Bone-Eating Worms Have Lurked in The Ocean For 100 Million Years
Deep in the ocean, bone-eating worms from the genus Osedax feast on the carcasses of whales, sucking up fats and proteins from the skeletons. And it looks like they've been doing so for a while now.
By scanning fossils to look for traces of bone-eating behavior, researchers from University College London (UCL) and the Natural History Museum in the UK have been able to identify seven new types of worm from the Cretaceous period.
There would've been no whale on the menu at that time, but traces left behind by these worms were found in fossils of mosasaurs, ichthyosaurs, and plesiosaurs: the dominant marine reptiles of the time, now on show in museum exhibits.
Related:
"We haven't found anything else that makes a similar burrow to these animals," says paleontologist Sarah Jamison-Todd, from UCL. "As the ancient bores are so similar to modern Osedax species, and we don't have body fossils to contradict us, we assume that they were made by the same or a similar organism."
"It shows that the bone-eating worms are part of a lineage that stretches back at least to the Cretaceous, and perhaps further. We can see how the diversity of bone-eating worms changes across millions of years."
The team was able to build 3D models of 130 fossils without damaging them, through the use of computed tomography (CT) scans. Six fossils showed signs of burrows.
That then led to the identification of seven new ichnospecies – species categorized based on traces in fossils, rather than direct remains of the creatures. Some of the boring patterns matched modern-day species, suggesting a surprising level of evolutionary stability across many millions of years.
The researchers also used microscopic fragments around the fossils to date the bones and the worms that chewed through them. That placed them at at least 100 million years ago, meaning these creatures evolved much earlier than previously thought.
"By using the remains of small organisms that make up the chalk itself, we were able to date the fossils to more precise time slices of the Cretaceous period," says Marc Jones, paleontologist at the Natural History Museum.
There are plenty of other discoveries like this still waiting to be made, the researchers suggest – which could happen through further scans of ancient fossils as well as studies of the modern species living in the oceans today.
Additional work looking at the genetics of the organisms living today could tell us more about the evolutionary history of these tiny creatures, though researchers will have to collect more samples and more data first.
"There are many more examples of boring that haven't yet been named from both ancient and modern bone-eating worms," says Jamison-Todd. "In fact, some bores from the Cretaceous appear to be similar to ones that are still made today."
"Finding out whether these burrows are made by the same species, or are an example of convergent evolution, will give us a much better idea of how these animals have evolved, and how they have shaped marine ecosystems over millions of years."
The research has been published in PLOS ONE.
Related News
Ancient Voice Box Finally Reveals How Dinosaurs May Have Sounded
Stunning Grand Canyon Fossils Reveal Evolution's Weird Experiments
Neither Scales Nor Feathers: Bizarre Appendage Discovered on Reptile Fossil
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If Another Home For Humanity Is Out There, This Spaceship Could Get Us There
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Project Hyperion competition winners dreamed up Chrysalis, a starship and space habitat that could make it to the planet Proxima b in just 400 years (which is ridiculously fast). The spacecraft is designed to run on a fusion engine, create artificial gravity, and carry about a thousand people while flying at around a tenth of the speed of light. Though Chrysalis remains a concept (for now), it could end up launching something unprecedented in the future. Headed towards the Proxima Centauri system, the starship Chrysalis traverses a seemingly endless expanse of space as it soars toward its final destination—the potentially habitable planet Proxima b. There, over a thousand passengers who have been living in the airborne habitat (the descendants of a crew that launched from Earth four centuries ago) will build a new frontier for humanity. Chrysalis sounds as if it flew straight out of a scene in Isaac Asimov's Foundation. But despite its sci-fi features, this is an actual spacecraft concept that recently won the Project Hyperion design competition hosted by the Initiative for Interstellar Studies (i4is). The craft is the brainchild of an interdisciplinary team of Italian researchers—Giacomo Infelise, Veronica Magli, Guido Sbrogio, Nevenka Martinello, and Federica Chiara Serpe—who were challenged to come up with a floating habitat that would eventually touch down on the closest exoplanet to Earth, Proxima b. 'The presentation is rich and visually engaging, drawing comparisons to iconic works like Rama, and showcasing a clear passion for both design and storytelling,' the competition jury said of Chrysalis in a recent press release. 'Its overall spacecraft design seems to take inspiration from the gigantic world ship concepts of the 1980s.' Each team that embarked on this conceptual journey needed at least one architectural designer, one engineer, and one social scientist. Their mission was to figure out how to accommodate a thousand (give or take 500) people over the centuries it would take for the spacecraft to reach its destination. Like the fictional starships it was inspired by, Chrysalis would to produce artificial gravity through a rotation system, in order to try and counteract the detrimental effects of microgravity on the human body. Designing support systems for food, water, waste, and an atmosphere—as well as coming up with ways to provide livable conditions and meet basic needs—were also mandatory parts of the contest. Additionally, there would need to be methods of transferring knowledge from generation to generations in order to both keep culture alive and retain (and