U.N. criticises German plan to deport Afghans
Germany stopped deportations following the Taliban's return to power in 2021 but the rise of far-right and anti-immigrant politicians has seen the topic rise up the agenda.
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said on Thursday he envisaged Germany "making agreements directly with Afghanistan to enable deportations".
But Ravina Shamdasani, spokeswoman for the United Nations' human rights office (OHCHR), told reporters in Geneva it was "not appropriate to return people to Afghanistan".
"We have been documenting continuing human rights violations in Afghanistan," she said, including denial of women's rights and executions.
Arafat Jamal of the UN's refugee agency (UNHCR) in Kabul said his organisation was seeking funding to protect 1.4 million Afghans who had returned since the start of the year -- most of them from Iran.
He said forcing Afghans to return risked causing further instability across the region and stressed that the UNHCR still has a "non-return advisory" in force for Afghanistan.
"In other words... the conditions on the ground are not yet ready for returns," he said.
"We urge countries not to forcibly return (people) to Afghanistan."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Masood Azhar not in Pakistan? Bhutto points to Afghanistan for housing one of India's most wanted terrorists
In a revealing interview with Al Jazeera, Pakistan Peoples Party Chairman and former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari said Islamabad does not know the whereabouts of Masood Azhar , the UN-designated terrorist and Jaish-e-Mohammed chief. Bhutto suggested Azhar may be in Afghanistan and challenged India to provide actionable intelligence if it believes Azhar is in Pakistan. 'As far as Masood Azhar is concerned, we have been unable to arrest him or identify him given his past within the Afghan Jihad context. It is our belief that he is in Afghanistan,' Bhutto said during the interview. Masood Azhar is accused of being responsible for several deadly attacks, including the 2019 Pulwama bombing , and India has repeatedly called for action against him. New Delhi has a long-standing claim that Pakistan protects terrorists and thr terrorist attack in Kashmir in April was linked to the rival neighbour. Islamabad had, however, denied the charges by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 3 minutes, if you own a mouse Undo Bhutto also responded to ongoing U.S. concerns, including a 2022 U.S. State Department report that cited continued operations of Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan. 'I could contest that with you. But suffice to say it's beyond that now,' he told Al Jazeera. Bhutto defended Pakistan's steps to meet international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), referring to convictions in terror-financing cases and the shutdown of over 90 institutions linked to extremist groups. Live Events On Hafiz Saeed , the founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba and another key figure wanted by India, Bhutto said, 'That's factually not correct… He is in the custody of the Pakistani state.' The interview comes as Pakistan faces increasing pressure following the release of the Global Terrorism Index 2025 . The report ranked Pakistan as the second-most terrorism-affected country, citing a 45% spike in terror-related deaths. The rise has been linked to the resurgence of militant groups near the Afghan border. Why is Masood Azhar 'wanted' in India? Masood Azhar has long been one of India's most wanted terrorists. He was released from Indian custody in 1999 in exchange for hostages on the hijacked Indian Airlines flight IC-814. Soon after his release, Azhar founded Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), which has been linked to several attacks on Indian military and civilian targets. Azhar has been on the run after being said to be the mastermind behind the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2016 Pathankot airbase attack, and the 2019 Pulwama bombing, among others. These attacks led to the deaths of dozens of Indian security personnel and civilians, and escalated tensions between the two neighbours. India has repeatedly asked Pakistan to take action against Azhar and hand him over. On May 7, 2025, India launched missile strikes on terrorist camps inside Pakistan in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. One of the targets was Jaish-e-Mohammed's camp in Bahawalpur. Following the strike, the death of ten of his family members, including his sister, nephew, nieces, and other close relatives was confirmed. India flags terror funding risk in IMF aid to Pakistan Following the May 7 strikes, India accused Pakistan of rebuilding the very terror infrastructure that had been destroyed. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh raised concerns about Pakistan's intent and international financial support to it. 'Pakistan will spend the tax collected from its citizens to give around Rs 14 crore to Masood Azhar, the head of Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist organisation, even though he is a UN-designated terrorist,' Singh said. He also alleged that the Pakistan government announced financial aid to rebuild the terror bases of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed in Muridke and Bahawalpur. The defence minister also called on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to reconsider its recent $1 billion assistance to Islamabad. 'Certainly, a large part of IMF's one billion dollars assistance will be used to fund the terror infrastructure. Will this not be considered indirect funding by IMF, an international organisation? Any financial assistance to Pakistan is no less than terror funding. The funds India gives to IMF should not be used, directly or indirectly, to create terror infrastructure in Pakistan or any other country,' Singh had said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
'Positive' response given to latest Gaza ceasefire proposal, says Hamas
