logo
Irish PM says Gaza is 'hell on earth'

Irish PM says Gaza is 'hell on earth'

Euronews08-05-2025

Germany's new Chancellor Friedrich Merz intends to declare a state of emergency on migration, Euronews confirmed on Thursday.
Government officials have told Euronews that Merz wants to declare a national emergency to step up the increased deportations of people attempting to enter Germany illegally via a safe EU country.
Merz and Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt want to invoke Article 72 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
This would mean that national law would apply to border protection and internal security with immediate effect.
However, Brussels would first have to decide on this.
Ambassadors of neighbouring countries are being briefed by the interior ministry about the move, the paper said.
But it is not immediately clear when the national emergency is set to begin.
Government sources told Euronews that the interior ministry is already making extensive preparations for the state of emergency.
On Wednesday, Dobrindt said he had instructed federal police to tighten border controls with the aim of turning back more irregular migrants, including those who intended to seek asylum.
'We will control the borders more strictly…will also lead to a higher number of rejections,' Dobrindt said less than a day after being sworn into office.
However, Dobrindt said that vulnerable people, including children and pregnant women, would not be turned back at the border.
Those plans attracted criticism from both Poland and Austria, and their legality has been questioned by some experts.
But it's widely considered that Merz declaring a state of emergency means he protects himself against legal challenges.
Martin has condemned what he described as Israel's weaponisation of basic life necessities, referring to the country's restriction on food and aid from entering the strip for almost two months. He told The Europe Conversation that this raises very significant issues for the European Union and the human rights laws which are central to the bloc's existence.
'In my view, this constitutes a war crime,' the Irish Prime Minister, who belongs to the Fianna Fáil party, said. 'And I don't say that easily.'
He argued that he is in favour of a resolution, and wants the release of the hostages, stating it is 'shocking to take people as hostages'. In November 2023, Martin visited a kibbutz where around 10% of the population was attacked during the 7 October attack by Hamas.
'I went to see, first hand, the impact of the horrific Hamas attack on Israel. I've condemned it from the outset when I went there to show empathy to people who have been attacked,' he said, adding that the hostages should have been released a long time ago.
He said however that the war waged in response has 'lost any moral compass in terms of its unacceptable impact on the civilian population and on children'.
'And in Ireland, there is this sadness now and horror and a sense of helplessness at what we see on our TV screens: young children in stretchers and hospitals, very badly injured. Many families being wiped out, kids being orphaned. From a humanity point of view, it's beyond comprehension.'
The Taoiseach denounced what he called Israel's 'doubling down' in terms of intensification of the war on the ground. 'I know that Israel would say, well, Hamas is in the hospitals and so forth. But children need basic access to medicine,' he said.
Martin met with Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels on Thursday, discussing matters ranging from trade and support for Ukraine to the Middle East. During this meeting, the Taoiseach shared his concerns about the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
'I think the president heard clearly my perspective on it. And I think she understands where I'm coming from and where others are coming from,' Martin said.
'I anticipate that there will be a lot of thinking across Europe on this issue.' While he welcomed the European Union's announcement of the recent €1.6 billion financial support package for Palestinians, Martin noted that, when it comes to a response, he doesn't believe there is a consensus within the European Union.
'I acknowledge and I understand the different backgrounds of member states, and the historic background that has informed member states' approach to the Middle East,' he said.
'But there is an unacceptable level of death and destruction and displacement [in Gaza]. And it is, many people have said, going back to 2011, it's hell on earth.'
He argued that the EU has been quick to communicate its concerns to other countries around the world when they violate territorial integrity, adding that this is fundamental to the European Union and what it stands for.
Israel argued in the past that the restriction of aid is lawful and that Gaza still has enough available provisions.
Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar announced the closure of the Israeli embassy in Dublin in December last year due to what he described as the "extreme anti-Israel policy of the Irish government" which he characterised as "antisemitism".
Last month, Fine Gael - in coalition with Martin's Fianna Fáil - confirmed its delegates at the European People's Party's Valencia congress refused to put their names to a motion condemning Hamas' October 7, 2023 attacks in Israel and calling for the release of remaining hostages, and defended the party's position. The Fine Gael delegation said it could not support the motion because it didn't mention 'the ongoing suffering of the people of Gaza", as reported.
Euronews has contacted the Israeli embassy in Brussels and the mission of Israel to the EU and NATO for a response.
The Netherlands is ramping up its pressure on Israel over its war on Hamas in Gaza in what appears to be a significant change in course for one of Israel's most loyal allies.
Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said on Wednesday that Israel's ongoing blockade of humanitarian aid is in violation of international humanitarian law, and urged collective action from Brussels to review the EU-Israel trade deal.
"What we're doing here, is giving a very clear signal," Veldkamp said at the meeting of EU foreign ministers in Warsaw.
"We've drawn our line in the sand because the situation in Gaza Strip is dismal, it's a catastrophic humanitarian situation," he added.
Ahead of the meeting, Veldkamp had written a letter to EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas urging a review of the EU-Israel trade deal, saying Israel is violating the association agreement.
In the letter, he wrote that Israel's intended system to control all aid distribution in Gaza does not comply with humanitarian principles of "neutrality, impartiality and independence."
The EU-Israel Association Agreement governs trade ties between the two partners 'shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles.'
The Dutch government intends to veto any agreement extension pending an EU review into Israel's compliance with the pact, which came into force in 2000.
The EU is Israel's largest trading partner, and the Netherlands has previously led initiatives to block discussions on suspending the association agreement.
It is some of the strongest language yet from the Dutch government against its ally, which has so far avoided outright accusing Israel of violating international law.
The Dutch government had been on the receiving end of mounting pressure from local branches of international aid organisations to take a stronger stance against Israeli violence in Gaza.
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof sat down with representatives of Oxfam Novib, Amnesty International, Pax, Save the Children and Doctors Without Borders last month, who had then expressed disappointment at the conversation's outcome.
"There is no red line for the government. They are holding onto the conviction that diplomatic pressure achieves more," Oxfam Novib director Michiel Servaes asid.
On Thursday, Schoof expressed support for Veldkamp's statements, saying they reflect government policy. He said Israel's announcement to expand its operations in Gaza and control the entire Strip was probably a factor that contributed to Veldkamp's decision to write to Kallas.
Still, the move was not without internal criticism. Geert Wilders of the hard-right PVV, the main coalition partner and the winner of the most recent national election, lashed out at Veldkamp on X, calling him a "weak minister".
Other foreign ministers present in Warsaw echoed Veldkamp's words.
Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot said, "it's time for the European Union and the whole international community to wake up. Honestly, what we are seeing is an absolute shame. It's not acceptable.'
Luxembourg Foreign Minister Xavier Bettel said he had spent much time in the region in recent months, but his pleas to Israel to show restraint have been in vain.
'I have the feeling they're listening to no one. I fully understand they have pressure, and Hamas, and they still have hostages. But we have to be around to table to see how we can find solutions,' Bettel told reporters.
'We need to find a solution to that and not to give the impression to the Palestinians that at the end of the day, they won't exist anymore,' he said.
The Israel-Hamas war began when Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing around 1,200 people, most of them civilians. Hamas took 251 people as hostages, and is currently holding 59, of whom 24 are believed to be alive.
A subsequent Israeli offensive has to date killed 52,400 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry whose figures do not distinguish between fighters and civilians.
The Israeli military says 850 of its soldiers have died since the start of the war.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli military says bodies of three hostages recovered in Gaza
Israeli military says bodies of three hostages recovered in Gaza

