Spain says April blackout was caused by grid failures and poor planning, not a cyberattack
Ecological Transition Minister Sara Aagesen, who manages the nation's energy policy, told reporters that a voltage surge led to small grid failures, mainly in the south of Spain, which then cascaded to larger ones and brought the system down in the two Iberian Peninsula nations.
She ruled out that the failure was due to a cyberattack.
The outage began shortly after noon on April 28 in Spain and lasted through nightfall, disrupting businesses, transit systems, cellular networks, internet connectivity and other critical infrastructure. Spain lost 15 gigawatts of electricity — or about 60% of its supply. Portugal, whose grid is connected to Spain's, also went down. Only the countries' island territories were spared.
'All of this happened in 12 seconds, with most of the power loss happening in just five seconds,' Aagesen said.
Several technical causes contributed to the event, including 'poor planning' by Spain's grid operator Red Eléctrica, which didn't find a replacement for one power plant that was supposed to help balance power fluctuations, the minister said. She also said that some power plants that utilities shut off preventively when the disruptions started could have stayed online to help manage the system.
Power was fully restored by the early hours of the following day.
The government's report was to be released later Tuesday — 49 days after the event — and included analysis from Spain's national security agencies, which concluded, according to the minister, that there were no indications of cyber-sabotage by foreign actors.
The government had previously narrowed down the source of the outage to three power plants that tripped in southern Spain.
In the weeks following the blackout, citizens and experts were left wondering what triggered the event in a region not known for power cuts. The outage ignited a fierce debate about whether Spain's high levels of renewable power and not enough energy generated from nuclear or gas-fired power plants had something to do with the grid failing, which the government has repeatedly denied.
Spain is at the forefront of Europe's transition to renewable energy, having generated nearly 57% of its electricity in 2024 from renewable energy sources such as wind, hydropower and solar. The country is also phasing out its nuclear plants.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez pushed back against such speculation and defended the country's rapid ramping up of renewables. He asked for patience and said that his government would not 'deviate a single millimeter' from its energy transition plans, which include a goal of generating 81% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
10 hours ago
- Spectator
Trump's Alaska meeting is a gift for Putin
From the Kremlin's point of view, holding a US-Russia summit in Anchorage, Alaska is an idea of fiendish brilliance. The venue itself determines the agenda. Literally half a world away from the petty concerns of the European continent, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin can flex the vastness of their respective countries. Anchorage is an eight-hour flight from Washington D.C. and roughly the same distance from Moscow, flying over no other country but Russia for most of the way. By travelling to the point where their countries almost touch in the North Pacific, both leaders can feel justified in prioritising issues that concern just the two of them, from arms control treaties to space cooperation to Arctic mineral rights. Seen from Anchorage, Ukraine seems a very distant and very local problem. The summit is the brainchild of Yuri Ushakov, a veteran diplomat who joined the USSR's foreign ministry in 1970. Ushakov is a wily old attack dog who learned the ways of Washington during a decade-long stint as Russian ambassador from 1998 to 2008. And in suggesting Alaska as a meeting point, Ushakov clearly knows how to flatter not only Trump's ego but also his own President's obsession with history. For Putin, Russia's conquest of north-east Asia and much of the coast of America's Pacific north-west is the founding myth of his country's modern greatness. In the 16th century Muscovy and Spain had both defeated Muslim occupiers and began expanding into rich new worlds east and west – in Spain's case, gold-rich America; in Muscovy's, fur-rich Siberia. Spanish conquistadors and Russian Cossacks reached the Pacific from different sides and started settling colonies along the coasts. In 1776, the Spanish Crown ordered the foundation of San Francisco – in the form of a Franciscan Mission and garrisoned Presidio – in direct response to news that Catherine the Great had started assembling a major Russian fleet to grab the unclaimed territory of northern California. In the event, Catherine's fleet was redeployed to fight a war with the Swedes, leaving most of California to the Spanish. Who was to say who was the more logical ruler of America's north-west coast, distant Madrid or distant St Petersburg? From 1816 until 1842 the southernmost frontier of the Russian empire was 70 miles north of San Francisco at Fort Ross on the Russian River (hence the name). For a brief period in the early 19th century Russia had a