Hamas said Friday it has given a positive response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza but said further talks were needed on implementation. It was not clear if Hamas' statement meant it had accepted the proposal from US President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire. Hamas has been seeking guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war, now nearly 21 months old. Trump has been pushing hard for a deal to be reached, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to visit the White House next week to discuss a deal. The Hamas statement came as Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early Friday, while a hospital said another 20 people died in shootings while seeking aid. The UN human rights office said it has recorded 613 Palestinians killed within the span of a month in Gaza while trying to obtain aid. Most were killed while trying to reach food distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organisation, while others were massed waiting for aid trucks connected to the United Nations or other humanitarian organisations, it said. Efforts ongoing to halt the war Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which the US would "work with all parties to end the war. He urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. In its statement late Friday, Hamas said it has submitted its positive response to Egyptian and Qatari mediators. It said it is fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework. It did not elaborate on what needed to be worked out in implementation. An official close to the talks said Hamas had several issues it was requesting that Israeli troops in Gaza pull back to positions it held on March 2 before it broke the previous ceasefire; that aid flow into Gaza in sufficient quantities through the UN and other international humanitarian agencies; and that negotiations continue beyond 60 days if needed to reach a deal for a permanent end to the war and the release of all remaining hostages. Previous rounds of negotiations have run aground over Hamas demands of guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the destruction of the militant group. We'll see what happens. We're going to know over the next 24 hours, Trump told reporters on Air Force One late Thursday when asked if Hamas had agreed to the latest framework for a ceasefire. 20 killed Friday while seeking aid Officials at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said at least three Palestinians were killed Friday while on the roads heading to food distribution sites run by the Israeli-backed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza. Since GHF began distributions in late May, witnesses have said almost daily that Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians on the roads leading to the food centres. To reach the sites, people must walk several kilometres through an Israeli military zone where troops control the road. The Israeli military has said previously it fires warning shots to control crowds or at Palestinians who approach its troops. The GHF has denied any serious injuries or deaths on its sites and says shootings outside their immediate vicinity are under the purview of Israel's military. On Friday, in reaction to the UN rights agency's report, it said in a statement that it was investigating reports of people killed and wounded while seeking aid and that it had given instructions to troops in the field based on lessons learned from reviewing the incidents. It said it was working at minimizing possible friction between the population and Israeli forces, including by installing fences and placing signs on the routes. Separately, witnesses have said Israeli troops open fire on crowds of Palestinians who gather in military-controlled zones to wait for aid trucks entering Gaza for the UN or other aid organisations not associated with GHF. The crowds are usually made up of people desperate for food who grab supplies off the passing trucks, and armed gangs have also looted trucks. On Friday, 17 people were killed waiting for trucks in eastern Khan Younis in the Tahliya area, officials at Nasser Hospital said. Three survivors told the AP they had gone to wait for the trucks in a military red zone in Khan Younis and that troops opened fire from a tank and drones. It was a crowd of people, may God help them, who want to eat and live, said Seddiq Abu Farhana, who was shot in the leg, forcing him to drop a bag of flour he had grabbed. There was direct firing. Airstrikes also hit the Muwasi area on the southern end of Gaza's Mediterranean coast, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians driven from their homes are sheltering in tent camps. Of the 15 people killed in the strikes, eight were women and one was a child, according to the hospital. Israel's military said it was looking into Friday's reported airstrikes. It had no immediate comment on the reported shootings surrounding the aid trucks. UN investigates shootings near aid sites The spokeswoman for the UN human rights office, Ravina Shamdasani, said the agency was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points operated by GHF. In a message to The Associated Press, Shamdasani said that of the total tallied, 509 killings were GHF-related, meaning at or near its distribution sites. In a statement Friday, GHF cast doubt on the casualty figures, accusing the UN of taking its casualty figures directly from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministryand of trying to falsely smear our effort. Shamdasani, the UN rights office spokesperson, told the AP that the data is based on our own information gathering through various reliable sources, including medical, human rights and humanitarian organizations. Rik Peeperkorn, representative of the World Health Organization, said Nasser Hospital, the biggest hospital operating in the south, receives dozens or hundreds of casualties every day, most coming from the vicinity of the food distribution sites. The overwhelmed hospital has become one massive trauma ward, he said. The WHO supports Nasser Hospital and other health facilities. The International Committee of the Red Cross also said in late June that its field hospital near one of the GHF sites has been overwhelmed more than 20 times in the previous months by mass casualties. It said the casualties had been on their way to the food distribution sites, and the vast majority of patients suffered gunshot injuries. Also on Friday, Israel's military said two soldiers were killed in combat in the north of Gaza and it was investigating. Over 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza. The Israeli military also issued new evacuation orders Friday in northeast Khan Younis in southern Gaza and urged Palestinians to move west ahead of planned military operations against Hamas in the area. The new evacuation zones pushed Palestinians into increasingly smaller spaces by the coast. The Health Ministry in Gaza said the number of Palestinians killed in the territory has passed 57,000. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is run by medical professionals employed by the Hamas government, and its numbers are widely cited by the UN and international organisations. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
News18
9 hours ago
- News18
Explained: What Russia's Recognition Of Taliban Government Means For Afghan Diplomacy
Last Updated: Sources told News18 that Russia's recognition is considered a step in the right direction for the Taliban regime but short of full international legitimacy. Russia officially recognised the Taliban government of Afghanistan on July 3, 2025, becoming the first nation to do so and signaling a major diplomatic change in the region. The step, which was announced following a meeting in Kabul between Russian Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov and Afghanistan's Acting Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi, has been labeled by Afghan officials as a 'historic step" and the start of a new era in bilateral relations. But the significance of this recognition remains complicated, since formal international validation of the Taliban is still dependent upon the United Nations and global opinion. Sources told News18 that Russia's recognition is considered a step in the right direction for the Taliban regime but short of full international legitimacy. Sources highlight that formal recognition from the UN protocol division is required, and until that time comes, the Taliban will be diplomatically isolated. The development is considered part of a larger trend with most nations interacting with the Taliban at various levels to secure their interests and ensure regional stability. India has followed a watchful but pragmatic policy towards the Taliban regime. Although New Delhi has not officially recognised the Taliban, it has resumed a diplomatic mission in Kabul and permitted the Taliban to send a Consul General to Mumbai. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri just held talks with Taliban representatives, which was the highest level of interaction since the Taliban came to power. India's engagement is motivated by security interests, competition for influence in the region against China, and an interest in keeping a handle on Afghanistan. Russia's Diplomatic Revitalisation: From Isolation to Engagement Russia's relationship with the Taliban has evolved dramatically over the past two decades. In 2003, Russia designated the Taliban as a terrorist organisation due to its support for separatists in the North Caucasus. However, the Taliban's resurgence in 2021 and the shifting geopolitical landscape prompted Moscow to reassess its stance. In April 2025, Russia's Supreme Court removed the Taliban from its list of banned organizations, paving the way for official recognition. The Announcement and What It Means Russia's Foreign Ministry made the announcement that it accepted credentials from Afghanistan's newly appointed Ambassador Gul Hassan Hassan, marking the beginning of 'productive bilateral cooperation." The ministry highlighted that this acknowledgement would promote cooperation in the fields of energy, agriculture, and anti-terrorism. Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi welcomed the move, terming it a 'good example for other countries" and hoping that it would spur further global involvement. Why did Russia Embrace the Taliban? Strategic Interests Russia's move is based on pragmatic reasons. Moscow considers the Taliban a ground reality and feels that talking to them is necessary in order to protect its interests in Central Asia. The Kremlin is seriously troubled by the ISKP threat, which carried out attacks in Afghanistan as well as Russia. By accepting the Taliban, Russia hopes to enhance security cooperation and counter-terrorism. Economic Opportunities Russia is also interested in huge economic benefits that can be derived from Afghanistan, especially in areas like energy, transportation, and agriculture. The Russian Foreign Ministry pointed to the promise of trade and infrastructure initiatives, which could be mutually advantageous for both nations. This economic aspect is a major reason Moscow is ready to normalise relations with the Taliban. Regional Influence By assuming the lead in recognising the Taliban, Russia becomes a central figure in deciding Afghanistan's future. This decision is most probably aimed at projecting greater Russian influence in the region and establishing a precedent for other nations to do the same. It also constitutes part of Russia's larger policy of interacting with regimes that risk being isolated by the West and thus increasing its diplomatic presence. Engagement Without Recognition: The Global Approach China has also dealt with the Taliban at multiple levels. Beijing has entertained Taliban ambassadors and permitted them to hold sway over Afghanistan's embassy in China, but not formal recognition. China is guided by economic interests, security concerns, and also a reluctance to be seen as the first major power to recognise the Taliban's controversial policies. top videos View all Other Countries Some other nations, such as Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan, have established diplomatic ties with the Taliban but stopped short of conferring formal recognition. Such engagement is usually driven by regional, economic, or security interests, but all fall short of overt diplomatic support. First Published:
