Sturgeon: I do not agree with Forbes being banned by Fringe venue
It comes amid a row over the Summerhall venue's decision not to have Ms Forbes back at any future events following a fringe show organised by The Herald newspaper.
The venue has reportedly suggested that John Swinney's deputy posed a safety and wellbeing risk to its staff over her views on trans rights.
Ms Forbes is a devout Christian and a member of the socially conservative Free Church of Scotland.
She was criticised during her SNP leadership battle for her stance on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights.
Ms Sturgeon, who appointed Ms Forbes as finance secretary while she was first minister, was asked whether she agreed with Summerhall's decision.
'I don't agree with cancel culture and I don't agree with that,' she said.
She added that she took no responsibility for the venue's decision.
Summerhall, which has received more £600,000 in government funding, previously held Herald Unspun live events with Mr Swinney and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, the latter of whom has U-turned over his stance on gender self-ID.
Ms Forbes expressed disappointment at the venue and said she 'fervently' believes in freedom of speech.
'Any effort to cancel people, especially politicians, undermines democracy,' she said.
'Many people attended the Herald event and it is important that we could freely discuss and debate matters in a respectful manner.
'I respect and acknowledge the fact that, in a liberal democracy, there are people who will agree with me and others who will disagree with me.
'That is all the more reason to create events where the audience and journalists can question politicians openly, as the Herald did.'
In a statement, the Summerhall venue said: 'This event was booked as a series of long-form interviews prior to the guest list being confirmed.
'Summerhall Arts primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again.'
Shona Robison, who succeeded Ms Forbes as Finance Secretary, also defended her colleague, calling Summerhall's decision 'unwise and unnecessary'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
34 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
JK Rowling was wrong to label Sturgeon a 'destroyer of women's rights'
Depressingly, it echoed the trans activists' habit of framing this debate as a zero-sum game, where one side's victory entails the other's destruction, when a more constructive tone was plainly required. Sturgeon was already being personally targeted over self-ID by other politicians, but Rowling's actions ratcheted up the pressure to another level. Whether it marked the moment 'rational debate' became 'impossible', as Sturgeon claims, is more contestable, but it almost certainly made the debate more toxic. Then again, I thought exactly the same about Nicola Sturgeon's own comments, when she linked concerns around self-ID to transphobia in an apparent attempt to discredit critics. Read more In one interview I saw at the height of the controversy, she was asked about women's worries around gender reforms. She claimed that of course the Scottish Government took women's concerns seriously, but then insisted fiercely and pointedly that there was a great deal of transphobia in the debate. Stressing transphobia when asked about women's concerns became the standard Scottish government response, not just from Sturgeon but from other ministers like Patrick Harvie. It seemed like an unambiguous attempt to smear their opponents. As someone who had often agreed with Sturgeon, I was taken aback. There are transphobes in the debate, as we can see more clearly now than ever – and misogynists on the other side too – but the repeated emphasis ministers put on this point did an injustice to the majority whose views were motivated by concern for women's rights. Like Rowling's T-shirt, it just further poisoned the climate. Did Nicola Sturgeon really take women's concerns seriously? She had by then already made clear her lack of sympathy with those objections, saying they were 'not valid' and insisting rather patronisingly that campaigners should focus on the 'real threat' to women – 'abusive and predatory men' – instead of trans people. She studiously ignored what deep down she must have known: that it was precisely those 'abusive and predatory men' that women's campaigners were most concerned about. The Scottish Government was backing a gender ideology that was much contested but relentlessly enforced by an activist community online and in person. Women had been hounded out of their jobs simply for dissenting from the orthodoxy. Those who disagreed that a trans woman and a woman were one and the same, or questioned someone's gender identity, were and still are framed as bigots and liable to find themselves and their employers the target of public campaigns of humiliation. In that climate, it would take a brave person to challenge someone's claim to be female in a women's only space. How, with a government that appeared to back gender ideology wholesale, could women's only spaces possibly be policed to keep out bad actors? Sturgeon seemed oblivious to these concerns. SNP MSPs even voted against an amendment by one of their own colleagues which would have halted the granting of a gender recognition certificate to rapists. Liberalism is not about placing the rights of one discriminated against group above that of another; it's about balancing interests fairly. This felt like the politics of the far left. Ultimately it was the controversy around Isla Bryson – who as Adam Graham had been charged with two counts of rape before declaring himself female and being remanded in a women's prison – that decisively destroyed trust in the Scottish Government's reassurances that gender self-ID was wholly benign. So yes, Nicola Sturgeon, like JK Rowling, has poured petrol on the flames. But, credit where it's due, she has also now held up her hands to being part of the problem. She told ITV: 'We'd lost all sense of rationality in this debate. I'm partly responsible for that.' She has also said that she wishes she'd paused the gender recognition act legislation to find consensus. Nicola Sturgeon has reignited the row (Image: PA) In their different ways, Nicola Sturgeon and JK Rowling have both tried to stand up for a vulnerable group, but we have watched them become increasingly radical, probably as a consequence of having to defend themselves constantly against those who monster them. They exist, as