logo
This ancient croc was bigger than most dinosaurs

This ancient croc was bigger than most dinosaurs

The prehistoric crocodile relative may have tolerated both freshwater and saltwater habitats, allowing it to conquer North American coasts in the Cretaceous. The giant crocodilian Deinosuchus was a top predator in wetlands habitats of the late Cretaceous. Here Deinosuchus hatcheri, a species from a rock formation in what is now Utah, chows down on a duck-billed dinosaur called Rhinorex condrupus. Illustration By JULIUS T CSOTONYI / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Around 75 million years ago, North America's largest and most formidable carnivore was not a dinosaur—but a croc. Deinosuchus, the 'terrible crocodile' in Greek, could reach more than 35 feet in length and weigh over five tons. Bite marks on bones leave no doubt that the immense reptile caught and ate dinosaurs. How Deinosuchus became such a large and widespread predator, however, has been a mystery.
Now, a new study published today in Communications Biology claims to have solved the puzzle—by shifting where Deinosuchus fits in the croc family tree and, potentially, how tolerant the reptiles were of salty habitats. 'We wanted to better understand how Deinosuchus became this successful top predator of coastal wetlands all over North America, why it grew so large,' says Márton Rabi, a paleontologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany and a coauthor on the paper. A new place in the croc family tree
Paleontologists have been on the trail of Deinosuchus since a pair of fossilized teeth were found in North Carolina in 1858. Since that time the reptile's fossilized teeth, bony armor, skull pieces, and skeletal parts have been found in Mexico, Utah, Texas, Montana, South Carolia, New Jersey, and more, popping up along the edges of North America's prehistoric coastlines in rocks 82 to 72 million years old. In the lowland marshes and swamps of Cretaceous North America, Deinosuchus watched and waited for prey to get close enough to bite.
Paleontologists categorized the three known Deinosuchus species as alligatoroids, the broad group that contains the American alligator and Chinese alligator today. The broad, rounded snout of Deinosuchus certainly carried a resemblance to alligators more than other crocodilians, the reptile group that includes both crocodiles, alligators, and their relatives, hinting at a close relationship.
After running a new comparison of family relationships, the researchers have questioned the traditional view and recategorized the massive reptile. Instead, the study suggests, Deinosuchus belonged to an ancient lineage that split off before the last common ancestor of today's alligators and crocodiles, carrying characteristics that are seen in both groups. This allowed the ancient croc to thrive among saltier habitats like estuaries and ocean coasts like saltwater crocodiles do today.
'We were surprised to find out that Deinosuchus was not a 'greater alligator,'' Rabi says. The team argues that the reptile's alligator-like appearance was likely a matter of convergent evolution rather than a family resemblance.
New York Institute of Technology paleontologist Adam Cossette, who was not involved in the new study, questions some of the methodologies used to construct the new family tree but notes that the new placement makes sense as Deinosuchus fossils show an array of traits seen in alligators and crocodiles, as well as some features 'usually found very deep in the tree.'
Rabi and coauthors wondered if the new classification could explain how Deinosuchus came to live in freshwater and saltwater habitats as geographically distant as Mexico and New Jersey. Alligators tend to prefer freshwater habitats, while many crocodiles are more tolerant of salt water. The researchers argue that Deinosuchus was more like a saltwater crocodile than an American alligator and, in addition to following coastal habitats, swam across a prehistoric sea that divided North America in two halves during the late Cretaceous.
Other researchers are skeptical of the argument, however. 'I disagree with species of Deinosuchus being saltwater tolerant,' Cossette says, noting that Deinosuchus found in Texas, for example, lived in freshwater environments that were not especially close to the coast. Deinosuchus fossils in Utah, as well, are found with freshwater fish and reptiles in habitats that were not especially close to the coast. It may be that Deinosuchus preferred freshwater but was capable of foraging in and traversing saltier waters when necessary.
'The abundance of Deinosuchus fossils in coastal deposits is a reflection only of the conditions for preservation,' adds University of Bristol paleontologist Max Stockdale, who was not involved in the new study. The shoreline is only part of the picture. Deinosuchus may have lived in environments not recorded in the fossil record. Additionally, Stockdale notes, freshwater species like Nile crocodiles and American alligators have been known to swim between ocean islands or spend time at sea, so the case for Deinosuchus remains inconclusive based on available evidence. How to grow a giant croc
Even as paleontologists still the particulars of Deinosuchus biology, there is no doubt that the predator was big. The fossils of Deinosuchus are often found in the same formations as the carnivorous tyrannosaurs, for example, but Deinosuchus could grow to be longer and more massive than the tyrant dinosaurs, making it a true apex predator. The croc even had a bite force greater than T. rex, though the two didn't coexist. In order for Deinosuchus to thrive, there had to be plenty of food. The broad range of the carnivore indicates that there was a great deal of suitable habitat to support such a gargantuan meat-eater.
'You need two things for growing giant crocs,' Rabi says, which are a fast growth rate early in life and a consistent food supply to fuel that rapid growth. During the late Cretaceous, when Deinosuchus lived, high global sea levels and a warm climate fed incredible growth within marshes and swamps everywhere the sea touched North America. The nature of these aquatic ecosystems, the new study proposes, allowed such giant reptiles to evolve in the first place.
'The high-productivity wetlands, including prey species, were critical for the evolution of Deinosuchus,' Rabi says, a pattern that is seen among other giant, prehistoric crocs such as Sarcosuchus that lived in ancient Africa and South America about 120 million years ago and the broad-snouted Purussaurus of South America between 16 and 5 million years ago.
Food wasn't the only factor for giant, cold-blooded crocs. 'The gigantism we see in Deinosuchus is a reflection of stability in the environment,' Stockdale cautions, especially as Deinosuchus would have relied on the temperature of its environment to regulate its body temperature. Conditions had to be just right for a long time to allow such a croc to evolve. Such ecosystems have evolved several times over in Earth's history, fueling the growth of giants like Deinosuchus. Perhaps someday they will again.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

