The Vietnam war is over: Saigon gives in with a sigh of relief – archive, 1975
It was a scene some had never expected to see and others had tried to imagine but never succeeded in envisaging. The North Vietnamese and the Vietcong rolled into Saigon just after noon.
T-54 tanks flying the red and white flag of the Liberation Armed Forces going before and the camouflaged Molotova trucks of the infantry –grinning, olive skinned boys in dark green uniforms – following after in a triumphant entry into the heart of the city.
The tanks roared down Cong Ly, the big street that leads to Saigon's centre from the north, and the first tank smashed through the gates of the Independence Palace, slewed, and turned. Then the other vehicles poured in, laagering in the park in front of the Palace.
The troops, armed to the teeth with AK-47s, automatics, and revolvers, and with machine-guns mounted on the roofs of the cabs, waved and smiled.
Two hours earlier and only 90 minutes after the final Americans had been evacuated from Saigon, President Duong Van Minh announced the surrender over the government radio in a brief speech. Minh, speaking slowly and sadly, said that 'our policy as a government is national reconciliation and concord. To save further bloodshed, I now order the armed faces to stop fighting. I also ask the forces of the National Liberation Front to do the same. We are ready and waiting to hand over full administrative power to you.'
Later, Brigadier-General Nguyen Huu Hanh, the highest-ranking General Staff officer left in the city, ordered all units to 'remain calm,' wait until contacted by communist forces, and then hand over their weapons.
The order was not immediately obeyed. One fight, witnessed by UPI reporter, Alan Dawson, broke out in front of the Palace itself. Dawson spent 10 minutes tucked between two Vietcong soldiers behind a tree. The communists put out a tremendous volume of tank, machine-gun, and rifle fire, and Dawson was able to pull out.
When a boatload of people tried to set off down the Saigon river to the South China Sea, a Vietcong officer ordered a tank to fire a round across the ship's bow. The boat turned around and returned to the Saigon dock. Crowds greeted a victory parade along Tu Do street apprehensively, according to UPI. Many people waved at the communist troops, and some of the soldiers waved back. The communists laughed and cheered and shouted, 'Hello, comrade,' to bystanders from tanks bearing Vietcong flags.
According to Hanoi Radio, the Liberation Army had been ordered not only to occupy 'all important positions and major lines of communication'' but to 'dissolve all armed organisations of the puppet administration.' 'It said troops had strict orders on how to behave. Lives and property of both Vietnamese and foreign residents should be protected.
The army command, the radio went on, had instructed all employees of the previous administration to report to their offices. 'The command calls on the entire people to unite closely under the banner of the great cause of the National Liberation Front and the Provisional Revolutionary government of South Vietnam.' it said.
The Liberation Front issued an order saying: 'Let all puppet army officers, soldiers, and air and naval personnel, no matter where they are hiding, quickly return to the nation, bringing with them aircraft, warships, and naval craft, and report in time to the Revolutionary administration.
Saigon Radio itself announced that the city was henceforth to be called Ho Chi Minh City – 'the city which Uncle Ho dreamed of.' Ho died in 1969.
