logo
Health-care privatization is no cure

Health-care privatization is no cure

Opinion
Health care remains in crisis in Manitoba. Wait times are high, surgical backlogs continue to leave patients in pain, and staffing deficits are straining the capacity of the system to a breaking point.
Patients and providers of health care are rightly frustrated and worried for themselves and their loved ones, unsure if public health care will be there for them when and where they need it. Some have grown so disillusioned with the public system that they are pushing for private alternatives to improve ER wait times and overall performance. Increasingly, there are prominent voices in Manitoba and beyond who are determined to abandon the public system, although they are at times subtler than calling for outright privatization and Americanization. Instead, they advance a route toward stealth privatization and a two-tier health-care system.
Take, for example, a series of recent opinion pieces published last month in the Winnipeg Sun. In these pieces, the authors repeat familiar arguments about the need to modernize health care in Canada. Yet, in practice, such calls for modernization always seem to mean more privatization. Mixed public and private systems like those in Switzerland, France, or Germany are often held up as examples of a better, still equitable, way forward. Access for all and more autonomy is promised.
It sounds like a great idea, on paper.
In practice, what proponents of such privatization and two-tier health services typically fail to mention is the inequalities in society that privatization exacerbates. They tend to downplay the out-of-pocket costs to individuals and the increased cost to the public system that remains.
There are only so many people willing to work in health care, as many Manitobans know all too well, especially those living in remote and rural communities. The public health-care system in Manitoba already faces steep competition from other provinces. Bringing in further competition from private health-care providers will only weaken the capacity of the public system that the majority of us would continue to rely on even if more private alternatives were available for the few who could reliably afford them.
Health care is a public good, and accessing it should not be determined by income or identity. When we allow health care to be commodified and subject to the motives of profit, costs go up and the conditions of work and care suffer, impacting both the social and economic health of society.
It will take political will and a long-term vision to reverse years of privatization and expand the coverage of the public system to include much-needed health services like enhanced mental health supports, expanded pharmacare and dental care, coverage for eye care, and fully public home and long-term care.
Yet, instead of moving forward with urgency to root out privatization and rebuild the public system, the government is making modest public investments while expanding privatization.
Reliance on private staffing agencies continues under the NDP, even though data show that these agencies are expensive, and that much of the public money going to private agencies is spent on travel and administrative costs, not patient care.
A new, five-year deal was recently struck by the NDP with Dynacare, entrenching the for-profit, private delivery of lab services in Manitoba, despite their criticism of this practice while in opposition. The government claims this will improve access, but Dynacare has a record of closing locations where Manitobans need them most. Alberta recently went in the opposite direction, bringing community lab services back under direct public operation and oversight, while B.C. just experienced 10 weeks of labour disruption with a private, American-owned outpatient lab service provider. It is unclear why the NDP chose to take such a practical and political risk.
All Manitobans deserve access to high quality public health care in their own communities. Publicly delivered care provides the best bang for our health-care buck, ensuring that care is integrated, accountable, and not beholden to the whims of shareholders or private owners seeking to line their own pockets. Evidence from other provinces in Canada shows that privatization of health care does not lower wait times or reduce costs for delivering that care.
To rebuild and strengthen publicly delivered health care, the NDP must prioritize health-care spending, especially in this time of growing economic uncertainty and increasingly frequent environmental crises like the wildfires that have ravaged Manitoba this year. They must show leadership in shifting the culture of health care so that patients receive the care they deserve regardless of income or identity, and providers can leave work knowing they served their patients well and were given the resources they needed to provide that care.
And finally, the government must rethink and reverse Manitoba's growing reliance on private interests to deliver public health care.
Noah Schulz is the provincial director for the Manitoba Health Coalition.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vigil to honour Manitobans lost to overdoses on Aug. 31
Vigil to honour Manitobans lost to overdoses on Aug. 31

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 days ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Vigil to honour Manitobans lost to overdoses on Aug. 31

