logo
From pigeons to dogs and cows: how animals have sparked unrest in Mumbai

From pigeons to dogs and cows: how animals have sparked unrest in Mumbai

Indian Express19 hours ago
In recent days, pigeons have emerged as unexpected players in Maharashtra's political discourse, triggering controversy that has pitted sections of the Jain and Marathi communities against each other.
What began as a dispute over bird feeding has escalated into a flashpoint, drawing in leaders across the political spectrum and heating up the state's polity.
However, this isn't the first time animals have catalysed socio-political turmoil in Mumbai.
From pigeons to dogs to cows, animal-related issues have a long and often overlooked history of inciting public unrest and communal agitation in the city.
A riot over dogs
In June 1832, Bombay, as the city was known then, witnessed one of its earliest recorded civil disturbances, sparked not by taxation or colonial policy, but by a dog-culling drive.
The British colonial government had enacted a law in 1813 authorising the culling of stray, ownerless dogs between April 15 and May 15, and September 15 and October 15. However, in 1832, the government extended the culling period until June 15, citing a surge in stray dog numbers.
'The diligence with which the cull was effected in 1832 excited attention. Special police dog-killers were paid the sum of eight annas for dispatching each dog. The dogs were either taken away and killed, or killed in the street and left as garbage… Many of the dogs captured, however, were neither dangerous nor loose, but snatched from private enclosures,' Jesse S Palsetta writes in her paper Mad Dogs and Parsis: The Bombay Dog Riots of 1832.
This aggressive enforcement coincided with a Parsi holy day and the Islamic month of Muharram. The Parsis, who regard dogs as sacred, were outraged by the indiscriminate killing. The payment incentive led to abuse, with dogs being seized even from private homes and sacred spaces.
On June 6, violence broke out in Bombay's Fort area.
'In consequence of a Government order for the destruction of pariah-dogs… Two European constables, stimulated by the reward of eight annas for every dog destroyed, were killing one in the proximity of a house, when they were attacked and severely handled by a mob composed of Parsis and Hindus of several sects,' S M Edwardes writes in The Bombay City Police: A Historical Sketch.
Following this, shops shut down in protest and crowds gathered at the police station, demanding an end to the killings. Tensions escalated the next day.
On June 7, as a citywide strike was enforced, shops and markets shut, Fort access was blocked, and the public harassed British officials. Supply lines to British garrisons were disrupted; carriages carrying British elites, including the Chief Justice, were attacked, and even water supplies were obstructed.
By midday, a crowd of 5,000 people assembled near the Fort's Central Police Station, forcing the British administration to read the Riot Act and deploy British troops to quell the trouble. The protest was forcibly dispersed, and several arrests followed.
While casualties were limited, the political significance of the unrest was immense. The Parsi-led protest, backed by Hindu Vanias, Jains, and Ismaili Muslims, showcased the economic leverage of Bombay's trading communities, who managed to paralyse the city's supply chains and challenge colonial authority.
Cows and communal flashpoints
Over 60 years later, it was the issue of cow protection that pushed Bombay to the brink of communal violence in 1893.
In the years leading up to the unrest, anti-cow slaughter sentiment was steadily building. The Bombay Gaurakshak Sabha had been actively organising rallies and disseminating pamphlets highlighting the sanctity of cows.
R H Vincent, Bombay's then police commissioner, said, 'A large number of pictures and pamphlets showcasing the sanctity of the cow and the ills of cow slaughter were distributed in Bombay.'
Public mobilisations became increasingly visible. In 1891, cows were paraded through city streets in processions. Protests even erupted over incidents where cows accidentally fell into roadside ditches and died, underscoring the heightened religious sensitivity surrounding bovine deaths.
These tensions culminated in communal riots that broke out on August 11, 1893, and violence surged for three days and simmered for nearly a month. Eighty-one people were killed, and 700 were injured before calm was restored.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chilling past, warm present
Chilling past, warm present

The Hindu

time32 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Chilling past, warm present

