Trump administration says it won't publish major climate change reports on NASA website as promised
Earlier this month, the official government websites that hosted the authoritative, peer-reviewed national climate assessments went dark. Such sites tell state and local governments and the public what to expect in their backyards from a warming world and how best to adapt to it. At the time, the White House said NASA would house the reports to comply with a 1990 law that requires the reports, which the space agency said it planned to do.
But on Monday, NASA announced that it aborted those plans.
'The USGCRP [the government agency that oversees and used to host the report] met its statutory requirements by presenting its reports to Congress. NASA has no legal obligations to host globalchange.gov's data,' NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said in an email. That means no data from the assessment or the government science office that coordinated the work will be on NASA, she said.
On July 3, NASA put out a statement that said, 'All preexisting reports will be hosted on the NASA website, ensuring continuity of reporting.'
'This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly,' said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe. She is chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy and co-author of several past national climate assessments.
Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's library and the latest report and its interactive atlas can be seen here.
Former Obama White House science advisor and climate scientist John Holdren accused the administration of outright lying and long intending to censor or bury the reports.
'The new stance is classic Trump administration misdirection,' Holdren said. 'In this instance, the administration offers a modest consolation to quell initial outrage over the closure of the globalchange.gov site and the disappearance of the National Climate Assessments. Then, two weeks later, they snatch away the consolation with no apology.'
'They simply don't want the public to see the meticulously assembled and scientifically validated information about what climate change is already doing to our farms, forests, and fisheries, as well as to storms, floods, wildfires, and coast property — and about how all those damages will grow in the absence of concerted remedial action,' Holdren said in an email.
That's why it's important that state and local governments and everyday people see these reports, Holdren said. He said they are written in a way that is 'useful to people who need to understand what climate change is doing and will do to THEM, their loved ones, their property and their environment.'
'Trump doesn't want people to know,' Holdren wrote.
The most recent report, issued in 2023, found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority communities, particularly Native Americans, often disproportionately at risk.
Borenstein writes for the Associated Press.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump seals the deal on stablecoin bill
He touted the GENIUS Act, which establishes a regulatory framework for dollar-backed digital tokens called stablecoins, as 'a giant step to cement the American dominance of global finance and crypto technology.' 'This could be perhaps the greatest revolution in financial technology since the birth of the internet itself,' he said at the signing ceremony, flanked by congressional and industry leaders. The stablecoin bill faced a lengthy and sometimes halting path to the White House. After sailing through the Senate Banking Committee earlier this year, the GENIUS Act — Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins ACT — hit its first snag in the upper chamber in May, when a group of crypto-friendly Democrats pulled their support from the legislation and blocked a procedural vote on the floor. Several weeks of negotiations produced an updated version of the bill that won back support from most of the crypto-friendly contingent on the left. After initially promising an open amendment process, GOP leadership scrapped plans to move the bill via so-called regular order when several controversial amendments threatened to derail progress. The GENIUS Act ultimately passed the Senate by a 68-30 vote in late June. Trump, who has become a key ally to the crypto industry in his second term, urged the House to quickly pass a 'clean' stablecoin bill and send it to his desk. The president's request frustrated efforts by some in the House who had hoped to tie the GENIUS Act to a broader crypto framework, allowing the lower chamber to put its stamp on legislation and preventing additional crypto legislation from losing momentum. House leadership ultimately opted to move the GENUIS Act to the floor alongside two other crypto bills without formally tying them together in what it labeled 'crypto week.' However, crypto week proved much more tumultuous than expected. A group of hardline Republicans blocked a procedural vote Tuesday, bringing the House floor to a standstill and leaving the trio of crypto bills in limbo.