we all do, in a truly horrible climate of so-called debate. Rowling was accused without evidence of transphobia from the first moment she dared raise her head above the parapet, and has been on the receiving end of death and rape threats since. These days she seems less measured. She's described the nurse Sandie Peggie, no poster girl for tolerance, as a 'heroine'. She has continued to attack Sturgeon. Sturgeon for her part became more intransigent as opposition to her position on trans rights increased, closing her ears to pleas to moderate her approach. It did not help either women or trans people. Many trans people now feel they are in a worse position than before Sturgeon's attempt at gender recognition reform. Both women have gone too far. Both women bear some responsibility for the bitterness of the debate. But both women could also be part of a reset, if they chose to be. Arguably, Sturgeon is showing a willingness to try. It would take a dramatic change of tone and approach, but God knows, it's needed. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
JK Rowling savages Sturgeon's book for ‘shameless denial of reality'
JK Rowling has reviewed Nicola Sturgeon 's memoir, Frankly, and said it 'reads like a PR statement that's been through sixteen drafts.' The Harry Potter author said the former first minister remained 'stubbornly wedded' to the idea that transgender women should be allowed into women-only spaces. Rowling said Sturgeon looked 'like a complete f***wit' when she was asked whether transgender rapist Isla Bryson was a man or a woman during a television interview. The author was a staunch critic of SNP plans, which were later ditched, to make it easier for transgender women to change their legal gender. Earlier this week the author mocked Sturgeon for using the memoir to warn about making public spaces safer for women. She tweeted a picture of the relevant pages of the newly-released book, across which she had scrawled in capital letters: 'Are you f-----g kidding me?' Rowling said she used to feel some 'non-partisan admiration' for Ms Sturgeon and empathised with her descriptions of being subjected to sexism. But in the review, she says Sturgeon 'denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification.' Rowling added: 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts.' Rowling began the review by comparing Ms Sturgeon to Bella Swan, the heroine of the teen fantasy Twilight novels, saying they both start out as 'a shy, awkward, bookish girl' and end up as a 'monomaniac'. She wrote: 'Both are consumed by a single, overriding ambition. In Nicola's case, it's independence for Scotland. 'In Bella's, it's having loads of hot sex with Edward Cullen without getting accidentally killed. Spoiler alert: only one of these ambitions is realised,' Rowling wrote. The Harry Potter author also mocked Ms Sturgeon's claim the 2014 independence referendum was not 'unpleasant and divisive', saying: 'No s***, Nicola. 'You, surrounded only by adoring nationalists, flying between public meetings in a helicopter bearing a large image of your own face, enjoying police protection and all the excitement of potentially bringing about your life's ambition, enjoyed the referendum? I'm amazed.' She added: 'Oddly, this message didn't resonate too well with No voters who were being threatened with violence, told to f*** off out of Scotland, quizzed on the amount of Scottish blood that ran in their veins, accused of treachery and treason and informed that they were on the wrong side of, as one 'cybernat' memorably put it, 'a straightforward battle between good and evil.'
Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
JK Rowling claims Sturgeon created a 'dystopian nightmare' in foul-mouthed review of Frankly
JK Rowling has published a review of Nicola Sturgeon's Frankly - and the Harry Potter author has not held back Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... JK Rowling has called Nicola Sturgeon a 'f**kwit' as she accused the former First Minister of creating a 'dystopian nightmare' for women. The Harry Potter author published a review of Sturgeon's memoir, Frankly, on her own website, saying the politician's push for gender recognition reform had led to 'real, lasting harm' for women. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In blunt language, she said the former SNP leader had looked like a 'complete f**kwit' when asked directly whether the transgender double rapist Isla Bryson is a man or a woman. Bryson, who had been born Adam Graham, was held and assessed in a women's prison before being moved to the male prison estate. 'Bryson, a convicted double rapist, had decided he was a woman and would rather be incarcerated with the sex against which he'd already committed the most male of crimes,' Ms Rowling writes in her review. 'When asked on television whether bald, blonde wig-wearing Bryson was a man or a woman, the first minister, whose composure and articulacy under fire had, for years, been her most potent political asset, made herself look – and forgive me for employing a PR term here – a complete f**kwit.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The author then suggests Ms Sturgeon tries in her memoir to shift the blame for the Isla Bryson furore to other people. 'Of course, the blame for her looking like a complete f**kwit lies with others,' she adds. 'Nobody had warned [Sturgeon] about Bryson, you see. 'She apparently had no idea that the very thing feminists had warned her was likely to happen, and had already happened – trans-identified man Katie Dolotowski had already sexually assaulted a ten-year-old girl in a public bathroom, and served his time in a women's prison in Scotland – would happen again. 'She explains in Frankly that she was worried about the impact it would have on trans people if she denied Bryson was a woman.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite copies of Frankly going on sale in Waterstones earlier in the week, Ms Sturgeon officially launched her book at the Edinburgh International Book Festival with an interview by the veteran broadcaster Kirsty Wark. During the interview, Ms Sturgeon said the gender critical feminist movement, which argued against gender recognition reform, had been 'hijacked' by the 'soft underbelly of prejudice'. Ms Rowling considers the question of whether Frankly is a 'good read' and says Ms Sturgeon lacks humour and adds that the book 'reads like a PR statement that's been through sixteen drafts.'
