
Canada Project Reclaims 'Foul' Industrial Area To Contain Floods
The Port Lands project has, in part, reversed a consequence of industrialization by reconnecting Lake Ontario with the Don River, more than a century after they were severed to create an industrial area.
Chris Glaisek, chief planning officer at the municipal body Waterfront Toronto, said the idea was to "heal the land from the way it was repurposed 100 years ago," with a focus on "flood protection and naturalization."
The complex project -- one of the largest in Toronto's history with a cost of Can$1.4 billion (US$1 billion) -- included digging a river valley and the creation of two new river outlets, with wetlands and marshes to absorb excess water during extreme storms.
The mouth of the Don River was once the Great Lakes system's largest fresh water marsh, a rich habitat and vital food resource for Indigenous people before colonization.
But Toronto, like many North American cities, saw industrial growth in the late 19th Century.
Much of the marsh was drained and filled in to make room for a port industrial area, while the river was re-routed into a man-made channel.
The Port Lands never thrived as an industrial area, leaving a vast stretch of eastern downtown under-used, and the Don River became polluted.
"It was really dirty, it was foul, it was terrible," Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow said recently.
On October 15, 1954 Hurricane Hazel hit Toronto, after hammering parts of the Caribbean and eastern United States.
It killed 81 people across the Greater Toronto Area and served as catalyst for the city to get serious about flood protection.
Hazel flooded the Humber River, in western Toronto, but Glaisek said "it was understood at the time that that same amount of rainfall, had it landed on the (eastern) Don, would have done a comparable amount of damage."
He called Hazel an initial "impetus" to re-naturalize the Port Lands, but rising awareness over the past two decades about the causal link between climate change and extreme floods helped advance the project.
To reclaim the Port Lands, Toronto partnered with the US-based landscape architecture firm Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, which has worked on the Brooklyn Bridge Park and the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago.
Laura Solano, the lead designer, said the project was "duty bound to address catastrophic flooding," but stressed it offered "much more."
Because the area has been reformed to cope with flood waters, parts have been declared safe for new housing -- an urgent need in the expensive metropolis.
There is also a new park, trails and people can canoe or kayak through the rehabilitated Don.
Solano stressed Toronto's initial decision to alter the area was consistent with the times, when North American cities moved to "industrialize their waters...to raise their economic position."
But now, "every city is looking to reclaim their waters," she told AFP.
The Port Lands "shows the world that it's possible to fix the past and turn deficit and remnant industrial lands into living and breathing infrastructure."
As Glaisek described the project, he stood on a bank that would, by design, be under water during a major storm.
"It's all planned so that it can flood, the water level can rise, the river can get about three, maybe four times wider than it is now, absorb all of that volume of water," he said.
"When the storm event subsides, it will shrink back down to this."
It's a planning approach that recognizes "we're seeing more and more of these events."
"Like in Texas, you see very tragic outcomes when you haven't really tried to plan for nature," he told AFP, referring to flash floods in early July that killed at least 135 people.
He urged planners to "reposition" their relationship to nature and ditch the mindset that "humans (can) control everything."
"Let's acknowledge the river is going to flood. Let's build the space for it." The mouth of the Don River was once the Great Lakes system's largest fresh water marsh, a rich habitat and vital food resource for Indigenous people before colonization AFP The Port Lands never thrived as an industrial area, leaving a vast stretch of eastern downtown under-used, and the Don River became polluted AFP The Manitou Mkwa Signers perform a song along the banks of Don River in Toronto's Port Lands Flood Protection Project AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local Germany
3 hours ago
- Local Germany
Which German universities are ranked among the 'best outside of the US'?
