
To Berlin's Relief, Musk — Not Merz — Got Slammed during White House Visit
Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz attends a meeting in the Oval Office on Thursday
BERLIN – German Chancellor Friedrich Merz went to the White House on Thursday to talk about trade, war, peace and the future of the Western alliance – a high-stakes meeting for which his top advisers made painstaking preparations.
President Donald Trump had something he wanted to say, too. About Elon Musk.
Sitting next to Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in his former adviser. Musk returned fire, and the two ex-besties were off on a wild, hours-long breakup that dominated the day's news cycle at home and abroad.
But see things from the Germans' side.
What they felt was … palpable relief.
Under the headline 'New Best Friends?' a political commentator for Germany's BR broadcaster wrote: 'It could hardly have gone better for the chancellor. His meeting with the U.S. president in the Oval Office, sometimes a scene of public humiliation, was extremely polite and almost harmonious.'
Germans, including Merz and his delegation, seemed thankful that Trump's trademark rage had been directed elsewhere during the meeting and was nothing like the president's public castigations of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during their visits to the White House
'You are smiling,' Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware) told Merz as he gathered with a gaggle of senators following the White House meeting. 'That's a very good sign.'
'Still standing!' added Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), to laughter.
Merz told the German broadcaster ZDF that he was 'very satisfied' with the meeting. Displaying no worry or concern about the visit being overshadowed, he added: 'I expected us to get along well. And that's exactly what happened.'
It did not escape German commentators, however, that on camera the leader of the European Union's most populous country, and the third-largest economy in the world, only got to speak for about four minutes in the meeting as Trump mostly held forth with the press.
But global leaders appear to be learning how to manage their encounters with Trump, or at least survive them.
'The team behind Merz prepared meticulously for this visit, and it showed. Phone calls between Merz and Trump prior to the visit helped pave the way for a smooth meeting,' said Sudha David-Wilp, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. 'Both leaders felt comfortable with each other and President Trump was in a positive mood yesterday, but many hurdles and summits are ahead. The challenge is to concentrate on the shared interest and channel out the noise.'
Like others before him, Merz also came bearing gifts. But were they the right gifts?
Trump was presented with a gold-framed copy of his German grandfather's birth certificate.
Gold is always good with Trump. But the president's reaction appeared a little tepid – though he did look up at the wall and joke that maybe he could find a place for it there. He seemed more enthusiastic about a golf club engraved with the U.S. and German flags. Merz is a fellow golfer and later posted on Instagram a picture of Trump with the club.
Merz will soon have the opportunity to see how the partnership fares on German soil. The chancellor told German broadcaster ARD that Trump had accepted an invitation to visit Germany. Merz said last month that he plans to include a trip to the small wine-growing town Kallstadt – the hometown of Trump's grandfather – during the president's anticipated visit.
Free from the baggage of his predecessors – including Olaf Scholz, who worked closely with President Joe Biden, and Angela Merkel, whom Trump repeatedly berated for her open-door migration policy at the height of Europe's migration crisis a decade ago – Merz's blank sheet going into the Oval Office was evidently advantageous.
'The whole world now knows: Trump has nothing against this German; he likes him,' German daily the Süddeutsche Zeitung wrote. 'Perhaps the most important reason for this: Friedrich Merz is not Angela Merkel.'
Following a question about the sweeping travel restrictions on 19 countries that Trump announced Wednesday, the president criticized Merkel's migration policy. 'We want to keep bad people out of our country. … Of course, you have a little problem, too, with some of the people that were allowed into your country,' Trump said to Merz.
'It's not your fault. … It shouldn't have happened. I told her it shouldn't have happened, but it did,' Trump said, without naming Merkel.
Merz didn't respond.
Merz appeared to handle Trump more smoothly than he did British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, though he had fewer speaking lines. Perhaps less was more.
Merz mostly went out of his way to praise and flatter Trump, but he also remained assertive – insisting, for instance, that Russia alone was to blame for civilian deaths following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. For the most part, Merz had Trump nodding along – except when Merz mentioned the children in war-torn Ukraine, at which point Trump stopped nodding and froze.
'Under normal diplomatic practice, Donald Trump's monologue would be an affront to the chancellor,' German publication Focus wrote. Instead, Merz took it in stride and used his small amount of speaking time wisely, the magazine wrote.
There were some noteworthy exchanges, including one about Nazis.
Merz began noting that June 6 was the anniversary of D-Day, when the Allied Forces landed on the beaches of Normandy, 'when the Americans ended a war in Europe.' That day in 1944 was the symbolic start of Europe's liberation in World War II.
