logo
Flatterer-in-chief: How NATO's Rutte worked to win over Trump

Flatterer-in-chief: How NATO's Rutte worked to win over Trump

Economic Times8 hours ago

NATO chief Mark Rutte
Synopsis Mark Rutte is trying to keep Donald Trump happy. He is doing this with a NATO spending deal. The deal aims to meet Trump's demands. It asks allies to spend five percent of GDP on defence. Rutte used diplomacy and flattery. This approach seeks to avoid conflict with Trump. Some allies are uneasy with Rutte's methods. When former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte took over as NATO chief last year his primary task was clear: keep Donald Trump on board should he come back to power.
ADVERTISEMENT Now as he hosts his first alliance summit as boss in his hometown The Hague, the veteran political operator seems on the verge of handing the volatile leader the kind of win he craves.
With a combination of diplomatic finessing and a large dose of flattery, Rutte aims to keep Trump happy with a carefully crafted deal that meets his demand for NATO allies to spend five percent of GDP on defence.
"He's been quite masterful in keeping the alliance together in a very difficult and sensitive period," a senior NATO diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity.Rutte's tour de force was cooking up a compromise on spending that allows Trump to claim victory by hitting his headline five-percent figure, while in reality setting the bar lower.The agreement sees countries promise to spend 3.5 percent of GDP on core military spending, while the other 1.5 percent goes to a looser array of areas like infrastructure and cybersecurity.
ADVERTISEMENT In a fawning message sent to Trump before he headed to The Hague, Rutte aped the US president's own style when he gushed that getting the deal was "something NO American president in decades could get done.""Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win," said Rutte.
ADVERTISEMENT Trump clearly liked the message as he posted it gleefully on his Truth Social feed.
Getting a successful outcome for NATO, the transatlantic alliance forged during the Cold War, was by no means a given when Trump stormed back into the White House threatening allies he would not protect them if they did not cough up.
ADVERTISEMENT As Washington berated Ukraine, cosied up to Russia and opened the door to pulling forces from Europe, it set alarm bells ringing over the future of an alliance founded on US might.Rutte's strategy has seemed relatively simple: never criticise or contradict the notoriously sensitive former reality TV star.When Trump suggested Ukraine caused Russia's invasion: silence. When he yelled at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office: no pushback. When he threatened not to protect allies: nothing to see here.
ADVERTISEMENT
Instead, according to Rutte, Trump has been absolutely right to demand a quick end to the Ukraine war, has not called into question NATO's mutual defence ethos, and has actually made the alliance stronger by forcing allies to spend more.All that courting appears to have paid off.
Diplomats say Rutte is one of only a handful of European leaders Trump willingly picks up the phone to. "Clearly the job is to keep the United States engaged as far as you can, even if it means that you have to sound a bit like Donald Trump occasionally," said Jamie Shea, a former senior NATO official now with the Chatham House think tank."So as long as that's the situation, I think allies will sort of turn a blind eye in Europe, at least to the occasional uses of Trumpian means and themes" by Rutte.That does not mean European allies have always been comfortable with Rutte's performance -- with some at times accusing him of going too far to please Trump.
That very nearly ended up blowing up in Rutte's face when Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez threw a last-minute spanner in the works by baulking at the spending deal. In the end though, Rutte again showed his diplomatic chops and managed to smooth things over with Madrid with another sleight of hand that allowed all sides to claim they got what they wanted.
"Hats off to Rutte's artistry," said another NATO diplomat. "Once again we saw his touch."
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
NEXT STORY

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump rebukes intelligence report raising questions on US 'obliterating' Iran nuke sites: ‘Fake news'
Trump rebukes intelligence report raising questions on US 'obliterating' Iran nuke sites: ‘Fake news'

Hindustan Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump rebukes intelligence report raising questions on US 'obliterating' Iran nuke sites: ‘Fake news'

US President Donald Trump and the White House on Tuesday sharply pushed back against a new intelligence assessment that casts doubt on the administration's claim that American airstrikes had 'totally destroyed' Iran's nuclear program. Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that Iran's nuclear facility in Fordo was completely 'obliterated' in US airstrikes. The report from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which was first disclosed by CNN, concludes that Iran's nuclear capabilities have been set back only 'a few months,' not eliminated. According to the assessment, while the June 22 strikes caused substantial damage to sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, Iran's nuclear infrastructure remains largely intact - contradicting public assertions by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed the report in a forceful statement, labeling it 'flat-out wrong.' 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' Leavitt said. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.' Neither the CIA nor the Office of the Director of National Intelligence commented on the report. The Israeli government has also refrained from releasing any independent assessment of the strikes. What does the report state The DIA's findings stand in direct contradiction to Trump's recent remarks on social media and at campaign-style rallies, in which he has declared that Iran's nuclear sites were 'totally destroyed' and vowed that Tehran 'will never rebuild.' Similarly, Netanyahu claimed in a televised address Tuesday that he and Trump had 'brought to ruin Iran's nuclear program,' framing the joint Israeli-American operation as 'historic.' But the classified DIA report reportedly found that while entrances to the deeply buried Fordo enrichment plant were collapsed by US bunker-buster bombs, the core underground infrastructure survived. It also concluded that key equipment - including centrifuges used to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels - had likely been relocated before the attack and remains operational. Two people familiar with the intelligence, who spoke on condition of anonymity to news agency AP, said Iran had likely anticipated the strike and moved portions of its 60% enriched uranium stockpile offsite, a claim backed by satellite imagery showing truck activity days prior to the airstrikes. What White House says Despite the assessment, the Trump administration and its allies are standing by their messaging. Vice President JD Vance echoed the White House line in an interview with Fox News, arguing that depriving Iran of the ability to further enrich its uranium or weaponize it constitutes 'obliteration.' 'If they have 60% enriched uranium, but they don't have the ability to enrich it to 90%, and, further, they don't have the ability to convert that to a nuclear weapon, that is mission success,' Vance said. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, went further, calling the leak of the DIA assessment 'treasonous' and demanding an investigation.