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
CBS News poll: Most Americans favor U.S. returning to moon, going to Mars
There is a lot of public favor for the idea of the U.S. returning to the moon, and also for eventually going to Mars. About two-thirds do, while a third does not. Younger Americans who are not old enough to remember the first moon landing are especially in favor, perhaps looking forward to seeing that exploration in their lifetimes. These views generally cut across ideological and party lines, as well. The first moon landing in 1969 continues to loom large in the public mind, all these years on — a big majority says it was worth doing, while just under a quarter says it was not. Views were comparable back when this was asked at the 40th and 50th anniversaries of it, too. That may be partly because, in general, Americans tend to think the space program adds at least somewhat to feelings of national pride. People tend to think it also contributes some — if not necessarily a lot — to technological contributions from which everyone can benefit. This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,404 U.S. adults interviewed between June 18-23, 2025. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.6 points. Toplines


Time Magazine
3 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Astronomers Discover Uncommon Way for Black Holes to Form
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope continues to deliver the goods. Launched on Christmas Day, 2021, it has since sent back a storm of dazzling images and a trove of good science. Now Webb has done it again. As NASA reports, two astronomers working with raw Webb data the space agency periodically makes available to researchers, have found evidence of a fast-growing black hole in an unexpected place and formed in an unexpected way. What the two astronomers—Pieter van Dokkumum of Yale University and Gabriel Brammer of the University of Copenhagen—found was a pair of spiral galaxies that collided in space. Each galaxy has a black hole at its center that was already present before the collision and which emit a red glow surrounded by a ring of light and matter, giving the overall formation the shape of the infinity symbol. Van Dokkum and Brammer nicknamed the pair the Infinity Galaxy. What surprised them was that the formation was also home to a third, larger, supermassive black hole—one with the mass of perhaps one million suns. This black hole was not in the center of one or the other galaxy as a supermassive black hole should be, but rather in the mashup of dust and gasses between them. 'Everything is unusual about this galaxy,' said Van Dokkum, in an extensive description he wrote for NASA. 'Not only does it look strange, but it also has this supermassive black hole that's pulling a lot of material in.' Just how the object formed is unknown, but Van Dokkum and Brammer have two theories, called the 'light seeds' and 'heavy seeds' scenarios. In the light seeds version, a star explodes and its core collapses, forming a black hole with a mass of perhaps 1,000 suns. Over time, other nearby stars collapse and form their own black holes and finally all of the bodies merge to form one supermassive black hole. But that theory has a problem. 'The merger process takes time,' Van Dokkum says, 'and Webb has found incredibly massive black holes at incredibly early times in the universe—possibly even too early for the process to explain them.' That doesn't mean the light seeds scenario doesn't ever play out, but it does mean that it's not as common as astronomers may believe. In the heavy seeds scenario a supermassive black hole forms directly from the collapse of a large gas cloud. In the case of the Infinity Galaxy, this occurred during the collision, when the galactic gas was shocked and compressed by the violence of the cosmic crackup. 'This compression might just be enough to form a dense knot, which then compressed into a black hole,' Van Dokkum says. That process is also called a direct collapse black hole. Not only did a supermassive black hole form from this collision, that black hole is still growing. Radio and X-ray emissions confirmed by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and by the ground-based Very Large Array, confirm that the black hole is still pulling in prodigious amounts of dust and gas from its surroundings. Van Dokkum and Brammer prefer the heavy seeds scenario to explain what they found since it would be such a natural result of a galactic collision. 'By looking at the Infinity Galaxy, we think we have pieced together a story of how this could have happened here,' says Van Dokkum. But they concede that other, less likely occurrences could explain the supermassive black hole. For one thing, the body between the two galaxies in the Infinity Galaxy might be a runaway black hole that was ejected from its parent galaxy and is now passing through the Infinity Galaxy, and just happened to have been spotted by the Webb telescope during this relatively brief interregnum. Alternatively, the supermassive black hole might be at the center of a third galaxy that happens to be in the foreground of the same area of sky as the Infinity Galaxy. If that third galaxy were a dwarf galaxy, it might be faint enough that only the superheated gas and dust surrounding the black hole would be visible. But the researchers don't expect those theories to be borne out. If the black hole were a runaway, the velocity of the gasses flowing into it would likely be different from the velocity of the gasses in the Infinity Galaxy. While they haven't yet measured the speed of the gasses, they expect them to be similar. The idea that the black hole lies at the center of a dwarf galaxy can be dismissed almost out of hand since dwarf galaxies typically don't form black holes that big. All that is enough for the astronomers to claim at least a cautious victory in their discovery. 'We can't say definitively that we have found a direct collapse black hole,' says Van Dokkum. 'But we can say that these new data strengthen the case that we're seeing a newborn black hole while eliminating some of the competing explanations.'