logo
Can robots like Roxy revolutionise cancer surgery in Scotland?

Can robots like Roxy revolutionise cancer surgery in Scotland?

BBC News30-01-2025

In operating theatre D at Glasgow's Royal Infirmary, gynaecological oncologist Dr Kevin Burton is directing four arms of a robot, affectionately named Roxy.The robot's mechanical arms, with surgical instruments attached to them, have been placed inside Dr Burton's patient through small cuts in the abdomen.The surgeon crosses the operating theatre to a console that would look more at home in an arcade and sits down. Dr Burton looks through a viewfinder and, with a joystick and foot pedals, he begins manipulating instruments. He is entirely in control of the robot as he cuts through tissue, avoiding important nerves and blood vessels as he searches deep into the pelvis for potentially cancerous lymph nodes.
It is now more than five years since I first witnessed robot surgeons in action at the Golden Jubilee hospital in Clydebank.Surgeons say the contribution of robotic assisted surgery since then cannot be overstated.This week, First Minister John Swinney spoke at Scotland's National Robotarium to pledge that innovation and technology would be one of three key platforms for reforming the NHS. Artificial intelligence is the latest tool to assist with diagnostics, and a new digital app is promised to improve patient access. But what role might robots like Roxy play?
Robotic surgery has been expanding in Scotland since it was first introduced in Grampian in 2015. Companies such as Versius, Mako and Rosa have supplied robots to health boards to assist with specialties such as thoracic, urology and pancreatic surgery. More recently some hospitals are using robots for orthopaedics.In 2021, the Scottish government invested £20m purchasing 12 da Vinci robots, primarily to develop cancer surgery, particularly in areas such as womb cancer or bowel cancer, the specialisms with the highest rates of open surgery.Surgeons say robotic assisted surgery (RAS) is transforming their ability to perform delicate and complex cancer surgery - with faster recovery for patients.But so far RAS is responsible for only around 1% of the total number of operations carried out on the NHS in Scotland and further investment would be expensive, with the cost of a da Vinci robot in the region of £1.7m plus running costs.
Prof Graham Mackay is the clinical lead for the West of Scotland Cancer Centre and also a colorectal surgeon. He tells me that across Scotland they are seeing huge benefits from RAS. Rates of open surgery have dropped from about 70% to 30% in the past three years and it has almost halved the length of stay in hospital for patients, who also experience fewer complications.Prof Mackay says expanding the programme to other areas would help ease pressure on hospitals."There are still a number of hospitals that don't have this technology," he says. "There are other cancer types which we're not treating yet by this and certainly from what we've seen in bowel cancer, this has really been the biggest step forward in surgical care that I've seen during my career. "What we want is that for all cancer patients, where they can benefit from it, to be benefiting."
Isobel Morrison is one patient who has benefited from RAS. The 84-year-old required a hysterectomy to treat womb cancer but thanks to Roxy, was able to get home the day after her surgery in time to celebrate her 60th wedding anniversary.Isobel said: "I called him the Tin Man, and just said he'd done a good job. "I woke up, and didn't realise I'd even had it, "When the doctors happened to be in the ward, I said 'Excuse me, have I had my operation? And they said yes'. "So then I got home the next day, and I felt absolutely fine."
Back in surgery and Dr Burton's operation has reached a delicate stage. Lymph nodes are cut away, and, still inside the patient's body, they are neatly put into a bag that will be removed by theatre nurses through the vagina.Dr Burton says the robot is "fantastic" and has "massive advantages" over traditional open or keyhole surgery.He says: "Robotic surgery gives you a really immersed close-up view, a really steady view, and has a 3D element to the vision which allows you do really complex tasks."He says higher obesity rates have been directly linked to an increase in gynaecological cancers and robotic assisted surgery enables surgeons to operate on patients who are so overweight that they would previously have been considered inoperable.Dr Burton says that without doubt RAS has the potential to save money for the NHS."If we can get patients in hospital for less time, that frees up more beds for patients," he says. "So when you get a winter bed crisis, for example, we have more beds, we have more doctors and more nurses to actually deliver the care needed."
In 2021, with post-pandemic backlogs mounting, the government saw robots as playing a central role in the remobilisation of the NHS.But technology moves fast and ministers need to choose which innovations will deliver most impact for less cost, when health board budgets are under more pressure than ever.The current plans talk of better use of data to increase productivity as well as innovations in genetic testing to better target of medications.Digital support for mental health, dermatology and the management of long-term conditions is also planned as well as a new Scottish health and social care app.So who can say whether more Roxies are set to join Scotland's NHS robot surgery team?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brighton GP surgery under threat from private company, says campaigner
Brighton GP surgery under threat from private company, says campaigner

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Brighton GP surgery under threat from private company, says campaigner

