Servitor Issued Notice Over Use Of Puri Jagannath Temple's Sacred Wood To Make Digha Idols
Last Updated:
Trouble started for Ramakrushna Dasmohapatra when he told some media channels that he had taken surplus neem wood from the 2015 Nabakalebar rituals at Puri Jagannath to Digha
Puri's Shree Jagannath Temple administration has served a show-cause notice to a senior servitor over allegedly using the shrine's surplus sacred wood in crafting idols in a temple at Digha in neighbouring West Bengal.
Servitor 'Daitapati Nijog' secretary Ramakrushna Dasmohapatra has been asked to submit his reply within seven days. The notice added that if a satisfactory explanation is not received within the specified period, Dasmohapatra will face disciplinary action as per the Shree Jagannath Temple Act-1955.
Trouble started for Dasmohapatra when he reportedly told some media channels in West Bengal that he had taken the surplus neem wood from the 2015 Nabakalebar rituals at Puri Jagannath temple to Digha for construction of idols.
However, he later denied making the claims. 'This is a false report. I have never told this to any news channel. My statements might have been morphed or intentionally edited. I just told the media that neem wood idols were consecrated at the newly built temple at Digha," he said.
Amid a row over the West Bengal government's portrayal of the Digha temple as 'Jagannath Dham' and alleged use of Puri shrine's surplus wood in the construction of idols there, Odisha's law minister Prithiviraj Harichandan on May 2 asked the SJTA to inquire into the matter.
'Nabakalebara' is a ritual held every 12 or 19 years, during which the wooden bodies of idols—Lord Balabhadra, Devi Subhadra and Lord Jagannath—are changed at the Puri temple. Dasmohapatra, who is known as Rajesh Daitapati in West Bengal, was also asked questions like who keeps the keys of the 'Daru Gruha", the store room in the Puri temple where sacred wood are kept, and whether 'Brahma' installation was made at Digha temple.
'Brahma' is a material considered to be the soul of Lord Jagannath, which is transferred from the old idol to a new one during the 'Nabakalebara' ritual.
(With agency inputs)
First Published:
May 05, 2025, 12:42 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
Rs 2.25 crore reward for Daitapatis for smooth conduct of Jagannath Rath Yatra
BHUBANESWAR/PURI: In a massive incentive, the Law department has approved Rs 2.25 crore for Daitapati servitors of the Shree Jagannath Temple if they ensure a smooth Rath Yatra. A proposal in this regard was sent by the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) recently. In a letter to the Srimandir chief administrator, the department informed that the government has approved Rs 2.25 crore as a 'special reward' for Daita servitors for disciplined conduct during the annual festival of the Trinity. The money will be paid from the SJTA funds and replenished with the allotment of funds as special grants to the SJTA at the supplementary budget stage. Other servitors welcomed the incentives for Daitapatis and urged release of funds for all servitors who render services connected with the Rath Yatra. In another development, the I&PR department has decided to set up temporary information kiosks at various places in Puri to reach out to maximum number of devotees coming to the city for Rath Yatra. At a preparatory meeting on Thursday, principal secretary Sanjay Kumar Singh said various programmes are being planned by the department for the upcoming Rath Yatra which includes folk art performances and live broadcasting of the festival. Meanwhile, DIG S Praveen Kumar informed that at least 70 platoons of police force along with four senior commandant rank police officers and 450 other officers will be deployed in Puri for the Snana Purnima on June 11. Addressing the press, the DIG said, 'Our primary aim is to bring discipline to the darshan of the deities, ensure the security of devotees, and regulate traffic.' Earlier in the day, the DIG discussed the security issue with Puri Superintendent of Police Vinit Kumar, and other senior officers of the district. The temple administration has also conducted a number of meetings with temple servitors and Daitapatis for the timely observance of daily rituals of the deities.
