logo
I've made £1.2k on Vinted and buyer even wore my dress to the BAFTAs – my 50p trick works every time for sales

I've made £1.2k on Vinted and buyer even wore my dress to the BAFTAs – my 50p trick works every time for sales

The Sun19-05-2025

A THRIFTY fashionista has shared her top Vinted selling tips after making £1,200 on the app - and she's even flogged a dress to a BAFTAs guest.
Zakia Moulaoui Guery, 37, has loved vintage clothes and thrift shops for as long as she can remember.
7
7
7
Her passion for second-hand clothing was sparked by her mother Marie-Therese who would take her to thrift stores in France during her childhood.
Zakia, who now lives in Edinburgh, said: "My mum was the best at finding treasure, sometimes matching outfits for me and my sister and stuff.
"When I grew up, that was the only thing we could do really, because we didn't have the money to go and buy new clothes all the time. And we had really nice clothes because my mother was really good at this.
"She loved it. So she would take the time to do it. This is the only thing I would say, it's really demanding, it takes time. If you're shopping quickly, then it's not for you."
Vintage and second-hand items now make up 90 per cent of Zakia's wardrobe.
She's made a commitment to stop buying brand new clothing but admits it can be tough if she needs something for work.
She said: "It's really hard because a lot of the basic items that you may need are really hard to find second-hand.
"So it doesn't work all the time, but I'm trying.
"Like if you need something specific, like work trousers or something specifically smart for something, it's a lot easier to just pop into M&S and just buy something rather than try to search for it."
And Zakia doesn't just buy second-hand and thrifted items, she sells on items from her wardrobe too.
I've made £10k on Vinted in 2 years - here's exactly why your items aren't selling, and how you can turn things around
In the past two years, she has flogged 48 items on Vinted - making an impressive £1,200.
Vinted is an online marketplace where people can buy and sell second hand clothes, shoes and accessories.
It's completely free to upload clothes to the app and Vinted does not take a cut of sellers' profits and instead charges buyers a small fee to purchase each item.
Zakia chose the username @VintageMamaScot which showcases her wardrobe style and is a nod to her beloved mum, who passed away during the Covid pandemic.
She said: "I only sell vintage or retro-inspired pieces on Vinted. I think unique items sell well.
"If it's something you definitely cannot find somewhere else, whether it's a dress that has a particular vibe or era, that might sell a lot quicker.
"But also good brands. So if you sell something that is a little bit pricey on the high street at an affordable price, that will get snapped up quickly. COS for example, or even things that are no longer made anymore.
"Cosmetics as well, it's not only clothing, it's also the beauty brands and stuff. That's where you can make a lot of money."
7
7
7
She continues: "If you're anything like me at Christmas, somebody gives you something and it's totally not you. You can sell it.
"As long as it's brand new in packaging, as long as it's not been used, then that's absolutely fine. I've sold perfume and creams and stuff on there and that's because the retail price is so high, so you can really make money on that.
"I've also been gifted pieces from Uniqlo, which is totally not me. So that sold really, really well because I think it's a good brand and it can be quite pricey."
Zakia is the CEO and founder of Invisible Cities - which arranges walking tours by people who have experienced homelessness. She travels a lot for work, which means she has the chance to find unique pieces along the way.
She said: "I'm very lucky to be able to be in different places and buy different things from different cities.
"In turn, that means that somebody from the UK or from Scotland might be able to buy a dress that is actually coming from the other side of the world - but it's second-hand and came back in my luggage."
Selling tips
But having interesting items isn't always enough to get them sold on Vinted.
So Zakia has picked up some handy tips during her time on the app, and they always help her to get the sale.
Do you need to pay tax on items sold on Vinted?
QUICK facts on tax from the team at Vinted...
The only time that an item might be taxable is if it sells for more than £6,000 and there is profit (sells for more than you paid for it). Even then, you can use your capital gains tax-free allowance of £3,000 to offset it.
Generally, only business sellers trading for profit (buying goods with the purpose of selling for more than they paid for them) might need to pay tax. Business sellers who trade for profit can use a tax-free allowance of £1,000, which has been in place since 2017.
More information here: vinted.co.uk/no-changes-to-taxes
First up, she maintains the 'Frequent Uploads' badge which Vinted gives to sellers if they regularly list five or more items, even if she doesn't have new clothes to flog.
She said: "If you don't have too many things to sell, say you only have five items, there's only so many times you can post, right?
"So what I do is I delete the post and then I upload it again. So Vinted believes that I'm putting up new stuff all the time."
Revealing her next hack, she adds: "And then I always start by knowing what I would absolutely sell it for at a minimum, so that I can reduce the price if needed. Once it's posted online, I just want it to sell.
"So if I'm reposting, I knock off £1 or 50p. Reducing your items regularly works quite well."
And her most exciting sale to date? A red sequins maxi dress which she had found in a New York thrift store for just $6 (£4.49).
Zakia was gutted when she realised the bargain buy was too big for her so decided to sell it instead.
She managed to sell it on for £15, three times what she paid for it, and even discovered the frock had made it all the way to the BAFTAs.
Guests at this year's glitzy award bash had been encouraged to "make sustainable fashion choices" and buyer Jackie quickly snapped up the sparkly dress. She was so happy with her buy that she sent Zakia a picture from the event.
Zakia said: "It shows how we can absolutely make vintage work on the red carpet.
"It's an old vintage Debenhams brand. So it must have been the late 80s or maybe the early 90s, I would say.
"And this is just the story of this dress with two of us in it over the last three months. So imagine the stories this dress has seen from the moment it was made."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness
‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness

