logo
Before the scandal: How SLC secured the 2002 Winter Olympics

Before the scandal: How SLC secured the 2002 Winter Olympics

Axios7 hours ago

Thirty years ago this week, Utah was on pins and needles for a big announcement that finally came June 16: Salt Lake City was named the host of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.
Then it turned out mountains of cash were hiding under the greatest snow on Earth.
This is Old News, our weekly attempt to collect the goggles and ski poles lost to the yard sales of time.
The week leading up to the hosting announcement was intense.
It was SLC's fifth attempt to host the Olympics in 30 years, and polling showed Utahns were not interested in trying again after raising $14 million for the two most recent campaigns.
Zoom in: Officials behind Salt Lake's bid were frantically decorating a tiny "hospitality room" at the Budapest hotel where the International Olympic Committee would vote later in the week.
While the other finalist cities — representing Canada, Sweden and Switzerland — brought a few posters and brochures, Salt Lake's representatives created a small immersive attraction.
They installed floor-to-ceiling paintings of Utah scenery (including Styrofoam snow) and speakers playing cowboy songs and Indigenous flute music.
The intrigue: The IOC had told the bidding cities to tone down their hospitality rooms after the elaborate displays four years earlier.
Spain flew in flamenco dancers. SLC brought real trees into a luxury suite for scenery. Committee members were lavished with gourmet food and gifts — which the IOC tried to prevent in 1995 with a $200 spending cap.
That didn't stop Salt Lake.
Friction point: In 1991, the city lost the 1998 games to Nagano, Japan, by just four votes, despite being considered the favorite.
Bribery allegations began the day after that decision, with later-substantiated reports that IOC delegates were peppered with millions of dollars' worth of gifts and vacations as part of Japan's pitch.
Not to be outdone, SLC's bid committee spent $1 million on behind-the-scenes gifts and favors for IOC members in the leadup to the 1995 vote — decisively eclipsing their try-hard hospitality room in Budapest.
Two of Salt Lake's organizers were indicted on federal charges of conspiracy to commit bribery, fraud and racketeering; they were later acquitted.
10 IOC members were removed, and 10 more were sanctioned.
The big picture: The revelations in Salt Lake triggered a global scandal and investigations that showed hosting bids for Nagano, Atlanta in 1996, and Sydney in 2000 involved extravagant largesse toward IOC delegates.
Reality check: After five bids to host the games, Utahns were hardly clueless as to the blurry lines between bribery and entertainment.
In 1995, before the announcement and years before ABC4 exposed the first evidence of payoffs, a columnist for the Ogden Standard-Examiner referred to the IOC as " Incredible Outlays of Cash."
The latest: The Olympics reformed the host bidding process before SLC was picked again last year to host in 2034 — but now it's harder to find cities that want the games badly enough to grease the wheels.
Previously in Old News

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LeBron on his pride representing the USA in the Olympics after winning a bronze medal
LeBron on his pride representing the USA in the Olympics after winning a bronze medal

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

LeBron on his pride representing the USA in the Olympics after winning a bronze medal

LeBron on his pride representing the USA in the Olympics after winning a bronze medal In 2004, Team USA men's basketball came away from the Summer Olympics with only a bronze medal after losing to Argentina in the semifinal round. It was an embarrassment for the program, which seemed assured of winning the gold every time ever since NBA players were first allowed to participate in FIBA competition. LeBron James played on the 2004 Olympic team, and its disappointing performance has caused some to mock him — some have even nicknamed him "LeBronze" as a result. Team USA would soon revamp its program by bringing in legendary Duke University head coach Mike Krzyzewski and Los Angeles Lakers great Kobe Bryant. There were reportedly concerns about James' lack of maturity at the time, to the point where some feared he would single-handedly cause the team to not win the gold medal in the 2008 Olympics. But he said during a recent episode of his "Mind the Game" podcast that the squad's failure led to its players taking responsibility and having a sense of pride about representing the United States. "Everything is city-based here," James said. "And it took a while for us, as far as the Olympics, to get that sense of pride back. We got our [expletive] kicked in 2004, and then we lost in the World Championship in 2006. It took us time to be like, 'Oh, this is real.' "The rest of these countries not only are getting better with the game of basketball, but it's a sense of pride, too," James continued. "And when you have that sense of pride, you have a sense of work ethic that goes a lot longer. You have a sense of accountability that's a little bit longer. You have a sense of wanting to be there because you know what you're representing." With Bryant leading the way, Team USA regained the gold medal at the 2008 Summer Games, and it was a jubilant moment for the program and all of its players. In 2012, Bryant manfully took a back seat and let James become the head honcho. The result was another gold medal. Last summer, of course, after Team USA failed to medal in the 2023 FIBA World Cup, James, Stephen Curry and Kevin Durant volunteered to play for Team USA in the Olympics once again. The squad won another gold medal, and James was named the MVP of the tournament for his all-around performance.