Hindustan Times
29-05-2025
- Hindustan Times
Miffed Odisha to apply for Jagannath patents amid spar with Bengal over deity
The Jagannath temple in the coastal city of Puri is a beacon of spiritual and cultural identity. This 12th-century shrine, dedicated to the revered deity, Jagannath, is not just a religious site but a cornerstone of Odia heritage, drawing millions of pilgrims annually. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government led by Mohan Majhi last week announced that it would seek patents or trademarks for terms intrinsically tied to the temple, including 'Jagannath Dham,' 'Srimandir,' 'Mahaprasad,' and the temple's logo. The announcement came a month after a controversy erupted After West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee inaugurated a Jagannath temple in Digha – a coastal town some 350 km from Puri -- and named it Jagannath dham. The controversy further intensified as Banerjee referred the new temple as 'Jagannath Dham', sparking widespread criticism because 'Dham' is a sacred designation traditionally linked to Puri, as per revered Hindu spiritual leader Adi Shankaracharya's designation of four Dhams (Puri, Badrinath, Dwarka, Rameswaram). Majhi shot off a letter to Banerjee asking her to desist from naming the Digha temple as Jagannath Dham. Puri Shankaracharya Swami Nischalananda Saraswati publicly denounced the decision, alleging that it exploits the diety's name for commercial gain. Puri's king Gajapati Maharaja Dibyasingha Deb said the nomenclature used for the Digha temple has deeply hurt the sentiments of devotees. 'Terms like Nilachal Dham, Shreekhetra, Srimandir, and Jagannath Dham have always been exclusively associated with the sacred temple in Puri,' he said. The controversy also deepened over a senior servitor of the temple claiming that surplus neem wood from the 2015 Nabakalebara ceremony at Puri temple was used to create idols for the Digha temple. Though a subsequent probe found the claim untrue, the servitor has been debarred from entering the temple for a month as he attended the consecration process of the Jagannath temple in Digha. Can sacred terms be patented? The Odisha government's move has sparked a debate whether sacred words, steeped in centuries of devotion, can, or should, be patented by a state. The Odisha government's initiative aims to protect the cultural and spiritual identity of the Jagannath temple by trademarking terms that define its rituals and offerings. According to Sri Jagannath Temple Administration chief Arabinda Padhee, patenting these terms is a 'legal measure aimed at preserving the sanctity, heritage, and unique identity of the Jagannath Temple'. The terms in question—such as 'Jagannath Dham' (the sacred abode of Lord Jagannath), 'Srimandir' (the temple itself), and 'Mahaprasad' (the sanctified food offered to the deity)—are deeply embedded in Odia culture. The move is also shaped by electoral politics. The BJP, which came to power in Odisha a year ago, is keen to consolidate its support among the people by championing the cause of religious identity and heritage. The dispute with West Bengal, ruled by the Trinamool Congress, allows the BJP to project itself as a defender of Odia pride and Hindu traditions, potentially strengthening its political base ahead of panchayat elections two years later. But can such terms, tied to religious tradition, be legally protected under intellectual property law? Lawyers say a patent is granted for an invention that has novelty and industrial applicability which means, if a thing or product or process is already existing, patent cannot be granted to it. Patents are for inventions. 'The Trade Marks Act, 1999 prohibits registration of marks that hurt religious sentiments or lack distinctiveness. Courts have historically ruled that religious terms cannot be monopolised unless they acquire a secondary commercial meaning. Odisha may struggle to prove these terms are uniquely tied to commercial goods/services rather than religious practice. Even if trademarks are granted, enforcing them against entities like West Bengal's Digha temple or other religious institutions could lead to protracted litigation,' said Radha Charan Das, a senior lawyer of Orissa High Court. 'For example, terms like Mahaprasad (sacred offering) are used widely across India, complicating claims of exclusivity. If Odisha succeeds, other states might seek trademarks for shared cultural or religious terms risking legal chaos. This could also contravene Article 25 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion,' Das said. But other legal experts argue that trademarking such terms is feasible if they are proven to have a distinctive association with the Jagannath Temple. 'Odisha can argue that 'Mahaprasad' is not a generic term for any consecrated food but specifically refers to the offerings prepared under the temple's strict rituals, cooked by the Suar Mahasuar Nijog using traditional methods. Similarly, 'Jagannath Dham' could be trademarked as a unique identifier of Puri's temple, distinct from other Jagannath temples worldwide. However, the courts may hesitate to grant exclusive rights to words with broad spiritual significance as words like 'Mahaprasad' may be deemed too generic or culturally universal,' said Srikanta Das, another lawyer. 'The process of patenting or trademarking requires demonstrating that the terms are not already in widespread use without permission,' he said. Das said that the state government can at best apply GI tag for Mahaprasad like the Tirupati temple administration did for the famous Trirupati Laddoo in 2009, but it's not easy. In Puri, where the Jagannath Temple's spire casts a long shadow over the city, the Odisha government's quest to patent divinity may protect the temple's legacy, but it also raises a question: can the sacred be bound by legalese?