LeMonde

time2 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Israeli military says bodies of three hostages recovered in Gaza

The Israeli military said Sunday, June 22, that it had recovered the bodies of three hostages in Gaza more than 20 months after they were abducted by Hamas militants. "In a special operation (...) the bodies of the hostages Ofra Keidar, Yonatan Samerano and Staff Sergeant Shay Levinson were recovered from the Gaza Strip yesterday," the military said in a statement. Samerano's father had announced earlier Sunday that his son's body, which was taken into Gaza after he was killed in a kibbutz by the territory on October 7, 2023, had been recovered by the Israeli army. He paid tribute to "the brave soldiers of the [Israeli military] and the Shin Bet" security service in a message posted on Instagram. The Israeli campaign group the Hostages and Missing Families Forum described Samerano as "a talented DJ who just wanted to make music, have fun, and travel." Keidar, a 71-year-old mother of three, was a resident of a resident of Kibbutz Be'eri – where over a 100 people were killed. Levinson, a 19-year-old tank commander, "engaged and fought terrorists on the morning of October 7 and fell in combat," a statement from the military said. Following the news, the forum repeated their frequent calls for the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza, writing on social media: "The hostages have no time. We must bring them ALL home, Now!" The attack by the Palestinian militant group Hamas on Israel in October 2023 resulted in the deaths of more than 1,200 people. Of the 251 hostages seized during the assault, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Israel's retaliatory military campaign against Hamas has killed at least 55,908 people, mostly civilians, according to the Gaza health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. Released hostages have reported that they were beaten and tortured by Hamas militants, while held in isolation in tunnels snaking underneath Gaza. On Sunday, Israel's President Isaac Herzog called for the "urgent release" of the remaining hostages after the United States carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. "This brave step serves the security and safety of the entire free world. I hope it will lead to a better future for the Middle East - and help advance the urgent release of our hostages held in captivity in Gaza," Herzog wrote on X.