Murray open to coaching return 'at some stage'
Murray open to coaching return 'at some stage'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Murray open to coaching return 'at some stage'

Andy Murray is open to a return to coaching "at some stage" but says he still has plenty to learn about the role. The 38-year-old, who retired from tennis at the 2024 Olympics, joined long-time rival Novak Djokovic's coaching team last November. Advertisement However, the pair parted company in May 2025 after just four tournaments together, with former number one Djokovic stating he "couldn't get more" out of their partnership. Murray was positive about the six months he and Djokovic spent together, hailing the "unique" experience of working with "one of the best athletes of all time", while also stating he had not planned on making the transition into coaching quite so soon after hanging up his racquet. "I would do it again at some stage. I don't think that will happen immediately," he told BBC Sport's Clare Balding at the unveiling of the Andy Murray Arena at the Queen's Club on Monday. "I wasn't planning on going into coaching as soon as I finished playing but it was a pretty unique opportunity. It was a chance to learn from one of the best athletes of all time. Advertisement "You also learn a lot about how to work with a team. As an individual athlete, you have a team of people around you, but you're the focal point whereas when you're coaching an individual, you're working with a physio, physical trainers, agents, and you need to know how to get your message across to the player and find out what makes them tick. That was the thing I learned and something I need to work on if I want to do it again in the future. "It was a brilliant opportunity for me. We got to spend some really nice moments away from the court. Results weren't as we wanted but we gave it a go. "We'll see about coaching in the future but I don't think that will happen for a while." Murray coached Novak Djokovic at the 2025 Australian Open and three other tournaments [Getty Images] 'Men's tennis is in a great place' While the jam-packed nature of tennis' schedule means focus has already shifted to the grass-court swing, this year's men's singles final at Roland Garros will be remembered as one of the all-time greats. Advertisement Defending champion Carlos Alcaraz recovered from two sets down and saved three championship points to beat world number one Jannik Sinner after five hours and 29 minutes – the longest French Open final in history. The pair, who occupy the top two spots in the ATP rankings, have now shared the past six major titles between them and Sunday's final – their first meeting in a Grand Slam trophy match – confirmed the arrival of a new blockbuster rivalry in men's tennis. Murray believes Sunday's final is confirmation the sport is in a "great place" and tipped Britain's Jack Draper, ranked fourth in the world, to be part of the success. "They're both brilliant athletes and very different personalities, which I think for fans is really exciting," Murray said. Advertisement "For me, particularly Alcaraz has an exciting brand of tennis to watch, and they complement each other well. They've already had some brilliant matches and from what I've been told, it was one of the best finals for a long time." "Moving forward, men's tennis is in a great place. People always worry at the end of a generation of players what's going to happen with the sport next, but generally sports continue to evolve and, in most cases, improve. "Jack [Draper]'s right in the mix just now and doing extremely well. He's going to give himself opportunities to win majors over the next five, 10 years." However, while heaping praise on the next generation, Murray was keen to emphasise that Alcaraz and Sinner have a long way to go to match the 20 years of dominance achieved by Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic. Advertisement "The sport's in a really good place but it's important not to forget what the guys have done before them, what Roger, Rafa and Novak have done," he added. "Winning 20-plus majors is something exceptional and it's easy in today's age to forget a little bit about that. I saw some pundits saying if [Alcaraz and Sinner] went on court against Rafa at the French Open, they would be favourites going into that match with Rafa in his prime. "Alcaraz and Sinner are on the path to being two of the best, no doubt about that, but it takes time to build what Roger, Rafa, and Novak had. We'll see whether they get that." 'Queen's is always special for me' Murray won the last of his five Queen's singles titles in 2016 [Getty Images] Murray is synonymous with Queen's. The Scot is the most successful player in the tournament's history, winning a record five men's singles titles between 2009 and 2016. He also won the men's doubles with Feliciano Lopez in 2019. Advertisement From this year, however, his name will not just adorn the honour's board but also the centre court at Queen's Club, which has been renamed the Andy Murray Arena. "It's pretty surreal," he said. "A number of tennis courts around the world are named after great players. It's a bit strange to have a court named after you. "I have a lot of amazing memories at this place and on that court. It's by far my most successful tournament that I competed in. "I won my first ATP match here. I didn't dream of winning Wimbledon or being world number one, I just wanted to be a professional tennis player and play on the ATP tour. Moments like that, you remember; it was a special moment for me. Advertisement "Winning the tournament feels great and winning major events is the pinnacle of the sport but that wasn't my dream growing up. You remember moments like the place where you won your first tour match and that's why Queen's is always special to me." This grass-court season marks the return of women's tennis to Queen's for the first time in 52 years, with singles and doubles events taking place from 9 to 15 June before the men take to the courts the following week (16-22 June). "Having women's tennis back at Queen's for the first time in over 50 years is brilliant," Murray said. "I hope the event gets well attended. They've got a brilliant field – I think 10 of the top 20 women are here. There'll be some brilliant matches and I always look forward to the grass season." Advertisement