On August 15, U.S President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin concluded a historic summit in Alaska. After friendly greetings and two-and-a-half-hour-long talks at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, they left without announcing any deal, but claimed to have made progress on many issues. The selection of Alaska as the backdrop for this summit, the first since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, was significant in more than one manner. Alaska was under Russian control for 125 years before being sold to the U.S. in 1867. Alaska is separated from Russia by a distance of 88 km, while the Russian Island of Big Diomede is located just 4 km from the U.S. Little Diomede Island, with the Bering strait separating the two. Also read: Trump-Putin Alaska Summit Highlights Alaska has been populated by Indigenous peoples, including the Athabaskans, Unangan (Aleuts), Inuit, Yupiit (Yupik), Tlingit, and Haida, for centuries. In the early 18th century, Danish explorer Vitus Bering was pressed into service by Russian Tsar Peter the Great to explore the regions to the east of Russia's border. In 1728, Bering sailed through the strait separating the Russian mainland and North America (the strait is now named after him). During his second voyage in 1741, Bering spotted the peak of Mount St. Elias, part of an Alaskan mountain range, from his ship St. Peter. His 'discovery' of Alaska was confirmed later during the voyage of Englishman Captain James Cook, who mapped the area in 1778. Trading outposts Russian traders — the Promyshlenniki — soon set up outposts in Alaska, interested in seal-hunting and otter fur trade. The first Russian colony was set up in 1784 on Kodiak island at Three Saints Bay. In 1799, Tsar Paul I established the Russian American company, and in 1806, their capital was moved from Kodiak to Sitka. The Russians had to contend with opposition from the Alaskan natives, including an armed battle in Sitka in 1804 between Tlingit and Russian forces. British and later American trade interest in the region was also a challenge to the growth of 'Russian America'. Over decades, overexploitation of seals and sea otters in Alaska meant that their populations shrank, gutting profitability for Russian traders. Further, Russia was defeated by the British in the Crimean war (1853-1856). Viewing Alaska as a hard-to-defend territory which was also becoming economically untenable, Tsar Alexander II decided to give it up. Despite British interest, the U.S. emerged triumphant in its bid for Alaska in 1867. Russia sold the parcel of land, measured 665,000 sq. miles, to the U.S for $7.2 million, in a deal brokered by U.S. Secretary of State William Henry Seward. The deal, dubbed as 'Seward's Folly', was widely criticised, since Alaska was viewed as a barren frozen wasteland. The subsequent discovery of natural gas reserves and rare earth minerals, however, changed the public perception. In 1896, gold was found in Yukon and prospectors arrived to seek their fortunes in the Klondike gold fields. In 1959, Alaska officially became the 49th State of the U.S. Traces of its Russian past persist in Alaska till day. Several Orthodox churches, with characteristic ornate decor and onion-shaped domes, dot the region. The Orthodox diocese in Alaska is reportedly the oldest in North America, and it maintains a seminary on Kodiak island, the site of the first Russian settlement. Local dialects, now fast-vanishing, arose from a melange of Russian and local indigenous language, and persisted in regions surrounding Anchorage. Russian, too, is taught in some areas, such as the Kenai peninsula. Alaska is also a strategically important region. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, the site of Friday's summit, was a forward front of American defence during the Cold War. Given the region's imperial Russian past, it was hardly a surprise that Anchorage was picked as the venue for the Putin-Trump meet — an American town acceptable for the Russians. When Mr. Putin met Mr. Trump on the tarmac of the joint base, he greeted him, saying, 'Good afternoon, dear neighbour.'

Putin emerges from the Alaska summit with increased stature and Trump echoing a Kremlin position
Putin emerges from the Alaska summit with increased stature and Trump echoing a Kremlin position

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Putin emerges from the Alaska summit with increased stature and Trump echoing a Kremlin position

