logo
Paleontologists dig through fossilized dino guts to see what's inside

Paleontologists dig through fossilized dino guts to see what's inside

Yahoo09-06-2025
Nothing quite fits the moniker 'gentle giant' more than sauropods. These gargantuan dinosaurs could reach up to 123 feet long and weigh up to seven tons. Sauropods have long been believed to be herbivores, munching on leaves during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.
Now, for the first time, a team of paleontologists have studied the abdomen of a sauropod with its gut contents still intact that lived roughly 94 to 101 million years ago. The finding confirms that they were in fact herbivores–and did not really chew their food. Instead, sauropods relied on gut microbes to break down its food. The findings are detailed in a study published June 9 in the Cell Press journal Current Biology.
'No genuine sauropod gut contents had ever been found anywhere before, despite sauropods being known from fossils found on every continent and despite the group being known to span at least 130 million years of time,' Stephen Poropat, a study co-author and paleontologist at Curtin University in Australia, said in a statement. 'This finding confirms several hypotheses about the sauropod diet that had been made based on studies of their anatomy and comparisons with modern-day animals.'
Fossilized dinosaur bones can only tell us so much about these extinct animals. Paleontologists can use trackways and footprints to learn about their movement and preserved gut contents called cololites to put together what their diets may have looked like. Understanding the diet is critical for understanding their biology and the role they played in ancient ecosystems, but very few dinosaur fossils have been found with cololites. These are gut contents that have yet to become poop–or coprolites.
In particular, sauropod cololites have remained elusive. With their gargantuan sizes, these dinosaurs may have been the most ecologically impactful terrestrial herbivores on the planet during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. With this lack of direct dietary evidence, the specifics of sauropod herbivory—including the plants that they ate—have mostly been theorized based largely on tooth wear, jaw shape and size, and neck length.
But that changed in the summer of 2017. Staff and volunteers at the Australian Age of Dinosaurs Museum of Natural History were excavating a relatively complete subadult sauropod skeleton. This particular Diamantinasaurus matildae specimen lived during the mid-Cretaceous period and was uncovered in the Winton Formation of Queensland, Australia. The team noticed an unusual, fractured rock layer that appeared to contain the sauropod's cololite with well-preserved plant fossils.
The team analyzed the plant specimens within the cololite and found that sauropods likely only engaged in minimal oral processing of their food. Instead of chewing, their gut microbiota would ferment the plants to digest it.
The cololite had a wide variety of plants, including foliage from conifers (cone-bearing seed plants), seed-fern fruiting bodies (plant structures that hold seeds), and leaves from angiosperms (flowering plants). From this, it looks like Diamantinasaurus was an indiscriminate, bulk feeder.
'The plants within show evidence of having been severed, possibly bitten, but have not been chewed, supporting the hypothesis of bulk feeding in sauropods,' said Poropat.
The team also found chemical biomarkers of both angiosperms and gymnosperms—a group of woody, seed-producing plants that include conifers.
[ Related: The mystery of why some dinosaurs got so enormous. ]
'This implies that at least some sauropods were not selective feeders, instead eating whatever plants they could reach and safely process,' Poropat said. 'These findings largely corroborate past ideas regarding the enormous influence that sauropods must have had on ecosystems worldwide during the Mesozoic Era.'
Although it was not unexpected that the gut contents provided support for sauropod herbivory and bulk feeding, Poropat was surprised to find angiosperms in the dinosaur's gut.
'Angiosperms became approximately as diverse as conifers in Australia around 100 to 95 million years ago, when this sauropod was alive,' he says. 'This suggests that sauropods had successfully adapted to eat flowering plants within 40 million years of the first evidence of the presence of these plants in the fossil record.'
Based on these findings, the team suggests that Diamantinasaurus likely fed on both low- and high-growing plants, at least before adulthood. As hatchlings, sauropods would have only been able to access food that was close to the ground. As they grew (and grew and grew), their viable food options also expanded.
Additionally, the prevalence of small shoots, bracts, and seed pods in the cololite implies that subadult Diamantinasaurus likely targeted new growth portions of conifers and seed ferns. These portions of the plant are easier to digest.
According to the authors, the strategy of indiscriminate bulk feeding likely served sauropods well for 130 million years. However, as with most studies, there are some important caveats and limitations.
'The primary limitation of this study is that the sauropod gut contents we describe constitute a single data point,' Poropat explained. 'These gut contents only tell us about the last meal or several meals of a single subadult sauropod individual.'
We also don't know how the seasons affected diet, or if the plants preserved in this specific sauropod represent a diet typical of a healthy sauropod or a more stressed one. The specimen is also a subabult, which could mean that younger sauropods had this more than adults did.
Despite the limitations, it offers an exciting look inside the stomachs of some of the largest creatures to ever live.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where did the potato come from? Tomatoes, 9 million years ago, apparently.
Where did the potato come from? Tomatoes, 9 million years ago, apparently.

