Shubman Gill's Toss Curse Continues In 5th Test Vs England, Ravi Shastri Dragged Into Commentary Banter
As England's stand-in skipper Ollie Pope – leading in place of the injured Ben Stokes – won his first toss in five matches, former England captain and now commentator Michael Atherton didn't hold back his humor in the commentary box. Turning to Ravi Shastri, who conducted all five tosses as broadcaster, Atherton quipped, 'You are doing these tosses. You'll get sacked.'
Shastri Takes It in Stride, Gill Unfazed
Shastri, now back in the commentary box after his coaching tenure, chuckled and responded with a grin, noting, 'When the coin landed, he (Gill) did not look up.'
Despite the weight of the bizarre streak, Shubman Gill showed admirable composure, stating in the post-toss interview: 'Don't mind losing the toss as long as we win the game.' He added, 'It was a bit overcast yesterday, but the wicket looks good. We'll look to post good runs in the first innings. It should be a good pitch for the bowlers.'
India made four significant changes to the playing XI, bringing in Dhruv Jurel, Karun Nair, Akash Deep, and Prasidh Krishna for Rishabh Pant, Shardul Thakur, Mohammed Siraj, and Jasprit Bumrah. For England, Pope led a new-look team in the absence of key pacers Stokes and Jofra Archer.
Green Pitch, Grey Skies, and Early Trouble
Inserted to bat on a green-topped wicket, India were tested early by England's pace attack. Gus Atkinson, playing his first match of the series, made an immediate impact by trapping Yashasvi Jaiswal in front. Though the decision was overturned on review, Jaiswal soon fell for just 2.
KL Rahul, India's most consistent batter in the series, followed shortly after for 14, chopping on while attempting a cut off Chris Woakes. At 36 for 2, India looked vulnerable, but Shubman Gill and Sai Sudharsan steadied the innings with calm and class.
Gill, chasing Sunil Gavaskar's long-standing record for most runs in a bilateral series, looked assured at the crease, finding boundaries with a short-arm pull and an elegant cover drive. Sudharsan, composed on debut, played a mature supporting role as India reached 72 for 2 by lunch, which came early due to a brief rain interruption.
Statistical Sideshow, But Stakes Still High
India's toss debacle has now drawn parallels with another painful memory: the 2018 England tour, where India also lost all five tosses in a Test series — the only other such instance in the 21st century. Interestingly, this is now only the 14th time in Test history that a team has lost all five tosses in a five-match series.
But Shubman Gill isn't letting the coin dictate the narrative. Drawing inspiration from Rohit Sharma, who led India to the 2025 Champions Trophy title without winning a single toss, Gill's mindset remains focused on performance, not probabilities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
Ex-Pakistan captain expresses concern ahead of India showdown at Asia Cup: 'Will be very tough'
India have been a dominant force in T20Is in the last couple of years while Pakistan have had an inconsistent run since their disastrous T20 World Cup campaign last year. The two arch-rivals have been placed in the same group in next month's Asia Cup and could potentially face each other thrice. read more Former Pakistan captain Rashid Latif did not sound too optimistic about his team's chances against India in next month's Asia Cup in the UAE citing the team's poor run in recent assignments and calling for an overhaul not just in the team's execution but also in their mindset. India and Pakistan have been placed in the same group in the Asia Cup, which returns to the T20 format this year, along with Oman and the UAE and the arch-rivals could face each other two more times after their initial meeting in Dubai on 14 September, given the format of the tournament. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Read | Ex-cricketer questions BCCI over India-Pakistan fixtures in Asia Cup: 'Especially after the terrorist attack…' 'It will be very tough for Pakistan to play against a strong Indian side on September 14. Asia Cup ho jaye bas (hope the Asia Cup goes ahead somehow),' former wicket-keeper Latif told news agency IANS. 'Humari cricket hawa may chal rhi hai (our brand of cricket is inconsistent)… We lost to Bangladesh and the West Indies — matches we should never have lost. Our captain might be good, but juggling all three formats is not easy. We have talent, but we are not making the right decisions yet,' he added. India's ruthlessness vs Pakistan's inconsistency The Men in Blue have been dominant in the T20 format, winning 24 out of 26 matches last year and handing England a 4-1 thrashing at home earlier this year. Pakistan, on the other hand, has been far from consistent in the shortest format, losing four out of seven bilateral series' since their disastrous T20 World Cup campaign in the US and the Caribbean last year, including a 1-2 defeat in Bangladesh last month. The Salman Agha-led side, however, regained some confidence ahead of the Asia Cup with a 2-1 victory over West Indies in the United States, sealing their victory with a 13-run win in the decider on Monday. India and Pakistan had faced each other twice in the 2022 edition, the last time the continental event took place in the 20-over format. While India won the initial contest, Pakistan bounced back in the 'Super Four' stage, winning by five wickets and progressing to the final at the expense of their arch-rivals. Pakistan, however, would go on to lose the final against Sri Lanka by 23 runs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite being placed in the same group, there are doubts as to whether the India-Pakistan match will even go ahead in light of the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam as well as the subsequent conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations that has resulted in a nosedive in diplomatic relations between the two neighbours
