
Ruling party delays push to pass bill halting criminal trials for president-elect
A parliamentary plenary session will not be held on Thursday and various bills at issue will not be dealt with this week, DP floor spokesperson Noh Jong-myeon told reporters at the National Assembly.
"Once the new leadership is in place, we are going to move forward with the legislation at full speed, and what happens after that is up to the new leadership to determine with its members," he said.
The move delays the ruling party's plan to vote on the bills this week, passing on the decision to the new floor leadership, set to take office on June 13.
Last month, the DP unilaterally passed the revision to the Criminal Procedure Act during a subcommittee meeting of the legislation and judiciary committee despite protest from the People Power Party.
The PPP has strongly opposed the bill, claiming the bill was specifically introduced to favor President Lee Jae-myung.
The DP had initially planned to convene the plenary session to pass three contentious broadcasting bills.
The bills call for amending the Broadcasting Act, the Foundation for Broadcast Culture Act and the Korea Educational Broadcasting System Act. The proposed changes aimed to alter the governance structure of public broadcasters -- KBS, MBC and EBS -- by significantly increasing the number of their board directors and granting media and broadcasting associations, as well as related professional organizations, the right to recommend board members. (Yonhap)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's bid for leniency on binding plastic cuts in UN treaty faces scrutiny
Despite President Lee Jae-myung's pledge to 'de-plastic' by the end of 2025, South Korea is drawing scrutiny for proposing softer language for a key provision in UN-led treaty negotiations aimed at reducing plastic waste. The South Korean government submitted amendments in tandem with Brazil to a draft provision mandating countries to reduce hazardous plastic products during the resumed fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee tasked with finalizing a legally binding international treaty on plastic pollution. The INC-5.2 began Tuesday in Geneva and will continue until Thursday. The second part of the INC-5 was launched as participating country representatives failed to reach a full consensus on what should and should not be included in a binding agreement against plastic pollution during the first INC-5 at Busan in December 2024. The original text, proposed jointly by Switzerland and Mexico, stated that each supporting state 'shall reduce' harmful plastic products with legally binding force. The definition of harmful plastics included plastics that risk leaking into the environment or human bodies, contain chemicals with potential health or environmental impacts, cannot be feasibly recycled or reused at scale or significantly obstruct circular economy efforts. A total of 77 countries — including all 27 EU member states and 14 Pacific Island nations formally backed the proposal, according to the UN Environment Program. However, the proposal submitted by South Korea and Brazil sought to revise the text to a more suggestive tone — requiring parties to 'take appropriate measures to address, manage, reduce or prohibit' harmful plastic products. In the proposal, two countries also suggested taking each country's 'circumstances, capacities and socioeconomic factors' into consideration when determining what constitutes an 'appropriate measure' to counter plastic waste. This is not the first time Seoul has aligned with Brazil in global plastic negotiations. A similar proposal was made during the first INC-5 meeting last year under the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration. Local climate advocacy groups sharply criticized the Korean government's stance throughout talks held so far at INC-5.2. 'President Lee made de-plasticization one of his core pledges during his presidential campaign and even promised to come up with a roadmap by the end of this year to combat plastic waste. Introducing a watered-down language during the treaty talks goes directly against that commitment,' said Solutions for Our Climate through an official statement issued Friday. Claiming that a legitimate response to the climate crisis is 'fundamental reduction, the group added that 'managing or addressing plastic pollution is not enough.' 'Korea must step up and lead on real solutions, not backtrack,' the group added. In response to mounting criticism, the Ministry of Environment denied claims that Korea was attempting to block plastic reduction efforts. 'We're not opposed to the reduction of harmful plastics,' a ministry official told The Korea Herald. 'From our knowledge, several countries have expressed difficulty in accepting the proposal presented by Switzerland and Mexico in its current form. Korea's intention was to facilitate dialogue by introducing alternative language that could help break the deadlock.'
