logo
BREAKING NEWS Two City traders who were jailed for rigging interest rates have their convictions quashed at the Supreme Court

BREAKING NEWS Two City traders who were jailed for rigging interest rates have their convictions quashed at the Supreme Court

Daily Mail​5 days ago
Two financial market traders who were jailed for manipulating benchmark interest rates had their convictions quashed at the Supreme Court today.
Former Citigroup and UBS trader Tom Hayes was found guilty of multiple counts of conspiracy to defraud over manipulating the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) between 2006 and 2010.
Carlo Palombo, ex-vice president of euro rates at Barclays bank, was found guilty of conspiring with others to submit false or misleading Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor) submissions between 2005 and 2009.
The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals from both men in March last year. They then took their cases to the Supreme Court.
This morning, the panel of five justices found there was 'ample evidence' for a jury to convict the two men had it been properly directed, but they had not.
In an 82-page judgment, with which Supreme Court president Lord Reed, Lords Hodge and Lloyd-Jones and Lady Simler agreed, Lord Leggatt said: 'That misdirection undermined the fairness of the trial.'
The jury direction errors made both convictions unsafe, Lord Leggatt said.
He added: 'Mr Hayes was entitled to have his defence to the allegation that he agreed to procure false submissions as well as his denial that he had acted dishonestly left fairly to the jury.
'He was deprived of that opportunity by directions which were legally inaccurate and unfair.
What was the Libor and how did the rate work?
The London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) was used as a reference point around the world for setting millions of pounds worth of financial deals, including car loans and mortgages.
Libor was designed to reflect banks' short-term funding costs and based on daily estimates from a group of banks as to how much they would expect to pay to borrow funds from each other for a range of currencies and periods.
It was an interest rate average calculated from figures submitted by a panel of leading banks in London, with each one reporting what it would be charged were it to borrow from others.
The Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor) was created with the euro currency in 1999 as a benchmark rate of interest for transactions in euros.
'It is not possible to say that, if the jury had been properly directed, they would have been bound to return verdicts of guilty.
'The convictions are therefore unsafe and cannot stand.'
Mr Hayes was jailed for 14 years after his conviction in 2015, which was later lowered to 11 years after an appeal, while Mr Palombo was jailed for four years in 2019.
Lord Leggatt continued: 'When the flaws in the directions given at Mr Palombo's trial are considered in combination, it cannot safely be assumed that, without them, the jury would still have been bound to convict Mr Palombo.
'Thus, his conviction also cannot stand.'
He added: 'Accordingly, both appeals should be allowed.'
A spokesperson for the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) said it would not be seeking a retrial.
In a statement issued after the judgment, it said: 'Our investigation led to nine convictions of senior bankers for fraud offences, with two of these individuals pleading guilty and seven found guilty by juries.
'This judgment has determined that the legal directions given to the jury at the conclusion of trial were incorrect in Hayes' and Palombo's trials and for that reason their convictions have today been found unsafe.
'We have considered this judgment and the full circumstances carefully and determined it would not be in the public interest for us to seek a retrial.'
The Libor rate was previously used as a reference point around the world for setting millions of pounds worth of financial deals, including car loans and mortgages.
It was an interest rate average calculated from figures submitted by a panel of leading banks in London, with each one reporting what it would be charged were it to borrow from other institutions.
Euribor was created along with the euro currency in 1999 as a benchmark rate of interest for transactions in euros.
In 2012, the SFO began criminal investigations into traders it suspected of manipulating Libor and Euribor.
Mr Hayes was the first person to be prosecuted by the SFO, who opposed his and Mr Palombo's appeals at the Supreme Court.
The SFO brought prosecutions against 20 individuals between 2013 and 2019, seven of whom were convicted at trial, two pleaded guilty and 11 were acquitted.
Mr Hayes had also been facing criminal charges in the United States but these were dismissed after two other men involved in a similar case had their convictions reversed in 2022.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brynmill murder charge as man dies in Swansea
Brynmill murder charge as man dies in Swansea

BBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Brynmill murder charge as man dies in Swansea

A man has been charged with murder following the death of a 65-year-old man in Swansea. Police were called to an alleged assault and an unconscious man outside The Mill pub on Brynymor Road, Brynmill in Swansea at around 20.15 BST on 65-year-old man was taken to Morriston Hospital where he died on Sunday. His next of kin has been informed and are being supported, South Wales Police Vonks, 50, from Swansea, has been charged with murder and is due to appear at Swansea Magistrates' Court on Monday.