Washington Post

timea day ago

  • Washington Post

Where did the potato come from? Tomatoes, 9 million years ago, apparently.

They're one of the world's most important food crops and delicious roasted, mashed or fried, but the exact genetic origins of the humble potato have long been something of a mystery to scientists. Now, researchers say the modern-day potato evolved from hybridization of the ancestors of tomato plants and another potato-like plant, known as etuberosum, in South America up to 9 million years ago. The hybridization created the petota lineage — which includes the cultivated potato seen in supermarkets around the world, as well as 107 wild potato species. Sandra Knapp, a plant taxonomist at the Natural History Museum in London and an author of the study, said in an interview Thursday that while scientists had known potatoes, tomatoes and etuberosum were closely related, the exact relationship had been unclear as 'different parts of the genome told us different stories.' The new research, published Thursday in the journal Cell Press, was carried out by a team of scientists in China, the United States and United Kingdom who focused on untangling this relationship. Scientists conducted intricate analysis of 128 genomes and found that 'all members of Petota exhibit a stable mixed genomic ancestry, derived from Etuberosum and Tomato lineages.' Researchers said they believe tomato and etuberosum share a common ancestor but diverged around 14 million years ago, before hybridization between them resulted in the origin of petota around 8 to 9 million years ago. The combination of two distinct genes in this 'hybrid speciation' event led to a key innovation — the development of tubers in petota. Tubers, the edible part of the potato, allow the plant to reproduce without seeds or pollination as well as storing water and carbohydrates, meaning petota was able to thrive in different geographic niches and diversify into a large number of species, scientists added. Knapp said while hybridization in plants is nothing new, the resulting plants are often sterile and it had previously been thought of as an 'evolutionary dead-end.' The latest research showed that, in fact, 'hybridization is a really potent force in evolution,' she added. Cultivated potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), along with maize, rice and wheat make up around 80 percent of human calorie intake, the researchers said, and are renowned for being cheap, versatile and packed with carbohydrates. However, wild potatoes are difficult to sample, and the study is the 'most comprehensive collection of wild potato genomic data ever analyzed,' lead co-author Zhiyang Zhang, a genomics expert from the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, said in a statement. Scientists detailed how this hybridization event led to the creation of tubers through genes known as SP6A and IT1, derived from tomato and etuberosum respectively. The changes came at the same time as the Andes Mountains emerged between 6 and 10 million years ago, researchers said. Having a tuber to store nutrients allowed potatoes to survive harsh weather and spread throughout cold climates in the Andes and central Mexico. While both petota and etuberosum have underground resprouting organs which allow them to reproduce without seeds, petota became more widespread than tomato or etuerosum species, as it was able to grow in areas such as grasslands, Alpine meadows and seasonally dry rainforests, the researchers added. Now, scientists want to understand the effect of tuber-related genes on plants and how the exact 'reshuffling' of genes in this case led to tuber formation, Knapp said, adding that it also raises the prospect of creating plants that can grow food faster, are more disease resistant and environmentally friendly. Studying the evolution of the potato also allows scientists to think about how the traits of wild species could be used on cultivated plants to boost biodiversity and mitigate the environmental impacts of agriculture, she said. Zhang, meanwhile, said in an interview that he hoped the findings could help 'generate a new species that maybe have a harvested fruit on the ground and a tuber in the ground.' One of his fellow researchers has joked that such a new species could be called 'tomtatoes.' Knapp suggested that the main benefit of the findings would be to build 'better potatoes instead of building cool weird things.' 'If we're going to optimize crops, what we want to do is optimize the thing we want from them and usually when you get something that does two things, those two things are not as good as the one that does the one thing better,' she said.

