
50 Years After the War, Trump Undermines U.S.-Vietnam Reconciliation
Over 20 years of fighting, the Vietnam War—or American War, as it's known in Vietnam—cost the lives of almost 60,000 American servicemembers and more than 3 million Vietnamese and left a lasting mark on both nations. In the 50 years since, particularly the past 30 after formal relations were normalized in 1995, Washington has pursued reconciliation efforts with Hanoi, including a number of programs that sought to repair some of the damage the war wrought on generations of Vietnamese.
In 2023 the two governments upgraded ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, the highest-level cooperative agreement under Vietnamese standards.
'We've come a long way, and it's profoundly changed the nature of our relations from former enemies to now partners,' says Tim Rieser, who served for 37 years as a foreign policy aide of then-Senator Patrick Leahy (D, Vt.), who was known for leading humanitarian efforts between the U.S. and Vietnam, and now serves as a senior policy advisor to Sen. Peter Welch (D, Vt.).
But under President Donald Trump's second-term administration, which marks its 100th day also on April 30, 2025, that progress is now at risk, Rieser and others tell TIME.
In recent months, the Trump Administration announced a freeze on a majority of foreign aid contracts via USAID, which in Vietnam helped to fund a number of reconciliation projects, including cleanup and rehabilitation programs addressing the effects of toxic herbicides used in the war, such as Agent Orange. The State Department also temporarily suspended global mine-clearing programs, including groups in Vietnam that have worked to clear unexploded ordnance (UXO) left behind from the war.
The Trump Administration has since backtracked on some of these moves. Some USAID programs related to Vietnam have been 'unterminated,' after a group of senators, including Welch, penned a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Meanwhile, the State Department order on demining was meant to last three months, and a State Department spokesperson tells TIME that 'U.S. demining programs in Vietnam are active with clearance operations ongoing.' Still, the Washington Post reported Wednesday that at least 34 of 43 USAID contracts with Vietnam have been axed and about 100 USAID employees let go.
The State Department spokesperson explained to TIME: 'Programs that have been terminated were determined to not fit within the standards laid out by Secretary Rubio for U.S. foreign assistance, which must make the United States stronger, safer, or more prosperous. The United States remains committed to strengthening its partnership with Vietnam. Ensuring we have the right mix of programs to support U.S. national security and other core national interests of the United States requires an agile approach. We will continue to make changes as needed. The United States and Vietnam have a robust bilateral relationship and we are committed to deepening and broadening those ties. We look forward to working with the Vietnamese government and people to address shared challenges and opportunities.'
But some damage has already been done.
'This Administration has done severe damage to the credibility of this country in the perceptions of people around the world that we're no longer a reliable partner,' says Rieser. 'It's the consequence of actions by people in Washington who have little sense of history, who know nothing of the importance of what we've done to build this relationship over many years.'
A 2006 study led by Charles Bailey, who worked in Vietnam from 1997 to 2007 as a representative of the Ford Foundation, found that there were three hot spots of dioxin—a toxic contaminant in Agent Orange, an herbicide used by U.S. forces during the war that has caused a range of disabilities among millions of Vietnamese: Phu Cat, which was cleaned up without U.S. aid; Da Nang, which was cleaned up through a USAID-funded project that was completed in 2018; and Bien Hoa, which was the worst contaminated.
The U.S. launched a campaign to decontaminate Bien Hoa during Trump's first term in 2019. The project would take 10 years and cost a total $450 million, funded by USAID and the Department of Defense.
But amid USAID cuts, workers on the project at Bien Hoa Air Base on the outskirts of Ho Chi Minh City, were suddenly told in February to stop working. According to ProPublica, pits of contaminated soil were left exposed or covered with flimsy tarps before the U.S. appeared to reverse course a week later, but Bailey tells TIME it's not certain for how long funding will continue or how the project will fare once most USAID staffers leave Vietnam later this year.
In addition to clean-up programs, USAID provided $30 million of annual funding to Agent Orange-related disability rehabilitation programs in 10 provinces in Vietnam, some of which have resumed. But Bailey says several organizations lacked the financial resources to 'bridge the gap between the original termination and the resumption,' so even when funds slowly began to flow in again, they had to let some staff go. 'The practical matter is that they are not fully functioning,' says Bailey.
Demining programs were also paused as part of the U.S. freeze on foreign aid. The halt at least temporarily cost some 1,000 people their jobs in Quang Tri, according to the province's foreign affairs department. The province is believed to have the highest number of unexploded mines in Vietnam. Vietnamese media have estimated that UXO are responsible for some 40,000 deaths and 60,000 injuries since the end of the war in 1975.
The State Department told TIME that 'war legacy projects including dioxin remediation programs in Bien Hoa and demining programs in Quang Tri remain active and running.'
Another program started during Trump's first term and paused during his second is the Vietnam Wartime Accounting Initiative, a $15 million effort to help Vietnam locate and identify the remains of hundreds of thousands of people missing from the war that USAID and the Department of Defense began funding in 2020. Thao Griffiths, a commissioner of the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) tells TIME that the Trump Administration terminated the program and put it under review, before reinstating it around a month later. It took around another month to hire and train new staff to get the program running again.
Rieser says addressing the war's legacy in Vietnam has long been important to the U.S. because lingering problems like Agent Orange, UXO, and unaccounted-for persons were 'a source of continuing anger and resentment' for the Vietnamese. 'There's hardly a family in Vietnam that didn't lose somebody or that doesn't know someone who died during the war and has never been accounted for,' he says. 'We couldn't get to ways of cooperating in other areas, whether it's maritime security, law enforcement, higher education, climate change, or public health, unless we first dealt with this.'
At the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, photographs of the 1968 My Lai massacre in which American soldiers killed hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians line the walls. There's an exhibit of the Con Dao prison, which was built by French colonists in 1861 but used by the Americans during the war to hold prisoners, who were routinely abused and kept shackled in cramped 'tiger cages.' Another exhibit shows photographs of the devastating effects of U.S. napalm bombs and Agent Orange.
It's 'essentially a museum of American war crimes,' Rieser says. But 'there's another chapter to the story, and that is what we've done since the war to deal with the terrible things that happened.'
'The dominant cultural memory in Vietnam has centered around heroic national resistance and sacrifices to defend the nation against foreign invaders,' including the U.S., says Phan Xuan Dung, a Vietnam Studies researcher at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and a PhD candidate at the Australian National University, but cooperation in addressing legacies of the war 'helped to build trust' between the two sides.
A new exhibit meant to open in July, which was spearheaded by former Sen. Leahy and Rieser and backed by $2 million in USAID funding, was supposed to highlight American reconciliation efforts and positive U.S.-Vietnam cooperation. According to Rieser, it would have shown that 'the United States didn't just walk away from the past and that we've tried to address it as best we can.' But the exhibit, like other war legacy programs, has also fallen victim to the Trump Administration's ruthless slashing. 'We've been working very hard to meet that deadline, and then suddenly, some anonymous uninformed person in Washington stops the funding with no idea what this is, or why it's important, or the consequences,' says Rieser.
What's at stake is U.S. credibility, says Phan. The Trump Administration's recent actions, which also include the high tariffs on global trading partners that the White House announced earlier in April then temporarily paused, 'reinforce Vietnam's belief that the U.S. is not a reliable partner, and thus Vietnam needs to avoid being reliant on the U.S., even on assistance to deal with the aftermath of U.S. wartime actions.'
Rieser says that it is particularly critical to maintain strong ties with Vietnam in order to counter the influence of China in Southeast Asia and protect U.S. interests in the region. Chinese troops marched through the streets of Ho Chi Minh City at this year's military parade for the first time, following Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Vietnam earlier this month. The invitation to China to participate in the Vietnamese parade—alongside representatives from neighbors Laos and Cambodia—was framed as a move to celebrate the 'long-standing traditional friendship and bonds' between the countries and their support for Vietnam in its struggle for independence, even as China and Vietnam clashed over their border from 1979, didn't officially normalize relations until 1991, and continue to dispute territory in the South China Sea.
'For us to be taking steps that cause uncertainty in our relations with Vietnam, whether it's by suddenly imposing large tariffs or walking away from war legacy programs that are important to both countries, to downgrading our engagement with Vietnam,' says Rieser, 'it's the polar opposite of what a sensible U.S. foreign policy should look like in that part of the world.'
Just days before the 50th anniversary of the end of the war, the New York Times reported that the Trump Administration told its senior diplomats in Vietnam—including U.S. ambassador to Vietnam Marc Knapper—not to participate in April 30 commemoration events, citing four unnamed sources. Vietnamese officials, however, said they still expected U.S. officials to attend, and the Times later reported that the U.S. Consul General Susan Burns ended up doing so.
