
How four-letter shock and awe can stop a war
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Dropped from a great height it can penetrate the thickest structure before detonating inside. Without warning, it can deliver shock and awe, stopping everything in its tracks.
It's neither bunker buster nor hypersonic missile. It doesn't come with a huge price tag and doesn't require a stealth bomber to get it to the target. Used sparingly, it can be the most effective weapon in an arsenal.
It is, of course, the F-bomb.
We saw how effective it can be when Donald Trump dropped it on a stunned media pack just before he left for the NATO conference in the Netherlands the other day. The whole world took notice because it was beamed live across multiple platforms. And after 12 days of intense missile exchanges, it shocked the leaders of Israel and Iran into stopping their violations of the ceasefire they'd just agreed to. One word stopped the war - for the moment anyway.
By chance I caught it on the BBC live stream as it happened. Did he just say that? I asked myself before the anchor confirmed it by apologising for the profanity. In subsequent airings, Trump's F-bomb was bleeped out.
A shame really. Sanitised, the video grab loses its punch. It dilutes the obvious, rage-inducing frustration the President was feeling, his impending victory lap at NATO threatened by the actions of Israel especially and Iran as well.
At first, I thought the bleeping out sanctimonious. We live in an era in which our screens are so peppered with F and C-bombs we hardly notice them any more. But then perhaps bleeping out Trump's lent it even more power. The word that can't be said was the word that mattered most.
I have no doubt Trump and presidents before (and after) routinely deploy these word bombs liberally behind closed doors. And I have no doubt Trump dropped a blizzard of them on Benjamin Netanyahu when he called him from Air Force One on the way to the NATO summit. It was described as an "exceptionally firm and direct" phone call.
And if we're honest, who hasn't dropped an F-bomb or three in moments of stress and frustration?
Studies show they're extremely effective in masking pain. Swearing stimulates the brain's amygdala, which releases adrenaline. The heart rate quickens, the skin's conductivity is increased and, most importantly, because we're bellowing words forbidden to us as children, we're momentarily distracted from whatever it is that's causing us grief.
Stubbed toe, packaging that refuses to open, tail-gating ute, smart alec Israeli Prime Minister ... a well-timed F-bomb will have an analgesic effect over most annoyances.
Surprisingly, used appropriately, swear words can also foster social connections.
For a brief moment on the White House lawn, Trump dropped his TV persona. Even his harshest critics - and, believe me, I'm no fan - could empathise with his frustration. The F-bomb not only stopped the fighting; it dropped Trump's performative mask for a couple of seconds. A rare moment of honesty.
HAVE YOUR SAY: Does swearing make you feel better when you've hurt yourself? Is there too much of it on TV these days? Have you ever stopped a conversation with a well-timed F-bomb? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A casual ABC radio host awarded $70,000 after being unlawfully fired for her opinion on the Israel-Gaza conflict will seek "significant penalties".
- A vast majority of Australia's drinking water supplies meet new "forever chemicals" safety limits, but an expert warns more research needs to be done to understand true safe levels.
- A surprise fall in inflation has boosted hopes of an interest rate cut after a key measure dropped to its lowest level in nearly four years.
THEY SAID IT: "Under certain circumstances, urgent circumstances, desperate circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain
YOU SAID IT: Proclaiming peace in times of conflict is a risky business but Donald Trump has his eyes set firmly on the prize - the Nobel peace prize.
"It's a bit early to be dishing out peace prizes for facilitating the end of this war," writes Ian, who thinks it's unfair to equate Neville Chamberlain with Trump. "Chamberlain may have sold Czechoslovakia down the river with the Munich Agreement, but he did have some good excuses. Britain had gone through a horrific war only 20 years earlier that cost the lives of one million of its citizens and avoiding a repeat of this weighed heavily in Chamberlain's mind."