Only regime change will stop Iran making a nuclear weapon
Only regime change will stop Iran making a nuclear weapon

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

Only regime change will stop Iran making a nuclear weapon

Only regime change will completely neutralise the threat that Iran will develop nuclear weapons, however successful 'Operation Midnight Hammer' may have been, though it will cement support for Trump domestically, an expert on foreign policy has told Euronews. Euronews interviewed Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow at the Bruegel Institute, on the American air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Kirkegaard said the attacks might eventually bring the world closer to closer to the end, as Iran has very limited tools to escalate the situation. According to the expert, Iran could choose to retaliate against either US bases by killing a number of US troops, or against the crude oil facilities, either by hitting the transportation through the Strait of Hormuz or some of the facilities in the Gulf Arab neighbours of Iran. But Kirkegaard said he thought both options "a low probability" because Iran today is "at a nearly historically weak military position". According to the expert, Iran's proxies, like Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Houthis, are weakened and the US could join a broader military campaign if Iran hits American targets. "This is the risk that the Iranians know that Trump has proven he's actually willing to pull the trigger. And they need to take it seriously. I don't think we're headed for more escalation, but on the other hand, does this bring a negotiated peace settlement or a return to an agreed international nuclear surveillance, sort of a JPCOA 2.0, any nearer? The risk is that I think the US and the European countries are now going to want a more intrusive JPCOA that Iran may or may not agree to. So I think the possibility of an accelerated peace move is there, but it is absolutely no certainty," he said. Iran might still be able to produce a nuclear bomb Kirkegaard said that for the moment, nobody knows how much damage the Iranian nuclear sites have suffered. If the Natanz and Isfahan sites are disabled, "this will make weapons-grade uranium enrichment more difficult", he said. "But that may not matter very much. Because the latest data from the International Atomic Energy Agency suggested that Iran had about 400 kilos of enriched uranium, up to 60 percent. That is, if further enriched, more than enough to produce a nuclear weapon, provided you have the technical know-how to do so, weaponize it. We don't know if Iran has that, but what it means is that destroying these facilities, even if they are successfully destroyed, isn't going to destroy the Iranian nuclear program." With a possibly large amount of highly enriched uranium hidden in the country, Iran may still be capable of building a nuclear bomb, he said. "Iran remains a nuclear threshold power, maybe not quite as near as it was 24 hours ago, but a country that could, if the regime decided to go all out to produce a bomb, might very well still be capable of doing so." He added that as a result, there is no military solution for the Iranian programme unless there is a regime change in the country. Trump will be remembered as a president who bombed Iran Kirkegaard said that despite Trump's aspiration to be a peacemaker in Ukraine, he will be remembered as the president who bombed Iran. "He's going to forever be the US President who bombed Iran. So whenever he's criticized by certainly the more hawkish elements of the US political firmament... he will always have, 'look, I bombed Iran'. What did Obama do? What did Biden do? What did even Bush do?" Trump will thereby deter criticism within the MAGA camp, according to the analyst, and he will certainly not cross the red line of sending troops to Iran. "The only thing where I think he will remain inhibited, but he's no more inhibited than any other president, is that you're not gonna have boots on the ground. You're not going to have a US actual invasion of Iran, which obviously would be a disaster for everyone involved. He knows that he's not gonna do that. But he has shown to the people who call him TACO and thought he was gonna chicken out, he showed them." Europe is irrelevant in the conflict Jacob Kirkegaard said Europe will be irrelevant in the conflict, but many leaders on the continent are happy that Israel, together with the US, is destroying Iran's nuclear and missile programme. "I think we have to say that the brief window of European diplomacy that we had on Friday with the meeting in Geneva went nowhere. The Iranians told the E3 foreign ministers that they are not interested in pursuing a deal that will freeze completely all nuclear enrichment. The reality is that Europe is irrelevant in this conflict. " The analyst added that Europe is also deeply split on the issue, and many leaders are quietly celebrating. "Friedrich Merz told German television that Israel is doing Europe's dirty work by striking Iran. There's no doubt that Europe secretly is very happy that Iran's ballistic missile and drone production capacity appears to be significantly degraded by Israel. " Striking Iran is directly weakening Russia, which is Europe's main strategic threat. "While nobody's going to praise Netanyahu publicly in Europe, the reality is that Friedrich Merz was right. But many European governments will obviously feel differently publicly or otherwise. And that alone will prevent Europe from taking a united stance that condemns Europe to irrelevance. It's really that simple."