Devin Ramdoyal had a gift for connecting with people, devoting close to 500 hours as a volunteer at St. Amant. But while Devin brought joy to others' lives, he struggled with mental illness since childhood and turned to drugs to self-medicate. Devin's life ended on Feb. 7, 2021, when he overdosed at the age of 22. Supplied photo A vigil honouring loved ones lost to overdoses will be held at 8 p.m. on Aug. 31 at Pembina Fisher Park. Sandra Ingram, Devin's mother, described him as 'the light of her life.' 'He was my beautiful boy and my only child,' she said. 'This could happen to anyone. Nobody sets out to be an addict.' As she navigated her grief, Ingram connected with parents who also lost children to overdoses and became involved with Moms Stop the Harm (MSTH), an advocacy group of Canadian families affected by substance use-related harms and deaths. A retired communications professor, Ingram channelled her pain into action. She became the first facilitator in Winnipeg for Healing Hearts, an MSTH bereavement support group that meets once a month at Riverview Community Centre. She now chairs the local planning committee for International Overdose Awareness Day. For the second year, a vigil will be held on Aug. 31 at Pembina Fisher Park. Purple flag markers will memorialize the Manitobans who fatally overdosed in 2024. Manitoba Justice's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner reported 570 suspected substance-related deaths in 2024. The event starts at 8 p.m. with a speaker introducing the sponsor, MSTH. The candlelight vigil will begin as the sun goes down. Some attendees will share stories, while others may simply state the name of a loved one who passed. Mondays A weekly look at news and events that matter in your communities. The vigil is open to anyone who wants to show support. 'Overdoses are happening in every community — in your own backyard. The more stigma is broken down, the better chance we have to help those in need,' said Ingram. Ingram's message to parents is clear. 'Be aware that any child who is different — whether that's a learning disability, mental illness or non-heterosexual orientation — is more at risk. With all the pressures of daily life and social media, it's sometimes too much. Get your kids the help and support they need.' For those using drugs alone, the National Overdose Response Service ( is a confidential, anonymous phone-based service that acts as a virtual safe consumption site. For more information, visit Candice G. BallLord Roberts community correspondent Candice G. Ball is a community correspondent for Lord Roberts. Email her at candicegball@ Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Manitoba's quiet elder care crisis
Manitoba's quiet elder care crisis

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 days ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Manitoba's quiet elder care crisis

Opinion Manitoba's population is aging faster than our systems are adapting. According to the 2024 National Institute on Ageing Survey, nearly one in three older Manitobans did not receive the home or community-based care they needed in the past year. Loneliness is rising. Retirement confidence is falling. And still, we speak of independence as if it is a given. We say we want Manitobans to age at home. But what if home is a walk-up apartment with no elevator? Or a hotel room after yet another evacuation? Or a place where home-care visits are promised, but arrive weeks late? In this province, aging in place has become a policy aspiration we repeat, without the systems to back it up. Too often, elder care is framed around the idea of staying put. But aging in place is just one part of a much broader care puzzle. It includes long-term care, caregiver respite, mental health supports, culturally grounded services, and dignified end-of-life care. When we treat it like a catch-all solution, we stop asking deeper questions. What kind of place? And with what support? For many older Manitobans, aging in place is not a choice. It is simply what is left. Long-term care is too expensive. Assisted living is out of reach. Others are left behind due to language barriers, cultural gaps, or geography. The systems that are supposed to support aging in place rarely speak to each other. And too often, they do not speak to older adults themselves. The NIA survey found that nearly 40 per cent of older adults in Manitoba expressed low retirement confidence and concerns about material deprivation. Some are too proud to ask for help. Others do not know where to turn. Many are aging in isolation, while those who care for them—whether unpaid family members or overstretched professionals — are burning out. What we are witnessing is not just a service gap. It is a quiet crisis. Not one of spectacle, but one of neglect. Not intentional, but structural. Not loud, but deeply human. And still, this is not inevitable. Some solutions are already in motion like hospital-to-home transitions, community-run wellness checks, and home support programs. But they remain fragmented, often too small to meet the scale of need. Without stable funding and cross-system co-ordination, these promising ideas struggle to take root. Manitoba is not starting from scratch. What is missing is not innovation. It is follow-through. Promising elder care pilots exist across the province. But too often they remain underfunded, disconnected, and temporary. In a system this strained, good intentions are not enough. We owe it to older Manitobans to turn aging in place from a hopeful phrase into a lived reality. That means investing not only in beds or budgets, but in people, relationships, and care that is rooted in dignity. Aging in place should not mean aging in silence. It should mean aging with choice, connection, and community. Marwa Suraj is a naturalized Canadian, a proud Manitoban, and a physician by training. She is Black, Muslim, and a woman: identities that shape her passion for equity, innovation, and social accountability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store