Bone-Eating Worms Have Lurked in The Ocean For 100 Million Years
Bone-Eating Worms Have Lurked in The Ocean For 100 Million Years

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Bone-Eating Worms Have Lurked in The Ocean For 100 Million Years

Not content with a diet of old leaves, some worm species actually eat bones. A new study has now traced the ancient ancestors of these bone-burrowers back through 100 million years of evolution. Deep in the ocean, bone-eating worms from the genus Osedax feast on the carcasses of whales, sucking up fats and proteins from the skeletons. And it looks like they've been doing so for a while now. By scanning fossils to look for traces of bone-eating behavior, researchers from University College London (UCL) and the Natural History Museum in the UK have been able to identify seven new types of worm from the Cretaceous period. There would've been no whale on the menu at that time, but traces left behind by these worms were found in fossils of mosasaurs, ichthyosaurs, and plesiosaurs: the dominant marine reptiles of the time, now on show in museum exhibits. Related: "We haven't found anything else that makes a similar burrow to these animals," says ‪paleontologist Sarah Jamison-Todd, from UCL. "As the ancient bores are so similar to modern Osedax species, and we don't have body fossils to contradict us, we assume that they were made by the same or a similar organism." "It shows that the bone-eating worms are part of a lineage that stretches back at least to the Cretaceous, and perhaps further. We can see how the diversity of bone-eating worms changes across millions of years." The team was able to build 3D models of 130 fossils without damaging them, through the use of computed tomography (CT) scans. Six fossils showed signs of burrows. That then led to the identification of seven new ichnospecies – species categorized based on traces in fossils, rather than direct remains of the creatures. Some of the boring patterns matched modern-day species, suggesting a surprising level of evolutionary stability across many millions of years. The researchers also used microscopic fragments around the fossils to date the bones and the worms that chewed through them. That placed them at at least 100 million years ago, meaning these creatures evolved much earlier than previously thought. "By using the remains of small organisms that make up the chalk itself, we were able to date the fossils to more precise time slices of the Cretaceous period," says Marc Jones, paleontologist at the Natural History Museum. There are plenty of other discoveries like this still waiting to be made, the researchers suggest – which could happen through further scans of ancient fossils as well as studies of the modern species living in the oceans today. Additional work looking at the genetics of the organisms living today could tell us more about the evolutionary history of these tiny creatures, though researchers will have to collect more samples and more data first. "There are many more examples of boring that haven't yet been named from both ancient and modern bone-eating worms," says Jamison-Todd. "In fact, some bores from the Cretaceous appear to be similar to ones that are still made today." "Finding out whether these burrows are made by the same species, or are an example of convergent evolution, will give us a much better idea of how these animals have evolved, and how they have shaped marine ecosystems over millions of years." The research has been published in PLOS ONE. Related News Ancient Voice Box Finally Reveals How Dinosaurs May Have Sounded Stunning Grand Canyon Fossils Reveal Evolution's Weird Experiments Neither Scales Nor Feathers: Bizarre Appendage Discovered on Reptile Fossil Solve the daily Crossword

Beyond Biomarkers: How Modern Technology Is Affirming Ancient Medicine
Beyond Biomarkers: How Modern Technology Is Affirming Ancient Medicine

