$265 Million Private Capital Unlocked Through Low Emission Transport Fund
The programme, administered by EECA (Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority), was revised in 2021, expanding the remit of its predecessor the Low Emissions Vehicle Contestable Fund (LEVCF), which launched in 2016. Projects approved for funding in the LETF's final rounds – 14, 15 and 16 – have been announced today.
Richard Briggs, EECA's Group Manager – Delivery and Partnerships, said the LETF had unlocked an extraordinary amount of private capital for projects that would not have happened as quickly or at all, as well as lowered organisations' operating costs by improving energy efficiency and productivity.
'The programmes demonstrated the benefits for business in making the switch to low or zero-emissions vehicles, machines, and vessels, showing others in their sectors what's possible and viable.'
Briggs said the rapid acceleration of energy-efficient transport technologies had reduced the risk for early adopters and the need for this type of support. As such, the LETF had wound down to a natural end.
Milestone projects include the world's first electric milk tanker (Fonterra) and electric hydrofoil ferry in commercial operation (Vessev and Fullers 360).
The fund supported New Zealand's first hydrogen-powered truck (NZ Post) and truck (Auckland Transport), first electric double-decker buses (Tranzit, Metlink, Greater Wellington Regional Council) and first electric supermarket delivery vans (Foodstuffs).
The LETF also co-funded around half of New Zealand's 1300+ public EV chargers, with almost 700 more in the pipeline. These include the country's first high-speed DC chargers (ChargeNet).
Briggs said EECA continued to support the heavy vehicle sector to improve its energy efficiency and lower operating costs through the Low Emissions Heavy Vehicle Fund, which offers grants of up to 25% of the purchase price of a new zero-emissions heavy vehicle, or 25% of the cost to convert an existing ICE vehicle to be power by zero or low-emissions technologies.
EECA would ensure successful delivery of previously co-funded projects, as well as provide data on EV charging infrastructure and fuel use across the transport sector, Briggs said.
'EECA is New Zealand's lead agency and expert voice on energy use and we're continuing to evolve to ensure we're best placed to support the market.'
A full list of approved projects for LETF rounds 14, 15 and 16 can be found below.
Notes:
LETF and LEVCF by the numbers
17 funding rounds across LEVCF and LETF, since 2016
359 contracts approved for funding
$100,487,332 in government co-investment approved
$265,466,603 in private capital committed.
Approved projects for Low Emission Transport Rounds 14, 15, and 16
Round 16 approved projects
Round 16 of the LETF launched on 3 February 2025 for Vehicles, Technology, Off-road and Marine. The round closed on 24 March 2025. EECA has approved five projects that would allocate co-funding of $469,159.
Beacon Marine Limited, $23,100: Beacon Marine will partner with Pahi Oysters to demonstrate an electric motor on an existing oyster barge.
Naut Limited $191,206: Naut will partner with an aquaculture business to demonstrate a fully integrated electric vessel, offering a low-emission alternative for an industry that has traditionally depended solely on internal combustion engines (ICE).
Cascade New Zealand Limited, $60,403: Cascade New Zealand will demonstrate electric forklift attachments as an alternative to hydraulic options which requires significantly less energy to operate. When used on an electric forklift, the energy reduction will enable less power usage and longer cycle time.
3i OPCO Limited, $160,150: 3I OPCO will demonstrate an electric excavator which will work within the holds of vessels to unload cargo.
Beacon Marine Limited, $46,300: Beacon Marine with partner with Explore Group will demonstrate an inboard electric conversion of their America's Cup tour experience boat from diesel propulsion to a fully electric system.
Round 15 approved projects
Round 15 of the LETF launched on 18 November 2024 for Ports. The round closed on 10 February 2025. EECA has approved five projects that would allocate co-funding of $1,630,742.
Lyttelton Port Company Limited, $333,392: Lyttelton Port Company will demonstrate shore to ship power by upgrading electrical infrastructure on LPC's inner harbour jetties to provide shore power to visiting vessels and accurately track energy usage and emissions reductions.