Historically, U.S. diplomats have not attended annual Vietnamese Victory day parades, instead holding separate ceremonies on April 30 and coming together later in the year to commemorate the anniversary of normalized ties.
But a number of Americans had been planning to attend commemorative events for the 50th anniversary of the end of the war—and a number still did, including John Terzano, a veteran of the Vietnam War and cofounder of the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize-winning Campaign for a Landmine Free World, who is frustrated by the Trump Administration's 'fickle' approach to diplomacy.
'Vietnam is a country and a people that deeply believes in symbolism. What makes the current [U.S.] ambassador and his presence or non-presence here so symbolic is he's the son of a Vietnam veteran,' Terzano tells TIME. 'He represents, in my opinion, the passing of the torch from one generation to another.'
The Trump Administration's recent actions, on the other hand, show a lack of understanding of the historical significance of the U.S. and Vietnam's relationship, Terzano says. 'April 30 is a day of peace. It is a day of commemoration and acknowledging sacrifices of people made on both sides, but it's also a day of looking forward,' he says. 'The United States is really still stuck in the past.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
State Department revokes over 6K student visas, including hundreds for ‘support for terrorism'
The US State Department has revoked thousands of student visas — most of them for overstays and various law violations ranging from DUIs and assaults to supporting terrorist organizations, including Hamas. The visas were pulled amid President Trump's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigrants and foreign-born college students, particularly those who have expressed support for terror groups. The State Department revoked thousands of student visas this week, most of them due to the holder breaking the law while in the US. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Of the 6,000 rescinded student visas, around 4,000 were because the holder broke the law, a department spokesman told The Post, with the 'vast majority' of the crimes committed included assault, DUI and burglary. Around 800 of the revocations were due to the visa holder being arrested or charged with assault, an official told Fox News Digital, which first reported the news. Troublingly, approximately 200 to 300 of the visas were revoked for 'support for terrorism' — the department said, citing 'INA 3B,' a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) pertaining to activities that justify the State Department denying someone a visa, such as 'inciting terrorist activity' and 'providing material support to terrorists.' Advertisement The department did not elaborate on how specifically those whose visas were being revoked were supporting terrorism; however, the official reportedly said they had engaged in behaviors such as 'raising funds for the militant group Hamas.' 'Every single student visa revoked under the Trump Administration has happened because the individual has either broken the law or expressed support for terrorism while in the United States,' a senior State Department official told the outlet. 'About 4,000 visas alone have been revoked because these visitors broke the law while visiting our country, including records of assault and DUIs.' The department said 200 to 300 students whose visas were yanked were taken due to 'support for terrorism.' Robert Miller Advertisement International students have come under intense scrutiny under the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered US embassies and consulates in May to put the brakes on any student visa interviews. When they resumed the following month, the administration said all future applicants would be told to make their social media profiles public. The department said this helped officials scrutinize prospective applicants for 'any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States,' according to a diplomatic cable sent by the State Department to embassies and consulates at the time. President Trump is also currently in a pitched court battle with Harvard University over his desire to strip the elite school of its ability to enroll foreign students. The administration has so far yanked around 40,000 visas, compared to 16,000 during the same time period under former President Joe Biden.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Vietnamese are helping Cuba with 38-cent donations. A lot of them.