Forbes

time4 days ago

  • Forbes

Beyond Biomarkers: How Modern Technology Is Affirming Ancient Medicine

Dr. Trisha Swift is the CEO of Mula, an integrative health practice specializing in tech enabled preventative care and root-cause healing. A recent study published in Current Biology has made waves in both the scientific and wellness communities: Each person has a unique respiratory fingerprint, a distinct nasal breathing pattern that can identify them with 96.8% accuracy, much like a biometric ID. But the implications of this respiratory biometric stretch far beyond just identification. These breath patterns were found to correlate with physical health markers (like BMI), emotional states (like anxiety and depression) and cognitive function (such as sleep quality and behavior). At its core, this discovery brings modern science full circle with ancient healing traditions. In Ayurveda, Prana, the life force carried by the breath, is understood to nourish both the mind and body and can be viewed as a nonphysical substance, finer than oxygen. In traditional Chinese medicine, Qi flows with the breath and is a key indicator of vitality and well-being. These traditions always saw breath not merely as a mechanical act, but as a mirror of the whole self. Now, neuroscience is saying the same thing. The study linked above used 24-hour nasal airflow monitoring and found that respiratory patterns remained remarkably stable across time and conditions, including rest, sleep, stress and activity. Even more compelling, these breath signatures reflected underlying emotional dysregulation and cognitive strain, often before they were consciously acknowledged by the person being studied. From Breath To Burnout The early identification of imbalances caused by chronic stress resonates deeply in our current health climate, where burnout, emotional exhaustion and cognitive fatigue are silently epidemic. We often talk about burnout in terms of long hours, high demands and lack of purpose, but what if we could detect its early physiological signs before people reach their breaking point? What if we could monitor subtle changes in our breathing and recognize when something is off, not just physically, but emotionally and mentally? This would represent a radical shift: not just toward early diagnosis but true preventive care. Rather than waiting for a diagnosis from disease screening or a breakdown from burnout, we could intervene at the first sign of dysregulation through lifestyle adjustments, breath work, sleep optimization or support for emotional health. These are not abstract ideas. They are actionable shifts waiting to happen if we invest and build the technology and systems to support them. Innovation Must Catch Up Modern healthcare, as it stands, is ill-equipped to detect this kind of subtle imbalance. It is built on late-stage intervention, rigid protocols and coding systems that reward acute illness over balanced health. Clinicians are overburdened with checklists, prior authorizations and productivity quotas. The system is excellent at treating disease, but poor at maintaining health. That's why rethinking how we assess health by embracing unconventional markers of well-being, like breath patterns, heart pulsations and other nonconventional biomarkers isn't just helpful; it's urgent. In a system centered on diagnosing disease, we need new frameworks that recognize the subtle rhythm disruptions before illness takes root. By moving beyond what's easily billable toward what's truly meaningful, we can open the door to more personalized and preventative care. Wearables have already started moving us in this direction. Finger-based ring wearables from a variety of brands, like Oura, SleepOn and Circul, can help track personalized health metrics such as sleep quality, heart rate variability, readiness scores and skin temperature. These wearables have empowered users to identify trends, optimize recovery and adjust behavior in real time. What these wearables have done for sleep and recovery, respiratory fingerprinting could do for emotional resilience and cognitive clarity. Imagine being alerted when your breath indicates rising anxiety levels, even before you feel physically stressed. Imagine your care team being notified when your sleep-breathing rhythm subtly shifts, predicting an oncoming bout of depression or cognitive fatigue. These are the front lines of preventative care. They are the future of medicine that honors the whole person, not just their diagnosis. Ancient Wisdom, Modern Precision In traditional healing systems, imbalance was addressed before illness appeared. Practitioners read the pulse, the tongue, the skin and the breath to assess how energy was flowing in the system. Treatment wasn't reactionary. It was responsive. The respiratory fingerprints discovery is a scientific bridge back to that wisdom. It offers modern precision to ancient intuition. It also offers a compelling blueprint for the next evolution of healthcare: one that is personalized and predictive. But to get there, we must invest in technology that captures dynamic health data, not just lab values once a year. We must support clinicians in using these insights within care plans and build reimbursement models that reward prevention, not just higher acuity. And most importantly, we must believe that well-being is more than the absence of disease—it's also in experiencing functional balance across all body systems. A New Way To Measure Wholeness As we learn more about how to measure ancient biomarkers, one thing is true: They are not a gimmick. They are a call to measure differently, to care differently and to lead differently. As a healthcare leader, I've seen what happens when systems become more focused on managing cost than advancing well-being. I've witnessed talented professionals fall into burnout while meeting metrics that have little to do with transforming healthcare. I've also seen the power of aligning cutting-edge technology with the timeless principles of traditional medicine and the whole-person healing it can enable. The discovery of respiratory fingerprints is not just a biometric breakthrough. It's a wake-up call to reimagine how we define, measure and maintain health. It affirms what many of us in the whole-health and integrative space already know: Well-being is complex, dynamic and deeply personal. It also strengthens the case I've made in my previous articles for high-tech holistic medicine and how innovation can help make the pivot from focusing on cost-containment to avoidance. We must invest in systems that listen to and measure the full story of our health, not just what's visible on a lab panel. It's time to breathe new life into healthcare and ourselves. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store