Supply risk identified for some UK animal medicines shipped to North
Vets, farmers and pet owners in
Northern Ireland
will continue to have post-
Brexit
access to animal medicines from the UK in the 'vast majority of cases', the UK government has said.
However, it warned of a 'risk of disruption' remaining for a small number of critical products.
The comments were contained in a policy paper on Britain's approach to veterinary medicines in Northern Ireland, published by Northern Secretary, Hilary Benn, on Thursday.
From January 1st, 2026, veterinary medicines from Britain distributed in Northern Ireland must comply with EU rules agreed between London and Brussels as part of the
Windsor Framework
.
READ MORE
Concerns had been raised by vets and politicians that up to half the veterinary medicines used in Northern Ireland could become unavailable because firms in Britain would choose to stop supplying them rather than carry out the additional retesting and relabelling required to sell them in the North after the cut-off date.
[
DUP leader: Windsor deal is an opaque mess
Opens in new window
]
The paper said London's current expectation was that there would be 'very limited disruption, with fewer than 20 products due to face discontinuation that we consider are likely to result in significant adverse impacts if not addressed.'
It announced two schemes which it said would provide additional resilience and 'plug any emerging critical gaps' by allowing vets to continue to access medicines from Britain.
The UK government said these were within the scope of the Windsor Framework so did not require negotiation with, or approval from, the EU. It is understood the bloc is aware of, and comfortable with, the move.
From January 1st, the Veterinary Medicines Health Situation Scheme will 'permit the use of suitable alternative products from outside Northern Ireland' by professionals without any additional red tape 'if the situation of animal or public health so requires'.
A separate Veterinary Medicines Internal Market Scheme will allow vets use specific individual medicines not authorised or available in Northern Ireland when needed, again without any additional administrative burden or certification.
The UK government also said any veterinary medicines already on the market in Northern Ireland can remain so until their expiry date, even if it is after the cut-off from January 1st.
The move was strongly criticised by some unionist parties. DUP MP Carla Lockhart said the 'stark reality' was that the UK government had 'chosen to prioritise placating the EU' over protecting the interests of animals, vets, farmers and the wider agri-food sector in Northern Ireland.
Instead of resolving the problem, she said, London had 'simply issued another paper and acquiesced to EU law that does not deal substantively with the concerns raised by the industry and does not enjoy cross-community consent'.
Traditional Unionist Voice leader, Jim Allister, said that 'instead of standing up for Northern Ireland, the [UK] government has largely rolled over, devoting its energy to encouraging reorientation of our supplies so that they come from the EU, not GB.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
44 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Homeowners can ‘save more than €3,500 a year' with energy-efficient technology
Homeowners using energy-efficient technologies such as solar panels, heat pumps and electric-vehicle home chargers can save more than €3,500 a year, a report says. As well as reporting big savings, people who have taken the most energy-efficient approach to their homes say they get additional benefits including enhanced levels of comfort, according to Electric Ireland's sustainability index. Despite the benefits, however, a significant portion of the population feel unable to invest in such technologies due to the upfront costs and a lack of clear guidance. A total of 13 per cent of those who took part in the survey said they had solar panels installed; 11 per cent owned heat pumps and 7 per cent had EV chargers. READ MORE Respondents said there were clear cost benefits to these new technologies. Householders generating energy through solar panels reported perceived savings averaging €91 a month on energy bills. Those with heat pumps said they saved an average of €77 monthly. EV owners reported average savings of €128 a month on fuel costs. The cumulative monthly savings for people with all three technologies comes in at €296 monthly or €3,552 over a year. While financial savings were listed as the leading benefits, some respondents also spoke of additional benefits: 60 per cent of heat pump owners said their homes were more comfortable as a result and 46 per cent said convenience was another benefit. Despite benefits of such technology, the Electric Ireland sustainability index shows that willingness to make the switch to more energy-efficient technologies remains low beyond the early adopters. For those who have yet to make any home energy-efficiency upgrades, few have active plans to do so. Just 22 per cent are considering solar panels with only 12 per cent considering heat pumps or EV chargers. The most commonly cited barrier is cost, with nearly 60 per cent saying the upfront cost was a key deterrent. 'What Electric Ireland's new sustainability index reveals is that the long-term benefits of more energy-efficient technologies are clear – but the upfront costs can be challenging' Electric Ireland's Noeline Gibbons said. She said the average cost of a solar PV system was €8,000 to €10,000 and when SEAI grants were included most households saw a return on investment within four to six years. 'We are acutely aware that many families and individuals want to start the energy transition, but struggle with upfront costs and a lack of information,' she said. Beyond cost concerns, others reported that the process of accessing grants felt like too much hassle or said they were unsure if the investment would pay off in the long term. Ms Gibbons said a lack of information and the ease of sticking to current habits were also noted by some as factors holding people back. Awareness of available grants was limited with less than 40 per cent familiar with government support schemes. 'Our sustainability index show that many consumers who are considering switching to more sustainable energy lifestyles simply don't know where to begin – and the range of options can feel complex and daunting so there is a clear need for simple accessible information,' Ms Gibbons said. The sustainability index was conducted by Red C Research between April 2nd and April 10th, with a nationally representative survey of 1,026 adults.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Magnier case: Row breaks out in court over claims gallery members tried to communicate with witness
