logo
Dead Sea Scrolls mystery deepens as AI finds manuscripts to be much older than thought

Dead Sea Scrolls mystery deepens as AI finds manuscripts to be much older than thought

Independent05-06-2025
Many of the manuscripts known as the Dead Sea Scrolls may be much older than previously thought, according to a new study that could transform our understanding of their Jewish and Christian origins.
The mysterious scrolls are a collection of ancient Jewish texts mainly written in Hebrew that were found in 1947 by nomadic Arab shepherds looking for a lost sheep.
They are the oldest Bible texts ever found, containing passages of the Old Testament from over 1,800 to 2,000 years ago.
Until now, a study of ancient handwriting suggests most of the scrolls are from the third century BC to the second century AD.
Some date-bearing manuscripts written in Aramaic/Hebrew have been estimated to be from the fifth or fourth centuries BC, and the late first and early second century AD.
But since most of the scrolls do not have any other date-bearing manuscripts for reference, the ages of the individual manuscripts haven't been precisely estimated.
Archaeologists have yet to accurately date over a thousand manuscripts and fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls collection.
Now, researchers have combined radiocarbon dating and an AI prediction model to arrive at a more accurate estimate of the age of individual manuscripts.
Scientists found that two biblical scroll fragments of the scrolls come from the same time as their presumed biblical authors.
These fragments have been objectively dated to between the fourth century BC and the second century AD, according to the latest study published in the journal PLOS One.
In the study, scientists trained their AI date-prediction model to analyse handwritten ink-trace patterns and digitised manuscripts.
The model was trained to analyse intricate geometries of the ink trace, looking into the curvature of each character's shape, helping it probe the texts beyond what traditional palaeography offered.
Researchers cross-verified the AI model with texts that have already been convincingly dated.
They found that it could predict the age of manuscripts just from the writing style with an uncertainty of some 30 years.
Scientists then used the AI to date roughly one thousand Dead Sea manuscripts.
They first made the model analyse the digitised images of 135 scrolls and let professional palaeographers evaluate the AI's predictions.
It then confirmed that many Dead Sea Scrolls are much older than previously thought, transforming our understanding of the development of two ancient Jewish scripts called "Hasmonaean" and "Herodian."
Scroll fragments written in these scripts could belong to the late second century BC instead of the current prevailing view of the mid-first century BC.
Manuscripts in the Hasmonaean-type script could be older than their current estimate of 150 BC to 50 BC, researchers found.
It still remains a mystery who exactly wrote the manuscripts.
Researchers suspect it was an anonymous author from the Hellenistic period of the third century BC.
The latest findings impact our understanding of political and intellectual developments in the eastern Mediterranean during the Hellenistic and early Roman periods, scientists say.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS to pilot AI prostate cancer tests
NHS to pilot AI prostate cancer tests

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

NHS to pilot AI prostate cancer tests

An AI tool to spot prostate cancer earlier is being piloted by the NHS. The two-year scheme involving more than 3,000 men aims to speed up diagnosis of the disease, which is the most common form of cancer in men. Every year around 55,000 men in the UK are diagnosed with prostate cancer and 12,000 die from it. But just half of cases are caught at an early stage, when treatment is most effective. Trials suggest the technology can help radiologists detect around 11 per cent more early-stage cancers by highlighting suspicious regions in MRI scans. The software by Quibim uses advanced AI, trained on real pathology results, to segment the prostate into zones and highlight areas most likely to contain aggressive disease. The two-year pilot, backed by £2.6 million in NHS funding, will be rolled out to seven hospitals in England. Clinical trials suggest it can raise detection rates from 80 per cent to more than 90 per cent. Early detection dramatically improves survival rates. Almost all men who are diagnosed with stage one or two of the disease are alive five years later, compared with rates of less than 50 per cent for those with late-stage disease. As well as looking at detection rates, the pilot will examine the cost-effectiveness of the approach to see if the NHS can save money by catching the disease sooner. It will also examine the impact on inequalities in heath, with black men twice as likely to get prostate cancer. Prof Peter Johnson, national clinical director for cancer at NHS England, said: 'The NHS is funding and testing this exciting AI technology to help us diagnose and treat prostate cancer patients as quickly as possible and offer them the best chance of survival. 'As part of the 10-Year Health Plan, the NHS is taking advantage of our unique position to test state-of-the-art technology like this, and rolling it out as fast as we can to make the NHS fit for the future.' Dr. Ángel Alberich-Bayarri, chief executive of Quibim said: 'This NHS rollout is a major milestone in our mission to improve cancer diagnostics through AI. 'We're proud to support the NHS in advancing early detection and addressing health inequalities in prostate cancer care. By empowering radiologists with AI, we can help ensure more men are diagnosed earlier, when their chances of survival are highest.' Screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent The findings come as The Telegraph launches a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. Currently, men are not offered tests, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. Even though prostate cancer is the most-common male cancer in the UK, it is the only major cancer with no screening programme. The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) is currently considering whether to recommend the rollout of testing. In the past, it has rejected the idea because of concern that PSA tests are too unreliable, and would result in too many men undergoing needless procedures. In recent years, however, the back-up technology used to confirm a diagnosis has significantly improved, with hopes that further advances being tested, could mean that in the future, screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent. Prof Shonit Punwani, Professor of magnetic resonance and cancer imaging and consultant radiologist at UCLH, said: 'Initial studies have shown that the tool helps radiologists to enhance their diagnostic accuracy through identifying subtle early stage lesions that are sometimes not obvious on scans. 'Ultimately, QP-Prostate aims to improve patient outcomes by assisting radiologists in creating more accurate and reliable MRI reports.'