Will Russia stand up for its ally Iran and how can Moscow benefit?
Will Russia stand up for its ally Iran and how can Moscow benefit?

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Will Russia stand up for its ally Iran and how can Moscow benefit?

Russia's foreign ministry slammed on Sunday the overnight US air strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling it 'an irresponsible decision to subject the territory of a sovereign state to missile and bomb strikes, no matter what arguments it is presented with' — all the while Moscow itself is intensifying its attacks on Ukraine. The Kremlin says the US attack 'blatantly violates international law, the UN Charter, and the resolutions of the UN Security Council, which has previously unambiguously qualified such actions as inadmissible' adding that 'It is particularly alarming that the strikes were carried out by a country that is a permanent member of the UN Security Council'. Russia, the permanent member of the UN Security Council itself, has been waging its unprovoked all-out war against Ukraine since February 2022, bombing Ukrainian cities and attacking Ukraine on the ground. 'We urge to stop the aggression, to step up efforts to create conditions for returning the situation to the political and diplomatic track,' the Moscow statement said, referring to the US strikes. At the St Petersburg forum before Washington's strike, Vladimir Putin said that Iran had not asked for help since the beginning of Israel's air campaign. The Russian president added that the comprehensive partnership treaty between Moscow and Tehran has no articles related to the military sphere, which is ironic, given Russian production of Iranian developed Shahed-136 drones (aka the Geranium-2). Euronews spoke with Nikita Smagin, an orientalist and author of the book "All Iran. The paradoxes of life in an autocracy under sanctions" about what is at stake for the Kremlin. Smagin says the Russian side has previously emphasised that its alliance with Iran is not a 'military one' and Moscow is therefore not obliged to provide it with military assistance. "It is logical to expect that Russia will not interfere in what is happening, because it does not want to risk for the sake of Iran the aggravation of the situation with Israel and the United States," the expert says. Smagin notes that Tehran's decision not to request military intervention from Moscow before the US strikes is not surprising. "The Islamic Republic was built from the very beginning on the ideas of sovereignty," he says, adding that one of the driving ideas behind the restructuring of the Iranian state was to put an end to the interference of foreign players, primarily the US and the UK, in Iran's internal affairs. "In this sense, Iran has never turned to Russia for help and is not turning to Russia now because it is afraid of losing some sovereignty, of giving up some of its sovereignty to Russia, as was the case with Bashar al-Assad," Smagin says. But the situation could change. "If only because Putin drew attention to the fact that he does not even want to think about the assassination, the destruction of Khamenei, it is obvious that these issues are somewhat disturbing to him," the expert explains. 'The fate of authoritarian leaders hurts Russia' According to US President Donald Trump, Washington knows "exactly" where Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is "hiding". Trump also said that the Iranian leader is "an easy target, but they will not kill him, at least not yet". If the Islamic Republic's regime falls or if it comes to physically destroying the Ayatollah, how will the Kremlin react to this? What would it mean for the Russian authorities? "In general, we see that the deaths in revolutionary processes, the destruction of heads of authoritarian states in general hurts the Russian side. We remember how Putin reacted to the assassination of Gaddafi," notes Nikita Smagin. The rebels were primarily operating there, but not without the assistance of foreign forces, including British intelligence and the Emirates. But nevertheless, all this looked like a serious "wake-up call" for Putin. And, apparently, this was one of the reasons why he began to change his positioning in the international arena. According to the analyst, if the Islamic Republic collapses, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei may well be granted asylum in Russia. "This is already an established practice. I think it is not that it is excluded. But if Khamenei is eliminated, it will not cause any joy in the Kremlin. They believe that killing leaders is a red line, beyond which in fact Israel has already crossed. It has already eliminated Hezbollah leaders, for example," he says. 