In spite of some people's worst fears, the first day under communist control was relatively calm. In general, newsmen were allowed to operate at will, although there were severe communication difficulties. Radio photographs and radio circuits were ruled out, and no planes were allowed to land to pick up television film.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
China set to debut new advanced weaponry at massive military parade
China is set to showcase its latest generation of military technology, including advanced unmanned underwater vehicles, during a major parade scheduled for next month. Pictures leaked on Chinese social media showed preparations are already underway in Beijing, where the People's Liberation Army (PLA) will show off a lineup of new land and water-based weapons systems on 3 September to mark the 80th anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender. The parade is likely to be one of the largest in China's history, potentially eclipsing the 2015 parade marking the 70th anniversary. That event involved more than 12,000 soldiers and included international contingents from Russia, Belarus, Mongolia, Cambodia and others nations. Beijing has conducted two large-scale rehearsals this month, on the weekends of 9-10 and 16-17 August, attended by 22,000 and 40,000 people respectively when troops, police and spectators are included. Analysts say next month's parade will be an opportunity for the Chinese government to send a clear signal to its rivals and show off the fruits of an unprecedented programme of military modernisation. Though the event will largely be shunned by Western leaders, many other foreign officials are expected to travel to Beijing to attend after the conclusion of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in late August. Xi Jinping, the president and head of the military, will deliver a speech on the occasion, which will feature 'new-type combat capabilities,' including hypersonic weapons and a range of electronic gear, Beijing has announced. Hundreds of aircraft, including fighter jets and bombers as well as ground equipment, some of which have never been seen in public before, will be featured in the parade, military officials said at a press conference. From trucks fitted with devices to take out drones, new tanks and early warning aircraft to protect China's aircraft carriers, military attaches and security analysts say they are expecting China to display a host of new weapons and equipment at the parade. China has the world's largest standing military, with more than 2 million personnel, and an increasingly sophisticated arsenal of missiles, aircraft carriers, and fighter aircraft. Navy power China is likely to display at least two types of extra-large uncrewed underwater vehicles (XLUUVs), according to leaked photos from the parade rehearsals. The vessels, estimated to be around 60ft long, were seen being carried across the city on massive transport vehicles, Naval News reported. Their torpedo-shaped hulls and pump-jet propulsion systems revealed that the underwater vehicles were built to be stealthy. Images showed one of the sea drones being marked as 'AJX002', while another type was photographed only under wraps. Six of the drones were reportedly spotted during the rehearsal. Four matched the AJX002 profile, while two appeared slightly larger. The AJX002 features four lifting lugs along its hull, indicating that it is crane-assisted. China operates the world's largest XLUUV program with at least five distinct types already in the water, Naval News reported. Armoured Vehicles The PLA will showcase its Type 99A main battle tank, which was developed as a replacement for the second-generation Type 88 tank, according to South China Morning Post. The development process for the Type 99 series, also known as the ZTZ-99, began in 1989 based on the design of the Soviet-era T-72 chassis. Weighing at around 55 tonnes, Type 99A tanks are the most advanced variant of the Type 99 series and have been deployed by the PLA since 2011. It features an upgraded 105mm main gun, an enlarged turret, a four-sided radar, and an integrated propulsion system. The main battle tank operates with a crew of three and measures up to 36ft in length. The Type 99A main battle tank is equipped with an advanced targeting system that allows the gunner to engage one target while the commander independently tracks the next, the SCMP reported. Its upgraded fire-control system features a third-generation thermal imager, meteorological sensors, and a ballistic computer—enabling precise engagement of targets at ranges up to 5km. Hypersonic and ballistic missiles A intercontinental ballistic missile system and hypersonic anti-ship missiles are among the advanced weaponry the Communist government will display at the parade. Photos on Chinese social media captured a new anti-ship missile from the YJ series being taken across the city for the parade rehearsals. The new YJ-15 missile was spotted along with the YJ-17, YJ-19 and YJ-20 hypersonic missiles. These sightings indicate China is advancing rapidly in hypersonic weapons technology, a field that has drawn global attention for its ability to evade traditional defence systems. Also visible in the images was a new transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) vehicle carrying a large, tarp-covered missile canister, which could be a new ballistic missile system. The anti-ship missiles and weapons with hypersonic capabilities will be particularly closely watched as the US and its allies prepare to counter China in any future regional conflict. Loyal Wingman An uncrewed combat air vehicle (UCAV), believed to be a Collaborative Combat Aircraft or loyal wingman drone, was spotted on the streets of Beijing during the rehearsals. Experts say the UCAV, which was spotted at the back of a truck, resembles either the Chinese FH-97 or the American YFQ-42A. Andreas Rupprecht, a Chinese military aviation expert, said that the scale of rehearsals alone already exceeds expectations. 'Just focusing on the aviation segment and what China is expected to showcase – the rehearsals for the parade alone are already exceeding everything one could have expected,' he told news outlet Defence Blog. The Victory Lap The 70-minute-long Victory Day parade, comprising 45 contingents of troops, will be surveyed by President Xi at Tiananmen Square alongside Russian president Vladimir Putin, according to reports. Authorities have stepped up security in downtown Beijing since the first rehearsals this month, setting up checkpoints, diverting road traffic and shutting shopping malls and office buildings. In Asia, World War Two ended on 2 September with the surrender of Japan after the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. Chinese Communist Party historians say China's casualties in the 1937-1945 Second Sino-Japanese War were 35 million. The Japanese occupation caused the displacement of as many as 100 million Chinese people and significant economic hardship, as well as the 1937 Nanjing Massacre, during which an estimated 100,000 to 300,000 victims were killed.