Some adults in their 60s have younger immune systems, research finds
Some adults in their 60s have younger immune systems, research finds

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

Some adults in their 60s have younger immune systems, research finds

Mayo Clinic researchers have discovered that some individuals over 60 possess immune systems that appear significantly younger than their chronological age. This cellular 'youthfulness' in older adults, however, is associated with a significant drawback: an increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases. The discovery was made while studying over 100 older patients receiving treatment for giant cell arteritis, a rare autoimmune condition. Researchers found these patients had 'stem-like T cells' which, despite behaving like young stem cells, were contributing to the spread of autoimmune disease. The findings suggest a complex trade-off, indicating that an immune system aging in tandem with the body may offer benefits, despite the perceived advantage of a 'younger' immune system.

OMG! Exclamation marks are for women! At least according to men, who see them as 'feminine' and 'emotional'!
OMG! Exclamation marks are for women! At least according to men, who see them as 'feminine' and 'emotional'!

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

OMG! Exclamation marks are for women! At least according to men, who see them as 'feminine' and 'emotional'!

Its purpose is to inject strong emotion into written text and is increasingly used on social media to show enthusiasm, excitement and friendliness. Now research suggests that women use exclamation marks more than men – who believe the punctuation to be feminine and emotional. Users of exclamation marks were also seen as being warmer, more enthusiastic and emotional but low in power and analytical thinking, the study found. Researchers at Pennsylvania State University studied 1,100 men and women to evaluate how they use exclamation marks in emails, text messages and group chats, and the reasons for their use. In one of five experiments, 61 per cent of people believed the writer was female when the sender used exclamation marks, compared to 21 per cent who did not think it was a woman. A second test found that men were around 25 per cent less likely to use exclamation marks, while another found that women were 30 per cent more likely than men to use them in texts. Senders who used exclamation marks were seen as around 20 per cent warmer than those who did not. The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, said: 'Women may use exclamation points more than men because they more strongly believe it is expected of them, and men may hold back because they believe such behaviour is seen as feminine.' It added: 'Intriguingly, women thought more strongly than men that exclamations would improve general impressions and perceived warmth. This may be because women perceive stronger backlash against them for being perceived as 'cold' if they do not use exclamations.' Researchers also suggest that 84 per cent of women worried about whether or not they should use exclamation marks. 'Women reported being more conscious than men of their use of exclamation points, often feeling they used too many exclamations and worrying about how others perceive this usage. 'This suggests that balancing the use of exclamation points to meet society's expectations of warmth, while avoiding the reduction of other perceptions, is particularly challenging for women,' they said. Researchers believe their findings show that in situations where a signal of warmth is important, people should use more exclamation points and where a projection of power is important, people should limit such usage. Exclamation marks were invented by 14th-century scholar Alpoleio da Urbisaglia but it took 50 years for scholar Coluccio Salutati to use them in writing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store