David from Burradoo writes: "Well said, John. Trump might just as well have declared 'Peas in Our Thyme!', except that he's a raw meat kinda guy. His fragile yet boundless ego requires constant soothing by way of public recognition of his manifold contributions to mankind. This whole superbomb Iran thing is to assuage his hurt feelings at the abysmal birthday parade turnout and the massive 'No Kings!' rallies across the US. The sooner we detach ourselves from this lunatic, the better. Pope's cartoon succinctly sums it up."
As for Iran's nuclear ambitions, Morry from Melbourne writes: "It may well be holding sufficient Californium 252 to trigger fission of its maybe 600kg of U235 and or otherwise plutonium bred in its reactor from a mix of U235 and 238. The problem will be the safe building of a critical mass sphere - a little less than 18cm in diameter. The firing of sections together cannot afford the faintest error - otherwise a radiation flash (at the very least) as will be lethal to a considerable distance. Smaller spheres can be devised, but great skill is required and maybe the skilled have been killed."
David from Kangaroo Flat writes: "He does warrant a prize for something. The extraordinary distraction he has created away from his stupendous failure in the Russia-Ukraine conflict; that deserves a prize. Some sort of Nobel Spin Doctor prize. What happened to his 'I will finish the Ukraine conflict within 24 hours' boast? At this stage, it would seem that if any of the current world conflicts do end, it will be despite Trump's meddling and not because of it."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Dropped from a great height it can penetrate the thickest structure before detonating inside. Without warning, it can deliver shock and awe, stopping everything in its tracks.
It's neither bunker buster nor hypersonic missile. It doesn't come with a huge price tag and doesn't require a stealth bomber to get it to the target. Used sparingly, it can be the most effective weapon in an arsenal.
It is, of course, the F-bomb.
We saw how effective it can be when Donald Trump dropped it on a stunned media pack just before he left for the NATO conference in the Netherlands the other day. The whole world took notice because it was beamed live across multiple platforms. And after 12 days of intense missile exchanges, it shocked the leaders of Israel and Iran into stopping their violations of the ceasefire they'd just agreed to. One word stopped the war - for the moment anyway.
By chance I caught it on the BBC live stream as it happened. Did he just say that? I asked myself before the anchor confirmed it by apologising for the profanity. In subsequent airings, Trump's F-bomb was bleeped out.
A shame really. Sanitised, the video grab loses its punch. It dilutes the obvious, rage-inducing frustration the President was feeling, his impending victory lap at NATO threatened by the actions of Israel especially and Iran as well.
At first, I thought the bleeping out sanctimonious. We live in an era in which our screens are so peppered with F and C-bombs we hardly notice them any more. But then perhaps bleeping out Trump's lent it even more power. The word that can't be said was the word that mattered most.
I have no doubt Trump and presidents before (and after) routinely deploy these word bombs liberally behind closed doors. And I have no doubt Trump dropped a blizzard of them on Benjamin Netanyahu when he called him from Air Force One on the way to the NATO summit. It was described as an "exceptionally firm and direct" phone call.
And if we're honest, who hasn't dropped an F-bomb or three in moments of stress and frustration?
Studies show they're extremely effective in masking pain. Swearing stimulates the brain's amygdala, which releases adrenaline. The heart rate quickens, the skin's conductivity is increased and, most importantly, because we're bellowing words forbidden to us as children, we're momentarily distracted from whatever it is that's causing us grief.
Stubbed toe, packaging that refuses to open, tail-gating ute, smart alec Israeli Prime Minister ... a well-timed F-bomb will have an analgesic effect over most annoyances.
Surprisingly, used appropriately, swear words can also foster social connections.
For a brief moment on the White House lawn, Trump dropped his TV persona. Even his harshest critics - and, believe me, I'm no fan - could empathise with his frustration. The F-bomb not only stopped the fighting; it dropped Trump's performative mask for a couple of seconds. A rare moment of honesty.
HAVE YOUR SAY: Does swearing make you feel better when you've hurt yourself? Is there too much of it on TV these days? Have you ever stopped a conversation with a well-timed F-bomb? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A casual ABC radio host awarded $70,000 after being unlawfully fired for her opinion on the Israel-Gaza conflict will seek "significant penalties".
- A vast majority of Australia's drinking water supplies meet new "forever chemicals" safety limits, but an expert warns more research needs to be done to understand true safe levels.
- A surprise fall in inflation has boosted hopes of an interest rate cut after a key measure dropped to its lowest level in nearly four years.
THEY SAID IT: "Under certain circumstances, urgent circumstances, desperate circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain
YOU SAID IT: Proclaiming peace in times of conflict is a risky business but Donald Trump has his eyes set firmly on the prize - the Nobel peace prize.
"It's a bit early to be dishing out peace prizes for facilitating the end of this war," writes Ian, who thinks it's unfair to equate Neville Chamberlain with Trump. "Chamberlain may have sold Czechoslovakia down the river with the Munich Agreement, but he did have some good excuses. Britain had gone through a horrific war only 20 years earlier that cost the lives of one million of its citizens and avoiding a repeat of this weighed heavily in Chamberlain's mind."
David from Burradoo writes: "Well said, John. Trump might just as well have declared 'Peas in Our Thyme!', except that he's a raw meat kinda guy. His fragile yet boundless ego requires constant soothing by way of public recognition of his manifold contributions to mankind. This whole superbomb Iran thing is to assuage his hurt feelings at the abysmal birthday parade turnout and the massive 'No Kings!' rallies across the US. The sooner we detach ourselves from this lunatic, the better. Pope's cartoon succinctly sums it up."
As for Iran's nuclear ambitions, Morry from Melbourne writes: "It may well be holding sufficient Californium 252 to trigger fission of its maybe 600kg of U235 and or otherwise plutonium bred in its reactor from a mix of U235 and 238. The problem will be the safe building of a critical mass sphere - a little less than 18cm in diameter. The firing of sections together cannot afford the faintest error - otherwise a radiation flash (at the very least) as will be lethal to a considerable distance. Smaller spheres can be devised, but great skill is required and maybe the skilled have been killed."
David from Kangaroo Flat writes: "He does warrant a prize for something. The extraordinary distraction he has created away from his stupendous failure in the Russia-Ukraine conflict; that deserves a prize. Some sort of Nobel Spin Doctor prize. What happened to his 'I will finish the Ukraine conflict within 24 hours' boast? At this stage, it would seem that if any of the current world conflicts do end, it will be despite Trump's meddling and not because of it."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Dropped from a great height it can penetrate the thickest structure before detonating inside. Without warning, it can deliver shock and awe, stopping everything in its tracks.
It's neither bunker buster nor hypersonic missile. It doesn't come with a huge price tag and doesn't require a stealth bomber to get it to the target. Used sparingly, it can be the most effective weapon in an arsenal.
It is, of course, the F-bomb.
We saw how effective it can be when Donald Trump dropped it on a stunned media pack just before he left for the NATO conference in the Netherlands the other day. The whole world took notice because it was beamed live across multiple platforms. And after 12 days of intense missile exchanges, it shocked the leaders of Israel and Iran into stopping their violations of the ceasefire they'd just agreed to. One word stopped the war - for the moment anyway.
By chance I caught it on the BBC live stream as it happened. Did he just say that? I asked myself before the anchor confirmed it by apologising for the profanity. In subsequent airings, Trump's F-bomb was bleeped out.
A shame really. Sanitised, the video grab loses its punch. It dilutes the obvious, rage-inducing frustration the President was feeling, his impending victory lap at NATO threatened by the actions of Israel especially and Iran as well.
At first, I thought the bleeping out sanctimonious. We live in an era in which our screens are so peppered with F and C-bombs we hardly notice them any more. But then perhaps bleeping out Trump's lent it even more power. The word that can't be said was the word that mattered most.
I have no doubt Trump and presidents before (and after) routinely deploy these word bombs liberally behind closed doors. And I have no doubt Trump dropped a blizzard of them on Benjamin Netanyahu when he called him from Air Force One on the way to the NATO summit. It was described as an "exceptionally firm and direct" phone call.