June full moon this week has major lunar standstill. Won't happen again until 2043
June full moon this week has major lunar standstill. Won't happen again until 2043

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

June full moon this week has major lunar standstill. Won't happen again until 2043

June's full moon promises to be a special sight, if Mother Nature cooperates. June's full moon will be at its lowest point since 2006 since we're in the middle of a major lunar standstill. You'll have to wait awhile before it rolls around again; It won't happen again until 2043. If you're outside, the moon will appear larger than normal low on the horizon and may even be orange or reddish. Here's what to know. The next full moon will be on Wednesday, June 11, with the peak occurring at 3:44 a.m. ET. 'The June full Moon got the name 'strawberry moon' from a number of North American native tribes, since the wild strawberry reaches peak ripeness and is ready for harvesting in June,' according to the Farmers Almanac. "Because of the importance of the wild strawberry as a spring food staple, the name 'Strawberry Moon' was given to the June full moon by the Algonquin, Ojibwe, Dakota, Lakota, Chippewa, Oneida, and Sioux tribes." June's full moon will be special. "In the Northern Hemisphere, it will be the lowest full moon seen until 2043, staying unusually close to the horizon " according to the Old Farmer's Almanac. Look for the full moon at 3:44 a.m. ET June 11, about 22 degrees above the southern horizon. "When the moon is low in the sky it appears especially big." The last time the full moon was this low was 18.6 years ago, according to in what's known as a major lunar standstill. It won't happen again until 2043. As the moon shines through the thick layer of air, it may appear golden, orange, or even reddish. June's full moon is the closest full moon to the summer solstice, which falls on June 21 this year. The summer solstice marks the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. Look toward the southern horizon at 3:44 a.m. ET on June 11. Can't pull yourself out of bed? You can see it later but that's the time it will reach its peak. Make sure you have a clear view since the moon will only be about 22 degrees above the horizon. "Every day, the moon rises in the east and sets in the west, but the location of the moonrise and moonset on the horizon changes, moving from north to south to north again over the course of a month. Throughout the 18.6-year lunar cycle, the northernmost and southernmost extremes also change," said. "During a major lunar standstill, the northernmost and southernmost moonrise and moonset are at their farthest distance apart. This affects how long the moon appears to stay in the sky." Called a 'major lunar standstill,' the natural phenomenon doesn't take place over one day but over about two years when the moon rises and sets at more northerly and southerly spots along the horizon, said. According to the remaining full moons of 2025 are: Thursday, July 10: 4:37 p.m. ET, buck moon Saturday, Aug. 9: 3:55 a.m. ET, sturgeon moon Sunday, Sept. 7: 2:09 p.m. ET, corn moon Monday, Oct. 6: 11:48 p.m. ET, hunter's moon (super moon) Wednesday, Nov. 5: 8:19 a.m ET., beaver moon (super moon) Thursday, Dec. 4: 6:14 p.m. ET, cold moon (super moon) The summer solstice occurs at 10:41 p.m. ET, June 20 this year. The solstice marks the exact time when the sun reaches it northernmost point in the sky, according to EarthSky. In the Northern Hemisphere, the June solstice marks the shortest night and longest day of the year. This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: June full moon is June 11. How to view in Florida lunar standstill

Paleontologists dig through fossilized dino guts to see what's inside
Paleontologists dig through fossilized dino guts to see what's inside

