logo
Here's what Texas DOGE talked about on day one

Here's what Texas DOGE talked about on day one

Yahoo08-03-2025

AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Despite not directly discussing legislation, the Texas House Delivery of Government Efficiency (Texas DOGE) committee met for more than 12 hours in their inaugural session. Here's a partial recap of what they discussed.
Before taking any testimony, Chair Giovanni Capriglione, R-Southlake, started to discuss his vision for the upstart committee.
'We will not be passive observers. We will be enforcers of accountability now,' Capriglione said. 'Our work will be thorough. Public hearings will shine a light on failures. Legislative proposals will emerge from this committee to drive reform. Investigations will hold bad actors accountable. We are here to advocate for the taxpayer, the small business owner, the retiree on a fixed income and the Texan who depends on public services that are too often compromised by mismanagement and negligence.'
Vice Chair Salman Bhoijani, D-Euless, laid also laid out how he hopes Texas DOGE will operate.
'As the eighth largest economy in the world, with the climate of innovation and doing more with less, Texas can lead the way in responsible, efficient government, ensuring tax money is being responsibly should be a bipartisan goal,' he said. 'But let me be clear, my focus is not about cutting essential services or devaluing hard working public servants. I'm here to work with you, not against you, to improve how we serve Texans.'
The first agency to testify in front of the committee was the Texas Sunset Commission, who the Texas DOGE Committee will have direct oversight over.
Sunset Commission Executive Director Eric Beverly started with prepared remarks, noting how the agency provides oversight similar to what DOGE is tasked with doing. He said in their 48 years of operation, they've abolished 42 agencies and programs, saving taxpayers a billion dollars since 1985.
'Sunset has resulted in less regulation, improved agency performance and greater government accountability,' Beverly said. 'There's no doubt that the face of state government looks different today due to the sunset process.'
Next, the committee heard from the Department of Information Resources (DIR) Executive Director Amanda Crawford. DIR impressed the committee with the scale at which they help government agencies, from state agencies down to school districts, secure cheap software and technology assistance.
Crawford estimated the DIR has saved Texas taxpayers at least $376 million in cost avoidance through securing cooperative contracts — using their leverage as a large collection of organizations to negotiate better deals.
Crawford also highlighted areas where DIR has helped moved government services online through Texas.gov, saving taxpayer money.
'DIR has returned to the general revenue fund 193 million through the Texas.gov program, and issued nearly six million in rebates to our customers over the last five years,' Crawford said. 'For example, renewing a driver's license online means Texans don't have to drive to a location wait in line, resulting in savings of around $57 per person and at least two hours of their precious time. In addition, utilizing texas.gov online services can free up state employees to complete other essential duties, saving agencies time and money.'
One aspect the committee discussed was to require smaller, local government organizations — like cities, school districts, special purpose districts — to use cooperative contracts. State agencies are already required to do so, but it's optional for other government entities.
'Why aren't they using you,' State Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, asked.
'It's more than likely they don't know,' Crawford responded.
'Should they be made to use you,' Cain asked. 'Would the taxpayers be happy? Would they save a lot of money?'
'I think they would save a lot of money,' Crawford explained.
The committee heard from Gwen Griffin, the chair of the new Texas Space Commission's Board of Directors. Griffin talked about the need for Texas to lead the way in America's reintroduction to space.
'Resources that can benefit our lives, such as helium-3 are abundant on the lunar surface. It's very rare here on Earth. We need to learn how to mine them and bring them back to Earth for the benefit of humanity,' Griffin said.
Committee members were excited to hear about the new advancements in space exploration, but showed some concerns about potential conflicts of interest in contract awards. Within their board of directors are representatives from SpaceX, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and more.
'It just concerns me, because it looks like you received applications, 281 applications… [for] $3.4 billion, but almost 20% of the grants given were people on your board,' State Rep. Ana-Maria Ramos, D-Richardson, said.
'We disclose to our chief compliance officer and our executive director if we do have a conflict of interest,' Griffin said. 'We never see those applications, we do not vote or speak about those applications if we are conflicted in our open meetings. Therefore we're not involved in that process should we be conflicted.
Griffin also clarified that the grants are not going to members of the board, but the companies they're affiliated with.
Further installments of the DOGE Committee Recap will be published leading up to their next hearing on March 12.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former GOP state Rep. Austin Smith, a Turning Point leader, indicted for forging election documents
Former GOP state Rep. Austin Smith, a Turning Point leader, indicted for forging election documents

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Former GOP state Rep. Austin Smith, a Turning Point leader, indicted for forging election documents

