Avoid 'Overusing' These 4 Common Supplements
Sometimes, people get so excited about the health benefits of supplements that they tend to overlook the potential dangers that can creep up when they take too many of them.
However, it can also be challenging to find enough information on how much or how little of a vitamin or mineral you should be taking. Luckily, there are some health experts out there spreading the word on which supplements are safe to take and which ones have a bit of a risk. Dr. Tania Elliot, a board-certified internal medicine doctor, and TikTok content creator, recently made a video about four common supplements that you should be wary about taking too much of.
'Using these supplements can be dangerous,' says Dr. Elliot at the start of her video. Read more about them below.
Commonly known as the 'sunshine vitamin,' vitamin D is a super popular supplement, as many people have been suggested to take more of it to support their brain health and improve the development of their bones and muscles. However, if you haven't been told to use it by a trusted doctor, you may want to keep track of just how much you take.
"Too much vitamin D can harm your kidneys, cause mood changes, and muscle pain," says Dr. Elliot.
Similar to vitamin D, calcium is notorious for improving bone health, and it's often taken by older people to prevent or aid osteoporosis. Calcium occurs naturally in many nutritious foods. Therefore, you may not need to take as much of it through a supplement as you may think.
Dr. Elliot says that when you take in more than "100 milligrams" of calcium a day, you could "harden your arteries" from a build-up of the mineral and increase your "risk of heart disease."
Vitamin E became a lot more buzzworthy on the internet after people began boasting about all of the ways it can benefit your skin and hair. It's an antioxidant that can protect cells from free radicals and is often taken in supplement form or found in skin products. However, too much of it in your system can cause some issues.
"Vitamin E can increase your risk of bleeding and hemorrhage," notes Dr. Elliot.
If you take anti-coagulant medication or have a family history of blood clots, you'll want to ensure you aren't taking high doses of vitamin E to prevent your risk of excess bleeding.
If you haven't heard of vitamin B6, you should know that it's often found in B-Complex supplements and is sometimes taken solo for brain health, boosted immunity, and to lessen symptoms brought on by premenstrual syndrome (PMS). However, like the other vitamins and supplements listed above, if you want to dabble in B6, just be careful not to take more than the daily recommended amount.
"[B6] can lead to neuropathy, which is tingling in your hands and feet, increased sensitivity to the sun, and heartburn," says Dr. Elliot.
Before you start thinking you can or should never touch these supplements, Dr. Elliot has a little disclaimer.
"Now there's a difference between taking the right amount to treat a deficiency versus an appropriate nutritional value," she explains.
"If you don't have a deficiency, you don't need to take high dosages, and it could harm your health."
Therefore, it's always a good idea to speak to your doctor about what supplements you should be taking, if any, before buying a bottle and starting to take them routinely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Plastic shopping bag policies are actually working, a new study suggests
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety. That extra fee at the grocery store for a plastic shopping bag isn't just an inconvenience –– it is actually making a difference for marine ecosystems, according to a new study. Policies that ban or impose fees on plastic bags are associated with a 25% to 47% decrease in plastic bag litter in shoreline cleanups, according to a study published Thursday in the journal Science. Plastic litter is a big risk to the health of marine ecosystems, and the problem is growing, said lead study author Dr. Anna Papp, an environmental economist and incoming postdoctoral researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The United States has no federal-level policy on plastic bags, so researchers analyzed 180 local programs, including full bans, fees on shopping bags and partial bans –– which sometimes have special regulations such as requiring thicker plastics to make shopping bags reusable. Researchers then analyzed data from more than 45,000 US shoreline cleanups to compare the litter before and after the policy was passed as well as the differences between areas with and without a policy, Papp said. 'The main finding is that these policies led to a decrease in plastic bags as a share of total items collected,' she said. Other studies have shown that plastic bag policies affect how many bags consumers use, said Dr. Erin Murphy, manager of Ocean Plastics Research for the Ocean Conservancy. But this most recent research 'really takes it to the next level, showing it's not only reducing the amount of bags we're using, but it's actually achieving our broader objectives of environmental cleanliness,' she said. Plastic bag pollution is harmful to both animals and humans. On beaches or other outdoor spaces, plastic pollution can have a negative impact on tourism or the value of spending time in nature, Papp said. Plastic bag litter is particularly dangerous to marine animals for two reasons, Murphy said. First, they enter the environment more easily than other types of plastic. 