logo
Shona Craven: Young people have the right to feel disillusioned

Shona Craven: Young people have the right to feel disillusioned

The National27-05-2025

'Call for more police powers to tackle rise in knife crime' was The Scotsman's line. Reports of these calls by the Scottish Conservatives coincided with
the sentencing of a 21-year-old man for murdering 18-year-old Lewis McCartney with a knife in Edinburgh, and came days after Kayden Moy, aged just 16, was stabbed to death in Irvine.
The general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation says officers need more stop-and-search powers. Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay says the SNP have been 'weak and reckless' in their approach to youth justice. The evidence, however, supports the Scottish Government's decision to take a public health approach to violence prevention.
READ MORE: Jonathon Shafi: Angela Rayner is well aware that Israel has broken international law
There are no quick-fix solutions here. The question of why a young person would even think about carrying a knife – let alone using one – goes far beyond police procedure, or sentencing guidelines.
We know by now that risk factors for youth violence include poverty, addiction and social isolation, plus broader societal factors such as high levels of unemployment and societal inequality. In other words, politicians must look at the bigger picture. Unfortunately, that isn't looking very positive right now for under-25s in the UK.
Hundreds of thousands of young people are struggling to find jobs and an even greater number are 'economically inactive', meaning they can't work, have given up trying or never even started, going directly from school to living off benefits and essentially admitting defeat.
It's a miserable situation that's projected to get much worse. But it's hard to blame these youngsters for feeling disillusioned.
A youth adviser who addressed the House of Lords last month was met with gasps after he reported that there were 'kids on the internet 24 hours a day, and they don't want to work for anything less than 40 grand'. He said there was a need to 'imbue them with a sense of 'you need to put a shift in, to get what you want in life'.'
But what do these youngsters want out of life, and is it realistic for them to believe that with hard work they'll be able to achieve it?
It's easy to dismiss them as coddled and delusional, but perhaps they're actually just numerate. If they're looking at rents, mortgage rates, energy bills and supermarket prices, they may conclude that even if they graft for 37.5 hours a week there won't be an awful lot left after they cover their essentials, especially if those include a car and fuel, or rail travel to a workplace.
Their parents and grandparents may grumble that it has been ever thus, and these young people just need to buck up their ideas, but the job landscape is fundamentally different to when they entered the workforce.
Past generations were willing to endure entry-level wages, flat shares and beans on toast for a spell, safe in the knowledge they would be able to climb a career ladder and improve their position. So fast-changing is the current technological landscape that young people who 'put a shift in' might end up sliding down a snake instead, finding themselves replaced by a chatbot or an AI agent.
READ MORE: Ellie Gomersall: Be in no doubt. Reform UK are a real and present danger
Maybe during the '24 hours a day' they apparently spend on the internet they are reading or hearing about the scale of in-work poverty – that's if they aren't experiencing it first-hand in their own family homes, with parents working multiple jobs but still drowning in debt.
The results of the latest Consumer Scotland Energy Tracker were published last week, with 15% of survey respondents reporting they were in energy debt or arrears (up from 9% last year) and a third saying they were unable to heat their homes to a comfortable level due to the cost.
Young people are living in these cold homes. It seems unlikely that a well-timed motivational lecture will convince them that hard work is guaranteed to get you what you want out of life. Of course, if you don't even try you will end up stuck, but tragically it seems many view that as a safer option – or their only option.
Responding to the £40k-a-year revelation, the Daily Mail's headline referred to 'internet-obsessed and job-shy Gen Z'.
There's a huge abdication of responsibility there – especially from a title whose website was a gateway drug for those vulnerable to what we now call 'doom-scrolling'.
Is it fair to chide digital natives for not having the self-restraint to put down their smartphones when their own parents are glued to the damned things?
It seems the best the Prime Minister has to offer is a European youth mobility scheme – in other words, an escape route out of the country.
The news that he is planning (probably, maybe) to scrap the two-child benefit cap (at some point, if he can find the money) won't do much to lift the sense of despair about the kind of future the broken UK political system is storing up for young people who have every right to feel demoralised.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ayrshire Scottish Water workers walk out in pay dispute as strike action resumes
Ayrshire Scottish Water workers walk out in pay dispute as strike action resumes

Daily Record

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Ayrshire Scottish Water workers walk out in pay dispute as strike action resumes