advance) technology. The spacecraft would also have to trek through space at a maximum velocity of a tenth of the speed of light, and make it to Proxima b in as close to 250 years as possible. The fastest spacecraft to date is NASA's Parker Solar Probe, which recently zoomed past the Sun at a blazing 692,000 kmph (430,000 mph). But even Parker would still be short of one trillion miles (1.6 trillion km) after 224 years of travel, and still have over 24 trillion miles to go. If Chrysalis ever becomes a reality, it should make it to Proxima b in 400 years, after a year-long acceleration period. It would take another year to decelerate once it reached the planet. Proxima b is 4.24 light-years away, and one light-year equates to about 9.5 trillion km (6 trillion miles). So, the journey from here to Proxima b would cover 39 trillion km (25 trillion miles) through the void. Doing that in 400 years is certainly nothing to sneeze at. Much like the chrysalis of a moth or butterfly blown to epic proportions, Chrysalis was imagined as a 58,000-meter-long (63,430 yards), 2.4 billion-metric-ton (2.65 US tons) cylindrical structure. Its narrower front end would mitigate the risk of impacts from micrometeoroids, space junk, and anything else that could cause a damaging collision. The minimized front end is also meant to reduce stress on the spacecraft as it accelerates and decelerates. Powered by the nuclear fusion of helium and deuterium isotopes, its propulsion system would be a Direct Fusion Drive (DFD)—an engine that is still very much in the conceptual phase. It is supposed to give the spacecraft a simultaneous burst of electrical power and thrust. There is a reason that some floating off-earth habitats in science fiction are shown rotating in space. The front end of Chrysalis—which is imagined to function as the habitat—would have multiple levels in flexible modular shells that fit into each other and constantly rotate on one axis to maintain artificial gravity. From outer to inner, levels would be specialized for food production, ecosystems, communal spaces, housing, gardens, facilities, a warehouse, and the axial core. The Cosmo Dome at the front end is intended to be a bubble of microgravity that provides an incredible view to passengers as they experience weightlessness for a while. So, where do we go from here? Humans have yet to reach Mars (much less Proxima b), and whether such a massive concept can ever translate to reality remains to be seen. However, landing on the Moon was seen as an impossibility only a hundred years ago—the limits of humanity are possibly boundless. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
2 Reasons We Feel Better When Others Are Worse Off — By A Psychologist
Most of us have a natural tendency to compare ourselves to others. This can be explained by social comparison theory, developed by psychologist Leon Festinger, which suggests that we determine our self-worth by comparing ourselves to others. When others experience setbacks, we may experience a range of emotions in response, from empathy to pity to even joy at their misfortune. While feeling happy about someone else's pain may sound strange, it's not as uncommon as you might think. This stems from our tendency for 'downward social comparison.' When we compare downward — i.e., to someone worse off — we often feel better about our own lives. It's a subtle, sometimes unconscious coping mechanism, especially in moments of self-doubt. The emotional experience of pleasure in response to another's misfortune is called Schadenfreude, a German word that combines Schaden, which means 'damage,' and Freude, which means 'joy.' Schadenfreude often occurs in competitive environments. For instance, you may feel happy when an employee who cozies up to your boss performs poorly and gets berated by them. This is because people have an inherent need to feel better about themselves and often acquire a better self-image by comparing themselves to others who may be less fortunate. Consequently, people who feel their self-worth is threatened are more likely to feel Schadenfreude. Here are two key reasons why you may be feeling happy about somebody else's suffering: 1. Schadenfreude May Boost Self-esteem In Competitive Scenarios Why do we feel a sense of guilty pleasure at someone's downfall? In a 2017 study published in the European Journal of Social Psychology, researchers sought to answer this question. They tested whether Schadenfreude met any of these four basic psychological needs: the need for self-esteem, control, belongingness and a meaningful existence. Researchers conducted four experiments, all of which pointed to similar outcomes: Schadenfreude does meet our basic need to reaffirm our social standing through comparisons, especially when we compare ourselves to a rival we're envious of. In the first study, participants were asked to imagine being in a job interview, which was also being attended by their primary university competitor. They were told that only one would get the position. In the competitive scenario, participants felt more schadenfreude and need satisfaction than in non-competitive circumstances. Researchers found that they felt more in charge, experienced higher self-esteem and felt a greater sense of belonging. In another situation, they were asked to recall a real-time scenario when their competitor failed. Once again, researchers found that more schadenfreude led to increased feelings of self-esteem, a greater sense of personal control and a stronger perception of meaning in life. Seeing someone else fail or struggle can shield us from feelings of inadequacy, at least for the time being. When life feels out of control, seeing others in similar or worse positions makes our own experiences feel less like personal failures and more like part of a shared human messiness. This is especially true in more competitive scenarios. We all want to believe we're doing 'okay' in life. If someone else is doing worse than us, it affirms that we're not falling behind. 