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Paleontologists dig through fossilized dino guts to see what's inside

Nothing quite fits the moniker 'gentle giant' more than sauropods. These gargantuan dinosaurs could reach up to 123 feet long and weigh up to seven tons. Sauropods have long been believed to be herbivores, munching on leaves during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. Now, for the first time, a team of paleontologists have studied the abdomen of a sauropod with its gut contents still intact that lived roughly 94 to 101 million years ago. The finding confirms that they were in fact herbivores–and did not really chew their food. Instead, sauropods relied on gut microbes to break down its food. The findings are detailed in a study published June 9 in the Cell Press journal Current Biology. 'No genuine sauropod gut contents had ever been found anywhere before, despite sauropods being known from fossils found on every continent and despite the group being known to span at least 130 million years of time,' Stephen Poropat, a study co-author and paleontologist at Curtin University in Australia, said in a statement. 'This finding confirms several hypotheses about the sauropod diet that had been made based on studies of their anatomy and comparisons with modern-day animals.' Fossilized dinosaur bones can only tell us so much about these extinct animals. Paleontologists can use trackways and footprints to learn about their movement and preserved gut contents called cololites to put together what their diets may have looked like. Understanding the diet is critical for understanding their biology and the role they played in ancient ecosystems, but very few dinosaur fossils have been found with cololites. These are gut contents that have yet to become poop–or coprolites. In particular, sauropod cololites have remained elusive. With their gargantuan sizes, these dinosaurs may have been the most ecologically impactful terrestrial herbivores on the planet during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. With this lack of direct dietary evidence, the specifics of sauropod herbivory—including the plants that they ate—have mostly been theorized based largely on tooth wear, jaw shape and size, and neck length. But that changed in the summer of 2017. Staff and volunteers at the Australian Age of Dinosaurs Museum of Natural History were excavating a relatively complete subadult sauropod skeleton. This particular Diamantinasaurus matildae specimen lived during the mid-Cretaceous period and was uncovered in the Winton Formation of Queensland, Australia. The team noticed an unusual, fractured rock layer that appeared to contain the sauropod's cololite with well-preserved plant fossils. The team analyzed the plant specimens within the cololite and found that sauropods likely only engaged in minimal oral processing of their food. Instead of chewing, their gut microbiota would ferment the plants to digest it. The cololite had a wide variety of plants, including foliage from conifers (cone-bearing seed plants), seed-fern fruiting bodies (plant structures that hold seeds), and leaves from angiosperms (flowering plants). From this, it looks like Diamantinasaurus was an indiscriminate, bulk feeder. 'The plants within show evidence of having been severed, possibly bitten, but have not been chewed, supporting the hypothesis of bulk feeding in sauropods,' said Poropat. The team also found chemical biomarkers of both angiosperms and gymnosperms—a group of woody, seed-producing plants that include conifers. [ Related: The mystery of why some dinosaurs got so enormous. ] 'This implies that at least some sauropods were not selective feeders, instead eating whatever plants they could reach and safely process,' Poropat said. 'These findings largely corroborate past ideas regarding the enormous influence that sauropods must have had on ecosystems worldwide during the Mesozoic Era.' Although it was not unexpected that the gut contents provided support for sauropod herbivory and bulk feeding, Poropat was surprised to find angiosperms in the dinosaur's gut. 'Angiosperms became approximately as diverse as conifers in Australia around 100 to 95 million years ago, when this sauropod was alive,' he says. 'This suggests that sauropods had successfully adapted to eat flowering plants within 40 million years of the first evidence of the presence of these plants in the fossil record.' Based on these findings, the team suggests that Diamantinasaurus likely fed on both low- and high-growing plants, at least before adulthood. As hatchlings, sauropods would have only been able to access food that was close to the ground. As they grew (and grew and grew), their viable food options also expanded. Additionally, the prevalence of small shoots, bracts, and seed pods in the cololite implies that subadult Diamantinasaurus likely targeted new growth portions of conifers and seed ferns. These portions of the plant are easier to digest. According to the authors, the strategy of indiscriminate bulk feeding likely served sauropods well for 130 million years. However, as with most studies, there are some important caveats and limitations. 'The primary limitation of this study is that the sauropod gut contents we describe constitute a single data point,' Poropat explained. 'These gut contents only tell us about the last meal or several meals of a single subadult sauropod individual.' We also don't know how the seasons affected diet, or if the plants preserved in this specific sauropod represent a diet typical of a healthy sauropod or a more stressed one. The specimen is also a subabult, which could mean that younger sauropods had this more than adults did. Despite the limitations, it offers an exciting look inside the stomachs of some of the largest creatures to ever live.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store