My flatmate pays rent and bills but never buys shared household essentials
My flatmate pays rent and bills but never buys shared household essentials

Metro

time20 minutes ago

  • Metro

My flatmate pays rent and bills but never buys shared household essentials

Everyone who's lived in houseshares has a few flatmate horror stories, from the ridiculously noisy to the chronically cleaning-averse. But sometimes it's a bit more nuanced, and one small habit can turn an otherwise great situation into a resentment-fuelled nightmare. That's the case for Jen, 28, from Manchester, who got in touch about bringing up an awkward issue — as well as being the only one in her flat who replaces household essentials, she's also footing the bill for them all. In this week's Money Problem, personal finance journalist and consumer champion, Sarah Davidson, shares her perspective. If you've got a money problem you'd like Sarah to look into, fill in this online form or email providing as much detail about your situation as possible. No issue is too big or small, and all submissions will be treated with the strictest confidence. I've lived with Becky* for the last five months, after my old flatmate moved out and the landlord brought her in as a replacement. For the most part, it's a good situation – we're not friends as such, but we occasionally hang out, and are both the same level of clean and quiet. You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. The issue is that although she pays her share of rent and bills on time, stuff like milk, toothpaste, and kitchen and toilet roll are left to me – and it really adds up. When she first moved in, we discussed shared essentials and agreed that we'd each get what was needed as and when, then split the cost. Ever since though, I'm the only one who's actually replaced anything, and my texts asking her to transfer half the cash go ignored. I've tried to mention it in conversation too, but she brushes it off saying she'll sort then never does. While I know I could just stop buying things or get them for myself, I can't handle having to go without or spend my life hiding washing up liquid in my room. I also don't want to start a full-blown argument about it, as we have to live together for at least until her lease (12 months) ends. Is there any way I can bring this up without it ending badly? How. Annoying. I think your problem will resonate with most people who have lived with roommates at some point in their lives. There's always one who eats your bread and never buys milk. But I agree with you, life's too short to keep loo roll under your bed instead of in the bathroom where it belongs. So, how to fix this 'without it ending badly'. First question – what does ending badly look like to you? It sounds like you're uncomfortable with confrontation and the 'full blown argument' is what you're worried about. Second question – what would a good ending look like? Ideally, you want Becky to contribute 50/50 to the household essentials without having to nag her. The answer (and I think you know this) is to talk to her about it. Not in passing and not by text. You also need to be clear, up front, about what outcome you are seeking at the end of the conversation. Before you get to this stage, though, I'd arm yourself with some facts. Make a list of the household essentials you share. Be specific about exactly how much is used collectively each month and write it down – two rolls of kitchen paper, half a bottle of washing up liquid, two pints of milk a week. Whatever it is, if you're both using it, it goes onto the list. Go back through receipts or check a supermarket online and put a price on each of those items. Again, write it down so you've got your monthly total. Is it a reasonable number? What could come off that list? Next time you find yourself having a chat in the kitchen and neither of you is in a rush to go anywhere, ask her if she's got half an hour in the next couple of days to sit down and go through your household expenses. Suggest she make a list of what she's got for the house over the past six months (approximately) and cost it up. Book a time, make a cup of tea and sit down with your lists. Tot it up, agree what you're both using and are happy to split and put a number on it. You both need to agree that this is what needs to be kept aside at start of the month, every month. Be accountable – the best way to do this is to keep track of spending and make sure you're both aware of the running total at all times. When I was a student, we had a jar in the kitchen and stuck cash in it once a week. When it ran out we all stuck a bit more in, and if there was any left over we got a takeaway together. Things have moved on a bit since then. but there are some fantastic apps that make things really easy to track. Splitwise is great, particularly if you're the one who does most of the shopping. It will keep a running total of what you've spent and she'll be able to see exactly what she owes you. You can pay each other back through the app by connecting your bank account securely or using PayPal. App-only banks Monzo and Revolut have a similar function, though you'll both need to have your own accounts. And budgeting app Emma is also a good option, allowing you to pay someone using a QR code you generate on your phone. There are plenty of others too. One word of caution: be mindful of the fact she might be struggling with money and that's why she's relying on you. This isn't fair, but it is something you and she may have to manage. Perhaps it can help to suggest shopping somewhere cheaper or cutting back on certain things. More Trending Ultimately though, you need to come to an agreement that's realistic for you both and make it as easy as possible to stick to. Personally (as long as you can afford to) I'd swallow my frustration up to now, wipe the slate clean and start afresh. It'll clear the air and there's no way she can claim unfairness. Sarah Davidson is an award-winning financial editor and head of research at WPB . View More » Got a money worry or dilemma? Email Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Sending one polite email can get a free hotel upgrade – trust me MORE: What I Own: At 22 and 23, we bought a run-down London four-bed for £910,000 MORE: I pay £480 for my rent and bills in London — I've saved £5,000 in less than a year Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.

Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall
Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall

The FTSE 100 rose to new highs once again last week, tipping the scales well above 9,100 points after a particularly strong day on Thursday which saw the likes of BT Group rise ten per cent. The British companies index is up more than 11 per cent this year, outpacing the key US benchmarks. Meanwhile, key upcoming UK economy data this week includes mortgage approvals and the Nationwide House Price Index. Additionally, there is likely to be more news emerging on how the government may tackle pension reform, amid debate over what age the state pension should be and whether the tax relief rate on pension contributions may be altered. In other markets, bitcoin fell towards the end of last week, from the highs above $123,000 down to around $115,000, with gold also retreating as investors took a risk-on approach once more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store