Christchurch Employer Sentenced For Immigration Offences
Young recruited a Thai national from overseas and facilitated their entry to New Zealand on visitor visa. False information was provided by Young in support of the individuals visitor visa application, supporting the application by stating they were related.
This was untrue. They were not related and the individual did not know Young prior to being offered a job by her and the application being submitted to Immigration New Zealand.
Young also charged 150,000THB (approximately NZ$7,500) for the job and applying for the visa, a debt the individual owed to Young.
Soon after their arrival in Auckland in March 2024, the individual was informed by Young that she would be living and working there. Young took photos of the individual so that she could advertise her services provided from premises that Young managed.
Later that day the individual received a message from Young that a customer was coming to see her. The message was an appointment for the individual to have sex with a client and included the time, cost and duration of the service.
Young would charge the individual a 35% fee on her earnings, as well as rent and expenses and kept a schedule of the debt which she would regularly send to the individual.
The individual provided massage and sex services at the direction of Young at various addresses in Auckland until June 2024, when she stopped working for Young after clearing her debt.
MBIE commenced their investigation after receiving a complaint that a female Thai national was breaching her visa conditions and being forced to work in a massage parlour and provide sexual services to clients.
The investigation led to the execution of six search warrants at addresses across Auckland and Christchurch, which ultimately resulted in Young's arrest.
'This case represents a serious breach of trust and responsibility,' said Steve Watson, General Manager of Immigration Investigations and Compliance. 'Their actions compromised the integrity of New Zealand's immigration system'
'The individual arrived in New Zealand expecting legitimate work opportunities, but was instead misled and treated in a manner that was both unlawful and deeply unfair'
While the offending was serious, the Court applied sentencing discounts for early guilty plea, previous good character and took account of the defendant's personal circumstances and determined that a non-custodial sentence with strict conditions would still hold Young accountable.
'The individual arrived in New Zealand expecting legitimate work opportunities, but was instead misled and treated in a manner that was both unlawful and deeply unfair'
'Immigration New Zealand remains committed to identifying, investigating, and holding to account those who take advantage of others for personal gain' says Mr Watson.
We encourage anyone with any knowledge of immigration fraud or exploitation to come forward.
To make a report, contact the MBIE reporting line on 0800 200 088.
To report an issue anonymously, call Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.
Note:
Ava Alisa Young is a Thai national and the holder of a New Zealand Resident Visa. She is also known as Marissa James Carr and Sasithorn Vas-ngam.
During the relevant period, the worker never held a visa allowing her to work in New Zealand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Taxi driver left stressed by supposed 'prank'
Gurpreet Singh. PHOTO: GREGOR RICHARDSON A Dunedin Taxis driver says he was left shivering and in tears after believing he was being "blackmailed" for $10,000 by two fellow drivers. The driver said former Dunedin Taxis director Gurpreet Singh and driver Vishal Vala demanded the payment be made to an Indian bank account in March to alter log books. He claims he was told if he did not make the payment he would be fired. When he complained to Dunedin Taxis chairman Paul Oliver and the police, he was told the incident was just a prank - an explanation which he doubted. The driver, who provided texts and emails to the Otago Daily Times, said he felt forced to withdraw the complaints, but said the ordeal left him scared of Mr Singh, who is still a driver for the company. "I still can't make any sense of this whole incident, that's why was I intimidated," he said in communication supplied to the ODT. "[I felt] threatened, emotionally blackmailed and financially blackmailed. "Tears are rolling down my eyes — I am stressed, I feel betrayed, I am shivering, and I couldn't sleep for the whole night." When approached by the ODT, Mr Singh and Mr Vala stood by their explanation the incident was a prank they regretted. Mr Vala said the prank took place while the pair were drunk. The driver said the incident happened after Mr Singh and Mr Vala befriended him when he first joined Dunedin Taxis, and claims the pair introduced him to their system of getting preference for big-ticket rides. They told him they had an arrangement with a staff member at the Dunedin Taxis call centre to allocate them