If Tesla's robotaxi service does kick off this month in Austin, it'll share the city's roads with other self-driving companies like Waymo and Zoox. Alphabet-owned Waymo operates driverless rides there through a partnership with Uber, while Amazon-owned Zoox's test fleet is also roaming the city.
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Musk's Act of Contrition Isn't Enough for Tesla
Sometime in the wee hours of Wednesday, Elon Musk shared a pang of contrition: Telling the president that he owes his election to you, amplifying calls for his impeachment and throwing in alleged associations with a dead sex offender do indeed err toward the pugnacious. Even so, Musk, like Trump, is not one to back down easily. Besides reported interventions from the likes of Vice President JD Vance, the slump in Tesla Inc.'s shares during last Thursday's online onslaught presents an obvious rationale. Investors appear relieved that the boss is showing his seldom seen humbler side, with the stock having made back virtually all of that loss. Meanwhile, a frisson had arrived on Tuesday in the form of a brief clip on X, Musk's social media platform, apparently showing a self-driving Model Y turning a corner in Austin.