President Vladimir Putin walked on a red carpet, shook hands and exchanged smiles with his American counterpart. Donald Trump ended summit praising their relationship and calling Russia "a big power ... No. 2 in the world," albeit admitting they didn't reach a deal on ending the war in Ukraine. By Saturday morning Moscow time, Trump appeared to have abandoned the idea of a ceasefire as a step toward peace -- something he and Ukraine had pushed for months -- in favor of pursuing a full-fledged "Peace Agreement" to end the war, echoing a long-held Kremlin position. The "severe consequences" he threatened against Moscow for continuing hostilities were nowhere in sight. On Ukraine's battlefields, Russian troops slowly grinded on, with time on their side. The hastily arranged Alaska summit "produced nothing for Mr. Trump and gave Mr. Putin most of what he was looking for," said Laurie Bristow, a former British ambassador to Russia. The summit spectacle Putin's visit to Alaska was his first to the United States in 10 years and his first to a Western country since invading Ukraine in 2022 and plunging U.S.-Russia relations to the lowest point since the Cold War. Crippling sanctions followed, along with efforts to shun Russia on the global stage. In another major blow, the International Criminal Court in 2023 issued an arrest warrant against Putin on accusations of war crimes, casting a shadow on his foreign trips and contacts with other world leaders. Trump's return to the White House appeared to upend all that. He warmly greeted Putin, even clapping for him, on a red carpet as U.S. warplanes flew overhead as the world watched. The overflight was both "a show of power" and a gesture of welcome from the U.S. president to the Kremlin leader, "shown off to a friend," said retired Col. Peer de Jong, a former aide to two French presidents and author of "Putin, Lord of War." Russian officials and media reveled in the images of the "pomp-filled reception" and "utmost respect" that Putin received in Alaska. Putin has "broken out of international isolation," returning to the world stage as one of two global leaders and "wasn't in the least challenged" by Trump, who ignored the arrest warrant for Putin from the ICC, Bristow told The Associated Press. For Putin, 'mission accomplished' Putin "came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war," said Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute. "He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished." In recent months, Trump has pressed for a ceasefire, something Ukraine and its allies supported and insisted was a prerequisite for any peace talks. The Kremlin has pushed back, however, arguing it's not interested in a temporary truce -- only in a long-term peace agreement. Moscow's official demands for peace so far have remained nonstarter for Kyiv: It wants Ukraine to cede four regions that Russia only partially occupies, along with the Crimean Peninsula, illegally annexed in 2014. Ukraine also must renounce its bid to join NATO and shrink its military, the Kremlin says. After Alaska, Trump appeared to echo the Kremlin's position on a ceasefire, posting on social media that after he spoke to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, "it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up." In a statement after the Trump call, the European leaders did not address whether a peace deal was preferable to a ceasefire. The pro-Kremlin tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda described it as a "huge diplomatic victory" for Putin, whose forces will have time to make more territorial gains. The summit took place a week after a deadline Trump gave the Kremlin to stop the war or face additional sanctions on its exports of oil in the form of secondary tariffs on countries buying it. Trump already imposed those tariffs on India, and if applied to others, Russian revenues "would probably be impacted very badly and very quickly," said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. In the days before Alaska, Trump also threatened unspecified "very severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to stop the war. But whether those consequences will materialize remains unclear. Asked about it in a post-summit interview with Fox News Channel, Trump said he doesn't need "to think about that right now," and suggested he might revisit the idea in "two weeks or three weeks or something." Alexandra Prokopenko of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center and a former adviser at the Russian Central Bank, posted on X that it was "an important tactical victory for Putin" that gives Moscow "an opportunity to build alternatives and be prepared." More pressure on Ukraine In a statement after the summit, Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress." But Trump said "there's no deal until there's a deal." In his Fox interview, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy "to get it done," but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. Zelenskyy will meet Trump at the White House on Monday. Both raised the possibility of a trilateral summit with Putin, but Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said it wasn't discussed in Alaska. The Kremlin has long maintained that Putin would only meet Zelenskyy in the final stages of peace talks. "Trump now appears to be shifting responsibility towards Kyiv and Europe, while still keeping a role for himself," Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Center wrote on X. Fiona Hill, a senior adviser on Russia in his first administration, told that Trump has met his match because "Putin is a much bigger bully." Trump wants to be the negotiator of "a big real estate deal between Russia and Ukraine," she said, but in his mind he can "apply real pressure" only to one said - Kyiv. Hill said she expects Trump to tell Zelenskyy that "you're really going to have to make a deal" with Putin because Trump wants the conflict off his plate and is not prepared to put pressure on the Russian president. Far from the summit venue and its backdrop saying "Pursuing Peace," Russia continued to bombard Ukraine and make incremental advances on the over 600-mile (1,000-kilometer) front. Russia fired a ballistic missile and 85 drones overnight. Ukraine shot down or intercepted 61 drones, its air force said. Front-line areas of Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk and Chernihiv were attacked. Russia's Defense Ministry said it had taken control of the village of Kolodyazi in the Donetsk region, along with Vorone in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine did not comment on the claims. Russian forces are closing in on the strongholds of Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka in the Donetsk region, which Moscow illegally annexed in 2022 but still only partially controls. "Unless Mr. Putin is absolutely convinced that he cannot win militarily, the fighting is not going to stop," said Bristow, the former ambassador. "That's the big takeaway from the Anchorage summit."

SCERT says Bose ‘fled to Germany out of fear', corrects error
SCERT says Bose ‘fled to Germany out of fear', corrects error

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

SCERT says Bose ‘fled to Germany out of fear', corrects error

Thiruvananthapuram: Following protests over alluding to the element of 'fear' behind Subash Chandra Bose 's travel to Germany during the independence struggle in a draft copy of a teacher's handbook, the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) carried out an immediate correction. The draft of the teachers' handbook prepared by SCERT for the fourth standard was published on the council's website for teachers' reference. In the book dealing with the portion of the Indian independence struggle, it was stated that Bose served as Congress president and later resigned from the organization to form a new party, the Forward Bloc. However, in the later part of the description, it was stated, "Bose fled to Germany, fearing the British. " SCERT sources said the handbook was not a final version, and the correction was made as soon as the undesirable allusion to Bose's exit to Germany was noted in the PDF version. The attempts to portray Bose as a coward who fled to Germany, fearing the British, caused much flutter, especially when the CPM and Congress persistently attack the BJP govt in the Centre and Sangh Parivar for their alleged attempts to alter the narrative of the Indian independence struggle. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store