2. Schadenfreude May Reaffirm Your Belief In A Just World Interestingly, another 2013 study published in the Australian Journal of Psychology found a link between schadenfreude and beliefs in a 'just' world. When people's belief in a just world was threatened, they felt more pleasure when someone else suffered a misfortune. For example, they might laugh more at a story where someone 'gets what they deserve.' This may be because they want to restore their belief that the world is fair. When someone holds such beliefs, they're more likely to think that good things happen to good people, while misfortune finds those who deserve it. If they can't help the victim, they might instead blame the victim or believe the person deserved it. This way, they get to justify the misfortune that befell them. However, this does not always indicate that the victim is deserving of punishment or that they are responsible for the outcome. Does Schadenfreude Make You A Bad Person? Schadenfreude doesn't automatically make you a terrible human being. The practice of downward comparison may feel cruel, but that is not always the intention. These reactions often happen without our conscious awareness, and you may have tried to push these thoughts away, knowing it wasn't right. This sense of awareness and moral grounding is what differentiates you from someone that deliberately wants to watch others fail. However, if you find yourself constantly hoping for someone else's downfall and actively trying to put them in compromising situations, that may be worrisome. Instead of trying to eliminate the instinct entirely, try to notice it but avoid giving it too much power. Otherwise, it may make you complacent and feel less motivated to improve because you think 'at least, I'm not that bad.' If you must compare, try to shift your mindset to lateral or upward comparisons that inspire change. Try to put in effort to grow. Look at people doing 'better' than you and learn from them. If seeing others do better than you makes you feel like you're 'not enough' or that you haven't 'achieved enough,' try comparing yourself to those only one or two steps ahead of you. That way, you can realistically map out your progress. You may also want to mark your progress against your past self. Self-comparison allows you to see how far you've come and where you want to go from here, but like any form of comparison, it's a double-edged sword that can make you spiral about your flaws. The healthiest approach is to learn to accept yourself right where you are, without any sense of comparison, viewing your journey in this life as strictly your own. When you begin to embrace the feeling of being and having 'enough,' you naturally stop engaging in self-destructive behaviors or trying to bring others down. Do you often take pleasure in others' misfortune to make yourself feel better? Take this science-backed test to find out: The Schadenfreude Scale
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
75,000 years old: Europe's oldest Arctic animal community discovered in Norway cave
The bones of a vast community of 46 animals in a 75,000-year-old cave in Norway have provided a stunning and rare snapshot of a vanished Arctic world. Researchers only recently discovered and explored Arne Ovamgrotta, but the ancient cave has held a significant collection of animal bones for 75,000 years. Researchers confirmed the finding of 46 different types of animals, hinting at the existence of a large community banding together to weather the cold. Their remains represent the oldest example of an animal community in the European Arctic during this warmer period of the Ice Age and provide an unprecedented first look at a community struggling, if not failing to survive, climate change. According to a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the study authors believe the newly discovered bones will feed conservation efforts today by helping researchers understand 'resilience and extinction risk in the present.' These animals didn't survive the Ice Age According to study author Dr. Sam Walker of Bournemouth University and the University of Oslo, this 'rare snapshot of a vanished Arctic world' included an impressive, if not astonishing, assemblage of bones. Among the animals were polar bears, walruses, bowhead whales, Atlantic puffins, common eiders, rock ptarmigans, and Atlantic cod. Additionally, as per a press release, they found collared lemmings, which no one had ever uncovered in Scandavia previously, a species now extinct in Europe. The massive number communicated to researchers that temperatures had increased significantly enough 75,000 years ago to allow these animals passage to the cave. Reindeer, porpoise, and freshwater fish bones further told researchers that rivers and lakes returned to this area. 'The cave has now revealed a diverse mix of animals in a coastal environment representing both the marine and the terrestrial environment,' according to a press release. A picture of this region on Earth became clearer than ever as remains over 10,000 years old are a rare find. This underexplored period during the Ice Age saw the melting of ice, which was enough to support a struggling community of animals. Warnings for our future DNA testing found that these animals did not survive when temperatures dropped back to bone-chilling and fatal degrees. Harsh sheets of ice returned to the region, preventing any possibility of migrating elsewhere, as per Popsci. 'This highlights how cold-adapted species struggle to adapt to major climatic events. This has a direct link to the challenges they are facing in the Arctic today as the climate warms at a rapid pace,' said Dr Walker. 'The habitats these animals in the region live in today are much more fractured than 75,000 years ago, so it is even harder for animal populations to move and adapt,' Dr. Walker continued. 'It is also important to note that this was a shift to a colder, not a period of warming, that we are facing today,' senior author Professor Boessenkool says. 'And these are cold-adapted species – so if they struggled to cope with colder periods in the past, it will be even harder for these species to adapt to a warming climate,' she concludes in a press release. Read the study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Solve the daily Crossword