Trump's new travel ban: Which countries are on the list? Who's exempt? How are people reacting?
Trump's new travel ban: Which countries are on the list? Who's exempt? How are people reacting?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's new travel ban: Which countries are on the list? Who's exempt? How are people reacting?

President Trump's sweeping new travel ban went into effect on Monday, barring citizens of 12 countries from visiting the United States and imposing restrictions on those from seven others. In a video message last week announcing the ban, Trump cited national security concerns, claiming that foreigners who were not properly vetted posed a terror risk. "We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States,' Trump said. The president also cited the recent attack in Boulder, Colo., by a man who allegedly shouted 'Free Palestine' and threw Molotov cocktails into a crowd of people calling for the release of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colo., has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said. 'We don't want them.' The suspect, identified as 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman, was arrested and charged with a hate crime. According to the Department of Homeland Security, Soliman is from Egypt and had overstayed a tourist visa. Egypt is not among the countries included in Trump's new travel ban. The ban, which went into effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. ET, prohibits foreign nationals from the following countries from entering the U.S.: Afghanistan Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Myanmar (Burma) Somalia Sudan Yemen It imposes partial restrictions on foreign nationals from the following countries: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela There are numerous groups of people who are exempt from Trump's new travel ban. They include: Any lawful permanent resident of the United States. Dual citizens, or U.S. citizens who also have citizenship of one of the banned countries. Athletes and their coaches traveling to the U.S. for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting events determined by the U.S. secretary of state. Afghan Special Immigrant Visa holders who worked for the U.S. government or its allies during the war in Afghanistan. Children adopted by U.S. citizens. Diplomats and foreign government officials or representatives of international organizations and NATO on official visits. Foreign national employees of the U.S. government who have served abroad for at least 15 years, their spouses and children. Individuals with U.S. family members who apply for visas in connection to their spouses, children or parents. Iranians belonging to an ethnic or religious minority who are fleeing prosecution. Refugees who were granted asylum or admitted to the U.S. before the ban. Those traveling to the United Nations headquarters in New York solely on official business. The announcement angered humanitarian groups working to resettle refugees. 'President Trump's new travel ban is discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel,' Amnesty International USA said in a statement posted to X. 'By targeting people based on their nationality, this ban only spreads disinformation and hate.' "This policy is not about national security,' Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, said in a statement. 'It is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States." 'To include Afghanistan — a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years — is a moral disgrace,' Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac, said in a statement. 'It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold.' The African Union Commission released a statement expressing concern about 'the potential negative impact' of the ban on educational exchange, commerce and engagement and the 'broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades.' The commission said it 'respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.' The new travel ban is similar to the one Trump imposed in January 2017, his first month in office. That ban restricted travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. (Syria and Iraq are not included on the new list.) It went into effect via an executive order with virtually no notice, causing chaos at airports nationwide and prompting numerous legal challenges. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a version of it in 2018. Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, told the New York Times that the new ban is more likely to withstand legal scrutiny. 'They seem to have learned some lessons from the three different rounds of litigation we went through during the first Trump administration,' Vladeck said. 'But a lot will depend upon how it's actually enforced.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store