And if we're honest, who hasn't dropped an F-bomb or three in moments of stress and frustration?
Studies show they're extremely effective in masking pain. Swearing stimulates the brain's amygdala, which releases adrenaline. The heart rate quickens, the skin's conductivity is increased and, most importantly, because we're bellowing words forbidden to us as children, we're momentarily distracted from whatever it is that's causing us grief.
Stubbed toe, packaging that refuses to open, tail-gating ute, smart alec Israeli Prime Minister ... a well-timed F-bomb will have an analgesic effect over most annoyances.
Surprisingly, used appropriately, swear words can also foster social connections.
For a brief moment on the White House lawn, Trump dropped his TV persona. Even his harshest critics - and, believe me, I'm no fan - could empathise with his frustration. The F-bomb not only stopped the fighting; it dropped Trump's performative mask for a couple of seconds. A rare moment of honesty.
HAVE YOUR SAY: Does swearing make you feel better when you've hurt yourself? Is there too much of it on TV these days? Have you ever stopped a conversation with a well-timed F-bomb? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A casual ABC radio host awarded $70,000 after being unlawfully fired for her opinion on the Israel-Gaza conflict will seek "significant penalties".
- A vast majority of Australia's drinking water supplies meet new "forever chemicals" safety limits, but an expert warns more research needs to be done to understand true safe levels.
- A surprise fall in inflation has boosted hopes of an interest rate cut after a key measure dropped to its lowest level in nearly four years.
THEY SAID IT: "Under certain circumstances, urgent circumstances, desperate circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain
YOU SAID IT: Proclaiming peace in times of conflict is a risky business but Donald Trump has his eyes set firmly on the prize - the Nobel peace prize.
"It's a bit early to be dishing out peace prizes for facilitating the end of this war," writes Ian, who thinks it's unfair to equate Neville Chamberlain with Trump. "Chamberlain may have sold Czechoslovakia down the river with the Munich Agreement, but he did have some good excuses. Britain had gone through a horrific war only 20 years earlier that cost the lives of one million of its citizens and avoiding a repeat of this weighed heavily in Chamberlain's mind."
David from Burradoo writes: "Well said, John. Trump might just as well have declared 'Peas in Our Thyme!', except that he's a raw meat kinda guy. His fragile yet boundless ego requires constant soothing by way of public recognition of his manifold contributions to mankind. This whole superbomb Iran thing is to assuage his hurt feelings at the abysmal birthday parade turnout and the massive 'No Kings!' rallies across the US. The sooner we detach ourselves from this lunatic, the better. Pope's cartoon succinctly sums it up."
As for Iran's nuclear ambitions, Morry from Melbourne writes: "It may well be holding sufficient Californium 252 to trigger fission of its maybe 600kg of U235 and or otherwise plutonium bred in its reactor from a mix of U235 and 238. The problem will be the safe building of a critical mass sphere - a little less than 18cm in diameter. The firing of sections together cannot afford the faintest error - otherwise a radiation flash (at the very least) as will be lethal to a considerable distance. Smaller spheres can be devised, but great skill is required and maybe the skilled have been killed."
David from Kangaroo Flat writes: "He does warrant a prize for something. The extraordinary distraction he has created away from his stupendous failure in the Russia-Ukraine conflict; that deserves a prize. Some sort of Nobel Spin Doctor prize. What happened to his 'I will finish the Ukraine conflict within 24 hours' boast? At this stage, it would seem that if any of the current world conflicts do end, it will be despite Trump's meddling and not because of it."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Dropped from a great height it can penetrate the thickest structure before detonating inside. Without warning, it can deliver shock and awe, stopping everything in its tracks.
It's neither bunker buster nor hypersonic missile. It doesn't come with a huge price tag and doesn't require a stealth bomber to get it to the target. Used sparingly, it can be the most effective weapon in an arsenal.
It is, of course, the F-bomb.