When various rankings of universities around the world are compared, a few of Germany's top schools stand out. Several Germany-based institutions rank among the top 25 universities in the world outside of the US, according to various rankings. Online media platform Visual Capitalist recently published a graphic that highlighted the "top 25 universities outside of the US". It included the top 25 non-US universities according to three separate rankings, including; the Times Higher Education ranking, the QS World University Rankings, and the Academic Ranking of World Universities. The Times Higher Education ranking included the most universities - more than 2,000 from 115 countries. Of these, a number of German universities secured top spots. RANKED: The 'best' universities in Germany for 2025 Germany's top-ranked schools this year Each of the evaluations had their own scoring system, so Germany's top schools earned different rankings between them. But three of Germany's top universities scored among the top 25 schools outside of the US in two of the rankings, and one school made it into the top 25 in all three. The German university that cinched a top spot in all three rankings was the Technical University of Munich (TUM). TUM was among the top 10 universities in the world out side of the US, according to the Times Higher Education ranking. Referring to itself as a "global marketplace of knowledge", TUM has a high proportion of international students – at 43 percent according to Times Higher Education data. The other German universities that claimed top 25 positions according to two of the rankings were Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) – also in Munich – and Heidelberg University. LMU received the highest ratings in its Arts and Humanities department, so it may be a better fit than the technical university for students interested in subjects in these fields. (LMU's website notes that admissions for the coming winter term are open until September 17th.) Advertisement Founded in 1386, Heidelberg University is the oldest higher education institution found in modern-day Germany. Among the perks of enrolling here is living in the surrounding city of Heidelberg, which is renowned for its scenic old town, and the surrounding forest, in addition to being a happening university hub. READ ALSO: Weimar to Heidelberg - The best German university towns for foreign students Germany was historically a world leader in higher education Germany ranks among the world's leading countries for top-notch universities today, but comes in behind the US and the UK in terms of number of high-rated schools. Interestingly, Germany was arguably the world leader in higher education at the beginning of the 20th century. In fact, German was the dominant language of science up until around the Second World War . At this time, the Germany's influence on science was ultimately reduced after many researchers and scientists fled Germany to escape persecution by the Nazis. In the decades since then, the US has become home to many of the world's top universities. But with the Trump Administration having made massive cuts to funding that US universities rely on, and trying to influence enrolment decisions , there has been speculation that the roles could now be reversed - with students from the US potentially pushed to seek opportunities abroad . READ ALSO: What Americans need to know about studying in Germany Advertisement


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
How will Iran respond to 'Trump route' in South Caucasus? – DW – 08/12/2025
A peace plan between Armenia and Azerbaijan brokered by Donald Trump calls for a US-backed transit corridor in the South Caucasus. Tehran's response has been surprisingly mixed. A US-brokered peace declaration between Armenia and Azerbaijan has been met with mixed reactions in Iran. Tehran has welcomed peace between the two ex-Soviet nations, but also expressed opposition to growing US influence in its backyard. Armenia and Azerbaijan are both located on Iran's northwestern frontier in the South Caucasus. After decades of territorial disputes, the two nations signed a peace declaration at the White House on August 9. The agreement provides for the construction of a transit corridor between Azerbaijan and its exclave of Nakhchivan, which goes through a 32-kilometer (20-mile) strip of Armenian territory. The corridor, which allows the US development and usage rights, is to be named the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" after the current US president, Donald Trump. Azerbaijan has established itself as a major oil and gas producer, and the new route would offers a more direct trade connection to Turkey and onward to Europe. For Iran, also a major energy power, this would be a severe blow. Also, Tehran maintains rather close ties to Armenia and is sensitive to moves that might limit its diminishing influence in the region. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On August 9, Ali Akbar Velayati, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran, "will not allow the creation of this corridor," as the US presence in the South Caucasus poses a threat to Iranian interests. However, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian quickly contradicted this assessment a day later. The peace plan "also takes Iran's views into account," he said during a phone call on Monday with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, which was reported in Armenian media. The planned route would not cut off Iran's access to Armenia, Pezeshkian emphasized. The corridor is much more than a transit project, said Afshar Soleimani, a former Iranian ambassador in Azerbaijan. "The main problem is the strategic competition between Russia and the West," he told DW. Solemani added that the