CentrePort Limited, $350,000: CentrePort will demonstrate a system that can control how and when electricity resource is consumed. It will unlock electricity supply capacity to enable electrification of CentrePort's heavy electric vehicles fleet to continue without triggering wider network reinforcement.
Port of Tauranga Limited, $447,000: Port of Tauranga will test an electric straddle carrier at Port of Tauranga to examine its feasibility in a New Zealand port context.
Otago Port Limited, $343,000: Otago Port will deliver emissions reduction by separate vertical and horizontal container movement associated with long distance port terminal container flow using straddle carriers.
Lyttelton Port Company Limited, $157,350: Lyttleton Port Company will replace a diesel sweeper truck, which operates at multiple Port locations, with a battery electric vehicle (BEV) equivalent. The project will demonstrate how the electric sweeper can operate efficiently for a full work shift and how its operation impacts battery performance and operational productivity.
Round 14 approved projects
Round 14 of the LETF launched on 29 July 2024 for Vehicles, Technology, Off-road and Marine. The round closed on 9 September 2024. EECA has approved 12 projects that would allocate co-funding of $2,198,620.
Etrucks Limited, $20,000: Etrucks will import and demonstrate an E1400 Windrose long-range electric truck. The E1400 has a loaded range (49t) of 670km. The truck will come equipped with MCS and CCS2 charging.
Port Napier Limited, $302,000: Port of Napier will demonstrate autonomous battery-electric container terminal tractors (ABECTTs) and a battery-swap charger in their port operations.
ContainerCo (NZL) Limited, $232,000: ContainerCo will replace a single empty container handler with a fully electric version to demonstrate that the current diesel empty handlers could be entirely replaced with electric handlers.
Seeka Limited, $27,000: Seeka will demonstrate two custom-designed electric ATVs for use under kiwifruit canopies, reducing emissions, improving safety, and cutting operational costs while aligning with sustainability goals through reduced fuel and maintenance expenses.
Lyttelton Port Company Limited, $252,000: Lyttelton Port Company will demonstrate replacing a diesel empty container handler with a battery electric equivalent.
Green Pacific Shipping Limited, $500,000: Green Pacific Shipping will demonstrate a 30-passenger electric foiling ferry built by Candela to operate between Auckland, Coromandel and Waiheke. Being transportable, including its charging equipment, it will be available around New Zealand for demonstration and trial by other potential users.
Change Fuel Technologies Limited, $97,000: Change Fuel Technologies will build and demonstrate a hydrogen refuelling vehicle which can supply hydrogen to off-road vehicles.
Rotorua Forest Haulage Limited, $20,000: Rotorua Forest Haulage will work with Scania NZ to demonstrate a fully electric truck that can operate on New Zealand roads at HPMV weights of 54T.
Action Manufacturing, $132,000: Action Manufacturing will demonstrate a 100% electric refrigerated semi-trailer. The technology represents a step forward for trailer refrigeration.
D&H Equipment Limited, $242,000: D&H Equipment alongside Ballance Agri-Nutrients will demonstrate a 20-tonne electric wheel loader in their fertiliser plant. This will test the suitability of electric off-road equipment in a highly corrosive fertiliser environment.
Kwetta Limited, $239,600: This project aims to demonstrate how Kwetta's 'grid first' innovation can unlock and optimise existing network infrastructure for EV fast charging, by piloting Kwetta's dynamic flexibility grid service.
United Civil Limited, $135,020: United Civil Construction will demonstrate their first fully electric 4-tonne excavator in Northland and Napier. This size excavator is widely used across many sectors and the project will demonstrate its use case across two regions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Is there anything we can actually do to bring down butter prices?