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'We quit US for country 5,000 miles away due to Trump and were blown away by experiences'
A family who moved from the USA to the popular Spanish city of Barcelona have spoken glowingly about the joys of reduced gun violence and a better healthcare system A family of three who moved from the United States to Spain because of their dislike of President Donald Trump have been blown away by their experiences in their new home. Benjamin Gorman, a former schoolteacher turned author, his wife Chrystal, and their daughter Franke, moved 5,000 miles across the Atlantic to live in the popular Spanish city of Barcelona. Benjamin said that he originally considered the move after he received 'very scary' death threats following his decision to sign a pledge to teach American history accurately. When he received backlash for this, he asked a friend of his from the FBI whether he could report the death threats if Trump were to win a second term, to which his friend said no. He claimed: 'He told me, 'You would basically be calling the Proud Boys for help.' So I knew that, if Trump won, I would have to get out.' After debating over which country to move to, the family eventually decided on Spain, in part because Benjamin speaks fluent Spanish and the family knew Barcelona well. Following their move, they have spoken glowingly about their decision and the benefits of living in Europe compared to the USA. Among the benefits are the improved healthcare system, and dramatically reduced danger of gun violence. Benjamin explained: 'The healthcare system is so much better that when we explain the American system to professionals here, they are gobsmacked by how ridiculous it sounds. 'Similarly, not having the constant threat of gun violence improves culture in so many ways. The way the police interact with people here is so positive. They're constantly de-escalating situations and working to protect people's dignity.' Whilst they are glad not to have to worry about gun violence or an incredibly expensive healthcare system, the family admitted there are some parts of home they miss dearly, most notably their family and friends. They also miss some sweet treats from home. Benjamin said: 'We've found a handful of specific products we can't get our hands on here in Spain. 'For example, we have chocolate M&M's and peanut M&M's here, but no peanut butter M&M's, which are absolutely the best kind.' Benjamin and his family aren't the first Americans to leave their homeland since the return of Trump to the White House, with others also fleeing to Canada or other parts of Europe. This includes Robert Apgar-Taylor who moved with his husband Robert Taylor to Canada. Speaking to CBC, he described the moment they stepped over the border. He told the broadcaster: 'We took a picture at the border. It was winter. We wore our plaid shirts and hats, and showed our immigration papers with the moving truck behind us. We were so excited.'
Spectator
12 hours ago
- Spectator
Can Friedrich Merz save Germany from becoming irrelevant?
Friedrich Merz arrived in Washington this week alongside Europe's most senior leaders, ostensibly to coordinate the continent's response to Trump's Ukraine designs. Here was Germany's moment to demonstrate the leadership it perpetually claims to seek – a chance to shape the conversation that will determine Europe's security architecture for years to come. Instead, before the Chancellor could even present his case to the Americans, his own foreign minister Johann Wadephul delivered a masterclass in diplomatic self-sabotage from Berlin. Germany must play 'an important role' in any future peacekeeping mission in Ukraine, declared the CDU politician, before categorically ruling out German soldiers on Ukrainian soil. 'That would presumably overwhelm us,' he explained with the sort of defeatist precision that has become his government's signature. In a single sentence, Wadephul had kneecapped his own Chancellor's negotiating position, advertising Germany's limitations rather than its capabilities to anyone listening. This wasn't merely unfortunate timing – it was the latest instalment in a pattern of cabinet colleagues undermining Merz's already tentative efforts at international leadership. Whether on defence spending, migration policy or economic reform, the Chancellor finds himself repeatedly ambushed by ministers who seem determined to advertise Germany's unwillingness to shoulder serious responsibilities. One might call it capitulation before the first battle was fought, but this represents something more systematic: the crystallisation of a political culture that has made strategic irrelevance into an art form. Here lies the exquisite tragedy of modern Germany: a nation trapped between its aspirations and its neuroses, too large to be irrelevant yet too terrified to actually lead. While Merz and other European leaders huddle in the White House, desperately hoping to dissuade Trump from striking a deal at Kyiv's expense, political Berlin sends its familiar signal: Yes, we speak of responsibility. No, we won't actually take it. The coalition has made itself thoroughly comfortable in this culture of irresponsibility. Vice-Chancellor Lars Klingbeil offered a textbook example of political evasion in his recent television interview, declaring that 'naturally we must also assume responsibility as Europeans when it comes to security guarantees'. Whether this involves troops, training, money, or something else