Passenger jet and cargo plane miss each other by just 300ft over Russia after 'unexpected manoeuvre' by Air China flight puts it on collision course
The dramatic incident, which unfolded in the early hours of July 7 over Tuva, a mountainous region bordering Mongolia, has reignited growing fears over global aviation safety.
Shockingly, the two aircraft - Air China Flight CA967 bound for Milan and an SF Airlines cargo plane heading to China - should have been separated by at least 1,000ft, in line with international safety regulations.
Instead, the Air China Airbus A350 mysteriously began climbing from 34,100ft to 36,000ft without clearance from Russian air traffic control, placing it on a near-collision course with the cargo jet flying at 35,000ft.
Startling audio recordings that surfaced over the weekend on Chinese social media appear to capture the confusion in the skies, with multiple pilots attempting to communicate with a Russian controller juggling four planes at once.
The near miss triggered an alarm known as the Traffic Collision Avoidance System on both planes, prompting the Air China pilot to ask air traffic control what had caused this to happen.
The audio, mostly in English, paints a picture of mounting chaos as the Airbus edged dangerously close to the Boeing.
The controller asked: 'Are you climbing with instruction or without instruction? Confirm, please.'
The pilot replied: 'No. Thank you.'
What exactly prompted the sudden ascent remains a mystery.
One theory is that the Air China pilot may have misheard instructions given to another aircraft nearby.
While two other planes - another Air China flight and a Hainan Airlines jet - were told to maintain their altitudes, Flight CA967 received no such directive before it began its unsanctioned climb.
Radar data confirms the terrifying approach, showing the jets heading almost directly toward one another at high-speed at cruising altitude.
The SF Airlines pilot, reportedly the first to spot the looming danger, urgently requested confirmation from air traffic control, only to be told an Airbus A350 was right in front of him.
A swift order was given that both aircraft were to veer off immediately in opposite directions to avoid catastrophe.
But behind the scenes, tensions flared. It is not known who released the recording and it could not be independently verified.
Air China, SF Airlines and the Civil Aviation Administration of China have been asked for comment by local media.
The recording circulating online also includes a conversation between the two pilots after they switched to a different communication channel and spoke to each other in Mandarin.
The sound quality meant that parts of the conversation were inaudible, but at one point the cargo pilot was heard to say: 'I saw your plane climbing. Did [air traffic control] instruct you to?
'I saw that there was a plane ahead and it was only 20 nautical miles [37km] away and still climbing. Such a crossing altitude is very inappropriate. I guess you also heard me saying 'request traffic information'.'
The Air China pilot appeared to blame the female Russian air traffic controller for the incident, saying 'the girl' was 'making a fuss' and had left everyone 'confused'.
He later said: 'We couldn't explain it clearly to them' and 'didn't know how to tell them'.
The pilot added: 'I assume we'll have to write a report on this kind of incident when we get back.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Fire breaks out on Air India's flight from Hong Kong after landing in Delhi
Air India grounded an aircraft for inspection after a fire broke out in its auxiliary power unit, or APU, shortly after landing in New Delhi on Tuesday. The fire was detected while passengers were disembarking flight AI315 from Hong Kong, the airline said in a statement. 'The incident occurred while passengers had begun disembarking and the APU was automatically shut down as per system design,' an airline spokesperson said. The APU is installed at the rear of the aircraft and serves as a backup power source. It is primarily used to start the main engines and operate critical onboard systems while the aircraft is on the ground. Passengers de-boarded safely but the aircraft, which landed in Delhi at 12.31pm local time, was damaged, the airline said. Flight tracking service Flightradar24 identified the affected aircraft as an Airbus A321. This was the third Air India scare in two days. A flight from the southern city of Kochi veered off a rain-soaked runway in Mumbai on Monday. All passengers got off safely but the aircraft's engine and runway infrastructure were damaged. The plane was grounded and both pilots de-rostered. A few hours later, flight AI2403 from Delhi to Kolkata aborted take-off at high speed after a technical issue was detected. The pilots stopped the aircraft, and all 160 passengers were safely disembarked. The flight was rescheduled for later in the evening. These incidents come amid heightened scrutiny of flight safety following last month's deadly Air India crash in Ahmedabad that killed 260 people. A preliminary investigation report released a month after the crash revealed the Boeing Dreamliner's fuel control switches flipped from 'run' position to 'cutoff' within seconds of the take-off. The report said that one of the pilots was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he had cut off the fuel. The other responded that he hadn't. The report caused an uproar with pilot associations accusing the investigators of indirectly blaming the pilots for the crash. A subsequent report in The Wall Street Journal suggested that pilot error could have played a role in the incident. However, Indian authorities condemned the report as speculative and irresponsible. Meanwhile, Air India said it found no problems with the fuel control switch mechanisms across its Boeing 787 and 737 fleet during inspections carried out after the Ahmedabad crash. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau expects to give a final report detailing its investigation into the crash within a year.