The alarming rise of butter prices has become a real source of frustration for New Zealand consumers, as well as a topic of political recrimination, writes Lincoln University professor of agricultural economics Alan Renwick. The issue has become so serious that Miles Hurrell, chief executive of dairy co-operative Fonterra, was summoned to meetings with the government and opposition parties this week. After meeting Hurrell, Finance Minister Nicola Willis appeared to place some of the blame for the high price of butter on supermarkets rather than on the dairy giant. According to Stats NZ, butter prices rose by 46.5% in the year to June and are now 120% higher than a decade ago. The average price for a 500g block is NZ$8.60, with some local brands costing over $10. But solving the problem is not a matter of waving a magic economic wand. Several factors influence butter prices, few of which can be altered directly by government policy. ADVERTISEMENT And the question remains – would we want to? Proposals such as reducing exports to boost domestic supply, or cutting goods and services tax (GST) on dairy products, all carry consequences. A key factor driving butter prices in New Zealand is that 95% of the country's dairy production is exported. Limited domestic supply and strong global demand have pushed up prices for a range of commodities – not just milk, but beef as well. These increases are reflected in local retail prices. Another contributing factor is rising costs along the supply chain. At the farm level, producers are receiving record prices for dairy. But this comes at a time when input costs have also increased significantly. It is not all profit. Weighing the options Finance Minister Nicola Willis. (Source: Getty) Before changing rules around dairy exports, the government must weigh the broader consequences. ADVERTISEMENT On the one hand, high milk prices benefit 'NZ Inc'. The dairy sector accounts for 25% of exports and employs 55,000 New Zealanders. When farmers do well, the wider rural economy benefits – with flow-on effects for the country as a whole. On the other hand, there is the ongoing challenge of domestic food security. Many people cannot afford basic groceries and foodbank use is rising. So how can New Zealand maintain a food system that benefits from exports while also supporting struggling domestic consumers? One option is to remove GST from food. Other countries exempt dairy products from such taxes in an effort to make staples more affordable. This idea has been repeatedly reviewed and rejected – including by the 2018 Tax Working Group. In 2024, it was estimated that removing GST could cost the government between $3.3bn and $3.9bn, with only modest benefits for the average household. Fonterra or supermarkets? File photo. (Source: ADVERTISEMENT Another route would be to examine Fonterra's dominance in the supply chain. There are advantages to having a strong global player. And it is not in the national interest for the company to incur losses on domestic sales. Still, the structure of the market may warrant scrutiny. For a long time there were just two main suppliers of processed dairy products – Fonterra and Goodman Fielder – and two main retailers – Foodstuffs and Woolworths. This set up reduced the need to compete on prices. While there is arguably more competition in manufacturing sector now, supermarkets are still under scrutiny and have long faced criticism for a lack of competition. The opaque nature of the profit margins across the supply chain also fuels suspicion. Consumers know what they pay at the checkout and what farmers receive. But the rest is less clear. This lack of transparency invites speculation about who benefits from soaring prices. In the end, though, the government may not need to act at all. As economists like to say: 'Nothing cures high prices like high prices.' While demand for butter is relatively inelastic, there comes a point at which consumers reduce their purchases or seek alternatives. International buyers will also push back – and falling global demand may redirect more supply to domestic markets. High prices also act as a signal to producers across the globe to increase production, which could happen relatively quickly if there are favourable climatic and other conditions. ADVERTISEMENT We only need to look back to 2014, when the price of dairy dropped by 48% over the course of 12 months due to reduced demand and increased supply, to see how quickly the situation can change. Alan Renwick is a professor of agricultural economics at New Zealand's Lincoln University. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons Licence.