Rep. Austin Smith, R-Surprise, on the floor of the Arizona House of Representatives on April 17, 2024. Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror Former Republican state legislator Austin Smith has been indicted on 14 misdemeanor and felony counts for allegedly forging voter signatures on his petitions for reelection last year. Former member of the state legislature's far-right Arizona Freedom Caucus Smith dropped his reelection bid last spring after he was accused of personally forging more than 100 petition signatures to get on the 2024 Republican primary ballot. Around the same time, Smith resigned from his position as senior director at Turning Point Action, the political advocacy arm of Turning Point USA, a far-right organization based in Phoenix that aims to mobilize young conservatives. But according to Smith's Linkedin and X accounts, he was rehired in January as Turning Point Action's strategic director. Smith made his X account private, blocking his biographical information — including his job title — on the morning of June 10, after the news of his indictment was made public. A Maricopa County grand jury indicted Smith on June 2 on four felony counts, for presenting documents he knew were forged to the Arizona Secretary of State's Office, and 10 misdemeanor counts for personally forging the names of electors on his reelection petitions. The felonies each come with a 1-2 year prison sentence; the misdemeanors come with a six-month imprisonment. When the allegations of signature fraud became public in April 2024, Smith vehemently denied them, calling them 'ludicrous' and accusing Democrats of creating a 'coordinated attack' against him. However, 100 of the signatures on his petition to get on last year's Republican primary ballot, along with corresponding addresses, obviously look like they were all written by the same person. And some of the people whose names were on the petition told the court that they never signed it. Smith took no accountability for the allegedly fraudulent signatures and said that he dropped out of the race because didn't want to spend tens of thousands defending himself in the civil elections challenge — as well as a possible criminal case for forgery. Ironically, Smith was a member of the Arizona House of Representatives Municipal Oversight and Elections Committee, where he decried unproven election fraud in Maricopa County, and has even made jokes accusing county officials of mail-in ballot signature fraud on social media. 'Signature verification in Maricopa County is a joke,' Smith wrote on Twitter in May 2023. Smith was one of the many Arizona Republicans who falsely claimed without evidence that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from President Donald Trump. 'What happened on November 3rd, 2020 in Maricopa County continues to be a national disgrace and embarrassment,' Smith wrote on his website. 'Not only that, Austin believes it was criminal and will fight every day in the State Legislature to hold those responsible to account.' Multiple audits, including a highly partisan review orchestrated by Arizona Senate Republicans, found no discrepancies in the election. Fraud allegations made in court in the days and weeks following the 2020 election were all rejected because there was no evidence backing up the claims. Neither Turning Point USA Action nor Smith immediately responded to a request for comment. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

He called for election integrity, then was indicted for fraud. Oh, the irony
He called for election integrity, then was indicted for fraud. Oh, the irony

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

He called for election integrity, then was indicted for fraud. Oh, the irony

A former Arizona legislator who was one of the state's fiercest crusaders for so-called election integrity has been indicted on charges of election fraud. You cannot make this stuff up. Ex-Rep. Austin Smith, R-Wittmann, stands charged with 14 felonies and misdemeanors alleging he forged signatures on his nominating petitions to run for reelection last year. Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes announced the state grand jury indictment on June 10. Those who see a conspiracy behind every cactus will likely rush to Smith's defense, just as they rushed to defense of Arizona's fake electors. Just as they rushed to the defense of Arizonans and others who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to try to stop Congress from certifying the 2020 election. 'Patriots,' I believe they called the rioters. Now, they have a new cause célèbre. Smith was a rising star on the hard right, a member of the Arizona Freedom Caucus and a senior official in Turning Point Action, the political advocacy arm of Turning Point USA. But his political career went into freefall in April 2024 when a Democratic attorney filed a lawsuit challenging Smith's nominating petitions. The lawsuit claimed he forged 100 of the 826 signatures on petitions he circulated — signatures that 'bear a striking resemblance to Smith's' — and thus should be disqualified from running for office for the next five years, as state law requires. The lawsuit included sworn statements from two voters whose signatures appeared on Smith's petitions, saying they did not sign them. Lawsuits seeking to knock candidates off the ballot are common. What wasn't common was Smith's reaction. Rather than fighting the petition challenge, as is typical, Smith quickly dropped out of the race. Naturally, he played the Trump card, proclaiming himself the victim of a politically motivated plot by those who fear him. 'What I was (told) was this was a very intense effort to 'get me' and I needed to be prepared to spend tens of thousands of dollars to defend myself, not only against the civil elections matter, but most likely against some sort of criminal investigation that would be launched by those on the left who are unhappy with my politics,' he wrote in a lengthy statement laying out his victimhood. Smith never struck me as the type to stand down from a fight that he deems righteous. Surely, if those signatures were not forged, I thought at the time, he would stand his ground and explain why those signatures looked so remarkably like his own. Surely, if those signatures were not forged, I thought at the time, Charlie Kirk and his powerhouse Turning Point operation would defend one of his key leaders against the 'tyranny' of the justice system. Yet, there was Smith, high tailing it out of the race and leaving his post with Turning Point. Opinion: Gov. Hobbs finally goes on offense against lawmakers 'The recommendation I received most was that I bow out and live to fight another day,' he wrote at the time. 'I might be confident of victory, but all it would take is a judge believing any one person, and all would be lost.' All wasn't lost, though, as the suspected forger was allowed to continue on at the Legislature through the rest of last year, making laws for the rest of us to follow. Not so much as a single Republican raised an objection. Mayes, meanwhile, launched an investigation at the request of then-Maricopa County Supervisor Clint Hickman, a Republican. 'This is a man who has lied to the people of Legislative District 29 and the entire state about our election operations for at least three years,' Hickman said at the time. 'And now he is accused of lying about the signatures he personally collected to get on the ballot again. 'An investigation will reveal the truth, but this episode tells us something about those who have spread falsehoods with such ease since the 2020 Election. They can't comprehend that most Americans and Arizonans are honest people. They accuse others of dishonesty so easily because they have no qualms about lying to win a political race or a business deal.' On June 2, Smith was indicted for fraud, filing false instruments and 10 counts of signing someone else's name on his petitions to get on the ballot. That same day, Smith announced his appointment to the advisory board of the Arizona Young Republicans. Just think of the advice he can offer young generations of election deniers and conspiracy buffs. Expect to hear the heated cries of 'lawfare!' from the far right in five, four, three … Reach Roberts at Follow her on X (formerly Twitter) at @LaurieRobertsaz, on Threads at @LaurieRobertsaz and on BlueSky at @ Subscribe to today. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Austin Smith will call his indictment 'lawfare' in 3, 2 ... | Opinion