Campaigners are holding a tug-of-war to highlight what they say is the threat to a community-run, non-profit GP surgery in Brighton from a private Whitehawk surgery is currently run by the Wellsbourne Healthcare Community Interest Company, but it could be handed over to Leeds-based One Medical Group after NHS Sussex started procuring for a new contract. NHS Sussex said it could not comment on the procurement process as it was still under way. Janet Sang, part of Sussex Defend NHS, said the campaign group was "extremely concerned" that an "effective and well-loved GP service" could be transferred to a profit-making entity. "We believe this is... not in the best interests of the people of Whitehawk," she added. One Medical Group, which said it had more than two decades of experience in "delivering high-quality primary care services across the UK", said it could not comment as the procurement process was ongoing. It added it had "consistently delivered [NHS services] to the highest standard across diverse demographics". "We pride ourselves on.... our collaborative approach with local communities, ensuring that healthcare is both reflective and responsive to local needs," it continued. 'Fantastic job' NHS Sussex said it needed to procure a new contract for running the doctor's surgery, which serves around 8,300 people, as the current one has expired. It said the new contract had been designed to meet the needs of the local population in what it called one of the most deprived areas in Sussex. Wellsbourne Healthcare CIC took over the GP surgery several years ago after the previous private provider walked away, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Anger over uncertain future of GP surgery Brighton & Hove City Councillor David McGregor, who said he planned to attend the tug-of-war event, said the Wellsbourne Healthcare CIC had done a "fantastic job" and NHS Sussex should "reconsider".Chris Ward, Labour MP for Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven, has started a petition - titled Save Wellsbourne Healthcare - that has more than 3,000 signatures as of 5 June. Sarah Webb, business manager at Wellsbourne Healthcare CIC, previously urged NHS Sussex to talk to the people of Whitehawk."Listen to residents," she told BBC Radio Sussex in May.

What I Spent: The therapy you actually get for £100, £50 or free on the NHS
What I Spent: The therapy you actually get for £100, £50 or free on the NHS

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

What I Spent: The therapy you actually get for £100, £50 or free on the NHS

While there are options available through the NHS, many people in the UK will have to pay out of pocket for talking therapy. According to services marketplace Bark, this will set you back an average of £60 per session. But it all depends on the type of therapy you have, where you're based, and the provider you go for — and to make it extra ambiguous, many don't tell you their rates until you get in touch. Then there's weighing up the cost for each visit versus the long-term outlay. For example, while certain therapeutic methods may seem more expensive, you may only need a limited number of sessions, so it could work out cheaper overall compared to ongoing counselling. It's important to do your research beforehand, as clinical psychologist Marianne Trent explains: 'I'm aware of some people (even unqualified people) charging £300 plus per session and coaching sessions can be astronomical too!' The titles therapist, counsellor, psychologist and psychotherapist are not protected in the UK, meaning anyone can legally describe themselves as such without specific qualifications. However, organisations like the British Psychological Society do register certain professionals – like clinical psychologists and chartered psychologists – while the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) and the UKCP (United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy) provide voluntary regulation and ethical guidelines for therapists. When choosing a therapist, it can give you peace of mind to check if they're registered with one of these professional bodies – and always make sure to check their training, experience, and adherence to ethical frameworks. The fact is though, professional support can be invaluable, and only you can decide whether the results are worth the investment. So if you're considering it, these three Metro readers' experiences can give you a better idea of what you can expect to spend. Dina Grishin, 39, is a career coach and coaching psychologist based in London, spending £100 on each 50-minute session she has with an EMDR therapist trained in the Polyvagal approach. 'This is a combination I've been looking high and low for so I'm happy I found her, even though this is the most I've ever spent on a therapist,' Dina tells Metro. 'I've been seeing her nearly weekly for a few months now (we're on session 10) but it's not therapy that will last years so knowing there's an end date this year – perhaps within a couple of months – also helps justify the cost.' She also visits an EFT therapist once every three to eight weeks ('on a 'when needed' basis after working more intensely at the beginning') paying £90 for each 90-minute session. And prior to that, she paid £60 per session for CBT and £50 for talking therapy. EMDR Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing – is a psychological therapy that can help people who are affected by traumatic memories. According to the NHS, EMDR – which is recommended by NICE – for the treatment of PTSD – uses one of two ways to process the memory: tapping from side to side and moving your eyes from side to side. Polyvagal-informed EMDR would see these methods used alongside the outlook that our autonomic nervous system (ANS) can shape our responses to trauma. EFT 'Emotional Freedom Technique uses the art of tapping on acupuncture pressure points to release negative emotions,' explains the Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation website. 'It has proved effective in reducing anxiety and improving overall wellbeing. EFT is often described as 'like acupuncture without the pins'.' CBT Cognitive behavioural therapy involves working with a therapist to help you change your thoughts and behaviour. Available through the NHS or privately, it's suitable for a range of different mental health conditions, and typically is offered in courses 5 to 15 sessions. Personal stylist Abbey Booth, 49, has been visiting a CPD certified hypnotherapy and anxiety coach, Jo – who charges £75 for 60 minutes – around once or twice a month for the last eight months. A spate of menopause-related anxiety and panic attacks led the Herts-based mum to seek out regular support, but she also books additional sessions when things are especially difficult, to help give her the tools to cope. In fact, she's so impressed with her 'brilliant' therapist, she paid for her son to see Jo when he was dealing with exam stress. Alongside working with Jo, Abbey recently began having ADHD coaching at a price of £150 for a block of three 45-minute sessions too. She tells Metro: 'During busy times I can get inertia/blocks or hyper focus, so It's really helped with coping strategies when the noise gets too much and I need time away to recalibrate and refocus. 'These sessions are run online and I've been having them for a few months. There's also contact in between via email and voice notes – brief check-ins which I find very useful.' Hypnotherapy This type of therapy uses hypnosis to try to treat conditions or change habits. It can help people work through a range of issues, but the NHS recommends avoiding it 'if you have psychosis or certain types of personality disorder, as it could make your condition worse.' Anxiety coaching 'An anxiety coach is someone who guides people out of anxiety using a structured, effective approach,' says the STILL Method website. It adds that while this coaching technique is 'not therapy', many find it to be 'therapeutic.' ADHD coaching Like anxiety coaching, this is more about helping people with ADHD to develop their own strategies and skills to manage their daily lives, work, and relationships. Coaches provide guidance in areas like executive functioning, organisation, and time management, either through set sessions or 'when needed' advice. Johnny Seifert, 32, from London, previously underwent seven sessions of private counselling at £50 per 55-minute appointment, but found he would often end up 'talking almost for the sake of talking, without being given any coping mechanisms to help actually make a difference.' After asking his GP for help with his anxiety, the host of mental health podcast Secure the Insecure was referred for an assessment with the NHS. Three months later, he had a phone consultation, and two weeks after this, was offered eight weekly group therapy sessions over Zoom. However, Johnny was unable to attend these lunchtime calls due to work commitments and was looking for something 'more one on one', so requested an alternative option. More Trending Around a month later, he was then offered a six-week programme of Self Guided Help. This involved Johnny working through a booklet and going through his behaviours with a Trainee Psychological Trainee Practitioner in 30-minute weekly phone sessions. 'Each week, 24 hours before the session, I am sent a questionnaire that has a risk assessment and assesses my anxiety levels,' he tells Metro. Towards the start, the course specifically focused on 'validating' what Johnny was feeling. Now on session four, he's progressed to learning tools 'such as Worrying Time Management to manage the time you actually worry' – which he says has been 'really useful'. View More » 'As it's on the NHS, I do sometimes feel that I am just a number,' says Johnny. 'It's very much about the present week rather than looking into past traumas and triggers of where the worrying (in my case) has come from, understanding those root causes so that the behaviours do not happen again in the future.' Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Perrie Edwards: 'I took my therapist to work every day to help manage my panic attacks' MORE: I get why women say Jason Statham's hair is 'ideal' — I'm more attractive bald MORE: Free school meals to be extended to 500,000 chilldren across the country Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.