A 'spiteful' boss cut his pregnant employee's work hours after she told him she had morning sickness, and then fired her when her maternity leave was due to start, a tribunal has heard. Sadia Shakil had worked as an accountant and bookkeeper at the property development firm Samsons in Bedford since October 2020, and became pregnant early the following year. But after Ms Shakil phoned her boss Mohammed Saleem on 30 March 2021 to inform him that she was experiencing morning sickness due to her pregnancy, he then proceeded to tell her in an email the following day that he was cutting her working hours. In the email seen by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote: 'Considering that I am unable to give you extra work as I am abroad and in view that you are feeling unwell during your pregnancy it would be best if you only come into work for 2 days per week.' The tribunal ruled that this was a 'fundamental' breach of Ms Shakil's employment contract, which caused her to experience 'stress, anxiety and panic' while questioning how she and her husband would be able to afford essential items for their baby now that their main source of income had been unilaterally reduced. During this period, Ms Shakil suffered sleepless nights and panic attacks while being 'plagued by worrisome thoughts', including 'doubts about whether she had done the right thing to have a baby at all when she was not financially stable'. After informing her boss that she needed to resign, Ms Shakil managed to secure a second full-time job in May, but she continued to work at Samsons in her spare time in the hope she would be able to resume her full-time role at the firm after her maternity leave. In the months that followed, Mr Saleem ignored multiple emails from Ms Shakil about her upcoming maternity leave, 'which caused her further stress and worry', at a time when she also suffered complications, being admitted to hospital on two occasions. By the end of September, blood tests had revealed a potentially serious condition which Ms Shakil was told put her baby at risk of still birth, resulting in the hospital booking her in to have her baby induced on 17 October. Two days after Ms Shakil's final email on 27 September, informing Mr Saleem that her leave would now commence on 1 October, he finally responded – referring to a letter she had not received 'putting her role at risk of redundancy '. Ms Shakil was dismissed with effect from 1 October 2021, when she began maternity leave, the tribunal noted. After her son was born on 18 October, the family were forced to move back in with Ms Shakil's parents 'due to the financial pressure that [her] loss of employment and lack of maternity pay had created'. Ms Shakil's subsequent claim to the Department for Work and Pensions for maternity allowance was then rejected on the grounds that her employer was responsible for paying it. 'The claimant's early weeks and months with her new baby were marred by the need to devote time to trying to resolve her financial predicament and bringing the employment tribunal proceedings,' the tribunal found. After an initial tribunal in Birmingham in April 2023, Ms Shakil was awarded £5,000 in damages for maternity discrimination and Samsons ordered to pay her for income lost while on reduced hours. In an email sent in June 2023 in which he asked Ms Shakil to provide her bank details so that he could pay her the sum awarded by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote 'I hope that you have a wonderful time utilising the monies gained from me', adding that the loss of money 'will make no difference to me'. A further appeal hearing in March 2025 found that Ms Shakil 'was horrified' by the email – which she described as 'disturbing and 'nasty' – and 'was shocked that Mr Saleem could be so spiteful to her'. Ms Shakil's appeal that the sum awarded to her had been too low was accepted, and the judge ordered Samsons to pay her a total of £31,860. Finding it to be a 'serious case of discrimination', the tribunal found: 'The discrimination took place at a time in the claimant's life which she had hoped and planned would be exciting and happy – the pregnancy, birth and early life of her first child. 'Instead, she suffered physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety and distress. These included sleepless nights, panic attacks, intrusive anxious thoughts and tearfulness. There was evidence that the claimant's confidence and self-esteem were damaged by the discrimination. 'These symptoms persisted from the time she was told that her hours had been cut to two days per week, until her baby was born. The symptoms did not stop then, however, because of the claimants' ongoing financial struggles.' It added: 'The effects of the discriminatory dismissal were ongoing at the time of the hearing, four years later, because the claimant is still worried that she might have a similar experience with her new employer if she decides to have another baby.'