We saw how effective it can be when Donald Trump dropped it on a stunned media pack just before he left for the NATO conference in the Netherlands the other day. The whole world took notice because it was beamed live across multiple platforms. And after 12 days of intense missile exchanges, it shocked the leaders of Israel and Iran into stopping their violations of the ceasefire they'd just agreed to. One word stopped the war - for the moment anyway.
By chance I caught it on the BBC live stream as it happened. Did he just say that? I asked myself before the anchor confirmed it by apologising for the profanity. In subsequent airings, Trump's F-bomb was bleeped out.
A shame really. Sanitised, the video grab loses its punch. It dilutes the obvious, rage-inducing frustration the President was feeling, his impending victory lap at NATO threatened by the actions of Israel especially and Iran as well.
At first, I thought the bleeping out sanctimonious. We live in an era in which our screens are so peppered with F and C-bombs we hardly notice them any more. But then perhaps bleeping out Trump's lent it even more power. The word that can't be said was the word that mattered most.
I have no doubt Trump and presidents before (and after) routinely deploy these word bombs liberally behind closed doors. And I have no doubt Trump dropped a blizzard of them on Benjamin Netanyahu when he called him from Air Force One on the way to the NATO summit. It was described as an "exceptionally firm and direct" phone call.
And if we're honest, who hasn't dropped an F-bomb or three in moments of stress and frustration?
Studies show they're extremely effective in masking pain. Swearing stimulates the brain's amygdala, which releases adrenaline. The heart rate quickens, the skin's conductivity is increased and, most importantly, because we're bellowing words forbidden to us as children, we're momentarily distracted from whatever it is that's causing us grief.
Stubbed toe, packaging that refuses to open, tail-gating ute, smart alec Israeli Prime Minister ... a well-timed F-bomb will have an analgesic effect over most annoyances.
Surprisingly, used appropriately, swear words can also foster social connections.
For a brief moment on the White House lawn, Trump dropped his TV persona. Even his harshest critics - and, believe me, I'm no fan - could empathise with his frustration. The F-bomb not only stopped the fighting; it dropped Trump's performative mask for a couple of seconds. A rare moment of honesty.
HAVE YOUR SAY: Does swearing make you feel better when you've hurt yourself? Is there too much of it on TV these days? Have you ever stopped a conversation with a well-timed F-bomb? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- A casual ABC radio host awarded $70,000 after being unlawfully fired for her opinion on the Israel-Gaza conflict will seek "significant penalties".
- A vast majority of Australia's drinking water supplies meet new "forever chemicals" safety limits, but an expert warns more research needs to be done to understand true safe levels.
- A surprise fall in inflation has boosted hopes of an interest rate cut after a key measure dropped to its lowest level in nearly four years.
THEY SAID IT: "Under certain circumstances, urgent circumstances, desperate circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain
YOU SAID IT: Proclaiming peace in times of conflict is a risky business but Donald Trump has his eyes set firmly on the prize - the Nobel peace prize.
"It's a bit early to be dishing out peace prizes for facilitating the end of this war," writes Ian, who thinks it's unfair to equate Neville Chamberlain with Trump. "Chamberlain may have sold Czechoslovakia down the river with the Munich Agreement, but he did have some good excuses. Britain had gone through a horrific war only 20 years earlier that cost the lives of one million of its citizens and avoiding a repeat of this weighed heavily in Chamberlain's mind."
David from Burradoo writes: "Well said, John. Trump might just as well have declared 'Peas in Our Thyme!', except that he's a raw meat kinda guy. His fragile yet boundless ego requires constant soothing by way of public recognition of his manifold contributions to mankind. This whole superbomb Iran thing is to assuage his hurt feelings at the abysmal birthday parade turnout and the massive 'No Kings!' rallies across the US. The sooner we detach ourselves from this lunatic, the better. Pope's cartoon succinctly sums it up."