India Today
28-05-2025
- India Today
Why Odisha govt wants to trademark Jagannath terminologies
BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari is likely to find some political satisfaction in the Odisha government's move to secure trademark rights over key religious terms associated with the revered Jagannath Temple in Puri. The decision comes on the heels of a sharp controversy over the naming of a new temple in West Bengal's Digha as Jagannath Dham—a row that Adhikari, who is leader of the Opposition in the Bengal legislative assembly, had vocally amplified, accusing the Mamata Banerjee government of 'cultural appropriation'.In a significant cultural and legal counter-move, the Mohan Charan Majhi-led BJP government in Odisha has formally initiated steps to trademark a cluster of terms intrinsically tied to Jagannath worship and the spiritual geography of Puri. These include 'Jagannath Dham', 'Shree Mandira', 'Purushottam Kshetra', 'Neelachal Dham', 'Bada Danda', 'Mahaprasad' and 'Neela Chakra'.advertisementThe development not only strengthens Odisha's cultural sovereignty over the Jagannath tradition but also raises the possibility of legal friction with the Bengal government, which has thus far remained silent on Odisha's Padhee, chief administrator of the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA), confirmed the decision and said the process of finalising the list of protected terms was underway. 'Once we obtain trademark rights, any unauthorised use of these expressions will be legally actionable,' he stated. According to Padhee, these names were not mere labels but sacred expressions deeply embedded in the liturgy, history and ritual fabric of the Jagannath tradition, many of them traceable to ancient Hindu trigger was the inauguration last month of the Digha Jagannath temple by Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, who described the site as 'Jagannath Dham'. This provoked sharp reactions in Odisha, with the state accusing Bengal of diminishing the religious and cultural sanctity of the original Jagannath Dham in Puri—one of the 'Char Dhams' in use of 'Jagannath Dham' in any context other than Puri undermines centuries of sacred tradition,' said an official from what may be viewed as both a religious and political escalation, Majhi had written to Mamata, seeking an explanation and urging restraint. In fact, one of the servitors from the Puri temple, who had led the consecration rituals in Digha, and was also accused of supplying unused wood from Nabakalebar for the deities in the new temple, was move to trademark temple terminology is now being steered through the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), under the Union ministry of commerce and industry. The SJTA is compiling archival documents, historical records and scriptural evidence to support their application, which aims to protect the exclusivity of the Jagannath tradition from unauthorised usage or plan has won the support of Odisha's religious scholars, cultural historians and even the titular Maharaj of Puri, Gajapati Maharaj Dibyasingha Deb, who chairs the Jagannath Temple Managing parallel with this cultural assertion, preparations for the grand Rath Yatra, scheduled for June 27, are on in full swing. At a high-level meeting of the Shree Jagannath Temple Managing Committee, several operational decisions were taken to ensure the smooth execution of the annual chariot festival. These included the formation of dedicated 'Pahandi Dalas' (teams responsible for carrying idols onto the chariots), the enforcement of restrictions on non-servitors accessing chariots, and a complete ban on mobile phones atop the committee also reviewed security measures around the sacred Ratna Bhandar (the temple's treasury), and debated the relocation of the donation box (Hundi) to prevent crowding within the sanctum sanctorum. Furthermore, a proposal will be sent to the urban development department to limit the height of buildings around the Shree Mandir and Gundicha Temple, aiming to preserve ritual purity and visual the Rath Yatra approaching, emotions around Lord Jagannath and his place in India's spiritual landscape are running high. Odisha's decision to trademark sacred terminology is not merely about legal protection; it is an assertion of identity in the face of what is seen as cultural overreach by a neighbouring state. The controversy has also offered Adhikari a potent narrative—one that allows him to accuse the Bengal government of not just political opportunism but of desecrating centuries-old spiritual to India Today MagazineTrending Reel advertisement