Trump jumped in: 'That was not a pleasant day for you? This is not a great day.'
Merz answered: 'No, in the long run, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship.'
Vice President JD Vance appeared again on his spot on the sofa as the president's wing man. But he did not pounce – and Merz made sure to say thank you.
'We owe the Americans a lot,' the chancellor said. 'We will never forget about them.' Turning toward the president, he continued, 'so with your German provenance, I think this is a very good basis for close cooperation between America and Germany.'
It was unclear exactly what Merz and Germany might get out of the meeting, other than future encounters minus any awkward baggage.
After Merz took a firm stand on Russia's responsibility for the war in Ukraine, Trump suggested that Russia and Ukraine be treated as two children fighting on a playground who should simply be left to battle it out.
Asked by the press about Trump's comparison of the war to a playground tussle, Merz didn't take the bait. 'I think we both agree on this war and how terrible this war is going on,' he said. 'We are both looking for ways to stop it very soon.'
Booth reported from London.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
6 hours ago
- The Mainichi
New S. Korea leader, Trump agree to seek 'satisfactory' tariff deal
SEOUL (Kyodo) -- New South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung and U.S. President Donald Trump agreed during their first telephone talks on Friday to work toward a "mutually satisfactory" agreement on U.S. tariffs at an early date, South Korea's presidential office said. "Regarding ongoing tariff consultations between the two countries, the presidents agreed to strive for a mutually satisfactory agreement as soon as possible," the office said after their phone talks, adding that the leaders pledged to encourage tangible progress to be achieved in working-level negotiations. The two countries have been trying to negotiate a deal on the 25 percent tariffs Trump imposed on South Korea in early April as part of his so-called reciprocal import duties targeting almost all countries. During their talks, which started off with Trump congratulating Lee on his win in Tuesday's election, Lee emphasized the significance of his country's alliance with the United States. Both sides expressed an intention to work closely together for further development of the iron-clad alliance, according to the office. The office also said that Trump invited Lee to the United States, and the two leaders agreed to meet at the earliest opportunity to hold more in-depth discussions on advancing the alliance.

6 hours ago
Japanese Professor Given Ukrainian Award for Humanitarian Efforts
News from Japan World Jun 7, 2025 17:12 (JST) Tokyo, June 7 (Jiji Press)--Kobe Gakuin University professor Yoshihiko Okabe was given the Golden Heart award by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday for making great contributions for humanitarian aid in Ukraine under Russia's invasion. Okabe, an expert on Ukraine issues, and others received the award in an event in Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine, according to the presidential office. The professor has published several books on Ukraine. He also gives lectures about the country. Last year, Ukraine's Honorary Consulate in Kobe was set up at the university in the western Japan city for cultural and academic exchanges with the country, and Okabe became Ukraine's honorary consul in the city. The other awardees included Veronique Bertholle, deputy mayor of Strasbourg, France, and Marc Cools, president of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press


Yomiuri Shimbun
8 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
International Students Scared to Leave U.S., Return to School after Travel Ban
Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post Students walk on the campus of Pennsylvania State University in State College, Pennsylvania, on Oct. 7. As President Donald Trump signaled plans for a new travel ban after taking office, the family of a 19-year-old Venezuelan student at the Savannah College of Art and Design decided she shouldn't go home for the summer. She wasn't sure she'd be let back in the United States if she left. The possibility hung in the air for months, but nothing happened. Her parents, in Caracas, started planning to fly her back. Then the White House announced Wednesday that it would restrict entry to the U.S. by nationals of 12 countries, with partial restrictions on seven others – including Venezuela. The art school student immediately scrapped her plans to go home – or to any other country. She canceled a getaway to Costa Rica booked for the next day and instead plans to stay in Miami with her sister, who is also on a student visa. Her bags are still packed. 'I came here looking for better opportunities than the ones I could find back home,' said the student, who, like some other international students interviewed by The Washington Post, spoke on the condition of anonymity or withheld their full identities because they fear losing their visas. 'I came here to learn from the best and contribute as much as I can. I haven't done anything wrong, but they're treating us like we're some sort of terrorists.' While the White House says Trump's order would not affect current visa holders, it has plunged foreign students into uncertainty. Many colleges, bracing for a possible ban, have been warning international students for months to avoid nonessential foreign travel due to fears they could suddenly be unable to reenter the country. Now that a ban has arrived – during summer break for many schools – some students are scrambling to get back from abroad before the restrictions take effect Monday. Others in the U.S. worry they won't be able to return if they leave. Data from the 2023-2024 academic year show there were about 24,000 international students in the United States from the countries listed in the ban, which include many African and Muslim-majority nations. In his executive order, Trump said the travel ban was based on 'foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism goals' and applies to people who are currently abroad and do not have a valid visa. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said that visas issued before Monday, when the order takes effect, will not be revoked and holders can enter the country 'as long as there are no other reasons that would prevent entry.' Students and experts are wary of the ban's scope – and about how it will be implemented at airports and borders, and whether efforts to obtain or renew visas will be disrupted. In late May, the State Department suspended foreign students' visa appointments as it prepared to expand screening of applicants' social media accounts, The Post reported. 'Prospective students will be forced to abandon their educational dreams, faculty members will no longer be able to effectively collaborate internationally, and families will be kept apart,' Barbara Snyder, president of the Association of American Universities, said in a statement. 'These bans send a message to all foreign nationals, even those not immediately affected by them: You are not welcome here.' By the numbers In 2017, during his first term in office, Trump enacted a travel ban targeting predominantly Muslim countries – sparking protests and legal challenges. The White House's latest travel ban comes as part of its broader effort to reduce immigration and align higher education with Trump's political agenda. Wednesday's order bars the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also partially restricts the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Iranians are by far the largest group of students affected by the restrictions, according to data from the Open Doors 2024 report from the Institute of International Education and the State Department. More than 12,000 Iranians studied in the U.S. in the 2023-2024 academic year – roughly three times the number of the next largest group, Venezuelans, of which there were 3,904 that year. African countries targeted by Trump's travel restrictions send far fewer people to study at American institutions. Just 66 students came from Chad in 2023-2024, for instance. The Open Doors data show stark differences in the type of education pursued by students from each of the affected countries. The vast majority of Iranians studying in the U.S. – 81.5 percent – are graduate students, while most students from Venezuela and Myanmar are enrolled in undergraduate programs. For most countries in the ban, much smaller percentages of the students they send to the U.S. are enrolled in programs that don't lead to a degree or are working in the U.S. under 'Optional Practical Training' status. The latter allows eligible students to pursue employment related to their studies for a year after graduation; those in science, technology, engineering or mathematics fields can apply to extend that to three years. Families spend months apart Arshia Esmaeilian, an Iranian student at the University of South Florida, had hoped to visit his family in Dubai next winter break. His mother had also been applying for a visa to visit him and his brother, who is also on a student visa, in the United States. But the travel ban means neither of those trips are likely to happen, Esmaeilian said. 'I was very disappointed,' said Esmaeilian, 21. 'My parents don't even know if they'll be able to come to the U.S. as visitors to attend my graduation next spring.' Another Venezuelan student, a 22-year-old at Pennsylvania State University, hasn't been home since December. He has an internship in the U.S. this summer and doesn't feel like he can travel to Venezuela after it ends. 'I'm just not willing to expose myself to that risk since I only have one year left in my studies,' the student said, adding, 'I really just hope that my parents are able to see me graduate.' Universities issue warnings More than a dozen prominent universities sent out guidance for international students ahead of a potential travel ban – some before Trump's inauguration in January. The ban stems from a Jan. 20 executive order instructing the Departments of State and Homeland Security and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on whether allowing people to enter from specific countries was a national security risk. 'If you must travel, please check in with us first,' Stanford University's Bechtel International Center wrote in March. 'We are able to connect you to immigration resources.' The same month, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology told its students to 'bear in mind' that changes and restrictions could 'be implemented quickly and without ample warning for travelers.' Jeff Joseph, incoming president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, described the ban as the latest salvo in a 'full attack on students and institutions,' including visa revocations and tougher social media screening. He noted that the ban comes at a time of year when international students typically schedule consulate appointments in preparation for the next school year. 'I have big concerns that these students won't even get their visas in time to be back here for the fall,' Joseph said. He added that it is unclear how much difficulty visa holders will face when they try to reenter the country, and that he is watching whether the administration issues guidance before Monday to airline carriers and ports of entry. For Alejandro, a rising senior at the University of Florida, the ban on Venezuelans felt like 'a slap in the face.' 'Even more than that, actually – it feels like a full-on betrayal,' Alejandro said. He had celebrated Trump's victory in November, believing it would help restore democracy in Venezuela. 'I really thought he was on our side – not that he'd be the one locking the doors to innocent people,' Alejandro said.