How Trump cajoled Iran and Israel into a cease-fire and forced them to comply
How Trump cajoled Iran and Israel into a cease-fire and forced them to comply

Mint

time30 minutes ago

  • Mint

How Trump cajoled Iran and Israel into a cease-fire and forced them to comply

It began with a ferocious weekend assault on Iranian nuclear sites by U.S. stealth bombers. What came next was a stunning display of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, a telegraphed missile attack on an American military base and an expletive-laced tirade by President Trump aimed at the leaders of Israel and Iran. The result by Tuesday morning: a cease-fire between Iran and Israel. It remains to be seen how long the truce will hold, and whether the U.S. and its allies will be able to use the leverage gained by the American and Israeli strikes to reach a diplomatic deal that prevents Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon in coming years. Yet, the rapid move from a surprise airstrike to a cease-fire, with major policy pivots announced via social-media posts that gave whiplash to friends and foes alike, has showcased Trump's unorthodox approach to wielding power. It isn't just allies who were bypassed. U.S. officials who would normally play a role during such a crisis were also left out of the loop, administration officials said, a sign of how narrow is the circle of advisers Trump trusts. Almost immediately after the American B-2 strikes, Trump called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and told him it was time to end the war, a senior administration official said. Trump's message: The U.S. had completed its military mission and would cease offensive operations and Israel needed to do the same, the official said. Vice President JD Vance has described the events of recent days as a new American foreign-policy doctrine focused on clearly defining national interests, aggressively negotiating to achieve them and the use of overwhelming force if necessary. The force in this case was the fleet of B-2 stealth bombers that struck underground Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow and Natanz with a total of 14 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs. It achieved what the Israeli military—despite gaining air superiority over Iran more than a week earlier—was unable to do. The underground facilities at Fordow were likely significantly damaged and at Natanz the enrichment plant was hit, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. 'The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it," Trump said in a social-media post. During the conflict, Israeli cities sustained several hits from Iranian ballistic missiles, and Iranian military targets were subjected to widespread bombing. Neither side wanted the war to go on much longer, at least at that intensity, and both were eager for a way out that they could portray as a victory. By then, Israel had hit what it considered the most important Iranian military targets and saw limited upside in a continued air campaign, according to people familiar with Israeli government thinking. Iran, meanwhile, had been exchanging separate messages with Washington via Arab intermediaries for days. On Saturday evening, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff informed several Arab countries that a U.S. strike on Iran was imminent, Arab officials said. After the attack, at Trump's direction, Witkoff exchanged direct messages with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, a senior administration official said. Witkoff told Araghchi that Iran needed to come back to the negotiating table, saying the U.S. could inflict more damage on the country, according to the official. Arab leaders also told Iran it was time to offer concessions to Washington, but Iran's foreign minister responded that Iran wouldn't negotiate under fire and wouldn't abandon its nuclear program, according to Arab officials briefed on the diplomacy. A satellite view of Iran's Fordow complex, an underground nuclear facility that the U.S. struck over the weekend. Once Fordow, Natanz and a separate site in Isfahan were struck by the U.S., Iran's top military commander vowed to retaliate, saying the U.S. had violated its sovereignty. Tehran's move, a limited missile salvo fired at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, seemed designed to avoid further escalation. Around noon Monday, moments before the missiles were launched, Iranian officials called Qatar to deliver a warning that the base would be hit, according to Middle Eastern officials familiar with the situation. Qatar relayed the Iranian message to the U.S. U.S. officials told Qatar later on Monday that Washington also anticipated the attack, and that the U.S. didn't plan to retaliate, U.S. and Middle East officials said. Iran passed messages to Qatar that the attack would target solely the base, not the civilian areas of Qatar, according to those officials. That gave the U.S. military, which already removed aircraft and many troops from Al Udeid, sufficient time to move remaining personnel from the base, and for the U.S. Embassy in Doha to warn American citizens to 'shelter in place." Qatar then closed the country's airspace to commercial flights as it awaited the Iranian barrage: a total of 19 missiles, according to Qatar. All were intercepted by air defenses, except one that fell harmlessly near the base. The interceptors collided with the missiles, leaving streaks in Doha's summer night sky. Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani, Qatar's prime minister, said at a news conference Tuesday in Doha that his country had received prior intelligence that allowed the country and the Americans to prepare, but didn't say what the intelligence was. Shortly after the barrage, Vance spoke with the Qatari prime minister around 5 p.m., and Trump spoke with Emir Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani minutes later, according to a person familiar with the calls. Trump asked the emir whether he would call Iran and ask whether the Iranian government was open to a cease-fire. He obliged, and Iran agreed. Trump—who just hours earlier publicly contemplated regime change in Iran—announced the cease-fire after the calls, posting on social media: 'CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!" A Truth Social post by President Trump announced a cease-fire between Israel and Iran. 'Donald Trump is not a pacifist, but there is an aversion to being drawn into long, drawn-out military engagements," said Michael Wahid Hanna, director of the U.S. program at nonprofit International Crisis Group. 'There is a motivation in doing the things his predecessors failed to do." Diplomats who would normally provide talking points for calls with regional leaders weren't asked for help, U.S. officials said. Instead of a flurry of orders and coordination requests, the National Security Council was effectively dormant. Despite Trump's social-media victory lap, Israel and Iran were still exchanging further blows. Four hours before the cease-fire was set to take effect at 7 a.m. local time on Tuesday, Israel launched a wave of strikes in Tehran, killing hundreds of security-force personnel, Netanyahu said on X. Among the targets was the headquarters of Iran's Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, a defense-ministry research institution, according to the Israeli military. Minutes before the cease-fire deadline, an Iranian missile struck a seven-story residential building in the city of Be'er Sheva, killing four people in one of the deadliest episodes of the war for Israeli civilians. Rescue workers the next day combed through piles of rubble at the site. Three more missiles were fired from Iran after 7 a.m., without causing casualties or damage, according to Netanyahu. Israel threatened further retaliation for the strikes. 'In light of the severe violation of the cease-fire carried out by the Iranian regime, we will respond with force," warned the Israeli military's chief of the general staff, Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir. Trump was surprised to learn Tuesday morning that the war hadn't ended. He stepped out on the South Lawn of the White House before boarding a helicopter on his way to a North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in Europe and rebuked both countries for threatening the cease-fire, especially the U.S.'s closest Middle East ally. 'Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I've never seen before," he said. He wasn't happy with the two nations 'that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f— they're doing." After boarding a helicopter for a short flight to his presidential plane, Trump tapped out an all-caps warning to Israel: 'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!" Thirty-eight minutes later, after a call with Netanyahu, Trump announced the Israeli warplanes were turning around. 'Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect!" Trump posted on social media. President Trump said in a Truth Social post on Tuesday that Israeli warplanes would turn around. Netanyahu said Israel destroyed a radar installation near Tehran and, after the call from Trump, refrained from further attacks. Israel had 'achieved all of its objectives for the war," he said. Iran's Supreme National Security Council proclaimed that it had delivered a 'crushing response to every act of hostility by the enemy" and 'shattered the enemy's primary strategic goal." With quiet returning to the Middle East, Trump's attention shifted to the NATO summit, where he will dine with royals and bask in persuading European allies to spend more on their own defense. 'It will be a much calmer period than what I just went through with Israel and Iran," he wrote online. Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at Alexander Ward at Jared Malsin at and Summer Said at