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government should cut GST on food if it's worried about butter price – Fran O'Sullivan
The Finance Minister did not need to call Hurrell in to reaffirm that global dairy prices are at a high and that this would inevitably spill over to higher farmer returns and, in turn, boost regional and finally national economies. (That's the plus side you didn't hear about before the meeting). Or that any notion of Fonterra slashing its own margins was not going to happen. They are thin when compared with the margins applied by supermarkets to dairy products, and she knows it. The upshot is that Willis did seek explanations from Hurrell over the co-operative's pricing, which she of course accepted. Within days, she was talking up Fonterra and the surging global prices on the Mike Hosking show as a plus – as indeed they are when it comes to the impact on the New Zealand economy. Hurrell subsequently made it clear his company is not moving to a two-tiered pricing system: an export price geared to global prices and a subsidised price for domestic consumers. There was more besides. It was sensible for Fonterra to shut the issue down quickly. It currently has its consumer brands business on the market. Any suggestion of a move to a two-tiered system would be a complication to that sales process or indeed an IPO of that business if that ultimately turns out to be the Fonterra board's preferred option. But while there was an element of the performative to the Beehive shenanigans, it does underline how much 'cost of living' issues are a lightning rod when it comes to sparking domestic dissatisfaction with the Government. Willis later described her meeting with Hurrell as 'constructive and engaging', underlining the fact that Fonterra does not control retail prices and that the final price is set by supermarkets, whose contracts and pricing strategies vary. This was more grist to Willis' campaign against what she claims are supermarkets profiteering at the expense of consumers. Already, she has been working to reduce the barriers to entry for other competitors. Willis has been encouraged that the Commerce Commission has taken a case against grocery giant Foodstuffs North Island and Gilmours Wholesale to court over what it believes is cartel conduct. The regulator said civil proceedings would be filed against the big grocery suppliers under the Commerce Act and Grocery Industry Competition Act (GICA). Foodstuffs 'strongly denies' any unlawful conduct. The Commerce Commission has also levelled criminal charges against retailer Noel Leeming over what it claims is a misleading price-matching promotion. The company 'firmly' maintains it had not committed an offence and would vigorously defend itself against multiple charges of misleading customers under the Fair Trading Act. Put that to one side. Prices have escalated on multiple fronts: dairy products, meat and some fruits; electricity and gas, rates, insurances. But they have decreased on others: mortgage and loan interest rates, and some fuels. There is little point in trying to jawbone prices down. In many respects, the answer lies with Willis. If she is overly concerned, she could wipe the 15% GST from particular food items. This is the case in Australia, where its 10% GST does not apply to meat, fish, produce, cheese and eggs, plain milk and cream, bread, butter and other spreads, bottled water, tea and coffee, cooking ingredients and oils, or infant formula. In Britain, most foods are zero-rated. Many European countries have reduced value-added tax rates for food, typically running at 5%-7%. Basic foods are exempted in Singapore, there is an 8% rate in Japan, and in the United States some states exempt various food items from sales tax. The upshot is that New Zealand verges on being an outlier in this area. Any changes to the GST regime would, however, have an impact on how New Zealand's tax regime is perceived as being neutral. Farmers are not the enemy. There is much to celebrate from our rural sector, which will deliver nearly $60 billion in export earnings this year. The fixation on rising prices has also overly consumed the Prime Minister, who frequently talks about 'cost of living issues'. But this is not going to be solved in the medium term. The upshot is that, short of any intervention by the Government, consumers will just have to suck it up.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
NZ 'lucky' to have 'premium' butter as only option — Fed Farmers
Federated Farmers' dairy group chair says New Zealanders are lucky to have premium butter, but he hopes prices drop at the checkout as soon as the cost of milk solids do. The price of butter rose nearly 50% to the year ended May, Stats NZ data showed. Dairy giant Fonterra's boss Miles Hurrell sympathised with households feeling the pinch but said price increases were a reflection of supply not being able to keep up with demand. Fonterra could not offer cheaper prices to local customers, he said. Federated Farmers Dairy Industry Group chairperson Karl Dean said New Zealanders had to pay the market rate. ADVERTISEMENT "We are lucky we get a premium product as our only option... the rest of the world would love to have grass-fed butter all the time," he said. "So it is good that we have that option, but all that we ask is that when the prices come down - which they will, they always do - that flows on through the supply chain." The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Hulk Hogan dies, sentencing for a New Zealander who assaulted two airline stewards, and a big accolade for Te Papa. (Source: 1News) Dean believed Fonterra, wholesalers and supermarkets were doing their best to keep prices down. But they needed to react quickly when contract milk prices changed, he said.