West, and the US especially, are trying to diminish Russian influence in the South Caucasus, and take advantage of a power vacuum brought on by Russia being bogged down in Ukraine. Shireen Hunter, an Iran expert at Georgetown University in the US, told Iranian news website Tabnak that she doesn't think Russia can "win back" its former dominance in the region, even if it is set to remain an important actor. "It is conceivable that Russia and the US are now seeking a comprehensive agreement on Ukraine and the Caucasus," she said. According to Hunter, the construction of pipelines and trade routes that bypass Iran has been part of US strategy since the 1990s. "Trump has merely accelerated this process and now achieved the signing of the agreement,' said Shireen, who was an Iranian diplomat prior to the 1979 Islamist revolution. The new "Trump route" would serve as a significant reinforcement of Iran's geopolitical isolation, she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The military exchange with Israel earlier this year, the loss of proxy militias in the Middle East, along with growing dissatisfaction among the population with political repression and the economic situation, have all significantly weakened the position of Iran's leadership. While Iran still maintains good relations with Christian-influenced Armenia, its relations with Muslim-majority Azerbaijan are tense. "Tehran attempted to curb Israel's influence in Azerbaijan by establishing closer ties with Armenia," Reza Talebi, an Iran expert at Germany's University of Leipzig, told DW. "The result, however, is that Azerbaijan is now even more closely linked to Israel," Talebi added. Azerbaijan was separated from Iran in 1828 after a Russian-Persian war and annexed to the Russian Empire. Two Iranian provinces along the northwestern border still bear the names West and East Azerbaijan. The number of Iranian citizens with Azerbaijani roots is estimated at around 18 million, which is more than the total population of Azerbaijan, at 10.2 million. There is also concern in Tehran about separatist groups wanting to secede from Iran and form a "South Azerbaijan." In Baku, there are also nationalist movements that speak of a "greater Azerbaijan" that would include Iranian Azerbaijanis. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video According to Leipzig-based expert Talebi, Iranian President Pezeshikan is trying to adjust Iran's regoinal policy, including towards Azerbaijan, the Iraqi region of Kurdistan, Pakistan, and Turkey. The government's goal is to avoid a new conflict in the context of Iran's growing isolation. The president himself is half Kurdish and half Azerbaijani. He met with Azerbaijan's president, Ilham Aliyev, in Baku in April, and spoke Azerbaijani in front of the cameras. With both global and regional alliances shifting, Iran must fundamentally rethink its entire foreign policy and adapt its goals to the changed realities, which would include accepting US regional presence, and resolving issues with Washington, said expert Shirin article has been translated from German


Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
China Evergrande Group Says To Delist From Hong Kong
Embattled property giant China Evergrande Group said Tuesday it will delist from Hong Kong Stock Exchange as a heavier-than-expected debt burden weighed on its liquidation process. The Hong Kong bourse's listing committee decided to cancel Evergrande's listing as it had failed to meet a July deadline to resume trading, according to an exchange filing. Once China's biggest real estate firm, Evergrande was worth more than $50 billion at its peak and helped propel the country's rapid economic growth in recent decades. But it defaulted in 2021 and became emblematic of the years-long crisis in the country's property market. A Hong Kong court issued a winding-up order for Evergrande in January 2024, ruling that the company had failed to come up with a debt repayment plan that suited its creditors. Evergrande's shares on the Hong Kong stock exchange were suspended that month. Liquidators have made moves to recover creditors' investments, including filing a lawsuit against PwC and its mainland Chinese arm for their role in auditing the debt-ridden developer. Evergrande's share listing will be cancelled on August 25, according to Tuesday's filing, which was attributed to liquidators Edward Middleton and Tiffany Wong. Middleton and Wong said in an attached progress report that Evergrande's debt load was bigger than the previously estimated $27.5 billion. "As at 31 July 2025, this claims' discovery exercise had resulted in 187 proofs of debt being submitted, by which claims of approximately HK$350 billion (US$45 billion) in aggregate have been made," the document read. This figure was not to be taken as final, Middleton and Wong added. "The liquidators believe that a holistic restructuring will prove out of reach" at this stage, the duo wrote. China Evergrande Group was a holding company and the liquidators said they had assumed control of more than 100 companies within the group. They said in the report that they were not able to "estimate the amounts that may ultimately be realised from these entities". The property behemoth's market value was only around $274 million when share trading was suspended, and its founder Xu Jiayin owned a roughly 60 percent stake at the time, Bloomberg News reported. "Whether or not there's a delisting, Evergrande's shareholders will likely have to prepare for near-total loss," Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Kristy Hung told the news outlet before the delisting was announced. "The developer's liquidation and substantial claims from creditors who are ahead in the order suggests equity holders face material risk of getting nothing," Hung said.