‘Game is not over': Says Iran as US, Israel hunt for near-weapons grade uranium
‘Game is not over': Says Iran as US, Israel hunt for near-weapons grade uranium

Hans India

time30 minutes ago

  • Hans India

‘Game is not over': Says Iran as US, Israel hunt for near-weapons grade uranium

Tehran: Iran still has stocks of enriched uranium - which is used to make nuclear weapons - and 'the game is not over', sources close to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Tuesday. The location of a stockpile of 400kg of the material - enough to make up to 10 nuclear weapons - is unknown after the United States' weekend bombing of three Iranian facilities. The 'missing' uranium is 60 per cent enriched. At 90, it can be used in nuclear weapons. Satellite photos and sources indicate that Iran most likely moved the uranium, and possibly some equipment to continue enrichment, to a secret location days before American B-2 'Spirit' bombers dropped 'bunker busters' on Fordrow, Natanz, and Isfahan, causing significant damage and destruction. Shortly after the attack, red flags were raised about the location of the uranium, with US Vice President JD Vance and senior officials privately admitting they do not know, at this time, where it is. After the US strike, Iran said it had taken "necessary measures" to ensure the programme continues. "We have taken necessary measures and are taking stock of the damage caused by the strikes," Mohd Eslami, chief of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said in a statement aired on state television. "Plans for restarting (the facilities) have been prepared in advance," he said, underlining Tehran's determination to continue despite US threats, "... our strategy is to ensure production is not disrupted." Israeli and US intel believes the material - packed in special crates, each small enough to fit in the boot of a car- was loaded on to trucks and taken to another underground site, possibly near Isfahan. Two Israeli officials, who asked not to be named, admitted this was likely what happened.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store