An argument broke out during a hearing in the High Court case taken by bloodstock billionaire John Magnier over a failed property deal for a Co Tipperary estate. On Thursday, the defence claimed a member, or members, of the public gallery were attempting to communicate with a witness under cross-examination by nodding to him on certain answers. The case centres on Mr Magnier's claim that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a 'full-frontal assault' on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre estate. Coolmore Stud founder Mr Magnier claims Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell at the higher price of €22.25 million to Mr Regan, founder of New York building firm JT Magen. READ MORE The Magniers say the deal was struck at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home on August 22nd, 2023. They also claim an exclusivity agreement in effect from August 31st to September 30th stipulated the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. Barne says there was never any such agreement as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement and they subsequently preferred to sell to Mr Regan. Mr Regan is not a party to the case. The nodding in court claim was made on Thursday by Martin Hayden SC, for Barne Estate, while his colleague Niall F Buckley SC, was conducting the cross-examination of a financial manager at Coolmore, Tim Gleeson. Mr Gleeson was giving evidence on communications timelines, statements and meetings surrounding the failed deal. Mr Hayden apologised for interrupting the cross-examination and claimed that he had been informed by a note from his legal team that a member or members of the gallery had been nodding at the witness. Mr Hayden gestured towards the Magnier side and told Mr Justice Max Barrett that he was asking individuals 'on the Coolmore side to stop making head gestures' in relation to questions asked of Mr Gleeson. 'It has happened on four occasions now in relation to particular questions asked and head gestures are being made by certain individuals in the gallery,' said Mr Hayden. Mr Gleeson said he did not see any gestures and that he was following documents from the witness box and facing the judge when answering questions over his witness statement. Paul Gallagher SC, for the Coolmore side, said he did not accept the assertion made by Mr Hayden. About 10 minutes later, Mr Hayden rose again to tell the judge 'it is occurring again'. 'They are giving indications of what the answers should be – that's unacceptable'. Mr Gallagher said it was 'an outrageous statement to make – it's not true'. 'I know Mr Gallagher is all-powerful but I don't think he has eyes in the back of his head, I'm not sure he can see what is going on,' said Mr Hayden. Mr Justice Barrett asked all present to refrain from any nodding upon hearing responses given by the witness. Moments later, Mr Gallagher said a member of the defence's legal team was now staring at the gallery where the Coolmore side were sitting at the rear of the court, which he considered 'highly inappropriate'. Mr Hayden said it was appropriate the defence made sure the claimed behaviour did not happen again. Jerome Casey, a senior member of staff at Coolmore who fronts property deals for Mr Magnier, told Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magniers, 'we are honourable people' who would not go back on an agreed deal. Mr Casey said the exclusivity agreement was put in place because contracts for the estate had not been issued immediately to Coolmore by the vendors' solicitors and that by late August he was made aware that Mr Regan was 'not happy' about the purported sale of the land to the Magniers. Mr Hayden asked Mr Casey if the main reason for the exclusivity agreement was Mr Regan's interest and was told 'very much so'. The case continues before Mr Justice Barrett.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Hospital apologises after misdiagnosis of seven-year-old's appendicitis
A hospital has apologised to a girl whose appendicitis was misdiagnosed at its emergency department in July, 2022, before her appendix later ruptured. A letter of apology from University Hospital Galway (UHG) was read in the High Court as Ariana Mocanu settled a legal action against the Health Service Executive (HSE) for €64,000. Jeremy Maher SC, instructed by PBN Litigation for Ariana, told the court the girl – who was seven years old at the time – had been incorrectly diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and discharged after midnight with antibiotics. Nine hours later, counsel said, she was brought back to the hospital but her acute appendicitis had progressed to a perforated appendix and peritonitis. She required urgent surgery. READ MORE Counsel said the girl's father had, on a number of occasions, raised the possibility of appendicitis with the hospital's treating medic but was told it was a urinary tract infection. Mr Justice Paul Coffey was told that liability and causation in the case are contested. In a letter, UHG said Ariana had been assessed by an emergency medicine doctor who formed the opinion, based on her presenting complaints, that the diagnosis was more likely to be a urinary tract infection than appendicitis. 'On this occasion, the diagnosis turned out to be incorrect. The hospital apologises for this initial misdiagnosis,' the letter from hospital manager Chris Kane said. It added: 'We regret what Ariana and her family went through and we wish Ariana and her family the very best.' Mr Maher told the court that experts on their side would say there was never a case where she should have been sent home. He said the HSE contended surgery would not have been possible at the hospital before morning in any event, which counsel said he found to be bizarre. Ariana had to have open surgery the next day and counsel said she had shown incredible courage. Ariana, from Gorey, Co Wexford, sued the HSE through her father. Outside court, the girl's parents, Diana and Petru Mocanu, through solicitor Piarais Neary, said they had brought the case for Ariana and to highlight to other parents the risk of appendicitis and to know the signs and when to seek urgent medical treatment. They said they welcomed the apology after three years. The young girl was brought to UHG on July 23rd, 2022 complaining of acute central abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. In the proceedings, it was claimed there was afailure to take any reasonable care for the safety of the girl and an alleged failure to exercise an appropriate level of skill, competence and diligence in or about the diagnosis, assessment, management and treatment of the child when she presented at the hospital. It was claimed she had been discharged with an incorrect diagnosis whereas she should have been admitted. All of the claims were denied. Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Coffey said he was satisfied it was fair and reasonable.