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Discipline? Defence? All went out of window': English media rant after India's 'miracle'; Aussies drop Ashes truth bomb
The English media showed no mercy after England lost the fifth and final Test against India at The Oval on Monday, as the tourists drew the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2-2. Meanwhile, the Australian media delivered a brutal reality check to the Ben Stokes-led side ahead of their upcoming Ashes assignment. England's Gus Atkinson bowled out by India's Mohammed Siraj on day five of the fifth cricket test match between England and India at The Kia Oval (AP) England, at one point, were cruising towards the 374-run target, riding on centuries from Harry Brook and Joe Root. Their 195-run stand for the fourth wicket took them to 301 for three. But their hopes took a major hit on the fourth afternoon when India struck thrice around the Tea break, removing three batters for just 26 runs. On the final morning, England began positively, hitting back-to-back boundaries with just 35 runs needed. But Mohammed Siraj turned the tide, striking twice in his first two overs before cleaning up the final wicket to complete his five-wicket haul. England fell just six runs short—suffering their narrowest defeat on home soil in 123 years. The Telegraph article titled 'Chris Woakes' remarkable act of bravery will be remembered forever' questioned England's approach against the Indian seamers, strongly criticising Jacob Bethell and Jamie Smith. It argued that tail-ender Gus Atkinson was the only batter with a clear plan, while the rest 'did exactly what India's seamers wanted them to do—either by throwing the bat at anything and everything, or poking their bats at anything and everything.' The piece read: 'Discipline? Defence? It all went out of the window in the nerves of the occasion. The disease had actually started on the fourth evening when Joe Root played a shot—or dab—which he regretted the moment he had tried it. He had lost the strike as Jacob Bethell struggled to come to terms with a red ball, and after the euphoria of his 39th Test hundred, Root tried something that was unworthy of his reputation. Bethell was given scant chance by England's selectors.' The Guardian, on the other hand, in its piece 'Are you not wowed? Bazball, India and a one-armed man deliver drama and beauty', couldn't stop gushing about India's heroism on the final morning and Siraj's fire. It wrote: 'England needed 35 to win and India three and a half wickets to level the series. The players came out to a huge rolling wave of applause, India's fielders breaking from their huddle to sprint in unison, impossibly heroic already—a group who have given us everything over the past two months. And this was a day for Mohammed 'the Demon' Siraj, who really is the most lovable maniac in sport, and who bowled like a god here to win this game.' England ready for Ashes? Since the summer of 2022, when the Bazball era began in England, the Stokes-led side has played 13 Test series and won eight of them. While that tally suggests success for the McCullum-Stokes partnership, the Bazball philosophy has faltered in crucial moments—a drawn Ashes at home in 2023, a 1-4 defeat in India in 2024, and now a 2-2 draw at home against an Indian side that recently saw the retirements of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, and R Ashwin. The most recent result has prompted many—especially the Australian media—to deliver a scathing Ashes verdict. "Toppling India would have given England a timely boost of confidence ahead of the upcoming Ashes tour, but the lingering Bazball sceptics would grow in volume if Brendon McCullum's troops failed to win another marquee series," a Fox Sports article titled 'Test miracle for the ages as Poms stunned at the death despite one-arm sacrifice' read. "Regardless, failure to defeat an undermanned Indian team — who are without retired superstars Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Ravichandran Ashwin — is a hammer blow for England's Bazballers." The Sydney Morning Herald noted that England were expected to turn a corner in this series, shifting from crowd-pleasers to serious contenders. But their recurring struggles—especially the inability to manage key fast bowlers—highlighted deeper problems that Bazball alone couldn't fix. The article titled 'The hard truths that show England will struggle to win the Ashes' read: "It is worth remembering that this was the series in which England were meant to have evolved from entertainers to winners. They had become more pragmatic in tactics, more inclined to sledge opponents on the field, and more susceptible to the petulance that followed India's series-saving rearguard in Manchester. Putting on a show was no longer enough. All those changes were, however, largely cosmetic next to a couple of hard cricket truths. First, winning big series generally requires keeping your best fast bowlers fit, something England have consistently failed to do over many years, not just during the Bazball era that began in 2022."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Injury substitution in cricket: Big no from Stokes, Ashwin calls out karma