Is IonQ a Better Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Than D-Wave?
Is IonQ a Better Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Than D-Wave?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Is IonQ a Better Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Than D-Wave?

The stock market had a turbulent year. However, quantum computing stocks have navigated the volatility and recorded impressive returns. The Defiance Quantum ETF QTUM outperformed the broader S&P 500 over the past year (+42% vs. +12.3%). Significant contributors to the gains in QTUM include IonQ, Inc. IONQ and D-Wave Quantum Inc. QBTS, which rose by 409.7% and 1,447.4%, respectively, in a year. But does D-Wave Quantum's outperformance in the last 12 months against IonQ indicate a better buy, or would you prefer the latter? Let's find out – IonQ's first-quarter revenues of $7.6 million may have remained unchanged from a year ago, but the company has issued encouraging full-year revenue guidance. After acquiring Lightsynq, the company anticipates doubling its 2024 revenues to fall between $75 million and $95 million for the year. IonQ is also heading toward profitability. IonQ narrowed its first-quarter non-GAAP loss to $0.14 a share from a loss of $0.19 a share a year ago. IonQ has made substantial progress as its unique linear ion chains in quantum computing help it to surpass 100 qubits and reduce errors compared to other quantum computers. The company has grown its customer base for some time. Notable among them are AstraZeneca PLC AZN and ANSYS, Inc. ANSS, to name a few (read more: Can IONQ be the Next NVIDIA, and Is It a Buy?). D-Wave Quantum's financial performance has been imposing, too. D-Wave Quantum's first-quarter revenues skyrocketed to $15 million, a 509% increase from a year ago. D-Wave Quantum was able to meet its customer obligations and reduce its liabilities, indicating a path to profitability. D-Wave Quantum finished the quarter with $304.3 million in cash, which can sustain operations until profitability. D-Wave Quantum's revenue growth is driven by increased interest in its technology. The company's 6th-generation Advantage2 quantum computer can solve problems in 20 minutes, which supercomputers may take almost 1 million years. CEO Alan Baratz recently said that the Advantage2 quantum computer is 'so powerful that it can solve hard problems outside the reach of one of the world's largest exascale GPU-based classical supercomputers.' D-Wave Quantum also boasts a strong customer base with notable clients, such as Lockheed Martin Corporation LMT and Deloitte (read more: Here's Why D-Wave Stock Promises High Growth and Is a Buy). Both IonQ and D-Wave Quantum are on track to become profitable. IonQ's ion trap architecture provides scalability and a competitive edge, while D-Wave Quantum focuses on quantum annealing for solving complex problems, potentially driving revenue growth and boosting investments. However, quantum computing's practical applications remain limited as it is an unproven market. Therefore, placing bets on both speculative stocks may heighten risk. Yet, risk-tolerant investors may prefer focusing on one stock for potential gains when the market recognizes quantum computing's true value. IonQ should be the preferred choice over D-Wave Quantum since the company has a larger intellectual property portfolio, including 950 patents related to quantum computing. Its recent acquisitions of Lightsynq, ID Quantique and UK quantum computing firm Oxford Ionics have strengthened its business position in the quantum space. Moreover, IonQ stock is less pricey on a relative basis compared to shares of D-Wave Quantum since it has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 212.84. D-Wave Quantum is trading at a P/S ratio of 240.66. IONQ – P S Ratio (TTM) Image Source: Zacks Investment Research QBTS – P S Ratio (TTM) Image Source: Zacks Investment Research And of course, let's face it, IonQ's CEO, Niccolo de Masi, sounds more optimistic as he believes the company will lead the field like NVIDIA Corporation NVDA. Others have imitated, but have always trailed behind. IonQ has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) : Free Stock Analysis Report AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) : Free Stock Analysis Report Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM): ETF Research Reports IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) : Free Stock Analysis Report D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store