As for Iran's nuclear ambitions, Morry from Melbourne writes: "It may well be holding sufficient Californium 252 to trigger fission of its maybe 600kg of U235 and or otherwise plutonium bred in its reactor from a mix of U235 and 238. The problem will be the safe building of a critical mass sphere - a little less than 18cm in diameter. The firing of sections together cannot afford the faintest error - otherwise a radiation flash (at the very least) as will be lethal to a considerable distance. Smaller spheres can be devised, but great skill is required and maybe the skilled have been killed."
David from Kangaroo Flat writes: "He does warrant a prize for something. The extraordinary distraction he has created away from his stupendous failure in the Russia-Ukraine conflict; that deserves a prize. Some sort of Nobel Spin Doctor prize. What happened to his 'I will finish the Ukraine conflict within 24 hours' boast? At this stage, it would seem that if any of the current world conflicts do end, it will be despite Trump's meddling and not because of it."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
31 minutes ago
- The Age
Suburban Rail Loop will help only the few
Credit when it's due I am not a fan of President Trump, I have been known to make the comment 'America, land of opportunity where even a fool can be elected president'. He has obviously been misguided on the question of tariffs, but I believe he should be congratulated on recognising that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. The world is indebted to Trump and Israel for the action they have taken. The world is further indebted to Trump for now enabling the peace process to begin. No doubt, Trump exceeded his authority in not going to Congress to obtain approval for the B2 bombing raid on Iran's nuclear facilities, but I believe the venture would certainly have failed had he done so. I can't think of a previous president who would have been prepared to take this necessary action. We are now seeing politics in action by his opponents in belittling what he has achieved. Give him credit when it is due. On this occasion, he has been given expert advice and has followed through on it. Alan Davidson, Altona Feeling less safe Early last week, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed to have bombed Iran in order to make us 'all feel safer'. However, his actions made me, and no doubt many others, feel less safe. Now with Netanyahu having drawn Donald Trump into the 'military action', I feel significantly less safe than last week. Is it because Netanyahu's and Trump's actions were based upon 'intelligence' that is contrary to that of both the International Atomic Energy Agency's and the US State Department? Intelligence that came from the same Israeli people and agency that ignored the warnings of Israeli borders watchers of heightened activity leading up to incursion of Hamas on the October 7, 2023, resulting in the deaths of over 1200 Israelis and now perhaps 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza? Why was that intelligence ignored? Perhaps then US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger's words from the 1970s still ring true: 'There are only 90,000 people out there. Who gives a damn?' ('Deep Water', Good Weekend, 21/6). In the greater scheme of things, ordinary people don't matter to the powerful. We have long known that the first causality of war is truth, and Trump has his own concept of 'truth'. Combine this with having complete disregard for rights, agreements, rules or law, and a preparedness to exert what is basically coercive control on all in his orbit makes for a dangerous combination. At a time when we need greater global cooperation, not competition, I'd feel much safer if Trump insisted countries spent 5per cent of their budgets on addressing global warming and humanitarian aid rather than weapons of war. Trump could then show himself to be a real leader. Rod Eldridge, Derrinallum Israel didn't start conflict Emma Shortis' claim (' Australia needs to find its courage ', 25/6) that Israel 'waged war on Iran' and breached international law is simply incorrect. Israel did not start a war with Iran—rather, Iran has long waged war on Israel through its proxies, including Hamas, whose October 7 attacks were funded, armed, and likely coordinated by Iran. Twice last year, Iran directly attacked Israel with missiles and drones. Israel responded in self-defence to prevent further escalation. Iran openly calls for Israel's destruction, funds groups dedicated to that goal, and even has a countdown clock in Tehran marking Israel's supposed demise. Is that not an act of war? In this context, Israel's actions were lawful self-defence. Likewise, the US acted to protect an ally and deter a regime that repeatedly calls for 'Death to America.' How is any of that illegal—or undesirable? Stephen Lazar, Elwood ABC charter needs attention As Karl Quinn writes, the ramifications of the Antoinette Lattouf case are 