the more expensive trips that came through the system — which was against the constitution of the company. The driver said he took a few of those rides after believing Mr Singh had set them up for him. On March 14, the driver claims Mr Singh told him that Dunedin Taxis had a record of those rides and they needed to be deleted from the company's system or else he would lose his job. The driver alleges Mr Singh had told him to make a $10,000 deposit into an Auckland-based staff member's Indian account to wipe logbook records. At this point, the driver was scared and refused to take part in the arrangement. The driver complained to Dunedin Taxis chairman Mr Oliver and to the police on the evening of March 14. The following day the driver received an apology from both Mr Singh and Mr Vala. Mr Singh wrote: "I'm really sorry for the prank — I misjudged it and I regret that it didn't come across as harmless fun. Mr Vala wrote: "I never imagined it would affect you that way, especially since we used to be good friends". The driver responded to a separate apology Mr Singh made on WhatsApp by saying he had "lost all respect" for the pair. He highlighted he was "shocked and shivering" after their threats. Mr Singh responded to him by saying "GOOD THOUGHTS FROM CHAT GPT" and "U can f... off". The driver said he ended up in the emergency department at the hospital with high blood pressure The driver said the incident left him feeling unsafe working for Dunedin Taxis, and he was not happy with the response from the company to his complaint. When questioned by the ODT, Mr Singh reiterated the incident was a prank and denied allegations of blackmail and any involvement in a scheme to give drivers preferential treatment for big ticket rides. He said the matter was amicably resolved with the help of two fellow drivers, and the police complaint was withdrawn. Mr Vala also denied the allegations. He said he had been drinking with Mr Singh when they decided to prank call the driver. "We did not know he would take it so seriously." Mr Vala thought the matter had been resolved within the company and said he was told no further action would be taken. Mr Oliver said he told the driver he could not do anything about the complaints against Mr Singh and Mr Vala because the driver had already taken the issue to police. "That was the end of it for me. "Whether there was $10,000 or whatever it was, it's just no longer my problem or concern ... it had nothing to do with taxi operations." He said after the complaint was withdrawn from police he thought the driver and Mr Singh and Mr Vala were friends again, and he did not have to take any further action. He said it was impossible to wipe any logbook records. "Unless they go up to Auckland and break into the place and do a Watergate, that's impossible." He said there were constant complaints some drivers were getting better rides than others, but the system could not be worked improperly.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Queenstown landlord with 22 migrant tenants in unlawful five-bedroom home fined over $100k
The living area for 22 tenants had security cameras on the wall. Photo: Supplied/TCIT A Queenstown Landlord chose to ignore tenancy rules housing 22 mainly migrant workers in a five-bedroom house, converted garages and a shed, the Ministry of Business and Innovation says. James Truong has been ordered to pay $113,723.56 for multiple breaches of the Residential Tenancies Act as well as refund 40 percent of rent paid by the tenants lodged in an unlawful boarding house. The Ministry's tenancy compliance and investigations team found the house had failed to meet healthy homes standards and Truong had interfered with the tenant's power supply as well as posting invalid rent increases and harassing a tenant The team had advised Truong to stop using the building as a boarding house in 2020 but a complaint in 2023 revealed 11 people living in the five-bedroom house, and a further 11 people in two converted garages and a shed. TCIT National Manager, Brett Wilson, said Truong was an experienced landlord who would have been well aware of his obligations and responsibilities under the Act. "Mr Truong knew the rules but chose to ignore them. There was significant non-compliance in this case with multiple breaches of the Act ranging from failure to comply with healthy homes and insulation statement requirements to interfering with the supply of electricity. "The level of damages awarded reflects the seriousness of the non-compliance in this case and the number of people affected," Wilson said. Wilson said the tenants were in a vulnerable situation given most of them were new to the country. "Many of the tenants were overseas workers on working holiday visas who had little knowledge of their rights as tenants in New Zealand. They were also working in a location with a shortage of rental accommodation which made them vulnerable to a landlord who was knowingly operating outside of the Residential Tenancies Act." The garage where five tenants lived. Photo: Supplied/TCIT Adjudicator, R Woodhouse rejected Truong's claims that house was safe and compliant and he was simply helping his tenants out. Woodhouse noted the commercial levels of rent charged at the premises were not consistent with that approach, and when attention from authorities came onto the premises, the tenancies were abruptly terminated. Truong was also issued with a three-year restraining order from committing any further unlawful acts related to operating a boarding house. RNZ has contacted Truong for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Queenstown landlord fined $113,000 for unlawful boarding house