Daily Record
5 hours ago
- Daily Record
Air India crash probe major update on key issue thought to be its cause
Following the horror crash last month, which killed 261 people, including dozens of Brits, Air India has inspected its entire fleet of Boeing 787 Dreamliners and Boeing 737 planes. Air India has found no issues in the locking mechanism of fuel control switches for its Boeing aircrafts. This key update comes after the doomed Air India flight 171 crash, which killed 261 people last month. The Boeing 787 jetliner - bound for Gatwick Airport - careered into a medical college in Ahmedabad, India, moments after take-off, reports the Mirror. The airline's entire fleet of both Boeing 787s and Boeing 787 Dreamliners have now been inspected. It said in a statement today: "In the inspections, no issues were found with the said locking mechanism." Such a fault would typically starve both engines of fuel, something which was highlighted as a possible cause in a preliminary investigation by third-party authorities this month. The two findings jar, but Air India reminded reporters it has some 33 Dreamliners in its fleet and subsidiary and low-cost unit Air India Express operates more than 70 Boeing 737 jets. Last week, India's aviation regulator ordered all airlines operating several Boeing models to examine fuel control switches and submit their findings to the regulator by July 21. In the past few weeks, the airline has faced disruptions in services amid heightened scrutiny and additional safety inspections, leading to flight delays, cancellations and growing passenger anxiety. On Monday, an Air India Airbus 320 flight veered off the runway as it landed during heavy rainfall at Mumbai International Airport, partially damaging the underside of one of the plane's engines and leading to a temporary runway closure. The flight had flown from Kochi in the southern state of Kerala. The airline said in a statement that all passengers and crew members disembarked safely and the aircraft was grounded for checks. In another incident, an Air India flight from Hong Kong had a fire in its auxiliary power unit on Tuesday while passengers were exiting the aircraft after it landed in New Delhi. 'The auxiliary power unit was automatically shut down as per system design. There was some damage to the aircraft, however, passengers and crew members disembarked normally, and are safe,' the airline said. Its statement added the aircraft was grounded for investigation and the aviation safety regulator notified. Indian conglomerate Tata Sons took over Air India in 2022, returning the debt-saddled national carrier to private ownership after decades of government control. The $2.4 billion (£1.7 billion) deal was seen as the government's effort to sell off a loss-making, state-run businesses. It also was in some ways a homecoming for Air India, which was launched by the Tata family in 1932. Since the takeover, Air India has ordered hundreds of new planes worth more than $70 billion (£51 billion), redesigned its branding and livery and absorbed smaller airlines that Tata held stakes in. The company additionally has committed millions of dollars to digital overhauls of aircrafts and refurbishing interiors of more than five dozen legacy planes. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Norfolk County Council urges action over battery farm fire fears
Energy secretary Ed Milliband will be asked to fund training and equipment for fire services in areas where large battery farms are County Council voted in favour of asking for government support for emergency services because of concerns they may have to deal with blazes at battery energy storage systems (Bess).A number are planned for Norfolk, and Conservative council leader Kay Mason Billig said she fears "they pose a serious risk", whilst calling for fire services to be consulted on battery farm planning Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said "fires at storage sites in the UK are rare" and "high safety standards" were already in place. Bess are used to stockpile excess energy from sources such as fossil fuels, solar and wind - and then release it when the power is needed electricity is held inside lithium batteries, which are housed in structures similar to shipping are seen as a key part of the government's plan for green power and energy security, with it aiming to increase storage capacity from 4.5 GW in 2024, to up to 27 GW by whilst Bess fires are rare, concerns have been raised about their safety, with Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service describing them as "an emerging risk".There is currently no single authority setting safety standards for them, but they are regulated by the Health and Safety Executive.A growing number of applications have been submitted for Bess sites, although developers recently suspended their plans for a large one at Rushall, near Diss. Mason Billig told a meeting of Norfolk County Council that she was concerned there was no legal requirement for fire services to be consulted on planning applications for Bess for a change in the law she also said she wanted ministers to make sure emergency services were equipped to deal with any fires at them."They present a real challenge to our fire and rescue services who are expected to respond to these highly complex incidents with no additional funding, training or equipment from the government or developers," she Billig added she wanted the government to set national safety standards for battery farms. Catherine Rowett, who leads the council's Green group, said she supported tighter guidelines and fire service funding – but warned against "scaremongering".She said Bess sites where there had been fires – such as one in Liverpool in 2020 – were based on older technology that is now out of use."We should resist the temptation to overstate the risks from Bess installations because local residents are receiving sensationalist misinformation that are causing many to fear for their lives," she councillors voted in favour of Mason Billig's proposals – 11 abstained and none voted against – so she will now write to Milliband.A spokesman for Norfolk's Fire and Rescue Service said it "would welcome closer fire service involvement in these sites as a positive step towards greater public safety in an emerging technology".The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero's spokeswoman said that "every battery storage facility we construct helps protect families from future energy shocks".She added: "Battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK and we already have high safety standards in place to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