'They're hard to recycle, they're single-use, and they're lightweight, and so they blow very easily in the wind. Even if we're trying to properly manage them, it's easy for them to escape waste management systems and get into the environment,' she said. Second, once they enter the environment, plastic bags can lead to population-level effects on marine species, Murphy said. Many species, including marine mammals and sea turtles, will eat the plastic bags, obstructing the gastrointestinal tract and preventing them from eating until they die, she said. Plastic bags can also entangle wildlife, keeping hatchling sea turtles from reaching the ocean and shading coral reefs, all of which can lead to disease and death for marine species. 'In 2024 alone, our International Coastal Cleanup volunteers cleaned up over 500,000 grocery bags from the environment and 500,000 other plastic bags, totaling more than a million different plastic bag types from the environment,' Murphy said. 'They're always in our top 10 items found in the environment, and that alone is an issue.' While bans and fees on plastic bags are helping, they are not eradicating the problem, Papp said. 'Plastic pollution is a growing global problem,' she said. 'The overall percentage of plastic bags is still increasing … This increase is just slower in places with policies.' The evidence suggests some policies are more effective than others: Full bans made a bigger impact than partial bans, and fees seemed better than bans, said study coauthor Dr. Kimberly Oremus, an associate professor at the University of Delaware School of Marine Science and Policy. 'One hypothesis is that in at least some cases, the revenue from fees is being used to further reduce litter. In Washington, DC, for example, they use the revenue from plastic bag fees to clean up river shorelines,' Oremus said. However, the hypothesis has not been investigated, and there is not yet enough data to say for sure that fees are more effective than bans, she said. More must likely be done outside of these policies as well, Papp said. The United States needs regulations not just on the consumption of plastic bags but also on the production and supply of them, she added. There are also steps you can take so your plastic shopping bag doesn't end up in the environment, Papp said. For one, if you do use a plastic bag, don't let it fly away and create litter. Then, properly dispose of it — for example, you can take it to a plastic bag recycling station, she said. And you can always go back to the three R's, said Dr. Rebecca Taylor, an assistant professor of agricultural and consumer economics at the University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign. Reduce the number of plastic bags you use, reuse them when you can and recycle them when you must.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans propose deeper Medicaid cuts. Here's what that means.
Senate Republicans are preparing to slice deeper into Medicaid to finance President Donald Trump's agenda, proposing legislation that analysts say could deal a greater financial blow to hospitals and result in millions more uninsured Americans. The measure reflects Republicans' willingness to cut the nation's safety-net health insurance program, despite qualms expressed by some moderates and populists within their ranks. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Last month, House Republicans passed massive tax-and-spending legislation projected to result in 7.8 million fewer Medicaid enrollees. The Senate Finance Committee's revisions to the bill released Monday could prompt even steeper coverage losses, sharply reining in a Medicaid financing maneuver that hospital groups say would slash payments to their facilities. 'The Senate just made a bad bill worse,' Chip Kahn, CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, said in a statement. 'Rural communities would take the hardest hit, with struggling hospitals compelled to face difficult decisions about what services to cut.' Rural areas disproportionately rely on Medicaid, and their hospitals are often the first backstop for patients without health coverage. Hospital networks said they might reduce pediatric, maternity or behavioral health services; end telehealth programs; close rural facilities; or enact layoffs if the Medicaid cuts become law, in a recent member survey by the American Medical Group Association before the Senate bill was released. These changes would partly be the result of caps on provider taxes, an unusual example of a tax many hospitals are happy to pay. States charge extra taxes to medical providers - mainly hospitals, nursing homes and facilities for people with intellectual disabilities - and in return give the providers higher Medicaid payments. That brings in more federal matching funds, which are pegged to state payments. The taxes, which some conservatives have dubbed a form of 'money laundering,' emerged in recent weeks as a top sticking point among Senate Republicans. The Senate legislation would throw a huge wet blanket over this practice. It says states must gradually reduce provider taxes on hospitals until they are no higher than 3.5 percent of a provider's net patient revenue. Right now, that threshold is roughly 6 percent - and the House bill caps it at that rate. At the same time, the Senate bill breaks with the House plan by exempting from the cap the two other main providers subject to the tax: nursing homes and facilities for people with disabilities. The proposed cap would affect 18 states, including New York, Virginia and Arizona. Six red states with high provider taxes would be exempt because they did not expand Medicaid to cover childless adults with low incomes: Texas, Kansas, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina. But