A Queenstown landlord has been fined more than $113,000 for illegally using his property as a boarding house for 22 tenants — migrant workers. Landlord James Truong must pay this amount to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) on behalf of the tenants, who were primarily employed in Queenstown's hospitality industry. In 2020, the Queenstown Lakes District Council and MBIE's Tenancy Compliance and Investigations Team warned Truong to stop using the property as a boarding house or apply for permission to formally change its use. He was clearly informed the rules of operating a boarding house and communicated his decision to return the property to use as a regular home. However, after receiving a complaint in 2023, the team investigated the property again and found 11 people living in the five-bedroom house, and a further 11 people in two converted garages and a shed. ADVERTISEMENT Garage area where five tenants were living. (Source: TCIT Queenstown) The investigations team took the case to the Tenancy Tribunal, which found Truong committed "multiple breaches of the Act" including operating an unconsented boarding house, failing to meet healthy homes standards, interfering with tenants' electricity supply, invalid rent increases and harassment of a tenant. The property had several problems, such as electricity overloading, missing smoke alarms and non-compliance with healthy homes standards. Smoke alarm not installed with attached bracket on dresser. (Source: TCIT Queenstown) Truong claimed the premises were safe and compliant, and he was simply helping his tenants out, but the tribunal declared the premises to be unlawful residential premises, as he did not have the necessary consent to operate a boarding house with six or more tenants. Investigations team national manager Brett Wilson said Truong was "an experienced landlord who would have been well aware of his obligations and responsibilities under the Act, including through previous interactions with him". "Mr Truong knew the rules but chose to ignore them. There was significant non-compliance in this case with multiple breaches of the Act ranging from failure to comply with healthy homes and insulation statement requirements to interfering with the supply of electricity. The level of damages awarded reflects the seriousness of the non-compliance in this case and the number of people affected," he said. ADVERTISEMENT Another smoke alarm not installed sitting on fridge and no brackets on the ceiling to show where it should have been installed. (Source: TCIT Queenstown) Wilson said the tenants were in a vulnerable situation, given most of them were new to the country and there was a shortage of rental properties in the Queenstown area. "Many of the tenants were overseas workers on working holiday visas who had little knowledge of their rights as tenants in New Zealand. They were also working in a location with a shortage of rental accommodation which made them vulnerable to a landlord who was knowingly operating outside of the Residential Tenancies Act." The adjudicator, R Woodhouse, said the investigation had been conducted in a fulsome and careful manner by MBIE, saying: "The witness evidence was consistent and credible". Gap between tenanted garages and main house. (Source: TCIT Queenstown) Woodhouse also did not accept that Truong was motivated by purely altruistic intentions, noting the commercial levels of rent charged at the premises were not consistent with that approach, and when attention from authorities came onto the premises, the tenancies were abruptly terminated. The Tribunal also criticised Truong for secretly recording private conversations between tenants and MBIE investigators, using security cameras installed throughout the property. ADVERTISEMENT Truong was ordered to pay $113,723.56 for breaches of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, and to refund 40% of the rent paid while the property was operating as an unlawful boarding house. He was also issued with a three-year restraining order from committing any further unlawful acts related to operating a boarding house. If a landlord intentionally breaches a restraining order this is an offence tried in the District Court and under Section 109A of the Residential Tenancies Act they are liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $3600.
