Collective action needed to conserve and protect big cats: Bhupender Yadav
In his address at the first Assembly of the International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA), envisioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi for conservation of big cats in range countries, held here, Yadav highlighted that India has emerged as a global leader in wildlife conservation, demonstrating notable successes over the past decade, and called upon the Big Cat range countries to actively engage and collaborate in the initiatives and programmes of the grouping.
The Assembly, which is the apex body of the IBCA, was attended by ministerial delegations from 9 countries - Bhutan, Cambodia, Eswatini, Guinea, India, Liberia, Suriname, Somalia and Kazakhstan.
It unanimously endorsed Yadav as the President of the IBCA, while it also endorsed S.P. Yadav as the Director General of IBCA.
Created by the Indian government, the International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA) is a coalition of 95 range countries with a mandate for the conservation of seven big cats, namely tigers, lions, leopards, snow leopards, cheetahs, jaguars, and pumas.
"The Assembly endorsed the proceedings of the first International Steering Committee meeting of IBCA, which was held in April 2024, ratified the Headquarters Agreement signed by IBCA with the Republic of India, approved the Workplan, Rules of Procedure of the Assembly and the manual of Staff and financial regulations of the IBCA. These will serve as the guiding foundation for the effective governance, operations, and collaborative initiatives of the International Big Cat Alliance," the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change said in a statement.
The IBCA was established by the Indian government, through the nodal organisation, the National Tiger Conservation Authority, through an order on March 12, 2024.
Its primary objective is to facilitate collaboration and synergy amongst range countries and other stakeholders, consolidating successful conservation practices and expertise to achieve a common goal of conservation of big cats at a global level.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Takeaways for India from Trump moment: strategic autonomy is alive, neoliberalism is dead
Donald J. Trump can be brutally forthright and publicly so. It is partly innate and partly a strategy to throw his interlocutors off balance. In a 1989 interview on CNN's Larry King Live, Mr. Trump was asked by the host about his strategies for gaining an edge in negotiations. Mr. Trump responded not with a direct answer, but with a startling personal comment: 'Can I move my chair? Because your breath is very bad. It really is... Has this ever been told to you before?' Years later, Mr. Trump explained that it was a demonstration of his negotiation tactics. Mr. Trump's outspokenness can be unsettling, but it can also be helpful. There are a few valuable lessons that Indian strategy could learn, thanks to the manner in which Mr. Trump conducts U.S. diplomacy. Donald Trump's worldview Key elements of his worldview have largely remained consistent for decades. Even before he made an entry into politics, Mr. Trump was anti-trade, anti-war, cognizant of the economic and social challenges within the American society, and believed that all other countries were taking advantage of the U.S. He is trying to turn all those beliefs into policies with varying levels of success. However, what is remarkable is his ongoing exposition of American policy, which is too candid to be comforting for partners abroad. For his critics at home, it is what he says rather than what he does that is infuriating. All countries are scurrying to reposition themselves. It is a moment of reckoning for India. Editorial | Soured relations: On Trump's 25% tariff, 'penalty' The idea that India's hesitation to go into a complete strategic lock-in with the U.S. and to completely open its market is hindering progress in bilateral ties is commonplace because its proponents are influential. India, whether under Jawaharlal Nehru or Narendra Modi, has been reluctant to do either of these, and strategic autonomy has held the country in good stead. For one, alliances are not insulated from shifts in U.S. priorities over time, Trump or not. To cite one example, when Joe Biden was President, Australia scrapped a $90 billion deal with France to build conventional diesel-electric submarines. Instead, it entered the AUKUS pact with the U.S. and the U.K. to acquire nuclear-powered submarines using the U.S. technology. All within the family, but hanging France out to dry. Mr. Trump, who is often portrayed as hostile to U.S. allies, is saying it all too loud. India's choice Amid Mr. Trump's rhetoric, India could be further incentivised to reinforce the idea of strategic autonomy, which remains the most viable framework for sustaining a robust relationship with the U.S. The Modi government has, in practice, followed the path of strategic autonomy. Both strategic autonomy and strategic subservience carry costs. India appears increasingly prepared to bear the cost of autonomy — rather than of subservience. Turning into a frontline of any U.S. strategy for containment of another country or expansion of its own interest can be fatal — ask Ukraine. Mr. Trump has done India a favour by silencing the call for abandoning strategic autonomy. If there was any doubt about strategic autonomy, the Trump moment has clarified it. Mr. Trump wants to