Former PAC leader avoids jail time after fraud conviction
Image: Mandilakhe Tshwete/ Independent Media
Former Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC) president Luthando Mbinda has been spared direct imprisonment after being convicted of fraud involving nearly R1 million in public funds.
The 64-year-old was sentenced in the Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Bellville, where the magistrate handed down correctional supervision and a wholly suspended custodial sentence.
During sentencing, the court considered Mbinda's circumstances, including his age, medical conditions, and family support, as well as the seriousness of the offence and the broader public interest.
Medical records confirmed that Mbinda suffers from chronic illnesses, including hypertension and diabetes, and requires ongoing treatment. The State acknowledged the records were dated, but did not contest his need for continuous medical care.
A probation officer's report described Mbinda as a married father of eight minor children with no previous convictions, who had fully cooperated with court proceedings.
His family, including his wife and children, had provided consistent emotional support.
The officer assessed Mbinda as a minimal risk to reoffend and recommended a suspended sentence, noting that the fraud was not committed for personal gain but stemmed from internal party issues within the PAC.
The report also recommended he attend a counselling programme.
The State opposed a fully suspended sentence but supported correctional supervision, arguing it would serve as both punishment and deterrent, especially given the misuse of public funds.
The magistrate acknowledged that although the amount was not excessive, the fraud had been carefully planned.
Mbinda had created bank accounts in his own name, 'LR Mbinda trading as Azania 2019', and submitted these to Parliament while using PAC letterheads.
This resulted in nearly R1 million in constituency funds being redirected from the official PAC account to the fraudulent accounts solely controlled by him.
The court found that Mbinda had misled Parliament and undermined party structures, though it accepted that there was no evidence of personal financial gain.
'He was dishonest,' the magistrate said.
'And while there may have been no personal gain, his actions diverted public funds.'
The magistrate stopped short of imposing direct imprisonment, citing his clean criminal record, medical needs, and the political context in which the offence occurred.
'This was poor judgment rather than criminal intent,' the magistrate said.
Mbinda's sentence includes: three years of correctional supervision; house arrest from Monday to Friday between 6am and 8pm, Saturday 6am and 4pm and Sundays between 6am and 2pm; he may not leave home without permission and must be available for unannounced visits by correctional officers; 16 hours of community service per month in Mdantsane for 18 months; mandatory attendance of behaviour modification, life skills, and personal responsibility programmes; all medical appointments must be pre-approved and properly documented.
In addition, he received a five-year custodial sentence wholly suspended for five years, on the condition that he is not convicted of any similar offence involving dishonesty during that time; although five years were imposed, the effective sentencing period was reduced to three years; he has also been declared unfit to possess a firearm.
Mbinda was convicted on April 14 this year after a Hawks investigation by the Serious Commercial Crime Investigation unit in Bellville.
Hawks spokesperson Warrant Officer Zinzi Hani said he was found guilty of fraud amounting to R995 670.20 but acquitted on charges of money laundering. Mbinda had handed himself over on April 9, 2021.
Two co-accused were initially arrested with him but were cleared of all charges on January 22 last year.
The court found that Mbinda had, on March 13, 2019, fraudulently opened two FNB accounts under his name and asked Parliament's Finance Department to deposit funds owed to the PAC into those accounts, bypassing the official ABSA account. Parliament then transferred R995 670.20 into the FNB accounts between March 22 and April 4, 2019.
The funds, meant for the PAC's operational and constituency purposes, were instead diverted and controlled solely by Mbinda. Both the party and Parliament suffered actual financial losses.
Mbinda was expelled from the PAC on June 14, 2017, two years before the fraudulent scheme.
Speaking after sentencing, Mbinda maintained his innocense and insisted the act was a result of negligence, not criminal intent.
'I see it as either negligence or violating parliamentary policies, in that instead of opening the account in the name of the political party, I opened it under LR Mbinda, my name, trading as Azania, which is also the PAC,' he said.
'The account was never used for personal reasons but for the constituency.'
He said he would appeal the conviction.
Cape Times

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
ActionSA introduces bill that would see removal of all deputy ministers
CAPE TOWN - ActionSA has introduced the Constitution Twenty-Second Amendment Bill, which, if passed, will see the removal of all current deputy ministers. The party said this would save the country more than R1 billion yearly. This follows President Cyril Ramaphosa's appointment of Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister. ActionSA parliamentary leader Athol Trollip said South Africa has the biggest Cabinet in the world. 'We have seen that deputy ministers are for all intents and purposes glorified doormen and doorwomen for the ministers. We've seen now in this case with the police incident that they are not good enough to be promoted to become ministers.' Trollip said they want more levels of vetting. 'We believe that obviously the president has the right to select who he wants on his Cabinet, but we believe there must be some kind of screening. We've seen Justice Zondo this weekend saying how it pains him to swear ministers into Cabinet that he had found against in the Zondo commission.'


Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
ActionSA's Trollip: Deputy ministers are redundant doormen and doorwomen for their ministers
CAPE TOWN - ActionSA said the country could save more than R1 billion of taxpayers per annum if President Cyril Ramaphosa could get rid of all deputy ministers in his Cabinet. The party has announced a Constitutional Amendment Bill to change the size and structure of the Cabinet. Among other things, the party wants all 43 deputy minister posts scrapped. This follows the president's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave for alleged interference in police investigations. President Cyril Ramaphosa has appointed Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting minister, despite there being two deputy ministers in the portfolio. ActionSA MP Athol Trollip said this makes their case. "There's absolutely no executive authority that a deputy minister has, so I'm saying they're redundant doormen and doorwomen for their ministers. In fact, all we've seen in this new GNU government is that deputy ministers spend most of their time travelling abroad and have spent nearly R200 million between them on travelling abroad. If they had so much to do at home in their departments, they wouldn't be overseas so much."

IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Analysts warn SA risks repeating mistakes without action on Zondo report
Analysts weigh in on the former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo's reflections on the emotional toll of the State Capture Commission. Image: Supplied Analysts have weighed in on former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo's recent reflections about the emotional toll of presiding over South Africa's controversial State Capture Commission, stating that it highlights challenges in South Africa's anti-corruption efforts. In a recent statement that has sparked widespread debate, Zondo expressed the emotional toll of presiding over South Africa's controversial State Capture Commission. He reflected on the personal discomfort of swearing in officials implicated in corruption, including members of parliament, despite the damning evidence uncovered by the commission. His remarks come amid renewed scrutiny of the country's efforts to combat systemic corruption and the efficacy of commissions of inquiry. Speaking openly last week about his experiences, Zondo conveyed the pain of holding a position that, while vital for uncovering corruption, often resulted in uncomfortable realities. 'I had to swear in Cabinet ministers who had serious state capture findings against them,' he said, highlighting his role's moral and emotional complexity. Although the commission's work was widely praised and criticised for its thoroughness, questions remain about the tangible outcomes of such investigations. Analysts and academics have weighed in on Zondo's sentiments, stating that commissions are, by design, investigative and advisory bodies rather than judicial authorities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Political analyst Dr Metjie Mkagoba, a senior lecturer at the University of Limpopo, explained, 'The issue is that commissions like Zondo's are meant to establish facts and make recommendations, not to deliver judgments or direct legal consequences.' He further noted the disconnect between uncovering evidence and translating findings into action. 'We spend vast sums on these commissions… more than R1 billion in the case of the Zondo Commission, yet there's often little follow-through regarding prosecution or systemic reform. That's a fundamental challenge in our governance.' Mkagoba pointed out that in South Africa, commissions are frequently used more for public humiliation than for delivering justice, often serving as a political tool rather than a pathway to accountability. 'Commission reports can expose who is corrupt, but unless there is political will to act, those findings remain largely symbolic,' he said. This sentiment echoes a 2024 Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) report highlighting that the Zondo Commission's recommendations are non-binding. The report states: 'Implementation of the Commission's recommendations is at the discretion of the President, and progress in Parliament has been slow and inconsistent.' It highlights the structural and political hurdles that hinder translating investigative findings into concrete legal actions. The timing of Zondo's comments coincides with renewed efforts to address police corruption, notably President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent announcement of a new commission to investigate allegations of organised crime involving top police officials and politicians, after General Lieutenant Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi made the revelation. In response, Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, said, 'The former chief justice has had access to the president whenever there were matters of concern to be discussed.' Meanwhile, critics argue that South Africa's approach to corruption remains fragmented. While commissions like Zondo's have shed light on widespread misconduct, the lack of follow-up action diminishes their overall impact. Mkagoba lamented, 'We need to move beyond investigations and ensure that political will and legal processes work hand-in-hand to hold perpetrators accountable.' IOL Politics