Trump admin halted Harvard grant, but Defense Dept. still paid it, court docs say
And according to court documents, they have — despite the grant's termination.
In a July 11 filing from one of its federal lawsuits against the Trump administration, Harvard informed the court it had received payment from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) — part of the Department of Defense — for the 'AMPHORA' program, which stands for Assured Microbial Preservation in Harsh or Remote Areas.
With emerging infectious disease hotspots expected to increase globally within the next 50 years, the program seeks to develop a system without refrigeration 'that can preserve any microbe (bacteria, fungus, virus) from any sample, environment, or clinical setting, increasing the DoD's ability to surveil for emerging threats and protect force health and readiness,' according to the agency's website.
Despite the grant being listed as terminated beginning May 12, DARPA has since asked Harvard's AMPHORA researchers to continue testing samples and to update on the project's progress, the court documents state.
Then on July 8, the government paid Harvard approximately $373,000 on the AMPHORA grant for work conducted by its scientists May 1-31.
Read more: Trump admin renews demand for Harvard foreign student info: 'We tried to do things the easy way'
According to Harvard, the payment 'reinforces' its court argument that 'the government's categorical terminations of research funding were arbitrary and capricious.'
'This new evidence provides further support for Harvard's arguments,' Harvard wrote in its filing last week.
Earlier court filings in Harvard's lawsuit disclosed that an unidentified Defense Department official had 'pleaded' with her superiors in the Pentagon not to cancel Harvard's AMPHORA grant because doing so could pose 'grave and immediate harm to national security.'
The official said Harvard was the top-performing team in the AMPHORA program, which involves several teams from varying research institutions.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly directed the cancellation of the military grants, and the notification stated the AMPHORA grant 'no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities.'
Harvard has inquired with the federal government about whether the AMPHORA grant is in fact still active, but they haven't received a response, they wrote.
A spokesperson for the Department of Defense said the agency does not comment on ongoing litigation.
More Harvard University news
A reckoning: Trump's attacks are inspiring self-reflection in higher ed
Harvard continues dismantling its DEI offices amid Trump attacks
Trump admin renews demand for Harvard foreign student info: 'We tried to do things the easy way'
Trump admin threatens Harvard's accreditation over antisemitism response
Read the original article on MassLive.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
It's Liberation Day III - and from today, dozens of countries will face painful Trump tariffs
It is "Liberation Day" III - the third tariff deadline set by Donald Trump. From today, countries without bilateral trade agreements face reciprocal tariffs - ranging from 25% to 50% - with a baseline of 15% to 20% for any not making a deal. He has delayed twice, from April to July and from July to August, but hammered this date home in his trademark caps-on style: "THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED. A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!" "Will not be extended" for anyone but Mexico, it seems. The country secured a 90-day extension at the last minute, with Mr Trump citing the "complexities" of the border. By close of business on the eve of deadline, he had a handful of framework deals - some significant - including the UK (10%), the EU, Japan and South Korea (15%), Indonesia and the Philippines (19%), Vietnam (20%). On the EU agreement, which he struck in Scotland, the president said: "It's a very powerful deal, it's a big deal, it's the biggest of all the deals." But what happened to the "90 deals in 90 days" touted by the White House earlier this year? The short answer is they were replaced by letters of instruction to pay a tariff set by the US. Amid of flurry of late activity, the US played hardball with major trading partners like Canada. "For the rest of the world, we're going to have things done by Friday," said US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick - the "rest of the world" meaning everyone but China. There is, apparently, the "framework of a deal" between the world's two largest economies, but talks between Washington and Beijing are continuing. Read more US news: In terms of wins, he can claim some significant deals and point to his tariffs having generated an impressive $27bn (£20.4bn) in June, not bad for a single month. But the legality of the approach is under siege - with the US Court of International Trade ruling that the "Liberation Day" tariffs exceeded the president's authority, with enforcement paused pending appeal. The deadline has stirred the pot, forcing a handful of deals onto the table. Whether they stick or survive legal scrutiny is far from settled. But the playbook remains the same - threaten the world with trade chaos, whittle it down, celebrate the wins, and pray no one checks what's legal.
CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
Elon Musk gave $10 million to Republican midterm efforts just before announcing his own America Party
PACs Congressional newsFacebookTweetLink Follow Billionaire Elon Musk donated a total of $10 million to a pair of super PACs aimed at helping Republicans retain their majorities in Congress after next year's midterm elections, new campaign finance reports show. The donations of $5 million each to the Senate Leadership Fund and the Congressional Leadership Fund came on June 27 – amid Musk's bitter feuding with President Donald Trump over federal spending legislation – and just days before the world's richest man declared he would form his own political party. The newly disclosed donations underscore Musk's outsize influence in US politics and raise fresh questions about what role the mercurial businessman might play in elections moving forward. The Tesla CEO emerged in Thursday's filings as the largest individual contributor to each of those congressional super PACs. Separately, campaign reports with the Federal Election Commission show Musk this year plowed more than $45 million of his own money into America PAC, the super PAC he oversees – as he worked, unsuccessfully, to shape the outcome of a Wisconsin Supreme Court race. In the 2024 election, Musk spent more than $290 million to help elect Trump and his favored congressional candidates. He served as a top White House adviser and the leader of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency for several months this year before stepping back from government work to focus on his companies. At the time, he signaled he also might pull back on his political spending. But by early July, Musk was publicly battling again with Trump and congressional Republicans over domestic policy legislation Musk said would explode the deficit. He also pledged to form the America Party, although there are few signs that he has taken concrete steps in that direction. Thursday's report with the FEC covers his super PAC's activity only through the end of June. CNN's Alex Leeds Matthews and David Adkins contributed to this report.
New York Times
3 minutes ago
- New York Times
Smithsonian Removes Reference to Trump's Impeachments, but Says It Will Return
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History this month removed a label referring to President Trump's two impeachments, a move museum officials said was part of a review of the institution's content for bias. The temporary label was added in 2021 to an exhibition about the American presidency. The label also included information about the impeachments of former Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, as well as about former President Richard M. Nixon, who faced possible impeachment before resigning from office. Mr. Trump is the only American president to have been impeached twice, in 2019 and again in 2021. He was acquitted both times after facing trials in the Senate. The removal of the label, which was reported earlier by The Washington Post, came after the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, which governs the institution, recently committed to reviewing its content under pressure from the Trump administration. Mr. Trump has called for a more positive framing of the country's history in Smithsonian museums, and tried to fire the director of the National Portrait Gallery, accusing her of being political. The label was part of an exhibit called 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,' which opened in 2000 but has not been updated substantially since 2008. The museum removed the temporary label until a fuller update could be undertaken, the Smithsonian said. 'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed,' Linda St. Thomas, a Smithsonian spokeswoman, said in a statement. 'The section of this exhibition covers Congress, the Supreme Court, impeachment and public opinion. Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