![[Editorial] Rules for some](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Rules for some
Rep. Lee Choon-suak's stock trade under aide's name sparks public outcry, legal probe Rep. Lee Choon-suak, a four-term lawmaker from South Korea's ruling Democratic Party of Korea, faces public fury and political fallout following allegations that he engaged in stock trading under a borrowed name — potentially implicating him in insider trading and false asset reporting. The scandal erupted after local media photographed Lee operating a mobile trading app during a parliamentary session on Monday. The account was registered under his aide's name. Lee was seen transacting shares in companies including Naver, KakaoPay and LG CNS — all designated as key players in the government's newly announced artificial intelligence initiative that same day. Lee's conduct presents a clear challenge to the credibility of the country's financial disclosure regime and ethical oversight. As head of the economic subcommittee on AI policy within the Presidential Committee on Policy Planning, Lee held privileged access to information that could materially affect markets. His trading activity — allegedly via an aide's account — raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest. If confirmed, such activity would constitute violations of both the Capital Markets Act and the Financial Real Name Act. The former prohibits trading based on nonpublic information, while the latter mandates that securities transactions be conducted under the true owner's name to prevent concealment. Furthermore, Lee's asset disclosure filed in late 2024 declared no stock holdings, contradicting reports that assets exceeding 100 million won ($72,000) were held in the aide's account. This would breach the Public Official Ethics Act, which requires officials to fully disclose their assets. Lee resigned from the Democratic Party on Tuesday night amid mounting pressure. The party, seeking to contain the damage, initiated expulsion proceedings. He was also removed from his post on the Presidential Committee and replaced as chair of the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee — a powerful role he had held until the scandal broke. The police have formed a task force of legal and financial experts to investigate. Civic groups have filed criminal complaints, while lawmakers from the main opposition People Power Party are calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor, citing doubts that a police-led probe will be sufficient to uncover systemic misconduct. This is not the first time ethical breaches have surfaced within the National Assembly in connection with lawmakers' financial dealings. In 2023, Rep. Kim Nam-kook of the Democratic Party was found to have traded cryptocurrency during parliamentary sessions. While that case led to his temporary resignation, he ultimately returned to office, underlining the soft consequences Korean lawmakers often face for violating ethical norms. The current regulatory framework is riddled with loopholes. Lawmakers can avoid declaring stock holdings if assets are sold shortly before disclosure deadlines, and the system fails to track holdings registered under third parties' names. In contrast, more stringent regimes elsewhere impose real-time reporting obligations and broader definitions of beneficial ownership. President Lee Jae Myung has called for a swift investigation, warning during a recent visit to the Korea Stock Exchange that 'playing with stocks will result in ruin.' Yet this scandal, centered on a senior policymaker allegedly trading from the floor of parliament, directly undermines his administration's emphasis on financial transparency and ethical governance. If the National Assembly hopes to restore public trust, it must go beyond symbolic dismissals. Reforms should include prohibiting lawmakers from trading in sectors where they hold policymaking authority, requiring real-time public reporting of trades, and empowering independent bodies to monitor and enforce ethical conduct. The case of Rep. Lee is more than a personal lapse. It reflects a political culture that continues to tolerate opaque asset reporting and blurred lines between public service and private interest. To move forward, South Korea's legislature must demonstrate that ethical standards are not optional and accountability applies even to its most senior members.


Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
Yoon's lawyers say ex-president injured in arrest attempt
Former president again refuses to be taken for questioning; lawyers claim attempts to detain him illegal Legal representatives of Yoon Suk Yeol claimed Thursday that the former South Korean leader was injured by what they assess as an "illegal" bid to enforce an arrest warrant for him regarding the ongoing criminal investigation into his wife Kim Keon Hee. Hours after the prosecution's second attempt to detain Yoon was thwarted Thursday morning, Yoon's lawyers said at a press conference that 10 officials of the special counsel team tried to forcibly get him into a car by lifting the chair that he was sitting on. They say that Yoon fell on the floor during the process and was injured. "There have been several cases in which a suspect, against whom an arrest warrant had been issued, refuses investigation, but there had not been one case in which (the enforcement of warrant) was conducted via physically dragging a person," the lawyers said in a press conference in front of the Seoul High Court. Yoon's side has maintained that the attempt to forcibly detain him was illegal, even though the court has issued a warrant for his official arrest. They claimed it was a deliberate attempt by the prosecution to humiliate the former leader. The former South Korean president has been refusing to cooperate with the ongoing criminal investigation, and the special counsel team said Thursday it had decided not to arrest Yoon due to adamant resistance from the suspect. It was the second failed attempt to arrest Yoon by the special counsel team looking into Kim. Yoon has been held at the Seoul Detention Center in relation to the ongoing investigation of the Dec. 3, 2024, imposition of martial law for the last month. He was impeached and removed as president and faces charges of insurrection and power abuse. He has been refusing to comply with the related probe and trials since being detained last month. Yoon has been summoned by the prosecution to give testimony related to accusations related to the Kim Keon Hee case, including accusations that he received illegal help in his campaign from a local pollster in exchange for helping a former member of his People Power Party secure a nomination in the parliamentary election. Due to Yoon's repeated refusal to cooperate with the ongoing investigation concerning his wife, officials undertook measures to forcibly bring him into custody. A 2013 Supreme Court precedent shows that suspects who refuse orders to cooperate with an investigation can be forcibly taken in for the probe. But footnotes attached to the Criminal Procedure Act published in 2022 state that if the suspect is in a state of undress for the purpose of refusing an investigation, he or she cannot be forced into custody. This is widely presumed to be the reason why Yoon was lying on the floor in only his underwear as he refused officers trying to take him into custody.