colony on Kaua'i island in Hawaii. And until 1867 the modern state of Alaska with its 6,500-mile coastline was known as Russian America and was a possession of the Tsar's. In the wake of the Crimean War, during which a Royal Navy force bombarded and briefly occupied the port of Petropavlovsk on Kamchatka, Tsar Alexander II realised he lacked the naval power to maintain control of his American colonies. He first offered Russian America to the British prime minister Lord Palmerston for the eminently logical reason that the territory was contiguous with British Columbia. Palmerston, however, was uninterested in acquiring half a million square miles of mostly unexplored North American wilderness. The only other plausible buyer was the US. But it took two years, and the distribution of tens of thousands of dollars in bribes to congressmen, for the Russians to persuade a reluctant secretary of state, William Seward, to write a cheque for $7.2 million for the Alaska Purchase – mocked at the time as 'Seward's Folly'. Even today, Alaska still bears the stamp of its century and a half as part of the Russian empire. A third of Alaska's population is Native American (by far the largest proportion of any US state) and most of the Aleut and Tlingit peoples still adhere to the Russian Orthodox faith. The major feature of every coastal town from Sitka to Kodiak is a distinctively Russian church, and there are communities of black-robed monks on out-lying islands – though most are Americans and their services are in English. Colonial echoes of Britain, France and Spain are commonplace in other countries, whether Anglican worshippers in Simla, French baguettes in Saigon or Spanish missions in California. Living echoes of a vanished Russian empire are much rarer and exist mostly in Alaska. It is clearly flattering and heartwarming for Putin to meet his American counterpart on what was once Russian territory. Some more excitable western commentators have claimed that hosting a summit in Anchorage encourages Putin's neo-imperial ambitions – including, supposedly, reclaiming the American lands sold by Alexander II. But the idea that 'Alaska Nash' (Alaska is Ours) is anything other than a Russian pub joke is absurd. A roadside billboard bearing that slogan and featuring a map of Russia including all of Alaska has been doing the rounds of Twitter as supposed evidence of Putin's revanchism. In fact it's just a jokey advertisement for a real estate company called Alaska. Rather than dog-whistling Russian imperialism, the location allows Putin to appeal to a bygone age of Russian-American cooperation where the two nations divided up large swaths of the world. The most recent example is, to Putin's mind, the Yalta conference of February 1945 where Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill pored over maps and divided spheres of influence in the crumbling Nazi empire. A similar carve-up of Ukrainian territory is exactly what Volodymyr Zelensky fears and he has spent the week since the summit was announced gathering European support to insist that no deal can be done over the heads of the Ukrainians. Unfortunately for Kyiv, and for the Europeans, they're not invited. It's also highly likely that even if Putin and Trump reach some kind of a deal on a ceasefire, it will be largely on Russia's terms. But it's also possible that Moscow and Washington could agree on other, non-Ukraine related issues, such as getting Putin back on board with the New START treaty limiting the number of deployed nuclear weapons – the kind of deal that nuclear superpowers make between each other. And there is nothing that both Putin and Trump enjoy more than playing the role of imperial presidents.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
FM's concerns about doing the right thing legally are ringing hollow
OK, so I can't see the results of my straw poll but I reckon The National could make a serious contribution to the discussion with such an exercise. Particularly so since the National Conversation these days is showing a distinct tendency to a desperation for action, to which the alleged party of Scotland's independence continually turn a deaf ear. Our 'honest' John seems to be perennially worried about doing the right/legal thing and like so many others, I've written previously about the futility of Swinney's road to oblivion. Ciaran Martin, Professor at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford but in a previous incarnation as Constitution Director (2011-2014) within the Cabinet Office and at the centre of the Edinburgh Agreement negotiations, wrote: 'Ultimately there are no constraints on what Westminster can do to block a lawful path to Scottish independence if it's so minded. There are, in effect, only two things that matter. One: The law is in Westminster, Two: The votes are in Scotland. So if these two forces clash, one has to give way to the other'. READ MORE: John Swinney interview: The FM on indyref2, Israel, energy and more So no hiding place, Mr Swinney. 