Strike action at Scottish Water sites in Ayrshire has resumed following a dispute over pay Scottish Water employees from across Ayrshire have walked out yesterday morning as a dispute over pay escalates. Workers from three unions have all rejected the latest pay deal from Scottish Water and industrial action is set to continue for the rest of this week. ‌ Unite the Union, the GMB and Unison members at the Camphill Wastewater Treatment Works near Kilbrinie, Cumnock Underwood Wastewater Treatment Works and Irvine Meadowhead Wastewater Treatment Work are all taking part in the strikes. ‌ Scottish Water have said that the strike action is "unnecessary" and that their latest proposal would see an average pay increase of around seven per cent over two years. However, the unions have said the "marginally improved" offer no longer included a "£200 performance-related bonus" which was part of the reason they initially agreed to postpone scheduled action on Friday, May 2 and Tuesday, May 6. They have also said that Scottish Water's counterparts in Northern Ireland received a £1,500 non-consolidated payment and a five per cent wage rise in December. The strikes have the potential to directly impact Scottish Water's ability to respond to water leakages, flooding, pollution and quality concerns. Sharon Graham, Unite general secretary, said: 'Scottish Water executives are short-changing their workers and the Scottish people while they laugh all the way to the bank with their eye-watering pay packages. 'Our members will not be forced into accepting a pay offer which has barely moved an inch since October last year. ‌ 'Unite continues to stand with our members in their fight for better jobs, pay and conditions at Scottish Water.' Sam Ritchie, Unite industrial officer, added: 'Unite's members at Scottish Water have overwhelmingly rejected the latest wage offer. It amounted to a marginal improvement which was totally unacceptable. 'Management also withdrew an offer to increase a performance related bonus which has further infuriated the workforce. ‌ 'For months Scottish Water has had the opportunity to make a fair and reasonable offer to our members, and they have consistently refused to do so. 'The chief executive, Alex Plant, has refused to become involved in pay negotiations while walking away with a publicly-funded pay package worth nearly half a million pounds. 'The strike action will go ahead next week over seven days because of Scottish Water's indifference and arrogance towards its workers.' ‌ Patricia McArthur, Unison's Scottish Water branch secretary, said: 'Staff are extremely frustrated. They deserve better than game-playing by senior Scottish Water managers. 'The company seems more interested in spending public money on anti-union tactics than in finding a solution to this pay dispute. 'Its managers proposed a possible pay offer, but then retracting it, only to come up with something much worse." ‌ Simon Macfarlane, Unison's Scotland regional manager, said: 'Scottish Water workers keep this essential public service running. They've not taken the decision to strike lightly, but have been pushed too far. 'The latest pay offer falls far short of what other public sector workers in Scotland have received. Scottish Water staff will now form picket lines across the country to demand the fair deal they deserve." ‌ Peter Farrer, chief operating officer at Scottish Water, said: 'This week's industrial action is unnecessary. It will mean union members losing valuable wages and add extra costs to the business which are ultimately paid for by customers. 'We invited the joint trade unions to talk over the weekend but unfortunately they refused to meet without preconditions. 'Given how close the vote against our latest pay offer was, we felt a resolution was possible and would be welcomed by all our colleagues. ‌ 'It is now time for the joint trade union leadership to return to the table with a sensible solution that ends this dispute. 'In the meantime, we have robust plans in place to maintain essential services should the trade unions press ahead with their strike action.'

STV by-election debate made me uncomfortable. Here's why
STV by-election debate made me uncomfortable. Here's why