'potentially profound' (' Lattouf case has cost much more than just the money ', 26/6). The outcome of the case does little to resolve whether ABC broadcasters are free to express their political views. In deciding that the ABC breached the Fair Work Act by dismissing Lattouf for holding or expressing a particular political opinion, the Federal Court casts doubt over whether the ABC can continue to claim that its broadcasters are impartial, fair and balanced. It might be time to change the ABC Charter, abandon the pretence of impartiality, and allow ABC broadcasters to express their views openly. That would be a refreshing change from the current situation in which most ABC broadcasters play at impartiality while clearly holding progressive, left-leaning worldviews. Rod Wise, Surrey Hills Keep opinion to yourselves I'm amazed and disappointed that the Federal Court has said that journalist Antoinette Lattouf could post information on her social media site that showed a view on the Israel Gaza war. According to the journalists' union the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), journalists 'Do not allow personal interest, or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit, to undermine your accuracy, fairness or independence'. The MEAA also informs that journalists 'Disclose conflicts of interest that affect, or could be seen to affect, the accuracy, fairness or independence of your journalism'. Journalists' views, such as on politics, should be private, and they should not interfere in any way in their reporting. Marguerite Marshall, Eltham $8 million in super. Really? I could hardly suppress my crocodile tears after reading the first question and answer in the latest 'Ask an expert' financial advice column (2 5/6). The questioners – a retired couple with a combined balance of $8 million in their SMSF – clearly consider the proposed new super tax to be a burden they want to avoid. Noel's answer, assuming the SMSF's earnings in 2025/26 to be $400,000, shows that the extra tax payable would amount to just over $7000. Given that the couple expect to draw from their fund a combined pension of $333,000 in the coming financial year, I suggest they won't struggle to pay this additional amount. And assuming a typical proportion of the funds are invested in shares, it's likely the extra tax would be more than offset by the tax refund associated with franking credits. Kevin Bailey, Croydon Tax helps The headline ' We have $8 million in SMSF. How do we avoid paying the new super tax? ' makes my blood boil. It encapsulates the way superannuation has been hijacked by selfish and greedy members of our society who have no concept of the greater good. If you have that much money in super, you should be appreciative of your good fortune and be happy that your tax is helping to fund services that benefit all. Ann Maginness, Beaumaris Eroding trust The exponential increase in misinformation and disinformation is not a new phenomenon, but, as mentioned in the article by Liam Mannix ″ Brett Sutton made it through a pandemic. Now he's fighting a new war ″, 25/6, has become more concerning with increasingly sophisticated AI technology. The problem has been enabled primarily through the ubiquitous electronic media, and in particular social media which propagates beliefs and opinions often expressed by those with hidden agendas or inexperienced and unqualified ″influencers″, that are often mistakenly confused with truth and verifiable facts. Consequently, trust in trained and experienced experts, including medical specialists, has been significantly eroded to the detriment of community health. Anything that can be done to reverse or mitigate this trend should be supported. I wish Brett Sutton every success in his endeavour to do this. Furthermore, education should from primary school on, emphasise the importance of deep, critical thinking and analysis, thereby empowering populations to differentiate between fact and fiction. Leslie Chester, Brighton 'Red notice' red flag I write as a concerned and angry consumer. I needed a plumber to address a toilet malfunction in my home. I selected a plumbing service from the internet that had thousands of five-star reviews. First hard learned mistake. I am an older woman at home by myself at the time of my call to them. I was quoted more than $30,000 to address the problem. I was absolutely floored by this, and told the attending plumber I would need to speak to my husband before any decision could be made. I was then transferred via phone to his supervisor and was told, effectively, that if I did not accept their quote without delay I would find myself with sewerage leaking everywhere and would be issued with a 'red notice' from the council that would order me to vacate my home. This man was so persistent that I felt bullied and threatened. I refused to succumb to his attempted coercion. I was advised by another plumber that no such work was necessary and the problem could be easily fixed