More than 300 student flats planned on empty Glasgow site
More than 300 student flats planned on empty Glasgow site

Glasgow Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

More than 300 student flats planned on empty Glasgow site

A planning application has been submitted for the project, on Meadow Road in Thornwood, which would bring a "long-neglected site" into reuse. The development would aim to revitalise the area as well as "provide enhanced safety to the immediate public realm through passive surveillance of the street". Applicant Primer Glasgow Ltd also said the 338-unit purpose-built student accommodation would create a significant increase in economic activity. Documents reveal that during pre-application engagement with residents, one of the key feedback was to create a plan that "will be completed and not fail". More than 300 student flats planned on empty Glasgow site (Image: Sourced) READ NEXT: Plan to demolish listed building to make way for UK-first hotel concept Papers also state that there were several unsuccessful applications on the land, along with incomplete building attempts. Currently, its condition is described as "very poor". Developer Primus Property Group said the structure will be thoughtfully designed to support a modern lifestyle, offering students comfortable and practical living spaces. Along with the properties, rain gardens, cycle storage, trees, study booths, lounge seating and more amenities are planned. Glasgow City Council planning officials are evaluating the bid and a decision is expected by Thursday, October 2.

UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI
UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI

Campaigners have accused ministers of lying to parliament and the creative industries after the government signalled it would not force AI companies to disclose how they train their models. Ministers are holding firm in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has called for artists to be offered immediate copyright protection against artificial intelligence companies. Peers voted by 221 to 116 on Wednesday to insist on an amendment to the data bill that would force AI firms to be transparent about what copyrighted material they use to train their models. In an amendment tabled on Friday, the government dismissed the Lords' request and reiterated its promise to publish an economic impact assessment and technical reports on the future of AI and copyright regulation. Beeban Kidron, the cross-bench peer and film director who has campaigned on behalf of the industry, said during Wednesday's debate that she would 'accept anything that the Commons does' after this week. 'I will not stand in front of your Lordships again and press our case,' she said. But the News Media Association (NMA), which represents publishers including the Guardian, said peers could table further amendments to the data bill when it returns to the Lords next Wednesday. Industry figures said the government was acting in bad faith by not addressing the Lords' concerns and called for it to make further amendments of its own before MPs vote on it on Tuesday. Kidron said: 'The government has repeatedly taken all protections for UK copyrights holders out of the data bill. In doing so they have shafted the creative industries, and they have proved willing to decimate the UK's second biggest industrial sector. They have lied to parliament, and they are lying to the sector.' She said the government's action 'adds another sector to the growing number that have an unbridgeable gap of trust with the government'. Owen Meredith, chief executive of the NMA, said: 'the government's refusal to listen to the strong view of the Lords … risks undermining the legislative process. 'There is still time for the government to do the right thing, and take transparency powers in this bill. This would be a key step towards rebuilding trust with a £126bn industry.' Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The government's approach to copyright has drawn the ire of major creative artists and organisations including Paul McCartney, Kate Bush and the National Theatre, with Elton John describing the situation as an 'existential issue' this week. Opponents of the plans have warned that even if the attempts to insert clauses into the data bill fail, the government could be challenged in the courts over the proposed changes. The consultation on copyright changes, which is due to produce its findings before the end of the year, contains four options: to let AI companies use copyrighted work without permission, alongside an option for artists to 'opt out' of the process; to leave the situation unchanged; to require AI companies to seek licences for using copyrighted work; and to allow AI firms to use copyrighted work with no opt-out for creative companies and individuals. Kyle has said the copyright-waiver-plus-opt-out scenario is no longer the government's preferred option, but Kidron's amendments have attempted to head off that option by effectively requiring tech companies to seek licensing deals for any content that they use to train their AI models.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store