'It will be easier to draw up the budget' The new crisis in the Middle East may hit Russia's influence in the region, but the sudden escalation has brought the Kremlin some good news. At the G7 summit in Canada, for example, it was decided not to lower the price threshold for Russian oil so as not to further destabilise the market. Since the end of 2022, one of the key aspects of leverage on Moscow has been the establishment of price ceilings for Russian oil at $60 per barrel. Three and a half years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the EU has proposed lowering the price ceiling to $45 per barrel, but it will have to wait for now. "If we take disintegration in Iran as a whole, or rather regime change, because disintegration (of the country) is already a concomitant, then, of course, it threatens Russia's interests in the long term," says Nikita Smagin. "The Kremlin, of course, expects to benefit from this in the short term: oil prices will go up very seriously. The worse the situation gets, the higher the prices will be and the easier it will be for the [Russian] budget to be drawn up - this year, by the looks of it, there could be problems with it," the analyst explains. According to Smagin, Russia will benefit in the current moment, but in the longer term, regime change and "turning Iran into some permanent point of instability threatens, of course, Russia's strategy in the Middle East, because a lot of effort has been invested in Iran." "Iran has been a reliable partner of the Kremlin on many fronts, " he says. "A lot of projects, and strategically important ones at that, were planned to be conducted through Iran, for example, the [transport corridor] North-South project, a possible gas hub. This, of course, is all for the future, but nevertheless, in the event [of the regime's collapse] there will be no possibility of realising it. In the long term, it will be a loss and a setback for the Russian side." 'The peak of Russia's military cooperation with Iran has long passed' In more than three years of full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has succeeded in "localising" the production of Iranian-designed drones. According to Nikita Smagin, Iran's importance as a supplier of Shahed-136 drones is in the past. The peak of military co-operation between the two countries came in 2022. As the expert notes, at the beginning of last year, up to 90% of components were not Iranian. "Only the engines were supplied from Iran. Everything else was made by Russia," he adds. "Even if localisation is not 100 percent now, it is very close to that. I think Russia will find ways to replace that, not to mention that the Shaheds don't play as big a role as they used to." "Still, there is a huge amount of in-house development. Russia has been investing in drones during this time," Smagin explains. "Moreover: even if we're talking about the Shahed specifically, it's not even strongly Iranian anymore. The Geran-1 and Geran-2 drones are very much redesigned, because the Iranian version was not as effective as many expected," he notes. In an interview with Kommersant, Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, describes the Shaheds' flight characteristics as "primitive" and "allowing them to be shot down en masse even with 7.62 mm anti-aircraft machine guns." He also writes of the "moped" engine sound, "alerting the entire neighbourhood to the drone's arrival." 'In Israel, Russia's role as a mediator is looked upon with no apparent antipathy' As Hannah Notte, a political scientist and expert at the James Martin Centre for Nonproliferation Studies, writes, Russia has always had limitations on how far it can go in supporting Iran. "The Kremlin's obsessive anti-Western agenda has raised the Islamic republic's profile as a partner, but Putin has other interests in the region - such as a long-standing, albeit complicated, relationship with Israel and the need to coordinate oil prices with OPEC - so he has been mindful of Israel's and the Gulf states' red lines when it comes to defence cooperation with Tehran," Notte wrote in a column for US outlet The Atlantic. Nikita Smagin believes that in the current conflict between Iran and Israel, Russia is no longer an "indispensable" mediator. "When the nuclear negotiations were going on, when Trump was trying to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, here Russia could act as an indispensable mediator," he says. "It was actually the only party that had the technical capability and was ready to export surplus uranium from Iran, pre-weapons grade or enriched beyond the required minimum per cent. Now, apparently, this issue is off the agenda". At the same time, despite the fact that relations between Israel and Russia, which became the first country in the world to receive a Hamas delegation after the 7 October attacks officially, have deteriorated, according to Smagin, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem look at Russia's role as a mediator "without any obvious antipathy". As Smagin notes, even after Moscow's invasion of 2022 and the subsequent wave of immigration in an attempt to avoid mobilisation, "a large number of agents of anti-Russian influence have appeared in the Jewish state, people who moved from Russia and have a very negative attitude to the Russian authorities and are obviously the backbone of anti-Russian sentiments in Israel."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store