three states with Republican senators - Missouri, Iowa and Indiana - would be affected. The cost of this move to hospitals isn't immediately clear. But they stand to lose $321 billion over the next 10 years under the House version and would face another $63 billion in costs from serving a larger uninsured population, according to an analysis by the Urban Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Hospitals collected $262 billion from Medicaid in 2022. Associations representing hospitals slammed the Senate legislation and called on senators to push back on the cuts. Ellen Kugler, executive director of the Alliance of Safety-Net Hospitals, said the Senate bill would 'bottom out resources that safety-net hospitals need to keep the doors open to serve their communities.' The Senate is aiming to pass its bill by July 4, a deadline set by Trump. It would then need to be reconciled with the House version and approved in both chambers before becoming law. But the path forward is far from clear, as Senate Republicans can lose only three GOP votes and still pass their bill. Americans have mixed feelings about the budget bill, with a plurality of 42 percent opposing 'changing tax, spending and Medicaid policies,' according to a recent Washington Post-Ipsos poll. Nearly two-thirds said the projected Medicaid enrollment drop from the House bill is unacceptable. It's not just the provider tax caps that have hospitals up in arms. The Senate bill also would pare back two other funding streams for hospitals caring for larger Medicaid populations and providing better-quality care. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) said Tuesday that he is concerned the Senate proposal would hurt poor Missourians and lead rural hospitals to close, and he said it needs a lot of work before he could vote for it. 'I don't think they understand politically who our voters are,' Hawley told reporters, referring to Senate Republicans backing the funding cuts. 'But also, setting aside the politics of it, it's just not the right thing to do to shut down a bunch of rural hospitals to pay for tax cuts.' But other Republicans sounded open to the Medicaid cuts after a Tuesday lunch meeting with Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Oz told Republicans the Senate bill would merely slow Medicaid growth, not reverse it, said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia). 'I believe what Dr. Oz said,' Capito said when asked whether she will support the Senate legislation, adding that she needs to 'talk to my folks in West Virginia' before committing to vote for it. Capito and West Virginia's other senator, Jim Justice, are among the Republicans who had expressed resistance to cutting Medicaid. West Virginia, which would have to scale back its tax on ambulance services under the Senate bill, has one of the highest share of residents on Medicaid and relies more heavily on federal dollars than most states. Justice told reporters on Tuesday that the provider tax caps would 'hurt' but that 'it may very well be you've just got to hold your nose on part of it and get through it.' After the lunch, Oz brushed off concerns about the bill's changes to provider taxes after meeting with senators, telling reporters that he does not believe they would hurt rural hospitals. 'The framework of addressing the legalized money laundering with state-directed payments and provider taxes must be in this bill, it should be in this bill, and I believe it will be in the bill,' Oz said. Health care experts generally agree the funding maneuver isn't the ideal way to boost federal funding for hospitals and other Medicaid providers. Former CMS administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, who served during the Biden administration, said there's 'an argument' against the provider tax. 'If it were up to me, I would change the way states can raise their state share,' she said. But there's little support in a Republican-controlled Congress for hiking Medicaid spending in lieu of provider taxes. Other Senate changes to the Medicaid proposal would expand requirements for some beneficiaries to work, train for a job or volunteer to include parents of older teenagers. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) acknowledged some members of his caucus are seeking changes to the Senate measure. 'We continue to hear from our members specifically on components or pieces of the bill that they would like to see modified or changed or have concerns about, and we're working through that,' Thune told reporters. - - - Daniel Gilbert, Theodoric Meyer and Liz Goodwin contributed to this report. Related Content Trump is as unpredictable as ever, even when faced with war Field notes from the end of life: My thoughts on living while dying He's dying. She's pregnant. His one last wish is to fight his cancer long enough to see his baby.
Medscape
36 minutes ago
- Medscape
Fast Five Quiz: CIDP Management
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a symptomatically treatable form of acquired neuropathy. The goals of treatment are decrease symptoms, delay progression, improve function of impacted areas, and achieve remission; if associated conditions are identified (HIV infection, lupus, paraproteinemia, and lymphoma), co-management of these diseases is indicated as well. How familiar are you with CIDP? Test your knowledge with this quick quiz. Medscape © 2025 WebMD, LLC Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape. Cite this: Jafar Kafaie, Christopher Luzzio, Florian P. Thomas. Fast Five Quiz: Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) Management - Medscape - Jun 19, 2025.