entirely 'must all be clarified in the coming days'. What sounds like commitment is actually an escape hatch – the political equivalent of agreeing to meet for lunch 'sometime soon'. Few politicians dare acknowledge the challenges that Russian imperial ambition actually poses to Germany. CDU foreign policy expert Roderich Kiesewetter represents a rare voice of clarity, reminding his colleague Wadephul that European peace cannot be guaranteed without military backing – including ground troops if necessary. Germany, Kiesewetter argues, cannot lead from Central Europe whilst simultaneously refusing engagement where it matters. The mathematics are brutal but simple: you cannot exercise leadership whilst advertising your unwillingness to pay its price. Yet this is precisely Germany's chosen strategy, demanding a seat at the top table whilst openly declaring vast swathes of policy off-limits. Chancellor Merz understands that Germany cannot define its role through economic power alone. Since taking office, he has tentatively begun moving Germany back towards leadership responsibility. But the resistance is formidable – within his own party, throughout the coalition, and amongst a public that has grown comfortable with foreign policy free-riding. The result is that Germany is stuck in an interstitial position: too significant to be ignored, too anxious to genuinely lead. Whilst Washington discusses Ukraine's and Europe's future, Berlin resembles a spectator at its own continent's strategic deliberations. It wanted to be an actor yet seems content remaining in the audience. This dysfunction extends far beyond foreign policy. The coalition's domestic paralysis mirrors its international timidity. When asked about the government's future direction, Klingbeil couldn't even feign enthusiasm for his own coalition. Rather than articulating any compelling vision, he made clear that he views this partnership as little more than a marriage of convenience – one held together primarily by fear of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party (AfD). Defining oneself solely in opposition to populists represents political dwarfism of the highest order. Those serious about defeating populism cannot practise politics purely ex negativo. They must offer positive alternatives, compelling visions, genuine leadership. Instead, Klingbeil offered warmed-over social democratic orthodoxy: higher taxes for high earners. But lack of revenue isn't Germany's problem. Rather, astronomical debt and a bloated welfare state burden the republic with obligations that will eventually crush future generations. Precisely when populists will find their richest hunting grounds. If Klingbeil genuinely wants to defeat populism, he must confront Germans with uncomfortable truths: they will need to work more and longer to save the pension system. Social spending must be cut – the state cannot continue housing every applicant in city centres. Real change requires discomfort for those who have arranged their lives at public expense. Klingbeil should also cease attacking coalition partners who dare speak inconvenient truths. When Trade Minister Katherina Reiche recently demanded Germans work harder, this wasn't pandering to the right – it was acknowledging a bitter reality. The coalition catastrophically underestimates German citizens by assuming they cannot handle genuine reforms. The necessary cuts would be entirely explicable. Everyone understands that deterring Russia carries costs. Everyone can calculate that fewer young workers cannot indefinitely finance more retirees' pensions. This requires basic arithmetic, not advanced mathematics. The irony is exquisite: by merely managing stagnation, the coalition achieves precisely what Klingbeil claims to oppose. Nothing feeds populists like politics' inability to address change. If the Union and SPD continue this path, they can watch the AfD overtake them in the next election. Germany's predicament extends beyond coalition politics to a fundamental crisis of strategic imagination. The country that once produced visionaries like Adenauer and Erhard, the architects of post-war European integration, now struggles to articulate any coherent vision of its role in a rapidly changing world. This matters far beyond Germany's borders. Europe desperately needs German leadership as it confronts Russian aggression, Chinese economic warfare, and American strategic uncertainty. Instead, it receives hesitation, half-measures, and the perpetual promise that someone else will handle the difficult decisions. The tragedy is that Germany possesses the resources, influence, and historical experience necessary for genuine leadership. What it lacks is the political courage to embrace the responsibilities that leadership entails. Until Berlin overcomes its preference for strategic irrelevance over strategic engagement, Europe will remain dangerously dependent on powers whose interests may not align with European security. Germany's choice is stark: lead or become irrelevant. The current strategy of wanting influence without responsibility represents the worst of both worlds and is a recipe for strategic marginalisation disguised as pragmatic restraint. The question is whether German politicians will recognise this reality before their nation's window for meaningful leadership closes entirely. Current evidence suggests they may prefer the comfort of managed decline to the challenges of actual leadership. If so, Germany's partners should plan accordingly.