The 2025 Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England came to a close on Monday with one of the most dramatic finishes of all time, where India pulled off a perfect Stone Cold 'Stunner' on England on the final day of the match and series, orchestrated by Md Siraj, to win the match by just six runs to end the series on level terms of 2-2. The series had been home to some extraordinary moments of cricketing action and also of determination. From Rishabh Pant coming out to bat with a fractured toe in Manchester to add a crucial 17 more runs to his total in India's first and ready to do it all over again in the second innings if required, to Chris Woakes' entry at the Oval with his arm tucked inside his sweater to keep England's hopes of winning the series alive—this was a series where emotions and grit were put on the highest pedestal. But these instances also call for a big question to be asked, i.e., should ICC allow player substitution for all types of injury instead of restricting it only to head injuries? While many believe ICC should, the English skipper Ben Stokes believes otherwise. Stokes, who ended up on both the giving and receiving end of the injury replacement question in the post-match press conference at the Oval, quoted a British idiom called Sod's law, which means if something can go wrong, it will go wrong—and usually at the worst possible time—and outwardly refused to support the idea of injury replacement in cricket. I don't see it being a thing: Ben Stokes Stokes, who almost mocked the idea of injury replacement in cricket after the Manchester Test where India were left struggling after their best red-ball batter of the last five years, Rishabh Pant, suffered a fractured toe, found himself surrounded by the same question after the Oval Test—after his team lost a game they might have won if the rule of player substitution for any kind of injury existed. Stokes, after the match, said that teams would continue to find loopholes around the rule if made, which will be unfair. Stokes, who himself was ruled out of the final Test due to a shoulder injury, further added that if the rule existed, he could have made himself available for the match, taken a chance, and would have simply replaced himself with someone else if it didn't work out. Stokes did acknowledge how his team suffered due to Woakes' injury in a similar fashion to how India struggled due to Pant's injury, but he simply dismissed the idea of substitution by saying we all need to just deal with the injury and rules as they are and move forward. While Stokes quoted Sod's law, his current situation can more perfectly be described by Murphy's law post his comments on Pant's injury, as the law states: whatever can go wrong will go wrong. Stokes was given karma treatment: Ashwin Former Indian off-spinner R Ashwin, while talking on his YouTube show 'Ash Ki Baat' after the Oval Test, called out Ben Stokes while mentioning Woakes' situation for them as karma and said, 'As you sow, so shall you reap.' Ashwin called out Stokes by saying that the English skipper was joking about the idea of player substitution after Pant's injury but karma hit him, and his team found themselves in a similar situation with Woakes. Although the off-spinner did not shy away from commending Woakes' effort and said that he is in awe of the English all-rounder who put his life and career on the line to almost help England walk away with the match, he simultaneously urged some serious discussion around these types of situations and asked teams to have some empathy towards the opposition. I am all for it: Gautam Gambhir India's head coach Gautam Gambhir voiced strong support for the introduction of injury replacements in cricket, especially in high-stakes Test series after the Manchester Test. According to Gambhir, if the umpires and match referee determine that an injury is serious and clearly visible, teams should be allowed to bring in a substitute. He believes this would be a fair move, particularly in tightly contested series like the one currently underway. Gambhir emphasised that no team should be forced to continue with just ten players due to an unfortunate injury, calling such a scenario highly unfair in a competitive setting. Legends side with Gambhir's views The English skipper Ben Stokes found no support for his comments about injury replacement, as cricketing legends from India and England such as Sunil Gavaskar and Michael Vaughan also voiced their support for Gambhir's comments. Gavaskar said, 'Here, it is a clear injury; there has to be a substitute. I want some committee to take a call on this kind of injury so that teams are not left handicapped.' Vaughan's comments came after England's unfortunate situation with Woakes, but his remarks eventually supported Gambhir's ideas. During the morning session of the fifth day, while Woakes was running around with just one good arm, Vaughan said, 'If there's a genuine injury in the first innings, it affects the game and the entertainment, which fans pay money to watch. The first innings is a good cutoff to make it fair.' How does player substitution actually work in cricket For most of its history, cricket had no injury-related replacement, as if a player was unable to continue, he simply had to walk away and his team had to play with one less player. However, on August 1, 2019, the ICC made a change and introduced player replacement for head-related injuries. According to the latest player substitution rule, cricket's substitution rules are set out by the MCC in Law 24 ('Fielder's Absence; Substitutes'). Here's how substitutions work: If a player on the field gets injured or falls sick, the team can bring in a substitute fielder. This substitute can only field—they are not allowed to bat, bowl, or act as captain in the match. A substitute can keep wicket only if the umpires agree, but only as a stand-in, not permanently. A big change was made in 2019 with the introduction of the concussion substitute rule. If a player suffers a head injury (concussion) during a game, a 'like-for-like' substitute is allowed. This means the replacement can do everything the injured player could—bat, bowl, field, or keep wicket. This substitution needs approval from the match referee to make sure the swap is fair. Runners (who used to run between the wickets for injured batsmen) are no longer allowed in international cricket. Tactical substitutions—replacing a player for strategy reasons—are not allowed according to MCC Laws, except in franchise leagues like the IPL, which have their own 'Impact Player' rule. In standard cricket (Tests, ODIs, most T20s), only substitutes for injury, illness, or concussion are permitted.