restore manufacturing and jobs in the U.S. and has, in the process, unsettled global trade. Access to its market has been a lever of American power for long, and Mr. Trump is just blunt about it. A trade deal may resolve some immediate issues, but India cannot ignore the reality that in a world where every country has turned protectionist, export-driven growth is a narrow and difficult path. Mr. Trump has made it amply clear that he does not want China being replaced by any country in U.S. supply chains. It will be foolhardy to assume that any future U.S. President will be fine with that either. It is as if no country wants to import anything other than plastic toys and T-shirts. India could pay more attention to leveraging its domestic market to build its economy and manufacturing. Considering the rapid automation and the consequent limits of job growth in manufacturing, 'making for the world' is not sustainable for India, economist Raghuram Rajan has pointed out. Mr. Modi on Sunday exhorted Indians to augment domestic consumption. A domestic market-driven development model needs to be articulated strongly. The priority and the emphasis need to shift. Ties with the U.S. The Trump moment tells India two things — strategic autonomy is alive; and neoliberalism is dead. India has to navigate the path ahead, and the U.S. remains a key partner in that. It is reasonable to assume that the U.S. will remain the most powerful state on the planet for several decades to come. Relations with the U.S. will continue to be a major determinant of India's capacity to realise its ambitions and make progress. Getting this one relationship right will be critical for India. Neither obsequiousness nor confrontation can advance India's relations with the U.S. India should also learn that soft power is supposed to be soft, not loud and screeching. As the yoga teacher would say, pranayama practice should not make any sound.
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump Advisor Criticizes India's Russian Oil Purchases, Claims They Fund Ukraine Conflict
Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on imported goods from India. He also said that nations buying Russian oil may be subject to 100 per cent tariffs on their exports to the US until Russia signs a ceasefire in Ukraine. One of the top aides to US President Donald Trump has accused India financing Russia war against Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow. He has been ramping up pressure on New Delhi to cut down its imports of Russian oil, with a threat of Russian oil penalties if it does not. On Sunday, during an interview on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, former White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller Ukraine war was asked about the Ukraine war. He said the former US president's position was clear. India must not be aiding the war by purchasing oil from Russia. Miller is one of Trump's top advisors and he was quoted by News 18 as saying, 'India buying Russian oil is indirectly contributing to Russia's war in Ukraine'. The statement is being seen as one of the most direct from Trump administration to date on US India relations. Miller was quoted as saying that many may be 'surprised to learn that India is now right behind China in purchasing Russian oil, even with those sanctions in place'. Reuters reported that a source in the Indian government had said New Delhi will keep buying oil from Russia in spite of possible sanctions from Trump. Trump said he would impose a 25 per cent Trump tariffs on India. He also said countries purchasing Russian oil may be subject to 100 per cent tariffs on their exports to the United States until Russia agrees to a ceasefire in Ukraine. The United States on Friday announced a 25 per cent tariff on some Indian imports. Trump said New Delhi's continued purchases of military hardware and energy from Russia had contributed to the decision.
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
‘If you are a true Indian…': Supreme Court rebukes Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Army, stays further proceedings
Synopsis The Supreme Court questioned Rahul Gandhi, a Lok Sabha member, regarding his comments about the Indian Army. This followed a clash between Indian and Chinese forces in December 2022. The court inquired how Gandhi knew about the alleged occupation of 2000 km of land by China. ANI Congress leader Rahul Gandhi The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, over his alleged remarks on the Indian Army following the Indo-China clash in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang sector on December 9, expressing concern over the nature of the statements, the Supreme Court granted interim relief to Gandhi and stayed further proceedings pending before the trial court in the case.A bench of the apex court questioned the basis of Gandhi's public claim that China had occupied 2,000 km of Indian territory, asking, 'How did you get to know that 2,000 km land was occupied by Chinese?'The court further observed, 'If you are a true Indian, you will not say these things.'The remarks came while the bench was hearing a plea seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated against Rahul Gandhi in connection with his comments on the armed forces. The court also advised the Congress leader to use appropriate parliamentary platforms for such statements. 'You are Leader of Opposition; say things in Parliament, not on social media,' the bench told the leader.