Her donation joined a chain-reaction of generosity. A new crowdfunding campaign for Cuba led by the Central Committee of the Vietnam Red Cross Society has raised more than $13 million in the first week — far more than organizers had expected for the entire two-month effort. And with that unexpected surge has come a complex reckoning. For many in Cuba and Vietnam, the charitable transfers bring up memories of past solidarity, when both nations shared dreams of communist independence won through revolution. But there's also the awkward realization that their roles have reversed because of choices made as the Cold War ended. Advertisement Vietnam, when faced with shortages and starvation, pivoted quickly toward free enterprise in the mid-'80s, leading to restored relations with the United States in 1995, and a manufacturing and agricultural boom that has nearly erased extreme poverty. Advertisement Cuba stuck with ideology and one-man rule. The island nation, which had an unequal but developed economy roughly on par with Argentina's in the 1950s, remained in the intransigent grip of Fidel Castro until his death in 2016. Even after President Barack Obama visited Cuba, seeking to end decades of hostility, Castro, his brother Raúl, and their handpicked successors maintained strict state control of the economy. A US trade embargo had been limiting Cuba's options since 1962. Compounding that challenge, Cuba's leaders failed to empower the country's well-educated population. From 1999 to 2016, the best that most Cubans could do was start small restaurants or other home-based businesses that the government harassed with high taxes and hefty regulations. Vietnamese economists — the architects of the country's success story — frequently traveled to Havana throughout this period, offering guidance and lectures. They said that many of their presentations drawing on what worked well in Vietnam, like letting people start small businesses without permits, were kept secret by Cuban officials. 'They didn't want to implement the freedom to do business,' said Le Dang Doanh, the former head of Vietnam's Central Institute for Economic Management. Today, Cuba is on its knees. Tourism never recovered from the pandemic. Facing tougher enforcement of the embargo from Washington, everything seems to be breaking down at once. Blackouts have spread because of a decaying power grid and a lack of fuel. Consumer prices have risen fourfold over the past five years, according to experts, spurring migration and putting already-scarce food and medicine beyond the reach of many workers. Even the infant mortality rate, which Cuba's leaders had proudly brought to levels lower than the United States, has been rising. Advertisement 'Cuba is in very bad shape,' said Carlos Alzugaray, an analyst and former Cuban diplomat in Havana. 'And those who are in power don't seem to know what to do either because they are ignorant, or inept, or corrupt, or don't care or because they are terrified about losing control if they go too far in opening up.' Vietnam, while supporting Cuba's call for the United States to drop its embargo, has become even more determined to help. Most of the rice that Cubans receive through government rations are donations from Vietnam. Last year, To Lam, Vietnam's top leader, visited the island and promised closer ties. The crowdfunding campaign, which aims to celebrate the 65th year of diplomatic relations between the two countries, represents a more emotional step of people-to-people connection. It has attracted more than 1.7 million donations, mostly from 38 cents (10,000 dong) to $38. Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, the president of Cuba, posted a public thank you note on the social platform X over the weekend, expressing gratitude for 'an act of love' that comes from 'a hardworking and heroic people who were able to rise up after several wars and today dazzle the world with their sustained progress.' He did not say how Vietnam's money would be used. Some Vietnamese critics online said it made no sense to support leaders who have made the Cuban people poor. Donors said they just hoped the cash transfers would get to the people in need. 'I know the support from Vietnam won't be enough to solve everything, but I hope it helps in some way,' said Mo, 33. 'And I hope their economy will get better so people there can have better lives.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
More Than 6,000 Student Visas Revoked By State Department
Secretary of State Marco Rubio looks on as Foreign Minister of Paraguay Ruben Ramirez Lezcano speaks ahead of signing a memorandum of understanding in the Treaty Room of the State Department in Washington, D.C., on August 14, 2025. Credit - Jim Watson—AFP/Getty Images More than 6,000 student visas have been revoked by the State Department since January as the Trump Administration cracks down on international students and other immigrants to the U.S, the agency says. Around two-thirds of the student visas have been cancelled due to overstays and other alleged law violations, including assault, DUI, and burglary, according to a State Department spokesperson. Roughly 200-300, they said, were revoked for 'support for terrorism' under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which bars foreign-born people from admission to the country for engaging in—or being deemed likely to engage in—'terrorist activities.' The revocations were first reported by Fox News. The Trump Administration has targeted international students and student visa programs as part of its broader efforts to reshape both U.S. higher education and immigration. Students with legal status but without citizenship who participated in pro-Palestinian protests, including those involved in setting up encampments on college campuses, or otherwise showed support for Palestine, have been a particular focus of the Administration. Several, including former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University PhD student Rümeysa Öztürk, were arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), with an official pointing to the President's Executive Orders on antisemitism following Khalil's arrest. Others have also been investigated. Read more: Trump Administration Expands 'Good Moral Character' Test for Citizenship Applicants Foreign-born students have also been the subject of attacks from the federal government's battle with Harvard University, which has refused to cede to Administration demands including altering its diversity, equity, and inclusion practices and changing its hiring practices to include more conservative voices. Amid an escalating pressure campaign, the Administration has sought to revoke the university's ability to enroll international students, halt its federal research grants and funding, and more. A deal between university officials and the Administration is now reportedly being negotiated. Other Administration measures have targeted foreign-born students more broadly. In April, the immigration records of thousands of international students were erased from an information system due in many cases to minor or dismissed legal infractions—temporarily leaving them without legal status in the country—before the government reversed the action later in the month following mass public pressure from students and the court system. Weeks later, the State Department announced in June that new student visa applicants had to make their social media accounts 'public' to open them to review for potential 'hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' 'A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,' the June announcement said. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests.' Contact us at letters@