'Honest' John's protestations about doing the right/legal thing ring hollow to me. They are nothing more than an excuse given he's an experienced political operator of more than 25 years standing. When, in 2018, SNP headquarters did the hatchet job on the National Council, I resigned as the convener of my local branch in the face of what I considered a democratic outrage. Now I read that the fortress that is the SNP leadership needs more than 1400 members to storm the barricades if they wish to be rid of the incumbent. A pale imitation of the party of the redoubtable Madame Ecosse – 'stop the world, Scotland wants to get on'. Chambers dictionary defines hope as 'to desire with belief in the possibility of fulfilment'. Alas, like so many of us independenistas (as distinguished from SNP activists who can't tell the difference between the indissoluble Spanish constitution and Scotland's 1707 Treaty of Union), my hopes for the future have disintegrated into the hope that the SNP, as presently constituted, meet their demise in the next 12 months. And for the simple reason that if this lot ever manage to get us to independence negotiations, the outcome will be as the ScotWind outcomes but on steroids. READ MORE: One million young Scots can shape our route to independence Yet if only 'honest' John was really serious about doing the right and legal thing, and showed humility by putting country before party, it could be quite different. Clearly the route to an independent state lies either in dissolving the Treaty of Union or deploying the mechanism of direct democracy by means of Article 25 (b) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights so as to anchor the chimera that is the sovereignty of Scotland's people and expose the gaslighting of the Westminster-funded civil servants. On current form, 'honest' John will go down in history as the Toom Tabard of our times, abandoning our country once again to the rapacious behaviour of our English overlords. If, dear reader, you are serious about the indy cause, please sign PE 2135 on the Holyrood petitions site if you've not yet done so, so that we can tell the Sir Humphrey brigade to sling their collective hooks and let Scotland's people exercise their right to self-determination through a legal and internationally recognised process. Iain Bruce Nairn
Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Infamous Mexican drug lord caged in US prison moans about not having TV
The former boss of the now-defunct Guadalajara Cartel, Rafael Caro Quintero, 72, was extradited to the US in February this year over the killing of a DEA agent in 1985 A notorious Mexican drug lord caged over the killing of a DEA agent is moaning about being denied a TV in US prison. Rafael Caro Quintero, who once ruled the Guadalajara Cartel with an iron fist, has filed documents with a New York court which claim he is being subjected to extreme isolation and denied communication with the outside world. His lawyers argue he is being treated like a terrorist after being extradited to the US in February. They say the extreme measures are in place without him having been tried in court. It comes after police shame British drugs mules by making them pose for photos with suitcases. READ MORE: What Ghislaine Maxwell said about Donald Trump in 9-hour prison interview Attorney Mark DeMarco, who is defending the narco kingpin, is asking a judge to change the conditions of his detention, claiming the current situation is a risk to his client's mental and physical health. After Mexico extradited him to the US in February, the 72-year-old has been held at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center under Special Administrative Measures (SAMs). These measures are put in place when a prisoner could cause death and serious injury to other people by communicating with the outside world. His lawyers claim he is locked up for 23 hours in a windowless cell which always has the lights on. When the weekend comes, he's locked up for 24 hours, and has no exercise or physical contact with relatives, they said. The team adds that since he's been locked up, he's only been able to have a couple of phone calls with family in Mexico, which were monitored by prison staff. They also complained that he hasn't been provided with a television though he is eligible to have one. At the moment, he only has a radio which he can't listen to because he only speaks Spanish. "The government has imposed these restrictions without demonstrating that Mr. Quintero poses a real risk . The measures are based on myths and legends that have surrounded him for years, not on verifiable facts," the litigants said. Caro Quintero was extradited to face charges for his alleged role in killing DEA agent Enrique 'Kiki' Camarena in 1985. He was arrested in Mexico in 2022, and has been awaiting trial since he was extradited to the US. This comes after it emerged how thousands of young children have allegedly been abducted by cartel members after they targeted them in McDonalds as part of a vile new recruitment strategy. The sick method sees Mexican gangs creeping around takeaway spots and luring kids to unknowingly join the underworld. According to local media, the children are promised a better life or lucrative jobs, before they are kidnapped by the cartels. It has been reported that the gangsters offer them a free vacation and then force then teens into a life of crime. Heartbroken families continue to hunt for their missing children following the abductions.