and for far less an amount. I know my problem is not unique. I was stunned to learn that there is very little avenue for me to address this behaviour with an appropriate governing tradesmen's body that would result in this particular plumbing service being sanctioned. Surely, it is wrong that such scams can occur so blatantly without consequence, and that the reputation of honest tradesmen is unfairly sullied by association. Christine Harris, Mordialloc AND ANOTHER THING Trump world Trump's desire for a Nobel Peace Prize by blitz bombing Iran is a classic case of the ends justify the means – which they don't. Greg Curtin, Nunawading How long until Trump launches his own awards system? Joan Segrave, Healesville Let's hope this time Donald Trump has said something true when he says Iran's nuclear capability has been destroyed. Tony O'Brien, South Melbourne NATO secretary general Mark Rutte has given the concept of ″brownie points″ a complete new meaning. Ruth Davis, Carrum Don't upset Donald! It is plaintive to watch the NATO leaders in The Hague to kowtowing to Donald Trump to keep the alliance together. For Trump the solipsist it was all that mattered - he was the centre of attention. Helena Kilingerova, Vermont Can the world's focus please be put back on the situation in Gaza? Israel is committing murder and mayhem. Rhonda Cox, Diamond Creek Re Megan Herbert's cartoon, 26/6: It was Hamas. It did house strategic targets. There never was a negotiating table. Sam Bando, Malvern Bezos' wedding Foam party? (' Protesting locals force Bezos to move Venice wedding spectacular ', 26/6). A foam party for 50 to 60-year-olds? And here's me thinking the US president was childish Pam Cupper, Dimboola Furthermore Twice this week the majority of the sport section has been devoted to the trials and tribulations of just one AFL football club. Enough! Apart from Carlton supporters – who cares! There are 17 other AFL clubs. Brian Kidd, Mt Waverley


Perth Now
31 minutes ago
- Perth Now
New Gaza talks push as Israeli attacks kill at least 21
Israeli gunfire and air strikes have killed at least 21 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, local health authorities say, as mediators reach out to Israel and Hamas to seek a resumption of ceasefire talks to end the war. Local health authorities said an Israeli air strike killed at least nine people at a school housing displaced families in the Sheikh Radwan suburb in Gaza City, while another strike killed nine people near a tent encampment in Khan Younis in the south of the enclave. Three other people were killed by Israeli gunfire and dozens were wounded as crowds awaited UN aid trucks along a main route in central Gaza, medics said, the latest in a series of fatalities at aid distribution points. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military on Thursday's incidents. Israel says it is seeking to eliminate militants from Hamas, which attacked southern Israel from Gaza in 2023, and free hostages still held by the group. The new deaths come as Arab mediators, Egypt and Qatar, backed by the United States, reached out to the warring parties in a bid to hold new ceasefire talks, but no exact time was set for a new round, according to Hamas sources. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who leads a coalition with far-right parties, insists that Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, release all hostages, relinquish any role and lay down its weapons to end to the war. Hamas, in turn, has stated it would release the hostages if Israel agrees to a permanent ceasefire and withdraws from Gaza. While it has conceded it would no longer govern Gaza, Hamas has refused to discuss disarmament. Hamas-led militants killed close to 1200 people and took 251 hostages when they attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, according to tallies from Israel, which launched a huge military campaign in response. Israel's retaliatory war has so far killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, according to local health authorities, and destroyed much of the coastal strip. Most of the hostages released so far have been freed through indirect negotiations between Hamas and Israel.

Sky News AU
41 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘What a waste': Peta Credlin slams Albanese's NATO decision
Sky News host Peta Credlin slams the Albanese government's decision to send Richard Marles and his entourage to the NATO summit. 'What a waste of $100,000 or so it would have cost taxpayers to send Richard Marles and his entourage to the NATO summit this week,' Ms Credlin said. 'And for Marles then to miss out not just on a meeting with the US President, but also his own counterpart, the US Defence Secretary. 'And just in case Marles misread the snub, his place in the NATO family photograph made it all crystal clear. 'Not just to us in Australia but every other government in the world who knows how to read these sort of diplomatic displays.'