The Herald Scotland

time35 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

STV by-election debate made me uncomfortable. Here's why

Hopes were not high for the live debate, aired on STV's Scotland Tonight. How could it be? Colin Mackay kicked off the programme referring to it as a 'political showdown' – one where only two candidates had bothered to show up. Mackay – STV political editor – told the audience that six candidates, from the SNP, Reform UK, Scottish Labour, the Tories, the Lib Dems and the Greens – had been given the opportunity to 'defend themselves and question their opponents'. Only the SNP's Katy Loudon and Reform's Ross Lambie were willing to 'cross swords' as Mackay put it. Loudon launched her segment taking aim at winter fuel payments, announced by Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves last year. There is immediately a slight glimmer of consensus between the two despite their blatantly obvious disagreements on politics. Read more by-election coverage: Voters are 'scunnered', they both agreed, but Lambie brings an abrupt end to consensus as he blames the SNP of being part of the political establishment that has caused a 'lost generation'. Cross examination allows Loudon to ask the Reform candidate whether he agrees with Nigel Farage on scrapping free tuition and prescriptions. Fair play to Lambie on this. We get a straight answer. 'No, I don't think so,' he said. ''In Scotland, we have a devolved administration, our manifesto in Scotland will not be scrapping anything along those lines.' When it comes to Mr Lambie's cross examination on Ms Loudon, he goes straight to a local issue: Wishaw's neonatal unit, raising concerns about plans to centralise the specialist care to a facility in Glasgow. Ms Loudon's response won't sit well with locals. She said her background is in teaching, adding: 'I'm not a nurse, I'm not a doctor, I'm not a clinician.' That, I would say, is a point to Lambie. But where he falters, instead of pushing Loudon on the local issues, he gives her a free shot to criticise Labour by asking her about cuts to winter fuel payments. It's not the strongest attack from Lambie. An absolutely brutal watch. — Rebecca McCurdy (@_RebeccaMcCurdy) June 2, 2025 Lambie then, bizarrely, accuses Loudon of being 'snobby' against football fans after John Swinney ruled out reintroducing alcohol in Scottish football stadiums. Lambie said: 'Don't you realise for local teams, like Hamilton Accies, you're putting a strain on their local finances.' Loudon seemed a bit perplexed by the accusation, but lumps her response in with the question on the NHS. She said: 'This is about taking expert opinion.' Loudon also faced tough questioning from Mackay, who pressed her on whether she would apologise to Lanarkshire residents, the region where waiting times in hospitals are amongst the worst. She did not directly answer, but said: 'I'm not going to sit here and pretend things are perfect,' but added the SNP was 'listening'. Lambie also did not come out of the debate well as her was quizzed on the Reform adverts using a speech from Anas Sarwar, accusing Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar of stating he wanted to 'prioritise the Pakistani community' – which he did not say. He refused to be drawn on whether it was racist and rejected that Mr Sarwar was misquoted. Look, the whole debate was pretty uncomfortable to watch. But it only got worse when Davy Russell, the Labour candidate, entered the frame. Read more: Russell said he would not attend the live debate because he would be out chapping the doors of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, but he told Mackay in a sit-down interview that he stopped door-knocking at 8.30pm, giving him ample time to appear at STV studios for the 10.40pm broadcast. So why wasn't he there? 'In a debate you can't listen,' he said, oddly, given if elected to Holyrood he would be expected to do just that three days a week. More uncomfortable viewing followed. Russell, while stating Scottish Labour opposed policies like the two-child benefit cap and the winter fuel payment, he would not answer the whether the UK Government was wrong. Mackay asks almost 10 times if he backed the Chancellor. Brutal. There hasn't been much press for the Scottish Tory candidate Richard Nelson, with the party widely expected to come fourth in the by-election. Attending the debate would have been a significant opportunity to boost his platform but instead, his small segment seen him argue the NHS was in crisis. But there is a trend here: there were no solutions offered. He was also keen to dismiss any concerns around his membership with the Orange Order. Lib Dem candidate Aisha Mir came across as a strong debater but did not seem confident on whether she could actually win, while the Greens completely declined to have any part in the debate. Was there a winner of the debate? I do not think so. Loudon was clearly the most competent on camera, but this is not her first by-election and she should have done better given that. The losers are obvious: the constituents in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse who were not given a competent debate they deserved.

Development on Bannockburn battlefield site refused planning permission
Development on Bannockburn battlefield site refused planning permission

Leader Live

time35 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Development on Bannockburn battlefield site refused planning permission

Turning down plans to build a trotting track for harness racing, the Scottish Government ruled the proposals would 'introduce new development and urbanisation in one of the few remaining undeveloped parts of the battlefield'. As such it ruled the development 'would have a significant adverse effect on the character of the battlefield, its setting and sense of place'. The site is where in June 1314 Robert the Bruce and his Scottish army famously defeated English troops led by King Edward II. Stirling Council approved plans for the development in July last year, with conservation charity the National Trust for Scotland saying was 'shocked and disappointed' at the decision. The Scottish Government formally 'called in' the decision in August 2024, with ministers now overturning the council's original determination. While ministers were 'sympathetic' to points made in support of the application, their ruling stated they 'do not consider that the benefits of the proposed development would outweigh the adverse impacts on a nationally significant battlefield and its associated listed buildings'. Ministers added the part of the battlefield where the development was to be sited is 'especially sensitive and remains undeveloped' – adding this 'greatly assists an appreciation of its role in the battle'. Diarmid Hearns, acting director of conservation and policy at the National Trust for Scotland, said: 'This is very welcome news for the trust and all who care about Scotland's heritage and history.' He said the ministers' conclusions 'closely accord with our stated views that this development was simply in the wrong place and would have badly impacted upon the setting of the battlefield'. He added: 'We hope that this decision brings this matter to an end and that the developer withdraws to a new site elsewhere that will not impinge on places of historical importance.' The Scottish Government also refused a separate application for a golf driving range to be built in the area, saying: 'The proposed development does not effectively protect the cultural significance or the key landscape characteristics of the battlefield.' Ministers said these plans 'would have a significant adverse impact on the landscape features, character and setting of the battlefield and that the overall integrity and character of the battlefield area would be compromised by the proposed development'. A Scottish Government spokesperson confirmed: 'Scottish ministers have refused planning permission for a golf driving range and trotting track within the Bannockburn battlefield.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store