Norwich radiologist says lack of doctors is causing cancer delays
Norwich radiologist says lack of doctors is causing cancer delays

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Norwich radiologist says lack of doctors is causing cancer delays

A senior radiologist has said there are not enough doctors to keep up with the number of cancer patients needing scan results, diagnosis and treatment. Dr Tom Roques, vice president of clinical oncology at the Royal College of Radiologists, who also works at Norwich and Norfolk University Hospital, claimed the NHS was struggling to meet the government's 62-day diagnosis targets in cancer care. However, Steffan Aquarone, North Norfolk MP, believed another significant challenge was ensuring patients in rural areas could access treatment. A spokesman for the Department of Health and Social Care said: "We are determined to tackle delays, diagnose cancer earlier and treat it faster." Dr Roques described a shortage of both radiologists and doctors. He said: "People are waiting for scan results or waiting for diagnoses and we're also really short of cancer doctors."There are delays further down the line in actually having that treatment because there aren't enough people to provide it."However, he says the problem was not just a Norfolk issue. "We are just not able to meet the government-set targets which themselves, are not that ambitious really."If you don't have the staff and nurses and the physical space to treat them [patients] then people are not going to be able to have the treatment they deserve." Matt Sample, from Cancer Research UK, said the 62-day government target had been missed annually since 2015, with 74,000 people not beginning treatment within that target last year. He said: "For people affected by cancer, every single day waiting to get that diagnosis and begin treatment is a worrying and stressful time even when they are seen within targets. "When those targets are missed, those worries and stresses are just compounded - it can impact their treatment options and ultimately their outcomes. Liberal Democrat Aquarone agreed, saying "more people die than are necessary". He remains concerned about the ability of people in rural areas to get cancer care. "This is entirely about access to treatment," he said. Julie Keeling, nurse director for planned care at Norwich and Norfolk University Hospital, said: "Our latest validated figures show that as of March 2025, 51.8 % of patients receiving first treatment for cancer are treated by day 62, with 48.2 % of patients waiting over 62 days for first cancer treatment. It is encouraging that this is an improvement on previous data."We know that we have more to do and are sorry that some patients have had to wait longer than expected to see us following a cancer referral."The Department of Health and Social Care said: "We are delivering 40,000 more appointments every week, investing £1.5bn in both new surgical hubs and AI scanners, rolling out cutting-edge radiotherapy machines to every region in the country and backing our radiologists and oncologists with above inflation pay rises for the second year in a row." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store